Rangers Discussion Posts 3

30 May 2026 10:41:43
I know some people are saying I wouldn't sign this or that player as they would take up a European slot, remember though we have over 40+ domestic games to play also. Now take Cammy Devlin for instance. Will he sign for a European club in European competition.

He might but I doubt it. Would he come to Rangers if he was told he may just be used domestically. I think and hope questions like that are used when talking with agents.

30 May 2026 15:10:28
I honestly doubt he would, Davie. I wouldn't go to a team who were in Europe to be told I'm only being used domestically. Especially when I could possibly sign a contract at the side I'm about to leave, who have European football also. A footballer's career isn't a long one, so you want to achieve as much as possible.

30 May 2026 15:34:31
Barron is a better player, if Barron played for Hearts, we'd have a big majority on here wanting him signed for a transfer fee, without being out of contact.

30 May 2026 15:35:06
Never added, not for me on a free.

30 May 2026 16:17:22
I really hope to God questions like that aren't used, Davie. That's basically telling a player he isn't good enough for Europe, not exactly filling the boy with confidence, mate.

30 May 2026 21:59:08
If he isn't good enough to play for us in Europe, then surely he isn't good enough.

30 May 2026 22:51:02
But we do sign players, then don't put them in the Euro squad though, Angus, Bb4, is it not better they know when they sign than disappoint them after?

31 May 2026 01:42:22
Players like who, Kaiser? It definitely isn't better to tell a player they're not good enough to play in Europe, especially when you're trying to entice the players to join your club. That's like flat out saying you're not good now, nor will you ever be, just being honest with you that you're not that good.

I would rather our club said, we don't feel you're ready for European football now, but keep working as we believe you have a high ceiling and we also believe that you'll be ready soon.

01 Jun 2026 11:42:47
Potential Champions League aith Hearts.

Think he's going nowhere right now until qualifiers are done.

28 May 2026 17:39:01
I asked AI to give me a list of Rangers possible signing and put them in order of probability, fyi

Lawrence Shankland Striker
Dan Neil Midfielder
Luke Graham Centre-Back
Akpe Victory Centre-Back
Oskar Fallenius Winger
Joel Piroe Forward
Josh Windass Midfielder.

28 May 2026 22:39:52
Well it got Shankalnd right at least. 😉

29 May 2026 07:31:45
It must be monitoring this site. Did you ask before Shankland signed?

29 May 2026 12:03:56
AI just picks up what has been written about on the web, so most of its information is coming from forums like this.

29 May 2026 22:54:06
It is also correct that there is no Ferguson.
He won't be signed.

30 May 2026 14:10:14
What makes you so sure, Slim Jim?

28 May 2026 17:10:13
I've just stuck a ton on " the lost sock"

In honour of my old pal Cheers, hope you're well mate

28 May 2026 20:34:17
Another "lost sock".

Cheers, where are you, brother?

28 May 2026 20:40:06
Was thinking that myself a few days ago, Tom. I hope he's been a good boy.

28 May 2026 22:39:04
Could be anywhere, Tom, our three cheers is a bit of a wanderer. What a guy. Miss him when he's not on tbh.

29 May 2026 13:50:44
He said he was having time out till season starts. A top man.

Alphe, let us know you're ok.

29 May 2026 21:41:31
Yeah, he did, John. He said he's not fell out with anyone, but was just taking a break. He's a funny guy as well. 👍

Echo your thoughts in Aphe. 👍

27 May 2026 23:25:22
Shankland will score goals and he'll work hard for the team.

He now becomes part of what we all hope will be a winning and very successful Rangers side this coming season, and I genuinely think the team we build this summer at Rangers could elevate his numbers even further.

People forget that statistically he's been one of the most efficient finishers in the SPFL over the last decade, sitting around the top 7 for conversion percentage so he's actually behind Morelos with Kyogo too and wduard not far behind
Shanks consistently outperforming his xG. That tells you he's not just living off hit and hope shots he's a natural finisher calm on the ball and calm under pressure.

He needs fewer touches and fewer chances to score, and Rangers will create far more opportunities than he ever got at Hearts, or I would like to think anyway? where at times he was carrying almost half of their goal output on his own.

That's why there's a real argument he can outperform previous strikers like Dessers. Dessers brought movement, work rate and chaos to defenders, but Shankland's game is more direct and clinical. Different profiles, but one that could suit a dominant Rangers team
Most importantly though he's our player now.

There's no point constantly comparing him to players who are no longer here. If we want success, titles and a proper winning mentality back at the club, the support needs to get behind the players wearing the badge now.

And let's be honest if Rangers are going to go to battle this season, compete properly and bring the title back where it belongs, we'll need goals from everywhere:
forwards
attacking midfielders
wide players
set pieces
the full squad contributing

No one player wins or loses a title alone

I also think AC will demand high standards and a winning mentality while helping build a quality side alongside the manager. Shankland is a cog in that machine an important cog but one of many needed to build a successful Rangers team again.

So let's get behind Shanks, give him our support, and see what he can bring to Rangers Football Club.

Personally, I think we'll be celebrating plenty of goals this season from across the team if we're building a team we all think we're going to build.

Come on folks let's have a good summer and look forward to World Cup and Our club building something we haven't seen for a long time a dominant Rangers football team💙💙.

28 May 2026 10:37:12
Great post mate. 💪🇬🇧

28 May 2026 10:58:05
Very well written post, Stig.

28 May 2026 11:52:55
Plenty recent Rangers strikers have been vilified over the last few seasons for:
Not scoring important goals.
Not scoring enough to win the title.
Being a sick note.
Not scoring enough goals.
Being huffy.
Being overweight.
Being unfit.
Missing chances.
Not linking up play.
The list goes on.
So why do those parameters suddenly change for some, just because a striker they like is Rangers daft?

28 May 2026 12:27:49
MPH, haven't you also vilified a few players who you deemed not good enough? Let's be honest, we've all done it over the years.

But now we're being run by people who genuinely seem to want to build a successful Rangers team, and they're putting their money where their mouth is. Surely we should get behind that.

We've been told Rohl will continue as manager, so we get behind him too. Some didn't want him to continue and thought we could do better.
I was one of them. But he's here, and, listening to the opinions of others who know the game, they all seem to think that, given a good squad of players, he can turn them into title winners. I can get behind that.

I can also get behind AC and his statement about what he wants from the club and the direction he wants to take us in.

You know as much as I do, and everyone on here does, that we've made some real mistakes over the years with management appointments and player recruitment.

But I'm going down the positive route this summer. I genuinely have a feeling we're going to build something special over the next year and beyond under AC's stewardship.

So yes, players have been criticised by all of us at some point, and no doubt they'll continue to be challenged and called out if supporters feel they're not good enough or not putting the effort in.

But right now I'm giving my full backing to Shankland, the rest of the squad, and Rohl. Let's see what we can do.

We could go round the houses pointing fingers about who said what, but let's not waste energy on that. Let's try to enjoy this summer, stay positive, and get excited about who we bring in.

And hopefully by the end of May next year we're all on here absolutely buzzing about winning the title or at the very least being close enough that we can clearly see real progression.

28 May 2026 12:46:11
Loving the positivity, Stig.

28 May 2026 15:47:37
How are those things you go on about, "parameters."
If you're going to put things like this, at least have some sense.

Are you saying Shankland won't have the same level to reach as Rangers expect all players to reach?

If so, why are you saying this?

Is it because you personally have absolutely destroyed everything Shankland has done for some years, simply because some people wanted him and you didn't?

Nothing in this post makes sense.
"Doesn't score enough goals to win the league."
"Doesn't score enough goals."
Being overweight.


Being huffy.
Being unfit.
Being unable to link up play.
Missing chances.

Don't you think most of these are the same thing, differently worded to pad out the same thing?

And they're most correct btw in regards to
Morelos
Roofe
And most of our recent strikers

Why on earth would you think Shankland would not face the same scrutiny, Haaland would face the exact same scrutiny, Coisty did, as have every striker I've known in 70 yrs.

28 May 2026 15:49:53
And where are you seeing these "sudden change" because a player is "Rangers daft", MPH? Is it all Rangers supporting players you dislike, or the ones that you don't want? Why on earth would you think that the "parameters change"? That's just ridiculous.

28 May 2026 15:55:28
Great post mph 🐑

28 May 2026 16:56:38
They were criticised because they were all those things. If Shankland turns out to be the same, then he'll get criticism too, and rightly so. Until then, nothing wrong with some positivity, guys.

28 May 2026 17:05:55
Ah well, each to their own. 🤷‍♂️

Thankfully nobody is going to change my positive mood for this summer.

Come on Scotland. 🏴

Come on the Gers. 💙

Kaiser, at this rate it's only be me, you, Tom and a handful of others on here celebrating Shankland as seems a few just don't want to see it as a positive move.


Actually, feel sorry for them, to be honest.
What happened to backing every player backing the team - then u get shot down for trying to be positive. 🤷‍♂️

Maybe they're having a bad time of it.

Chin up folks - it can only get better. 💙

28 May 2026 17:09:49
I'll reply to a few of your points, TT.
First off, huge difference between rating and "disliking" a player.
As a fan, I want players who are good enough. Not because they are Rangers daft etc.
Secondly, all players are judged on parameters.
So if the above parameters I listed are used against previous strikers, then Shankland should be judged on that criteria as well. No free pass just because he was born a bluenose.
Thirdly, because I don't rate a player, it doesn't mean others don't, and, as I've always said about any player or manager, I hope they prove me wrong.

It means we, as a club, are doing something right.
As for judging Shankland, if he's all that, then why didn't he fire Hearts to a title after they were 9 in front?
Why didn't he score all these critical goals that our previous strikers didn't?
Why did he miss chances just like all our previous strikers if he was good?
Why hasn't he been Scotland's number 1 striker all these last few years if he's that good?

28 May 2026 17:50:25
Easily answer why he's not had many caps for Scotland, manager's a dick.
Stingo, I'm very happy Shankland will be wearing our colours next season, mate.

28 May 2026 18:01:19
Thank you, Star.

Not once in my post did I mention Shankland is all that.
I actually went with stats that have him sitting 7th best striker in the SPFL, and I quoted he's behind Morelos on those stats, and Eduard and Kyogo are top. Not sure why you're wanting to twist a post that was full of positivity for our club this summer, not just about Shankland but the Owners and manager.



How the post can get turned into an argument, I'll never know.

It's kl. I'm not arguing, and will carry on my positivity for the summer ahead, as I personally think it will be a good one.

28 May 2026 18:05:20
And, I tell you something, bro.

There's only a couple of people in here who constantly say
"people only want him Bev because he's a Rangers fan"

Personally I've never in bout 15 years seen anyone say anything like, "I only want him because he's a Rangers fan."

Is it so difficult to take in that every single person knows that a player has to be good enough first and foremost, then having the club in his heart is only a fantastic thing to have inside your club?

There's a couple who seem to think Rangers fans are idiotic and only want to see Rangers fans in their team, nonsense.

Rangers fans want winning teams, players that will bleed out for the club.

Shankland is one of them, and clearly a very intelligent player too, one that can see things our other strikers don't, one that can ping one from 25 yards or win a header in the box, a boy who never ever hid his allegiance to my club.

I for one am proud to have him and really chuffed for the family.
If you still don't like the lad that's fine, but don't aff these fantasy "parameters" to pad it out, they remind me of the very dodgy stats.

28 May 2026 18:05:59
Yet the manager who is a dick has managed to get us to qualify for a World Cup; something no other managed since 1998. And before I get the 'it is easier' quotes, we won the group and didn't need to rely on the easier route.

I am with MPH on this. I like Shankland and will support and hope he succeeds; not because he is a Rangers fan, but because he is a Rangers player. But I prefer to see how he performs on the pitch, like every other signing, before I get too excited.

If he scores as many as Dessers, I will be happy, despite that not being good enough for some. However, he will need better players around him, as well as one player never wins or loses a league.

So, continue to be excited, Stig, and I see shoots of hope, but we have a lot to do this close season. I hope we add some real quality, though, and don't just rely on players who played well against us. Shankland was a no brainer, as people say, but he is the exception imo.

28 May 2026 18:06:15
"Why did he miss chances?"

Really, I've seen it all before, but this takes the top prize, innit.

28 May 2026 18:10:23
FFS, Stig.
You were totally against Rohl continuing this season and then did a full 360.
So that means I'm a better fan for backing the manager.
And you're a better fan for backing Shankland.
Therefore our negatives have cancelled each other out.

28 May 2026 18:53:27
MPH

Again, as I said in my most, I was one of many who didn't want him to continue. I'm sure ⬆️ top I said that?

And also said, listening to others on here who know the game, think he will do well when he gets good quality players in. Players who AC said he's going to bring in, leaders across the park, and I said ⬆️ there I can get behind that.


So yes, I'm allowed to come to the table and change my mind and be positive, am I not?

Because I said I would have preferred another manager straight after we lost 4 of the cup finals and also said I didn't think Rohl could turn it around. I've gone away and took on others opinions and changed my mind, spectator hearing from AC I can buy into that and I have, and as I said ⬆️ there I look forward to our club building a successful team.

Shankland, I think, will be an important cog, but one of many important cogs to take us to success this coming season.
I honestly don't see anything wrong with that at all. Yes, I've changed my mind, yes I've taken on others opinions and now I agree he had a bad hand, players stopped playing not just for him but for our club.
So I want to wish him the best for the coming season and I hope he gets dealt a cracking hand by AC and the rest to help build a successful Rangers.

I don't see why I can't and shouldn't be able to that?

28 May 2026 17:45:07
But they weren't " parameters " were they

They're criticisms, not parameters
Nobody, not one person has said, nor will ever say " he gets a free pass because he's a born Rangers supporter " ever
And the ridiculous statement " why didn't they win the league, why didn't city win the league, they have the most expensive striker ever and the most expensive team too
, Hearts lost to a team who were handed a pen that wasn't and Hearts denied a pen that was, bad luck and bad decisions are the reason why they didn't win the league, Lawrence Shankland was the main reason they almost won the league

And all these " whys", they simply proved you know little about pro football, I could add " why " to every single player in the world, in the world,

Why didn't Liverpool win they had Isaac and salah
Why didn't Chelsea win, they spent trillions
Why didn't Real win or get to CL final
Why didn't Bayern beat PSv, Kanes the best in the world, I could be still posting this next year and beyond

I'm actually incredulous that anyone who follows football would ask such a redundant and ridiculous question like this

And yet, you clearly didn't apply those questions to your own favourites, like why didn't win Dessers never win the league,

I know the answer to that, it's really quite simple,

Because he was part of a team that failed, not him, the team

He scored plenty
Shankland scored plenty, , no need to reply if all you can do is this kind of nonsense, football players the world over have never won a league title but doesn't mean they aren't great players,

And again Shankland has and never will be given a " free pass " by anyone, think you only put that in there because you don't have anything else to say about him you haven't already said,

28 May 2026 21:11:44
You are ranting now, TT.
The parameters listed are all valid against criticism of previous Rangers strikers from posters on here this past week who then said that if we had Shankland we would win the league.
Therefore, implying that Shankland would score more, miss less chances etc.


Now if an expert on pro-football like yourself can't grasp this, what chance do lesser mortals like me. 😜
P.S. As an expert on "pro-football", didn't you save about how good Martin would be as manager? 🤐

29 May 2026 10:28:50
I am just concerned that many fans think Shankland is the answer to all our problems, I am glad he is onboard, but it makes no difference to me that he is a Rangers fan or not. Does that mean he didn't try for Hearts or any other team because he didn't support them?

Many said we would have won the league over last few seasons if he already was here.

We don't know that, maybe we would, maybe we wouldn't, but again it's about a team not an individual.

For the amount of players we need to move on and bring it, I am concerned we don't get immediate results, and all you guys will be on the usual bandwagon of Rohl out, it's his fault. Best players in the world take time to gel together.

29 May 2026 10:35:48
Can someone point out to me where anyone has said they won't back Shankland? Thestig, where have you seen this? Also, am sure every fan will celebrate when Shankland scores and plays well. Strange comment to make, only a few will celebrate Shankland. 🫣

29 May 2026 10:38:23
Mph, it's pointless, mate, better just leave him to his rants. 👍

29 May 2026 10:43:57
Geesa, 100% correct and why this Rangers minded is just a fallacy. Shankland played to his top level with Hearts despite not supporting them, and therefore it should be possible for every signing to do the same for us no matter who they support or where they come from. Age and experience help with that.

So will Shankland be able to continue that with the demands of the club he supports on his shoulders? He does have that age and experience, but as a fan of the club does it make it more difficult; will he try too hard.



My worry as well is we start poorly and then, due to our lack of patience to build success, fans start trying to chase Rohl out. Before anyone goes on about spending 15 years without success and that being patient, just tell me where we have given anyone other than SG longer than 12 months before poor run of form caused the above to happen.

29 May 2026 11:20:30
Angus, we won't start poorly.
We will be flying out the traps this season coming. 😊
We will have a strong squad ready for the fight.

29 May 2026 16:12:08
Stig, I love your newfound upbeat posts. 👍 But at some point we will hit a bit of rough seas, as every team does. Shankland will be missing chances, as he did this year, that the guy in seat 21 (sorry if that is anyone here 😂) thinks he should be scoring, despite having never kicked a ball in professional football. Shankland didn't get that to the same extent at Hearts, but it will start here again, that is, unless being a fan gives him a bit of leeway.

Ah, and he better not smile if we get beaten. I wonder if a smiling Rangers supporting player is taking it as badly as we do. 🤔

So I hope we start well and continue to, but worry what happens during that slow spell.

27 May 2026 19:56:32
Hearing lots of rumours about incomings-which is great.

Although, I'm concerned we will end up with a bulging squad if we don't shift some of the ones already here.

We have sent around 7 back who were on loan, but we have about 7 to return. Who likely won't get a look in and experience shows, we've had trouble moving them on for fees. And I'd imagine some of our current squad will be on their way out.

Cameron
McCausland
Nsiala
Cifuentes
Cortes
Nsio
Curtis

Do any of these have a future apart from Curtis?

We currently have 4 defenders and could potentially lose Sterling and Fernandez. Meaning we'd need to bring in 6 if we want two for each position.

We currently have 7 midfielders and could lose 👇 meaning we could need 5 in.
Dio
Raskin
Rice
Bahrami

The our forward line we have 6 including Shankland. Could lose

Miovski
Antman
Gassama
Chermiti

Which could leave us looking for another 3 wingers and a forward.
Then possibly Butland off.

We could lose 16 players from our squad including the loans who will be returning.
That's scary and a lot of work needing down in a couple of months. It's going to take more than this window.

Take all that away who are we actually left with? I count 8 😫😳

Thoughts?

27 May 2026 21:44:03
Oh, and Danilo. Forgot about him. So that's 17 and Tavs already gone, so potentially could be 18. 😱

27 May 2026 22:29:08
Gazza, of the names you list though, 9-10 of them didn't play for us last season. So would we need to replace them? Yes, we need to get rid of them, although I would keep Rice, Nsio and Curtis.

I hear squad of 26 plus academy, so not sure how many that means we will need from the 26 there who played last season.

27 May 2026 22:45:21
Angus,

I get what you're saying. However, we brought in others to replace those.

So, I'd still say we need a large amount of additions.

I don't think we look to offload this many in one transfer window and have such a huge change and large number of incomings.

27 May 2026 23:05:49
Kelly, Sterling, Souttar, Fernandez, Rommens, Barron, Aasgaard, Cameron, Chukwuani, Gassama, Curtis, Chermiti, Shankland, Naderi.
Antman? I'd keep.
Butland, Rankin, Diomande, McCausland, Bajrami, Miovski, Cifuentes, 30m+.
1 Gk, 2 Rb, 2 Cb's, Lb, Dcm, 2 Cm's, Rw, hopefully Moore on loan.
26 man squad.
Sterling can cover most positions, why 2 Rb's, unless a youngest is good enough.

27 May 2026 23:09:21
I would keep McCausland also.

27 May 2026 23:19:57
Forgot about Danilo.

28 May 2026 09:46:58
Star, our issue has always been getting someone to want them. And you also forgot about Sterling (and Shankland 😉). But I tend to agree with who we keep. We might see some players who can play multiple as back up as well, to keep us covered for injuries.

28 May 2026 14:14:44
And Cortes.

28 May 2026 16:53:45
There's a player in nsio.

27 May 2026 11:26:59
Seen this on x regarding Dan Neil:

"The72 - We Love the #EFL
@_The72
Ipswich Town fans, would you like to see Dan Neil signed permanently? 🤔

If so, there might be some new competition for his signature 🐺".

The comments are very underwhelming from Ipswich fans.

27 May 2026 11:43:41
Saw quite a few Sunderland fans slate him as well.

27 May 2026 11:44:14
Kenny, be better asking the Sunderland fans, he only played 16 games for Ipswich after January, he wouldn't have been truly game fit either as only played 3 games for Sunderland before then.

27 May 2026 11:47:21
Reidpt, did you? I find that very hard to believe.

27 May 2026 11:54:22
Never heard one Sunderland slate Dan Neil, Read. I just said to my Mrs what I've just read, she just laughed and shook her head.

27 May 2026 12:05:49
Saw a good few on the comments of the YouTube videos saying he slows the game down, not good enough, etc. Time will tell. Seems to be our preferred target over Watt.

Think we've just been burned with Championship players too many times. Every single one of them has been world beaters and would walk it up here. Hopefully if he does come it's different.

27 May 2026 12:14:05
Reid, telling you now, I've never heard that from one Sunderland fan, slows the game down? Also, I find that very hard to believe, as he is always looking to play the ball forward.

27 May 2026 16:54:52
Star, I have looked a lot to see what people say about him. Any analyst tends to think he is better as an advanced 8 or a deep lying playmaker rather than a straight holding number 6. So, I suppose it depends which deep lying player we need, but his strengths don't seem to lie in his defensive awareness or his physical tackling.

On a lot of notice boards and the Roker forum that I can see.

Not looking to argue or challenge your opinion, just that this is what I can see.

27 May 2026 17:31:22
Angus, Niel is an 8, mate, converted a few seasons ago. He was outstanding playing 6 in the prompted side, yes deep lying player maker, but I would disagree if they posted on here about defensive awareness.

Niel is very clued up on the game, and wins a fair amount of duels, not a physical player, but his technical awareness gets him out of a tricky situation.
Sure he played an 8 on loan at Ipswich.

27 May 2026 18:21:30
Star, that is what I mean. He is a more natural 8. We already have Raskin and Barron who we were/are trying to convert from 8s to 6s. I would like a number 6 who is that deep lying breaker up of play and a playmaker for that position.

That allows our FBs to break forward. Sort of a Ryan Jack who allowed Tavs to do that in his prime.

So, is Neil here to replace one of Barron or Raskin as an 8?

27 May 2026 18:45:40
Angus, Raskin and Barron can't control a game from deep. He would, even if we use him as an 8. I just want him signed, mate, lol. More players with his leadership all the better. He does play as an 8, you'd see what I'm talking about with his workrate. It's something else, but very capable of playing deeper.
Raskin and Diomande will probably be away.

27 May 2026 19:21:05
Can't comment on Dan Neil as I've not seen anything of him, but the last thing we need is another player who slows things down. We are absolutely terrible for it.

27 May 2026 20:18:37
Lawrence, that ain't Neil slowing things down, always playing the ball forward, none of this back the way.

27 May 2026 22:44:30
Star that is me against him now. If he can't pass the ball back the way then he must b no use. 😉

Seriously though, Raskin and Barron aren't those deep lying playmakers or No6s. Since early in Clement's time, we have been trying to get that experienced no 6 and not got him.

I am not sure Neil is that either, no matter how good you think he is. And I'm not arguing that, as I haven't seen him. We really need someone who can play that protective, playmaker. I don't think that player is Watt either. I had hoped Anderson would come, but that seems out as well now.

28 May 2026 07:33:32
Angus, I just leave it for Rohl and the recruitment team, but I know why Rohl fancies Niel.

28 May 2026 09:48:42
Star, so do I, as I don't know much about players we are linked with. I also never see many we are openly linked with join us. I don't know Rohl, so do not know if he does like him either. Not saying he would be, but just don't see him as that No 6 we have been promised for ages from what I have read.

28 May 2026 09:50:15
See, unless you've watched him yourself a right good few times, I'd be ignoring what some random fan on X thinks. If you believe them, you're assuming they have an eye for a player and a relatively good knowledge of the game. I can't recall watching him once, and they might be right, but if our scouting team has watched him and he's captained Sunderland in the Championship, he's got something.

My worry is always, can they deal with the expectation here, the speed of the game and the physicality.

28 May 2026 09:59:11
Angus, supposedly Rohl wants him, only from the media.

28 May 2026 11:12:43
Star, I tend to take what is written in media with a pinch of salt. Someone can like a player but not think he will fit in and improve their team. Nothing against Neil, as rarely seen him play. Just don't see him as the no 6 from what I've read. However, I have a new hat to eat when I am wrong. 😉

28 May 2026 13:35:53
Same as me with the media, Angus, hardly get any information on Rangers now, mate, did with GVB and Beale, started drying up with Clement, the way I like it though, why I believe others will also be struggling now.

26 May 2026 23:02:56
Scottish players we have had and let go or missed out on include Patterson, Doig, Ferguson, Bowie, Gilmour, McBurnie was available before he went to Hull on free, Ross McCrorie, lennon Miller, Max Johnstone, Josh Mulligan most of these guys would improve our team, not only that but we could have had Shankland for last two years for nothing and we let Curtis go to Kille whilst having Skov Olsen playing garbage.
There needs to be action in getting Scottish talent back into our squad and fast. If any of the above are available we need to get them even if it means selling our best players because our best at the moment got us 3rd in the league and no cup wins and out of Europe very early.

Most of the above are under 25, McBurnie is out of our price range now he is on premiership wages. same for Ferguson and Gilmour I would imagine. Not Scottish but Azeez scored twice today for Nigeria in 2 nil win, cannot see Gers being able to afford him, especially after the season he has just had. However If it is true that Gers are looking his Youtube clips are very decent. Barney Stewart and Calvin Miller anybody?

26 May 2026 23:57:29
I would bring in Barney Stewart if we could.

27 May 2026 00:00:28
Stewart and Miller will be going to Hearts if McInnes gets his way.

27 May 2026 07:10:01
Only me it was absolutely correct decision to let Curtis out on loan.

27 May 2026 08:07:37
That is just a list of Scottish players. My memory is Gilmour didn't want to stay. I just don't rate McBurnie more than a battering ram. Others left or weren't signed for reasons at the time. Some might have wanted to stay or come, but for some reason it didn't happen.

I don't plan on ever berating the club or any player for that.

Also, I am sure we don't use YouTube clips as our recruitment source. I can send you mine now, and I look fantastic. 😉 I am cheaper than Azeez as well.

27 May 2026 17:13:00
Are your YouTube clips not all in black and white, Angus? 😃

27 May 2026 18:08:49
YouTube is just what folk shouted watching me play.

27 May 2026 18:24:57
Shanksi, they are a bit like the Harry Enfield and Paul Whitehouse Arsenal team sketch of 1933. Have a look online for it if you don't remember. I am the one with the pipe. 😂

Kaiser. 😂 I was the midfield anchor, I think that was what they said anyway. 😉

28 May 2026 05:31:28
The same Calvin Miller that was in the Celtic end at the Scottish Cup game jumping about with Stephen Welsh etc? No thanks.

28 May 2026 08:24:26
It wasn't our best players who got us 3rd, it was our worst players that caused that.

28 May 2026 11:13:12
Geesa, I think you will find they were all culpable of that.