Rangers Debates 3
Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.
13 Nov 2025 17:26:23
Guys, there has been a lot of to and fro's the past few days, Atlantic league, ranking positions, national teams, my da is bigger than your da. This has resulted in quite a bit of bickering.
Carlukes email attests that Asa is not who he says he is, as per Thomas Brakstads confirmation, right, where does this leave the site?
People have a way of coping differently circumstances dependent, Asa lost his mother, is this a falsehood also? I personally don't think it is, is Asa connected to Brann? We don't know. He does.
Asa's could clear this up with proof, do we push him for it? Or will he drift off to the aether.
Should he? I don't know, does he have to, the site is anonymous.
Lots is taken on trust on here that people are who they say they are, me I'm a gab of f that tells terrible jokes, it's a mask I have to wear to hide from my pain.
I like Asa's input and debates at times, he is a gd poster, but lately I agree he has been erratic. Are we aware of what if anything he is struggling with? No we're not.
Let's take a bit of time think things thru before response.
I hope this can be resolved one way ot the other, not just for Asa, but for anyone else on here who has to wear a mask to get thru the day.
Agree3
13 Nov 2025 18:17:23
Think we need a bit of proof.
I don't know what to believe, but think the lads on here deserve the truth to be honest, it's a hard one, but needs sorting out as it's continually happening.
I seem to know more about Asa than I do about every single person on here combined, which is a wee bit weird but he deserves to be able to counter these accusations and Carluke needs to prove his.
Never boring on the banter eh.
13 Nov 2025 18:20:34
Nice post Fork
You are a caring man I sense that. I too like Asa's input on here but we can't blame mental health for every choice we make. I know that btr than most. I have tried to help Asa and give him books to read as I have seen this coming for a long time. The honest answer is nobody can help him Asa bar himself. If he has been telling the odd tale or two which I strongly suspect he has to own that and just come back on and be himself. I really do hope you get the help you need Asa. It is once again quite clear you are not quite yourself. Once you own that yourself the rest of it is a piece of piss my friend.
PS The book that will help your recovery is called The games people play by Eric Berne π«‘.
13 Nov 2025 18:51:25
If i was to pick someone on here to have my back it would be u Fork, u seem like a classy individual. As for the Asa debate, I couldn't care if any of it is true of false tbh. I do what he can't and just ignore things I don't like. Either way it seems like the guy could do with some help.
13 Nov 2025 19:07:08
Why thanks Supernovo, appreciated ππ.
13 Nov 2025 19:14:39
Fork, if you ever need to get something off your chest we'll always try to help you.
13 Nov 2025 19:35:00
Can just picture you fork sitting in your smoking jacket and cravat, glass of cognac in hand, typing away as your man servant relights another hold rolled Cuban cigar. That is class
Joking aside that was a nice wee post fae supernova, it has been getting a bit mental in here, life's tough enough without this wee escape turning madder than the minute.
13 Nov 2025 19:37:06
I'm fine Mark, but thank you. I carry what I do because I choose to, it makes me who I am.
13 Nov 2025 19:44:41
Well said fork mate. Seems to kick off more every international break too when there nothing Rangers to debate. I enjoy Asas posts generally regardless if he is who he says he is for whatever reason, however as u say I have also found him very erratic as u say, and unwilling to accept others having a different opinion and getting involved in petty arguments of late.
He did say he'd suffered loss which obviously has a effect so if this is affecting him or anyone for that matter, keep talking and get help. It's a good thing we are annonamous for these reasons.
PS. I am Danny Rohl.
13 Nov 2025 19:51:50
I've tried very hard Fork to be respectful in my posts to Asa. Is he who he says he is, maybe, maybe not. Does it matter, to some more than others. When the whole investing in Rangers stuff came up I asked a simple question in a search engine. I have never posted the information I got in response as I was wary of the fabled "pile on" that I would get if I did.
Its very difficult to always post respectfully to someone that you believe is not being truthful but I have tried. His assassination of football in this country over the last two days has been difficult not to respond to. Boasting about how Brann took Rangers apart. For someone who has posted so much about coefficient scores and UEFA rankings maybe he should have a look at where Brann are compared to Rangers.
As I alluded to he would be very offended if I were to tear into Norwegian football the way he has about Scotland.
He has said that apart from two clubs the teams are hammer throwers, are Hearts top of the league because they are hammer throwers?
For a man who talks so much about respect he has shown very little of it while discussing Scotland and its football over the last two days.
What type of response do you think I would get if I had used the username I am God.
He called himself after a Norse God.
I think Asa is harmless, but he is such a Walter Mitty character its difficult to respond to him without him flying off the handle.
13 Nov 2025 20:19:10
So the highly successful international businessman who meets up with the great and the good, though he spends a suspiciously large amount of time on here being offended by the slightest wee criticism of Norwegian football while dishing it out to anyone who disagrees with him isn't who he says he is?
Well, I'll be darned!
13 Nov 2025 20:33:06
JFM that is a very reasonable assessment my friend and one I have concluded to myself. From the permission from Andrew Cavanagh to be on here, hiring and firing at SK Brann, shares in Rangers and many others it's just simply not believable nor does it make any sense to any reasonable person.
That being said I believe on another post someone has emailed SK Brann and they have confirmed Asa is an internet troll. Sad really to make up this stuff. I do hope the man gets help π«‘.
13 Nov 2025 20:37:05
JFM I get Rangers come from all over the world but does seem strange to me to spend so much time and agrivation slating the league of the team u support in a different country that u really don't rate. Unless perhaps his ideas come from hoping having Old firm would help raise the profile of his leagues rather than helping us out?
13 Nov 2025 20:54:13
Agreed shota it does get testing at times, people see different things and react to how they think, we are all individual with our own wee foibles, that's what makes it diverse, without the diversity there's no site. Now excuse me while I send my man for another bottleππ€£.
13 Nov 2025 20:56:50
Jfm I get it bud there has been a lot of back n forth recently and people can be tested, patience can be a virtue both sides of an argument don't possess unfortunately.
13 Nov 2025 21:23:23
Agree with you fork this thread has gone round the houses lately and it's doing no one any favours.
We don't know the full facts about Asa, and speculation helps nobody. If someone has genuine evidence of wrongdoing, the sensible route is to pass it to the Eds privately so it can be checked, rather than dragging it out in public. Equally, if Asa wants to explain himself, that's his choice as it's been his choice to tell everyone about his supposed life and stature etc
but let's not bully someone into a corner.
People on here bring different masks for different reasons. Most have felt and lived through loss, We should try to remember there are real people behind the usernames.
So let's pause the personal stuff, stop the bickering, and get back to proper debate about Rangers. If anyone's upset or getting personal Ed's please step in as you usually do before it gets over the top. If Asa wants to speak, give him the space to do so and anyone else for that matter.
Hope we can move forward with a bit more respect and keep the site a place for decent discussion.
But maybe if we keep to football we wouldn't be going round the houses every other week must admit the more it happens the less I can take serious
If you have a problem you want to share feel free but let's not keep going round the houses sharing, caring and then fallen out, rinse and repeat it feels pointless and losses it's meaning the more it happens almost like a false hood.
I would also recommend anyone who has deep personal grief or depression etc not to just use this site but to seek real professional help by qualified professionals. Who will be able to give proper counselling and and prescribe medication if it's needed.
Anyway let's everyone get back to the football if we can. ππ.
13 Nov 2025 21:58:36
What i would like to ask hopefully without offending anyone is how many of the posters on here who attend matches at Ibrox got to meet Asa when he was over for the old firm game? I will be very surprised if anybody says they did.
13 Nov 2025 22:41:20
My point was i wouldn't like that league, and think we should be looking for better.
13 Nov 2025 22:59:11
Totally agree stig and we'll said and put across, great post budπ.
14 Nov 2025 00:44:18
Personally i couldn't care less what asa is or isn't.
long ago i said my small business took every waking minute to keep on top of, i didn't have time to eat never mind spend all day on a fans forum
serious illness put paid to those problems
but maybe asa has managed that trick
who knows, maybe minions relate posts to him and he dictates the response,
Anyway, hope he is back tomorrow, but i would suggest one thing, tho it may be strange to say this to such a successful businessman
nobody should simply close their mind to another man's disagreement in what you say
listen, and learn.
14 Nov 2025 01:53:06
Nor was there a response to Ibroxforme request to meet up in Norway for a glass of wine
maybe too busy with work, who knows.
14 Nov 2025 13:18:34
I for one was once accused off being Racist by ASA on the live chat which I received a full apology from him which I accepted, but found his accusations towards me uncalled for and very strange! His posts lately were also very strange and on this app gloating an hour after beating us in Brann was also very strange πβοΈ.
14 Nov 2025 14:32:19
Well, i do not believe in beating about the bush, and I am always upfront and direct. The poster known as Asa, in my humble opinion, is a pure fantasist!
Now, what we don't know is why he is like this?! Is he a troll? Is he at the wind up? Is he a fantasist living off grid from reality? Is he a very lonely individual, with issues, who gets comfort from creating a fantasy persona because he struggles with his real persona? Who knows!
I do not think he is a troll, or at the wind up, because he takes things so personally. Unfortunately, I believe the guy is suffering from delusions of grandeur, which could be brought on by some sort of past trauma etc. This might be his escape from his reality.
Anyway, on that basis, i will not be commenting further on the guy, as I do not want to cause additional distress etc.
14 Nov 2025 18:02:04
I couldn't careless who Asa is or anyone else on here. I read the posts for Rangers updates and have had plenty from Asa and others.
15 Nov 2025 00:09:14
Some brilliant posts there, guys. Anything I could add has already been said. Could we please put this to bed now guy's, please π.
15 Nov 2025 09:51:03
100% self inflicted, but as others have said, its done now, imo he is getting more airtime than he deserves, due to his treatment of people on here.
17 Nov 2025 16:44:45
Correct ows. It's mental how people want to try and find out about Asa if it's true or it isn't who cares. No one on here knows Mach other apart from a couple that have met each other think John has met one or two.
FB you are seriously having a giraffe mate after what happened with you Jesus Christ you didn't own your mistake and it was never cleared up either IMO. This is one you should be staying well clear of.
17 Nov 2025 16:46:09
Forgot to say fork I wouldn't want you having my back because yer a snitch ππ.
18 Nov 2025 08:34:56
100% agree Stormπππ€£π€£.
13 Nov 2025 09:30:45
So we can now intentionally kick someone in the head and expect nothing more than a yellow card, as long as it is deemed to be soft enough.
That means it is subjective and whoever is officiating the match decides if enough force has been applied to merit a red or yellow card.
Hence why Trusty only received a yellow, you can bet if the boot were on the other foot (pun intended), then one of our players would be taking an early bath.
Rules cannot be subjective for that very reason, they should be black and white. Did they do such and such? If the answer if yes, then they must receive a yellow or red card.
In our case this was an INTENTIONAL KICK TO THE HEAD, which surely comes under dangerous play, intent etc etc?
If one of our players were to get sent off for the same thing, I would have no problems with the decision whatsoever, as it would be fully warranted.
Agree2
13 Nov 2025 10:56:05
Roofe wiped out the Prague goalkeeper, fractured his jaw and Rangers appealed his 5 match ban for dangerous play.
13 Nov 2025 10:58:30
Correct Cletus, he stopped, then intentionally kicked Butland's head, force means nothing, shockingly bad call that could have repercussions.
13 Nov 2025 11:23:17
Cletus - agreed, intent was there and now they are sending out the wrong message to players that this behaviour is OK - any intent or forward motion to a players head (goalkeeper on ground) when the ball is nowhere near without being truly taken to task is therefore folly - the officials are now making a fool of themselvesπ€.
13 Nov 2025 11:52:57
I hear you MPH, awful challenge BUT there was no intent on Roofe's part. You can clearly see that on the YouTube clip. His eyes were fixed on the ball and the pace of both himself and the keeper meant stopping was impossible.
Trusty however, had pulled out the challenge when he saw jack had control of the ball, a slight pause and then he went again with the kick to the head. He opted to go again, rather than stop, and that means intent on his part.
The force of the challenge shouldn't matter, what if he got his wee fly kick wrong and his studs caught him in the eye?
What if he went in with more force than he intended?
It is for reasons like this that this sort of challenge cannot be accepted - 'Sure it was only a wee tap, no harm done', won't always cut it.
ANY intentional kick to the head, however slight, should merit a straight red card. Full stop.
13 Nov 2025 12:03:39
Collum is basically saying it's ok for kicking a player on the head as long as it's not forceful.
13 Nov 2025 13:17:19
I don't disagree, Cletus.
But we can't rip up the rule book over every incident.
My point about Roofe is that he did wipe out the Prague keeper with a high boot and Rangers still felt the need to appeal it.
And it is very difficult to prove intent.
13 Nov 2025 14:34:59
Force does matter as it's in the rules whether we all agree or not I think it's time to move on. We got beat because we weren't good enough.
13 Nov 2025 16:15:29
So you can pause and then kick out at the keepers head with no force, so what happens when you catch the keepers eye with the no force kick, force has nothing to do with a red card, covering up is all i see.
13 Nov 2025 17:09:51
This challenge would have been reviewed against the Serious Foul Play law.
It couldn't be classed as Violent Conduct as the incident occurred in play whilst competing for the ball.
The rules as written state "A tackle or challenge that endangers the safety of an opponent or uses excessive force or brutality must be sanctioned as serious foul play. "
This is completely subjective and if we all applied this to 100 challenges there's be a huge disparity in the outcome.
To combat this the governing body and referees meet at the start of each year to agree how they will apply the subjective rules
In our league it was agreed, and communicated to clubs, that the threshold for endangering a player would be based on the position of the foot, i. e. tackle with studs showing you are putting a player in danger.
Thelos was a red card due to the fact his studs were showing and the force was excessive.
Trusty's was a yellow as the studs weren't showing and the force wasn't excessive.
For me, the issue is in the the way the laws are written - these don't help referees.
13 Nov 2025 17:26:50
Rangers appealed because the rules allowed it and it was accidental.
i know the head kick was minimal, but it was also intended and could have a dangerous outcome
they know they get away with it, i myself am moving on.
13 Nov 2025 19:50:29
The force argument should be irrelevant as it is definitely endangering an opponent. Therefore a RED. How can force be an issue when u don't even have to make contact if u take a swipe at someone or kick out at them?
13 Nov 2025 21:25:06
Kaiser, because force forms a huge part of the written rule.
Bizarrely, if it was deemed Violent Conduct, there wouldn't need to be any contact - which I think is what you are referring to.
The laws are a mess.
14 Nov 2025 07:05:27
Yes the rules are a mess EHL but the same rule that says about force also says endangering opponent which any kick to the head certainly is. I fact for me kicking out at someone's head is violent conduct so he should have been off on both counts.
12 Nov 2025 18:42:38
So wullie collum is backing walsh and dallas for not sending trusty off, says a yellow is sufficient as it was only a tap, so there we go, so no more to be said on the matter as wullie has the final say, either wullie is corrupt stupid or loyal to his pals is open to all interpretations, make you own mind up.
Agree4
12 Nov 2025 19:22:28
By the the laws of the game they were correct.
12 Nov 2025 20:04:14
Willie Collum we know what you are π«‘.
11 Nov 2025 17:29:41
Not a rumour just a discussion I've had with a few of my mates over the last few months. How would folk feel about bringing in Gogic from St. Mirren? Wouldn't break the bank, dependable (part from the odd rush of blood to the head) and no nonsense which I think we could really do with right now. Only 31.
Agree4
11 Nov 2025 18:48:47
No for me, I have said before because we are mediocre just now, we are willing to settle for guys who are good journey men but I my opinion not good enough for Rangers.
Let's raise our standards.
11 Nov 2025 19:37:28
He's a pretty decent player and right now he improves our defensive squad.
I wouldn't be against it as such but for me Katic is the one we should target in January to improve our 11, he would have from then til summer to prove he can be a full time starter for next season and if not he's a very good player for the squad.
11 Nov 2025 20:52:59
Katic is a good shout. Always liked the big man.
11 Nov 2025 21:03:39
Katic is not good enough and never will be.
11 Nov 2025 21:21:22
I think Katic and Gogic are better than what's on show at the moment.
11 Nov 2025 21:47:58
Katic is not the same player from when he was here. He's a defensive monster and has been for a good few years.
Absolutely he's our best defender of he's here. Walks into the team.
11 Nov 2025 21:56:01
Getting to silly season again, bloody Gogic. I'm just waiting for Bruce Anderson's name to come up again, he'll be dynamite π.
11 Nov 2025 22:12:28
Wouldn't be hard Stuarty, our defence is howling!
12 Nov 2025 06:13:01
We should never have let Katic go. I said it at the time that it was the wrong decision. Same with Colak, he would have thrived in a two up top.
12 Nov 2025 08:00:45
Silly season? We brought in Andrews a few years back and h done a job. Similar circumstance here a think. A just think the lad could do a job and be a decent. Squad player.
12 Nov 2025 10:58:52
Gogic and Bashiri?
12 Nov 2025 11:39:10
A just think he wouldn't. Andrew's was rapid and as strong as an ox. We were getting bullied day in and day out and Mutton and Hartson especially kicked us black and blue. Big Marv was brought in to give us strength to play against them at the time.
Yeah he done okay for us and was a machine playing through injury. And it wasn't a few year ago. He signed over 20 year ago.
12 Nov 2025 11:41:32
Why don't we go in for Danny Wilson while we are at it pfff.
12 Nov 2025 11:42:09
Bashiri yes big unit.
12 Nov 2025 11:49:50
It's amazing how players leave Rangers as not good enough and turn into Superstars as they bounce from club to club, playing at a lower level.
Would anybody have McCausland back?
11 appearances, 3 goals and 2 assists.
Katic was never good enough.
Colak was a sick note.
12 Nov 2025 12:45:18
Mph Colak has hardly kicked a ball since Rangers, he's never been a regular, don't even know where he is now, so could be now.
12 Nov 2025 13:18:53
No, Mccausland was Pish. Katic is a very very good defender who should never have been aloud to leave. He is better defender than anything we have.
12 Nov 2025 19:04:11
Correct MPH its hilarious.
Katic is a defensive monster but plying his trade in the German 2nd division ππ Stevie you haven't seen him play recently as you didn't even know he was playing with schalke until a week or so ago π€―.
12 Nov 2025 20:16:56
Storm what?
I've known he's been at shalke since the day he signed I follow him on instagram mate. I've watched him play for shalke twice this season.
I've watched him play for Plymouth a few times last season and I've seen play in Europe a good few times as well most notably against Arsenal where he was best player on the park a few years back. Dunno where u got that from mate but wasn't me who never knew he played with shalke.
See the ones slagging him off, genuine question, have any of yous watched him atall lately? This season or last or even when he was in Switzerland? I have, he's a cracking defender. Blows anything we have out the water.
12 Nov 2025 21:06:17
Stevie being truthful I've never seen him since Rangers, but he'd have needed to improve a great deal since because he was average for Rangers mate.
12 Nov 2025 21:57:20
I'm not saying he hasn't improved a great deal either Stevie, because if fans seen Ross Stewart in recent season they would think he was the same player.
12 Nov 2025 22:43:17
Beale that's all I want people to take on board. He's not the same player.
Hes 3-4x the player je was when he was here mate.
Really really good centre half so he is mate.
I guaruntee the ones against it would be eating their words if we brought him back I guaruntee it mate.
As u say, Stewart as an example and there are plenty of, the one I use most is Craig Moore who was like a different human being altogether when we brought him back.
Players improve and develop. People need to change the single minded views.
13 Nov 2025 10:24:51
He really isn't a defensive monster π€¦ββοΈ he is nowhere near good enough. You have seen him a handful of times since he has left ππ.
You mentioned a few weeks ago about buying him from Plymouth so you obviously didn't know.
Katic is not the standard required and never will be.
13 Nov 2025 10:28:41
Stevie you said in other page you hardly watch football these days so do you watch Rangers and katic games and that's it? π absolutely brilliant π.
13 Nov 2025 11:42:14
Storm show me where I wrote but him from Plymouth?
You are WRONG mate I did not say that Sony are wrong. I've followed him on instagram since he was at Plymouth so I know he's at shalke. I watched he's debut. I'm sure he scored on he's debut actually. Friday night game.
Anyway. Shalke play a lot on Friday nights. I've watched him at least twice for shalke maybe even 3.
Yea if I see they're playing I watch it to see how he does.
With Plymouth I watched him at least 3 times due to the cup run they had and playing the bigger teams. Went out my way to watch him.
When he was with the Swiss mob I came across him playing Arsenal by accident and he got MOTM. He was outstanding that night totally dominated arsenals attack. Go back n watch the game instead of arguing with me.
Seen him play a few European games since he left us.
Lastly, cause I've said I don't watch much football these days doesn't mean I don't watch it at all. Is that what I said?
Football on every single day, u can watch 2 games a day Tuesday Wednesday Thursday u can watch game on Friday maybe 2 u have one one a minday and then at weekend u could watch 3/4 games a day both days.
Back in the day I'd have been at most of that
Now I watch it n turn it off if it's rubbish or maybe pass up a day altogether. Still watch some games mostly I start watching n if don't like turn it off
Who are u to tell me what I do and don't watch,
And who are I to tell me when I've watched Katic.
Have u watched him.
U just come on here and pick arguments with folk from time to time then come in and admit u we're having a bit of an episode after.. Don't tell people what they think and know.
13 Nov 2025 14:38:16
Who are you to tell me what I can and can't do? See it goes both ways.
I can say what ever I want it's a free world. You haven't watched katic as much as you say you have that's my opinion and it will stay my opinion π he also has never been good enough for Rangers.
Ps I ain't going through the archives as I don't care that much about it but I know you said as I was laughing my head off at the time π.
13 Nov 2025 15:27:48
Storm to tell u the truth as I'm an honest person, fair enough?
I remember saying that now. Sometimes my memories gone mate like totally gone. Go to the kitchen n don't know why. Phome council n forget what I phoned for. Really bad I'm
On jags for it. N referred to doke clinic at the hospital. Too many head injuries is the reason mate.
Now I'm being honest with u here cause I can't go a liar.
But yes I have watched Katic the times I say.
It's actually not an awful lot a tiles your talking about 9 or 10 times since he left Rangers 4 years ago maybe 5?
Storm a don't lie bro.
13 Nov 2025 15:29:24
Ed just add ro last post.
I knew he signed for shalke when someone corrected me that was the whole point in the post there was I knew it but did say Plymouth too corrected then I went awe wit how did o forget thatβ¦β¦
So your correct I did say it but it's my memory and head injuries playing up mate not lies.
12 Nov 2025 16:43:19
The thing is that Rangers need to win a league title in this country
Nowhere else, just this country, it's not just a target
It's a necessity and nothing less will be enough
We can concentrate on Europe and signings when we have achieved that " Necessity "
Gigi is a good defender, Djiga is not a good defender
Bushiri is a tiger
Fernandez is a donkey
Shankland is a very good footballer and a wonderful goal scorer
Miovski is not even a good footballer and vchermiti may not also be
So, Walter would have signed shanks without a doubt,
He understood to get to Europe we had to win the league
To win the league we need the best team
Bomber was laughed at, he remains the only left back to ever score a hat trick v Rangers I believe
We signed him, and we signed mor3 like him, I'd, Robertson, the finest left back in Scotland and possibly Britain imho
Many more " best in Scotland "
We won 9 titles in a row
It's not rocket science is it.
13 Nov 2025 17:30:09
i myself have no idea how katic has progressed or otherwise, i know one thing
no supporter would simply know so little that they want him signed " just because he scored v celtic"
that's an insult to their intelligence,,
14 Nov 2025 00:24:47
I was against Martin from the start because of his philosophy and inability to adapt. I believe you build from the back and if you're lucky enough to have a midfield linchpin (which we have even if he's not at it jist now) then you have a solid foundation. Reason I brought Gogic up a while back talking with my mates is that I'm a Paisley lad so have a few St. Mirren supporting fans so will watch the odd game with them and he's always impressed me.
No nonsense. Back to basics and build from there. We aren't a project and need tried and tested experience and he fits that criteria. I think if Rohl makes us hard to beat then gets Raskin motoring then we are on the right track. The wingers will come alive if we feed them⦠The striker situation? Am puzzled! A still think Miovski could come good but I wouldn't hold ma breath. There's talent there if utilised properly.
11 Nov 2025 09:08:21
Interesting read on X that we've already had 3 errors go against us according to the KMI panel. Triple what anyone else in the league has had and yet again having us as the team who get the most errors against.
For the interest of of those who may not know the 3 this season are Hearts first goal, the Cornelius goal Vs hearts chopped off and Trusty red card Vs them.
Last season we had 5 errors against us. Add this to our current season that's 8 errors. Celtic on the other hand have had 1 error go against them. The ball out of play call Vs hibs last season.
Agree5
11 Nov 2025 22:13:43
Doesn't surprise me Ayrshire tbh.
12 Nov 2025 21:47:50
Coincidence? I don't think so.
10 Nov 2025 12:59:34
Nice to see an upturn in our aptitude, l know we have seen many false dawns over last while.
Let's hope the progress continues and Danny's on a Rohl.
Sorry, my son has already handed me my coat. π.
Agree2
10 Nov 2025 21:40:40
It's a very promising start Bunnet, that's all we could have asked for. 3 points against Livi and he will be on a Rohl.
12 Nov 2025 06:16:42
Rohl has had a good effect. Martin was clearly the problem. Although I do think some of these will never be good enough to get us to the required level. Its only the fact that Celtic are so poor that we are still up there.
Rangers Debates
Rangers Debates 2
Rangers Debates 4
Rangers Debates 5