Rangers banter 9

26 Nov 2025 17:03:57
Imo excellent interviews from Rohl and Raskin. Both spoke exceptionally well.

26 Nov 2025 17:34:36
Yeah, thought they handled a couple of difficult questions really well to.

It's nice looking forward to pressers again.

26 Nov 2025 17:39:30
You just get the feeling that everything he says is in the best interests of the club / players / fans and not to feed his own ego.

26 Nov 2025 18:03:11
Defo ehl, Rohl comes across as a very good thinker.

26 Nov 2025 18:45:46
Have to agree John has won me over but i'd still preach caution a lot to prove still but has done well with what he has right now.

26 Nov 2025 19:37:03
Nice to hear Raskin really wants to stay here and doesn't want to leave. He has to be given the captain armband sooner rather than later.

26 Nov 2025 19:41:26
He is steering the ship well.

26 Nov 2025 19:50:18
John, everyone I've spoken to at the club has been really impressed, not just in terms of his ability as a coach - but he's apparently spent a lot of his own down time getting to know a lot of people at the club and has taken a genuine interest in things well beyond his remit.

I've also heard he's nicknamed haartrockner (German for hairdryer) as he's not shy in expressing his frustrations.

26 Nov 2025 20:06:14
I've met him at auchenhowie. Lovely friendly man.

26 Nov 2025 20:19:00
What a contrast from recent managers. Really enjoy listening to him.

26 Nov 2025 21:21:02
Totally agree John, really right behind our new head coach Danny Rohl and at last think we've found the guy that can take us where we all want 🤔All our supporters like Rohl and are right behind him 👍🇬🇧.

26 Nov 2025 21:23:27
I was a poster who wanted Gerrard back. I'm so glad that didn't happen.
Very impressed with Rohl.

26 Nov 2025 21:58:44
Ta ehl and wise John.
Always appreciated.

27 Nov 2025 07:35:15
Fair play EHL u were very outspoken about wanting Rohl when most didn't. He's looking like he could have a bright future with us if we can get him some decent players in January.

26 Nov 2025 16:39:43
Oh what i'd do to have a young scotty arfield available at Rangers just now 🙏 We've got no midfielder anywhere near arf's ability and those clever/special runs into the box to score goals 👌 Absolutely loved arfield at Rangers and we'll have to be very wary of him on sunday, even if it's from the bench 🤔.

26 Nov 2025 17:29:16
TBF Sir Walter,
Id take an old Scotty Arfield.

26 Nov 2025 17:33:11
I wish we could of had arfield another year to but was the time to move on imo.

26 Nov 2025 20:21:37
Loved Arfield. Played the second striker role perfectly 👌.

26 Nov 2025 20:50:34
We will need to be wary of Falkirk as a team they are no mugs with a very good coach.

26 Nov 2025 21:38:29
Im pretty certain youve said this about 5 times now mate😁 good player on his day but he was a 20 minute man by the end.

27 Nov 2025 05:02:58
Yes and a cracking 20 minute man in the end BigDado 👌I agree J-zer, John mcglynn is a wily, old fox mate 🤔.

26 Nov 2025 15:12:59
Sterling added to Europe squad, Cornelius classed as long term injury. A positive move re Sterling.

26 Nov 2025 16:44:45
I love the lad John, but how long before he is out AGAIN!

26 Nov 2025 16:55:16
Gd gd hope the big guys injury worries are over👍.

26 Nov 2025 17:14:45
Stevie from 4lads said this morning that we probably won't see Cornelius play for Rangers again.

26 Nov 2025 17:30:11
Did someone not say he went off injured after 7 mins the other day, was that a wind up.

26 Nov 2025 17:35:38
Shame as i thought Cornelius gave us a better balance and would have been content to keep him.

26 Nov 2025 17:37:40
Scott, we may see him in April if he is not returned to his club.

26 Nov 2025 17:40:54
Bazbear he played the planned 60 minutes.

26 Nov 2025 18:46:44
Unfortunately i agree only matter when with stirling we should be looking to move hom on.

26 Nov 2025 19:59:54
Cornelius gave us an option at LB as well as a more balanced three at back, Soapy and Fernandez or even Tav but Djiga a big NO going forward.

27 Nov 2025 05:04:46
If we're playing a 3 at the back, i'd absolutely have tav in there on the right side of a back 3👍For me this is tav's best position now 🤔🇬🇧.

26 Nov 2025 14:51:12
Shots

Gonna get tech here and it won't be popular. Three built stands were built Akor perforated brick, cheap, short life etc. Stands build shelf life expiring and shows. We built three new stands in just over season and shows. We need true build, rel smaller modelled on Wembley. Long lasting and a monument dwarfing/belittling piggery. Easily 80k capacity. Given high demand I see filling ST.

26 Nov 2025 16:38:22
Miller how about we build from ground up, at a slightly different venue. Near the river Clyde

Would be controversial.

26 Nov 2025 16:40:27
Only fill if doing well.

26 Nov 2025 17:30:38
On the capacity side of the argument, there are ways to minimise lower attendance, seen somewhere else, can't remember where, but the top tier can be closed and large banners were placed all round and you wouldn't feel as if stadium not full, got to remember building practice has changed a lot, many ways to achieve things but think a 65k would be a good number.


As long as there is a hooters bar and so I can't be accused of anything there could be a dangalies bar for the ladies and a couple of the guys on here. 🤪.

26 Nov 2025 17:36:31
John if possible we could take the main stand down brick by brick and rebuild it on new site, I can borrow my cousins transit to help with the moving.
On a serious note those who keep saying we wouldn't fill it, look at why it's been like that this season, you need to speculate to accumulate, hopefully the mistakes of this season are condemned to the history books.

We move upwards on onwards.
Enhanced income on matchdays is the only realistic way of achieving this long term.

26 Nov 2025 17:42:28
Shota issue is not filling it, we have a large waiting list, all Rangers want is too sell the season tickets.

26 Nov 2025 18:24:35
John

Don't think controversial. Parking facilities round Ibrox crap. Only issue is Main stand probs most easily identifiable in Scotland and so demure. Hard gers to move wholesale.

26 Nov 2025 18:50:18
milerbrandwilson, work started in 1978 and completed in 1981 that's a good bit over one year.

26 Nov 2025 19:16:44
I think we should be looking to do similar to Arsenal. Retain the land around Ibrox and build a new housing area. Turn the old main stand into something special in terms of the housing. Maintain it as a way for the club to keep making money for years.

A new all purpose stadium would be ideal, as close to Ibrox and govan as possible of course but we are Glasgow Rangers not govan Rangers so as long as it stays in southside of Glasgow this should be acceptable

A new all purpose stadium of 80,000 should be the dream.

27 Nov 2025 05:06:55
I'm old school and most definitely want us remaining at our beloved/historical, Ibrox stadium 🙏 Everyone entitled to their own opinions right enough 🤔.

27 Nov 2025 07:38:48
Yeah I wouldn't want us leaving Ibrox somethings are just critical to your identity as a football club.

26 Nov 2025 13:33:54


MrPotatoHead has written an article entitled, Assessing James Tavernier's Stats At Glasgow Rangers

26 Nov 2025 16:41:20
Mr ph congratulations on an excellent piece. Well done.

26 Nov 2025 16:54:24
good data but surely you have to put it in context by direct comparison with other players doing the same job. indeed you could read those stats and say his long ball passing is improving year on year.

still though thanks Tav but time to part company, but let's hope we have someone as loyal and better coming in to replace him.

26 Nov 2025 16:56:54
Nice article MPH. I've been saying for years Tav is not a defender.

26 Nov 2025 16:58:26
Good article Mph and agree👍👍.

26 Nov 2025 18:07:57
just popped in today to feel a certain feeling of deja vu. what fans need to realise is that they have an opinion of players and those are worthless (sorry) and I include my own in that.
what is apparent is that for 10 years managers (7 permanent) have played Tavernier at RB and even Rohl continues to do that. yes there may be no other options but no manager has gone out and tried to buy a better RB defender. so is the conclusion that Tav plays the role in the way that every manager wants him to play it or very close to it. are managers willing to balance his defensive frailties as they are far out-weighed by his attacking virtues. so have an opinion but balance it with the one that matters (the manager) who doesn't agree with it. yes we haven't won much but even despite that the next manager has still seen him as an asset otherwise they would have replaced him or sold him.

re the stats worth considering that he attempts 56 passes per game which compared to Raskin who only attempts 41 and ask yourself whether our playmaker should be making less passes than our RB. the point is there are many other things to look at ahead of James Tavernier whatever you think of him.

26 Nov 2025 18:12:56
Good to see you back Angus.

26 Nov 2025 18:19:19
Welcome back Angus.
Or just maybe, 6 of the 7 managers deserved the sack as they continually over looked Tavs defensive frailties for what he gives going forward.
I could see that point of view if Rangers were winning domestic trophies consistently under all the previous incumbents.
They weren't and defence has been a huge issue in all those 10 years.

26 Nov 2025 18:33:45
Glad seeing you back Angus, hope you're fighting fit mate👍.

26 Nov 2025 18:40:22
Angus how u doing bud, hope you and yours are well👍.

26 Nov 2025 18:50:31
mph, I could agree with that opinion if each of those managers had tried to replace him with a defensive RB but they didn't. Stirling was bought but has been injured so often/long they would have tried again. Martin loaned Aarons but didn't play him there.

I suspect that managers see we face a low block so want our RB to attack more than they defend. what every manager has failed to do has been to find a way to cover that gap our attacking FBs leave when they go forward; remember the criticism of Jefte and now Meghoma as well so it isn't just RB where the issue lies. so the criticism should sit with those managers or perhaps the defensive midfield pivots who are tasked with covering the FBs forays forward. not since Ryan Jack has anyone managed that.

If they wanted Tav to defend they would tell him to sit at RB and only defend. if he didn't they would drop him, that hasn't happened. so not one manager has done that so Tav plays as he is asked it would appear. again an opinion but the evidence is there to support it.

26 Nov 2025 20:01:20
Welcome back Angus hope your well mate.

26 Nov 2025 21:28:15
Very good to have you back posting Angus, hope you're well pal 🙏I absolutely agree with you regarding tav mate 👍 Are all these manager's who continue to rate and play tav wrong 🤔I don't think so.

26 Nov 2025 22:15:19
cheers guys. not arguing about ability as a defender although I think he gets the flak purely for us winning nothing in the time he was here. My argument is you can't blame the player for 7 managers choosing to play a style which uses his attacking ability and not just asking him to sit in and defend.

I wait for the day when he is gone and fans are complaining our next RB doesn't get forward enough to support attack.

26 Nov 2025 22:24:34
Great to see u posting, hope all good with u and family.

Don't really agree with your take on Tav, if rhays the standard re aging players and very poor players all over the team I believe in my lifetime we will see 10 before we win 56.

God I hope i'm wrong.

26 Nov 2025 15:45:36
Dujon back in Europa squad.
Good luck big guy.
Great to see.

26 Nov 2025 14:28:23
All this talk about Tav being given a new contract is giving me the fear. Yes he has given us 10 years of service and been very highly paid for such poor returns in trophies. He has had his time and the amount of goals we concede down the right side of defence because he is not in position is appalling.

Is it too much to ask to get a RB that doesn't constantly get caught out of position and can just defend.

26 Nov 2025 15:26:55
Your not allowed to criticise Tav because your not allowed to have an opinion if you don't rate him, it's tedious the amount of time this discussion happens on an ageing pro who done well in the past, but is on the slide imo opinion yes opinion and has been for a while, no matter who tries to blow smoke up his archie.

26 Nov 2025 15:50:19
Can't see him getting a new contract mate, he's been done for the last 3 years or so.

He was a great servant who will be remembered fondly, but he does need to be remembered, can't do with watching him much longer.

26 Nov 2025 16:10:02
indeed Fork, he should have moved years ago but our failing to bring in a replacement is the issue.

however its not his fault he can't recover from being out of position, its how we play. its the manager who decides if he should go forward or stay put.

but yes move on and get a new cover that can do as well or indeed better than him.

26 Nov 2025 16:13:14
not sure he'll be remembered too fondly by most

he stayed too long.

26 Nov 2025 16:25:21
Should tav be no1 next season no is he good enough for back up over the next year or 2 yes we done the same with big balogun 2 times now I think we give tav another year at reduced terms.

26 Nov 2025 15:24:11
Spot on, BT.
My thoughts exactly.

26 Nov 2025 16:44:21
Allymc62 of course he'll be fondly remembered.

26 Nov 2025 17:16:07
U do realise it's team sport? Actually a squad sport. Tav is simply one of 11 or 1 of 25.

He can't claim to win trophies on he's own so he can't be blamed for a lack of them.

It's going a bad understanding of the game of football when people pick out one person to blame for a lack of success in a team.

26 Nov 2025 19:09:53
Tav should have been replaced and hasn't.

However we have regressed so badly and replaced players who have left with worse quality than tav is probably our best performer, is still getting numbers better than our front 6 players.

He currently should get a new deal unfortunately, it's a sign of where we are.

26 Nov 2025 20:48:53
Got to think Tav looks one of better players on stats this year
That just shows how bad we have been performing, not many of new signings have actually strenthened team.
Tav has been good servant over years, but time has caught up with him, just does not have ability to get back into position, should have left couple of years ago, but obviously no one was willing to pay him anything near what we do,
If he wants new contract is he willing to take substantial wage cut while not being automatic first choice.

(not sure i would if more money available else where)

26 Nov 2025 09:56:42
Had asked this before, with the news of a feasibility study being undertaken for Ibrox, anything people would like to see being done, maybe something you seen at another stadium or the like.

I know on the pitch comes first but see the improvement of the stadium vital if we are to progress.

Would tearing down the three stands be possible or filling the corners, lowering the pitch, I think going forward a 60-65 thousand capacity would be ideal,
All over Europe many teams have or are looking towards improving there stadiums and I see this as important part of our future.

26 Nov 2025 10:54:54
Shota, tearing down stands probably means a nove to hampden, looking what we paid sfa for four games would be exceptionally expensive.

26 Nov 2025 11:23:29
Yes would like a 70,000 seater stadium - anything possibly suppose depends on cost and what owners want but more seats more money.

26 Nov 2025 11:44:00
I would like to just do up what we have improve the standard of the facilities toilets food beverage kiosks the old club store, the stadium footprint as a whole could do with abit of a tidy up imo before any major building works.

Cosmetic improvements may not bring in the revenue that we need but it would improve the overall experience and give us something that we can all be proud of.

26 Nov 2025 11:46:03
Agree John, a move to Hampden would need to happen, and yes be expensive and not ideal for the support but don't see any other option going forward.
Would just filling the corners and lowering the pitch be enough, yes mabye another 5-10 thousand but the overall experience is where most clubs are looking to exploit and building from new could make this materialise, look at the match day revenues of spurs and the like down south it's crazy money, and we could top that with the right direction.


Just depends on how far the owners are willing to go.

26 Nov 2025 11:59:50
There was an artist interpretation came out a few months. Not unlike the Allienz stadium. It looked amazing.

26 Nov 2025 12:09:21
Simple things really, the surrounding areas need a facelift, toilets need done as they are a disgrace, better food.

26 Nov 2025 12:11:28
One stand at a time, just like last time.

26 Nov 2025 13:12:08
Be madness to add capacity by 20.000 until we get a competitive team on the park, been many empty seats this season down to the product on the park.

26 Nov 2025 13:34:20
Rosevale my thinking, brilliant having a 70k stadium but will feel empty having 45/50k.

26 Nov 2025 13:36:04
I don't think they can fill the corners there needs to be a minimum of 2 entry and exits for emergency vehicles i'm sure.

26 Nov 2025 13:37:55
honestly don't see us filling 70000 stadium week in week out. maybe for the big games yes but consistently i don't believe that will happen.

maybe to 60000 might be more realistic.

26 Nov 2025 14:35:51
New stadium. where are we getting £500m 🤣🤔.

26 Nov 2025 15:37:28
18000 on the waiting list that wouldn't need to wait if we had a bigger stadium, 45 k would give 63 k 50 k would give 68 k, reasonable numbers in a 70k stadium.

26 Nov 2025 16:18:10
70k+ seats. half would be empty after 75mins most games, let's be real

once the team start winning trophies again and competing in Europe then the fans will stay (hopefully)

Under the current leadership, i don't see it happening any time soon.

26 Nov 2025 14:51:20
Supply and demand.
Success on the park can make improvements off the park seem like a valuable investment long term.

26 Nov 2025 15:03:20
Fork

Completely agree. Currently I think main stand holds 50% capacity. Seated newer stands can be reduced weeks, each brand new stands built within playing season/close season. Realistically we could have brand new rebuild 3 seasons at minimal impact.

26 Nov 2025 15:09:36
Never going 70k that's mental.
Can we even lower the pitch anymore? I new we couldn't years ago but something may have changed.

26 Nov 2025 16:27:46
John what was the fee I read somewhere it was 67k if that's true it's not that expensive for 4 games tbf.

26 Nov 2025 16:34:34
I would think we would pay for it the way every other club does, not many have £500 m sitting in a bank acco7nt, it would come from private funding, loans, sponsorships, revenue, past and future, quite a few other streams I, m sure.
The fact is we are falling further and further away, we are never getting the tv money like other leagues so match day money and utilising the ground for other things is the only way forward, and yes we need to be winning to fill it, but this would be a long process to organise and complete so need to start sooner than later.

26 Nov 2025 16:49:16
We are not filling the old place just now! Far less adding 20k capacity on top.
Can we not just prioritise winning something first?

26 Nov 2025 16:55:41
Theres no reason we couldn't fill Ibrox up to 60k there's a waiting list around 15k and WHEN we start winning many of those who've stopped going mainly young adults will gp back. Bigger capacity more income and we could do the work 1 stand at a time so could still play our home matches in Ibrox.

26 Nov 2025 17:15:45
Storm

Tend agree. How many times can we lower without impacting surface? All improvements mentioned so far bit piecemeal. Think overall stadium redesign needed.

26 Nov 2025 17:32:37
Did something not come out about the water table a while back, maybe wrong.

26 Nov 2025 09:09:12
Although his defending is quite poor at times always has been, tav currently top scorer and top assister. Probably a big reason he keeps getting new deals. Once he's gone he will be a huge loss of numbers.

26 Nov 2025 10:06:01
Absolutely paul, the scale tav will be missed at, will only be revealed when he's gone 🤔.

26 Nov 2025 10:22:06
We must have someone else able to take corners, free kicks, penalties, other than Tav, part of reason he is top scorer, assists,
What % of his free kicks, corners are accurate.
When was last free kick he scored.

26 Nov 2025 10:28:38
Tav's new contract negotiations have been put on hold for the time being due to the sacking of Stewart and Thelwell.

26 Nov 2025 10:55:15
Any decent striker would be queuing up to take the penalties.
Pretty sure others would fancy a free kick now and again.
People forget first and foremost he is a defender. And has been rank rotten in that department for years.

26 Nov 2025 11:01:16
Never got my head round professional (doing it for a living! ) footballers not being able to hit a dead ball. It's literally what you get paid for.

And I do understand some are better than others yada yada, but jeezo, if I could spend days on end practicing hitting a dead ball I'm pretty sure I would be fairly good at it after a while.

26 Nov 2025 11:39:57
You think it's Tavernier decision for taking free kicks penalties and corners?

26 Nov 2025 12:18:17
No it probably not Tav decision to take everything, so does that not reflect badly on coaches than we do not have any variation at set pieces,
What do they do all days at training if not trying new ideas as most teams find it easy to defend these against us.

26 Nov 2025 12:40:44
Why Jasp, because Tavernier is our best with a dead ball?

26 Nov 2025 12:41:29
would think its the manager who decides who takes what. so maybe on the training park Tav shows more consistency than others. maybe i am wrong. but why would a coach not say tav you aren't taking these because big joe is better than you.

26 Nov 2025 12:41:53
It's probably not? it's a hundred percent not his decision Jasp.

26 Nov 2025 12:44:06
You shouldn't be asking anyone on here anyway, only people that could answer that would be Gerrard, Gvb, Beale, Clement, Ferguson, Martin, Rohl.

26 Nov 2025 12:50:08
Jasp you can try new things in training that's fine, the coaches are still going to want to the best set piece taker to take it. We've scored two corners in the last two games both assisted by him.

Obviously peoples opinions are different but i know if i had to pick someone to take a free kick/penalty/corner in a big moment it would 100% be Tavernier over anyone else in the squad.

26 Nov 2025 13:14:06
For the tav bashers/doubters, do you ever give it a thought to how every manager we've had since tav was signed from wigan for 200k in 2015,rates him highly and always have him as a first team regular that 🤔funny that guys eh🤔.

26 Nov 2025 13:40:56
sws 100% right, he might not be brilliant but return on investment has been superb. most consistent and available player we have had for a long time, yes he is well past his best before date.

people forget how poorer we were anytime he was injured.

26 Nov 2025 14:11:47
Maybe Fry with change the set plays, but that corner from Tavernier for Fernandez goal was quality.

26 Nov 2025 14:27:37
Been supporting Rangers since the mid 80s and without doubt Tav is one of the greatest when it comes to ball delivery. His direct attacking play has been crucial to any success we've had since he's been at Rangers. There isn't even an argument against it. Some people will throw all manners of crap just to meet their own agenda.

26 Nov 2025 14:47:32
He's been incredible, He's not anymore simple as that for me.

26 Nov 2025 15:29:59
Just like some blow smoke up his arse because they don't agree with others, R1 is correct.

26 Nov 2025 16:05:16
R1 but he's clearly still the best at dead ball situations we have or he would be talking everything, this was brought up about him taking free kicks etc, yes he not the same player.

26 Nov 2025 16:11:18
Fork it's the usual suspects that blow smoke up his arse. SWS better players than Tav have left and we've moved on fine in the past and am sure the same will happen when he leaves.

26 Nov 2025 14:53:58
The same managers who've all been tin tacked during his tenure at RB ( apart from Gerrard ), SWS.

26 Nov 2025 15:12:05
He is the captain so he will have some say it's mental to think otherwise.

Great post mph and 100% correct.

26 Nov 2025 15:15:36
Coops every manager has been sacked also so they obviously don't know that much. You can play it both ways remember 👀

With the exception of Rohl obviously.

26 Nov 2025 15:24:04
We don't know if we have anyone better at taking at set plays as it's always him tha takes him. It's a bit like Ronaldo he always takes but rarely scores ….

26 Nov 2025 16:33:24
G4 and anyone else answer my question on tav then ie. why is it every manager that tav has played under at Rangers rates tav highly and always play him, i'm waiting 🤔Also the majority of former Rangers pundits rate tav, i wonder why 🤔.

26 Nov 2025 16:39:10
It clearly the manager decisions and thinking different says enough.

26 Nov 2025 17:02:39
Does Cornelius not take free kicks?

26 Nov 2025 17:41:13
Think Cornelius got to take one once….

Tav has ran his course. I get we don't currently have a better option at RB but that's a failure of recruitment not an endorsement of Tav.
We've been needing to replace for last 2 seasons plus.

26 Nov 2025 17:45:36
Nobody cares. You're always talking about every manager, most of them sacked btw, that was in the past when tav was an asset. Past glories don't excuse mediocrity now he's on the slide, time waits for no one. He was gd in the past he isn't anymore, as R1 said.

You love to have your soapbox and preach your opinion. It doesn't mean we need to agree, no matter how much you say it, whether it annoys you or not. Its every week, tedious tiresome and boring. Others are allowed to have an opinion.

26 Nov 2025 17:47:48
Fork, he's take them from the rightside of the box, but this will all be worked out in training park, maybe Fry will come up with something different, but that ball from the corner from which Fernandez scored was top class.

26 Nov 2025 17:54:39
Fork have your opinion like the rest, like I will have mine, but clearly James Tavernier is the best we have with a dead ball, or could you please explain why every manager we've had has him on set plays?

26 Nov 2025 18:00:17
I agree Star it was, but he's on the slide and has been for a while, he was great in the past, but he is not that player now, though still has a gd delivery.

26 Nov 2025 18:01:33
Fork, Annoys me fgs man, get a grip, nothing more annoying that folks posting about something they can't see or don't know, clearly Tavernier is the best we have, I don't want him getting a contract but obviously he's the best or 7/8 managers wouldn't have him on them.

26 Nov 2025 18:22:17
Think I'm maybe getting confused here Fork, sorry if I am mate, let's put Tavernier's debate to bed for once, I'm the same as you in not wanting him getting another contract 👍.

26 Nov 2025 18:33:56
Your opinion not mine. And I know what I see, do u think you know better are you superior, no your not, get a grip, okay have a pop at the others who are saying similar, you think yours is the only opinion that matters and that your always right, sorry your opinion is irrelevant, and as bad as SWS, every manager "in the past" that would be when he was playing like a captain, he isn't anymore and u said as much earlier, " yes he's not the same player" or are u going to say u never said that either.

U need yo get a grip n stop being g condescending as u think your better because u kicked a ball, newsflash most of us have, and some even coach.

26 Nov 2025 18:38:48
Ignore that then⬆️ apologies Star u set me off on one and lost the plot.

26 Nov 2025 18:43:40
Posts are getting missed on the crossover bud and us crabbit sods are going loony on them, apologies again bud.