Rangers Rumours Member Posts


gdog55's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

gdog55's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To gdog55's Posts



To gdog55's last 5 banter posts


To gdog55's last 5 rumour replies


To gdog55's last 5 banter replies


gdog55 has no Rumours Posts



gdog55's banter posts with other poster's replies to gdog55's banter posts


25 May 2024 17:22:33
They don't even need to pay well to beat us. That's why they're a million miles away from us. I'm not really interested in the "cheated" talk, that just hides the fact that even when we play well and they play badly we're nowhere near good enough with the squad of players we have.

Today was like watching Walter's teams in the 90's but in reverse. So often Tommy Burns Celtic were the better team against us but we just knew how to win regardless of how well we played. Celtic have that now and we look lost, can't get a result even when we play ok (some players played well, some were not good at all, again) .

That Butland in the end sold the jerseys sums it up. Yes, Wright should do better and he will be our fans easy whipping boy so they don't have to question their favourites, but he lost the ball 20 yards inside Celtics half and our GK was presented with a bread and butter save that he fumbled 70 yards later. You can be as good as you want as a Rangers GK but if you can't step up in the big moments (he has been suspect at multiple Celtic goals this season then it means nought. That's what set Greegs, Goram and Klos apart - none of them lose that goal, at that time, in that game.

Lot's of work required on this squad, I'm glad the season is over and we don't have to watch them for a few months.

If we don't start with the leadership positions in the team over summer with a new captain and a new right back, we'll be right back here again next season. He was the worst player on the park today.


1.) 25 May 2024 18:13:10
Gdog I agree, said to my son immediately after their goal that stemmed from Wright lettin ball roll under his foot, and yes butland must do better. I have said on here before butland is not flawless.

2.) 25 May 2024 18:21:17
Correct about Tav he hide one again.



Current State of Glasgow Rangers

14 May 2024 07:39:47
{Ed's Note - gdog55 has posted a new article entitled, Current State of Glasgow Rangers




13 May 2024 14:45:25
Rangers Logo

gdog55 has written an article entitled, Current State of Glasgow Rangers




15 Apr 2024 12:31:02
Glasgow Rangers Logo

gdog55 has written an article entitled, Evaluation of Rangers' Players


1.) 15 Apr 2024 15:35:21
Good post dog and difficult to disagree with any of those that you would let go. I like Cantwell and believe that he is the standard we need as a minimum, I would however sell any of the current squad that can generate us serious money since I believe that we need a total rebuild and I really don't want Lundstrum anywhere near the team. He doesn't drive us forward.
My problem is that from what I see I believe that we need to be bringing in as many as eight or ten players, most of them starters and we need to start developing our own players, something we haven't done for a number of years.
To do this I fear that we will need to find serious investment since I doubt that selling Butland and the others, (if we can get rid of them), will still leave us at least £20m short of what we need.
There are players available of Bosnans that could do a job for us but they won't come cheap if we can get them. We also need an old head that can lead the team that the young players can look up to, finding that person is equally problematic.

2.) 15 Apr 2024 15:44:42
Berkshire, everyone knows we need a clear out big time. We won't make big money on any of them even if we do find takers.
Maybe 10 players in is a big ask to get quality, even 2mill per player that's 20mill b4 salary and sign on deals.
It's going to be painful, and that's if PC fancies the challenge?

3.) 15 Apr 2024 14:52:54
Awesome, thanks Ed. I was wondering where my post had went. :)

{Ed033's Note - ok, thanks for the post.

4.) 15 Apr 2024 19:18:30
We could still win this League and, if we do, then that puts an entirely different valuation on players. I agree though, players who do not appear to be trying or who are frightened, should go now. Walter always brought in plenty of new faces every year and that's the only way it works.

5.) 15 Apr 2024 19:30:42
Excel post gdog. Well done.



14 Mar 2024 19:47:08
Pretty soft way to go out, didn't play anywhere near well enough to go through and shot ourselves in the foot with the goal we lost. We beat better teams on the last run.

But, and this is the most important thing for me, 4 months ago we couldn't even have seen ourselves being disappointed to be going out to Benfica in the last 16. I think that speaks volumes on how far we've come since PC was given the reigns.

So, yes, disappointed to have gone out with a poor performance knowing we can play better and have done in the last 4 months, but at the same time happy that we've got to that mindset so quickly as 4 months ago under the car salesman that would have been viewed a good performance, not a bad one.

Also takes away the distraction when trying to win a league (the most important thing) and hopefully not playing two games a week means we can properly rest up the squad. Few of them looked absolutely out on their feet tonight, a long way from the end.





gdog55's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

26 May 2024 16:06:13
I think Todd posts on here under several aliases.

Certainly sounds like him: everyone else's fault and all about him.

Big mouth, wasted talent, just like at Norwich, where incidentally he was surrounded by better players than we have and suffered exactly the same problems.

This era's Joey Barton. All talk and no follow through.




Click To View This Thread

24 May 2024 10:50:49
I think this one is going to come back and bite us in the a*rse in a few years.




Click To View This Thread

20 May 2024 08:58:56
I agree, Hagi isn't the answer. but he's been better for us than Cantwell. Their comparable first season numbers show this. I actually nearly shat myself laughing when I saw Cantwell compared to Foden above. He's more like our Yan Dhanda than our Phil Foden!

If Tav is still here next season, and still the captain, Clement won't see out the season IMO. He's never been great defensively and you need a good defence to win titles. The best defence generally does (including our 55 year) . He's been worse than he's ever been defensively this season though, what legs he had to recover his defensive inability have clearly gone. I was though enthused by PC's comments re: end of a cycle and making sure people go out on a high. I think he knows this too. IF he doesn't we're in trouble.

Tav has been a great servant to the club. I would never accuse him of not giving his all or his loyalty. He'll certainly go with my best wishes. But, at the same time, I think it's fair to say he's considered by many to be a better right back than I've ever thought he was. I may be old fashioned, but I don't want my right back to be top scorer, I want my right back to stop the other team scoring and he's never been great at that.




Click To View This Thread

09 Feb 2024 10:58:49
Ally with the dictionary definition of blue tinted specs there.

He was neither standing nor had two feet on the ground, Sterling literally slid right through him (though obviously unintentionally) and wiped him out after he stood on his toe.

If he hadn't slipped and gone through him, he wouldn't have been sent off IMO, but he did so he was.

And "winning the ball" means nothing in the modern game, no. If you win the ball with excessive force endangering an opponent you're walking. We've seen it multiple times.




Click To View This Thread

09 Feb 2024 08:55:11
Thought it was a red personally. Easily meets the first criteria of endangering an opponent and excessive force. Could easily meet the second criteria as well (though I don't think it was a lunge I think it was a slip - either way, the lunge isn't required, the excessive force and endangering an opponent criteria is enough) .

Actual IFAB Rules wording:

Serious foul play
A tackle or challenge that endangers the safety of an opponent or uses excessive force or brutality must be sanctioned as serious foul play.

Any player who lunges at an opponent in challenging for the ball from the front, from the side or from behind using one or both legs, with excessive force or endangers the safety of an opponent is guilty of serious foul play.





gdog55's banter replies


Click To View This Thread

28 May 2024 13:48:29
What does a referee's religion have to do with their competence as a referee or what team they follow?




Click To View This Thread

28 May 2024 08:30:32
Those stats are irrelevant. Just data, not information.

Now tell us how many of those 51 were wrongly disallowed and how many of the 4 of ours to see if the ratio of incorrect calls is different. That's the actual information.

This conspiracy nonsense is total tinfoil hat, head in the sand refusal to accept we're just not good enough. It doesn't help.

Raskin needlessly fouled Hart, it was he right call on review, we weren't cheated. But sure, let's keep using referees to deflect from our own failings, because that always works out well.




Click To View This Thread

26 May 2024 10:54:51
100% a foul on Hart. If that's at the other end and not given we're going crazy.

Not to mention we could easily (and have had previously this season in similar circumstances, i. e. Benfica away and Souttar) a penalty given against us if it was some refereeing conspiracy (for the record, I don't think it was a penalty in either case, but those calling "conspiracy" against us can't have it both ways. If we were being conspired against, that's easily given and justified as a penalty based on others we've seen this season) .

Too easy to use referees as an excuse for our own failings, both Raskin putting his hands on Hart in the first place (why? ) and just not being good enough again.

And to counter the "what about Scales on Sterling first half" - Walsh didn't give either of them as pushed on first viewing and VAR can't review the Scales one as it's outside the box. If it's inside the box he gives both as pushed on review. So at least Walsh was, for once, consistent in not giving either on first viewing. But that doesn't mean both weren't pushes on second viewing, they were.




Click To View This Thread

26 May 2024 10:03:00
Said it many times, he'll leave Rangers for the same reason he left Norwich and that's nothing to do with talent.

He's certainly a talented footballer, though he doesn't do enough with it for me, but he just doesn't have it between the ears. Never has had and at 26 he no longer has the excuse of being a young player who needs to grow up. He should be coming into his prime, but his mindset is going to see him a League 1, bottom end Championship player in England or moving somewhere like Turkey.

I've been saying since January I would sell him if any decent offer came along. I just don't like him. The way he carries himself, his "all about me" attitude and his lack of performance to back it up. His numbers are worse than Hagi. I'm not advocating for Hagi, I think we need better, but at least Ianis is about the team, not himself and is likeable for the output we get.




Click To View This Thread

25 May 2024 20:43:14
That so many of our fans don't think that was a foul is wild to me. Stonewall push and we'd be going mental if that wasn't overturned were it at the other end.

I'd rather concentrate on why Raskin did it. He had a good game overall, but that decision costs us a goal just as not fouling Bernardo in the centre circle contributed (with Wright and moreso Butland) to losing one. I'll cut him some slack on their goal as he was out on his feet by then having put so much into the game, but there was no need to even put hands on Hart at the corner to give VAR a decision to even make. Por decision IMO.




Change Consent