Rangers banter 43418

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.



26 May 2016 17:14:08
Will we get floated on the stock markets so we can buy shares and time soon?

Agree1 Disagree4

26 May 2016 18:17:21
Seeing as we can't even produce a set of audited accounts I very much doubt it.

26 May 2016 20:19:09
Bosshogg I think you will find we have provided audited accounts showing operating loss around 9 million and we owe the parent company ie the 3 bears and dave king ex amount aswell although the money we owe them is soft loans to be converted into shares when possible so your point is totally wrong.

{Ed039's Note - I don't think those accounts were fully signed off by an auditor)

26 May 2016 18:44:27
Boss hog did u not read the last accounts then?
Last years accounts were really good even though the board never had much time to implement their own ideas on how the club should be run, u really should check your facts b4 slating the board.

26 May 2016 21:02:41
I thought the accounts were signed off mate showing we owed the 3 bears and dave king 18 million and that we had operating losses of 9 million they were sent to company's house sometime in march I'm sure . ithink there was unaudited accounts initially stating we only had operating losses of 500 k but the audited ones showed 9 mill I apologise to bosshogg if I'm wrong on that.

26 May 2016 18:18:38
Not till all court issues are complete (which could be a year or more) .

27 May 2016 09:41:19
The last set of figures I recall were released in March 2016 and dealt with the 6 month period, which ended 31st December 2015.

These figures are not audited and even says so on our website (not sure if Ed will let link get posted)

goo.gl/WCylTe

Now it is possible that there are audited accounts but if they exist I have never saw them and I am usually quite thorough with things like this.

27 May 2016 15:02:16
Bosshogg if I'm wrong then as I said I am big enough to apologise for jumping the gun but if you search rangers audited accounts in Google it shows that the audited accounts were submitted 31st of march the link you have posted was from the 6th of March which you are correct in saying at that time they were not audited not sure how to post the link but have a search mate you will see the article I'm talking about.

27 May 2016 15:05:24
The link with regards to the audited accounts.

goo.gl/J2g5EP

26 May 2016 22:23:16
As ed pointed out, those accounts were not audited.







 

 

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass  
 
Change Consent