Rangers banter 101761


Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.

28 Mar 2024 12:50:34
Ajax for clement? He has signed a contract at Rangers until 2027 which he stipulated by himself, the current Ajax mangers contract doesn't expire until 2025, I smell a rat, or you could provide a shard of evidence to back up your statement?

Agree2 Disagree0

28 Mar 2024 13:15:54
Two year gap.

28 Mar 2024 14:23:36
Nothing anywhere online about this at all, may be absolute pants.

28 Mar 2024 16:18:13
95% of rumours don’t appear anywhere else till on here

It is a rumours site.

28 Mar 2024 16:28:53
True John.

AlsO, 63.65% of statistics are made up.

28 Mar 2024 17:40:34
Rumour guy was 0 for 0 btw, tjn saying ljinders getting the job also.

28 Mar 2024 17:53:35
Cool fork anyone can post whatever. It’s for the reader to judge the merit of a post.

28 Mar 2024 19:24:05
How can 95% of rumours appear elsewhere after they are put on here when most of those rumours are only half a story? Surely if journalists were on here snooping for scoops they would at least need a name?

Or why would journalists believe the rumour when all the rumours get rubbished and the posters of rumours get abuse?

Is this something that used to happen before abuse? Is the abuse a recent thing?

28 Mar 2024 19:43:44
The boy is in for the Ajax job fork but don’t know if it’s set in stone.

28 Mar 2024 20:22:13
No probs John, I thought that too Storm, cheers guys?.

28 Mar 2024 23:52:02
Apparently Abraham Lincoln taking over from Clement when he goes to Ajax. Saw it online.

29 Mar 2024 05:05:17
RTG people on here have put up fake info and it’s landed in the media a day or two later from here and there have been others like John CF5 that have put info on here and been in media day or two later also.

29 Mar 2024 08:16:24
Sir Walter he won't come to rangers until he gets his theatre trip out of the way.

29 Mar 2024 08:58:42
Correct, Storm. I think it was whitehorse who put on a fake rumour. shortly after it was in the press.

29 Mar 2024 09:03:28
So people are posting fake rumours aswell, could this be a reason why people posting rumours get grief?

Found it strange when I read that journo's snoop here for a scoop but a big deal was made the other day about why people don't post rumours, well they post part of rumours but conviently leave out names. Maybe that's why they won't post names, incase journo's steal their scoop.

29 Mar 2024 10:27:55
Rtg because of people like u, contribute 0 but run posters down r u coldo per chance.

29 Mar 2024 11:11:00
I have not ran anyone down John? I would like you to show me where I have. I have actually defended people who post rumours and encouraged them to post.

29 Mar 2024 11:40:23
And actually I have contributed, I put up a talking point the other day which you posted on so that's not true.

You seem to have taken the huff with me, is it because of the thread the other day? If you look back you'll see that a helluva of people agreed with the points I was making so I'm not alone. Maybe you are taking it personally?

29 Mar 2024 11:43:05
John I thought that from his 1st post but it may not be.

It was to see if it went in papers RTG and the boy came on and said so after it he wasn’t trying to dupe anyone on here.

29 Mar 2024 11:46:19
You criticise majority of posts. Why don’t u post threads and join in.

29 Mar 2024 12:07:38
I have posted threads John and I have joined in on many threads, please go and have a look. You would use the term criticise, I would say sometimes I have a different opinion. But I can see where I have ran anyone down?

Yeah Stormtrooper I wasn't suggesting that anyone was trying to dupe anyone else. What I'm getting at is I asked John the other day if he knew names? He said he won't post names as people who post rumours get abuse. So I made the point that he had already posted half the rumour which by all accounts he could then get abuse. So why not post the full rumour as it doesn't make sense to not be scared to post half a rumour?

I then read this morning that journo's read these pages and people have posted fake rumours. So I asked if this was why people who post rumours get abuse or maybe why John conviently doesn't post names.

You see how confusing all of this is and how its hard to make sense of it all.

29 Mar 2024 12:31:04
Oooft lol @John 27.

29 Mar 2024 12:35:16
He doesn't post names because it's always a ?storm either way, damned if u do damned if u don't, its his choice bud, stop picking at it.

29 Mar 2024 12:42:11
Was that a bullet point in your rumour SWM or did you hear it in a Booth☺️?.

29 Mar 2024 12:57:37
RTg the numbers below your posts indicate threads u post, says only one for you mate.

29 Mar 2024 13:03:25
I'm not picking at it, it has came up today because I have been accused that I run people down. I have simply explained what I meant by my original points and then asked if today's revelation about Journo's had anything to do with all of this.

My god you's are a touchy bunch. ?‍?.

29 Mar 2024 13:52:57
So what you are saying then is that you were wrong John, because I have posted a thread therefore I have contributed.

Tell me John where does it say in the rules or terms and conditions of the forum that I have to start a thread to "Join in"?

Maybe I'm happy just tagging along in threads created by someone else or maybe some of the points that I would use to start a thread may already have been started by someone else. Would I be accused then of going over old ground?

I get the impression that you don't like being questioned?

Why can't I challenge points, offer different opinions or ask questions without the need to explain myself to you? I mean isn't that the very basics of "Joining in".

Lastly John do the numbers below my posts make my opinion any more or less relevant?

29 Mar 2024 13:55:37
Yes we are??.

29 Mar 2024 14:33:48
Love being questioned, ask all the others I engage with.

29 Mar 2024 14:57:33
I thought all the others abused you and that's why you don't answer their questions when asked to share info? Perhaps questioned was the wrong choice of word. I should have went with challenged.

I take it by your silence on the other points I made in my last post that you accept that what you were saying had no real purpose?

29 Mar 2024 16:04:15
RTg imo u have normal purpose, here to mix it.

29 Mar 2024 17:26:10
That's not what I asked you and I'm not looking for your approval either John. I wonder what gives you the sense of power that you think you can make up rules and correlate them between my posts as though that conludes that my opinions are less relevant? That was exactly what you were trying to do earlier in this thread John.

30 Mar 2024 09:05:28
Try ignore me then.



Log In or Register to post

Remember me

Forgot Pass  
Change Consent