Rangers Rumours Member Posts

Stephen1988buchan's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Stephen1988buchan's Posts

To Stephen1988buchan's last 5 banter posts

Stephen1988buchan has no Rumours Posts

Stephen1988buchan's banter posts with other poster's replies to Stephen1988buchan's banter posts

05 Dec 2021 06:27:19
If £18.5m is true this might be a way to save more money. If we sell kent at 12m and goldson at 6.5m it means we pay liverpool less money. Makes sense even better if its 50/ 50 lol.

1.) 05 Dec 2021 07:33:20
Unfortunately don't think it works like that or we'd just put all the value on Goldson and give liverpool nothing.

2.) 05 Dec 2021 09:13:43
If its 18.5 milliom then would imagine would be more like 16.5 or 17.5 for kent. Nobody paying 6.5 for goldson who can sign a pre contract in Jan. wouldn't get 6.5 for him with 3 years left never mind 6 month.

3.) 05 Dec 2021 10:57:31
We still need to give Liverpool a % and we still need to win the league also so players going out will need replaced with better players that cost money.

4.) 05 Dec 2021 10:58:25
Who is going to pay 6.5 million for Goldson when they can get him free in the summer? 🤦‍♂️.

10 Nov 2021 07:33:01
Av read that villa will need to pay 2m compensation to rangers to get Gerrard. It should be the remainder of his contract 9m. If rangers had to sack him we would need to pay it.

1.) 10 Nov 2021 08:23:39
There's a clause in his contract he can go for 2 million. A contract drawn up by Rangers.

2.) 10 Nov 2021 08:29:05
If Gerard decided to leave we wouldn’t obviously wouldn’t need to pay the rest of his contract.

3.) 10 Nov 2021 08:31:42
Theres not a hope in hell his 2.5 years will equal 9million? Think the money there paying is buying out his contract which would be under 3 million. By your calculations he's on 70k a week here with 2.5 years left on his contract.

4.) 10 Nov 2021 08:53:55
Sweep have you read the contract or guessing.

5.) 10 Nov 2021 09:07:47
Sweep that has been denied this morning by people in the know at the Club that have said the compensation is significantly more. I would like to think that this is the case given what Brendan Rodgers' compensation was across the City.

6.) 10 Nov 2021 09:31:11
I've read £4.5 million release clause for Gerrard alone from more reliable sources than Sweep1.

7.) 10 Nov 2021 11:50:18
Mr ph if we get more than four million for gerrard that will be fantastic business.

16 Aug 2021 16:10:53
Lol some people are going on about money we lost because we didn't qualify for cl. How can we lose money we never had?

Let's be honest over the 2 legs we didn't play to our full potential. That's football.

I hope we can get a good run in Europe and win the league. With the players we have theirs a good chance.

1.) 16 Aug 2021 18:23:54
We did lose that money by not winning the game against Malmö that’s why people on here go on about it.

2.) 16 Aug 2021 18:30:30
We never lost it we just never gained it, can work both ways we lost the game so lost the chance at the cash, or never had the cash to lose so would be a bonus lol.

3.) 16 Aug 2021 18:51:11
No kj we can't lose what we never had in the first place deary me 🙄.

4.) 16 Aug 2021 20:22:00
Priceless 😂.

5.) 16 Aug 2021 21:21:18
By not getting to the champs league we lost that money.

6.) 16 Aug 2021 21:30:32
The problem is spending plans in the near future depended on the CL Group stages money. You sure can't lose what you never had so you adjust accordingly.

7.) 16 Aug 2021 21:33:23
We didn’t deserve the money, we got beaten twice and lost 2 goals to a team with 10 men who should never have had the player sent off.

16 Aug 2021 10:52:35
Hi guys. I think it's funny when people go on about us not reaching cl. How much money we have missed out on and so on.

We are in a position where we are guaranteed European football.

It's mostly ex players from the other side that are going on about it but its all deflection from the fact they haven't managed it ether in the last 4 or 5 years.

1.) 16 Aug 2021 11:19:39
Your right Stephen, the stick our club gets is beyond the pale. The ex players/ pundits from other clubs are only looking for issues in Rangers. Keith Jackson article last week and this weeks are a disgrace as an excuse for journalism. The media have flung the Toys out the Priam re Rangers not giving them access. We’ll pay the money it’s simple. They now think they can just stir things up and constantly criticise our club.
Ignore the noise and don’t by into their paranoia about all things Rangers you read.
The press here are a disgrace. 🇬🇧55 to be 56.

2.) 16 Aug 2021 11:23:14
Come on Stephen, this not getting into the CL has put as back the way and cost us a fortune with us getting a real favourable draw to get there? EL is a must as let’s be honest that other competition would probably cost us money!

3.) 16 Aug 2021 11:38:09
I agree Stephen, eurleage money helps massively.

4.) 16 Aug 2021 11:59:34
I find it a bit strange why you find it funny that we failed to qualify for the CL. I certainly can't see the funny side on missing out on millions of pounds and playing against the big boys of European football.
Who cares if they failed in the past its about us and what we do and we messed up big time against 10 men and an average side in Malmo. That's a massive failure no matter what way you look at it. You seem to be the one deflecting from what happened and why you find it funny is beyond me because there's a massive difference from missing the CL compared with the other European comps. Many millions of pounds of a difference.

5.) 16 Aug 2021 12:03:53
We lost a reported 15 million last season its not just ex players from the other side.

6.) 16 Aug 2021 13:09:58
Totally agree Stephen. Last year when they got ko from the CL, you never seen one media article linking any of the so called superstars eddy, Ajer, McGregor ect being linked with a move away. Fast forward 12 month we get ko and low and behold morelas, Kent, Tav, and Hagi all either want away or will be sold and for ridiculously low fees if you believe what they print.
Imho this is all media nonsense designed for one reason only and that is to unsettle our best players and to drive the transfer fees down for our players.

Just a couple of small examples of this is their new Japanese boy will be a 30 mill player. Yet morelas 14 mill, Kent, 12 mill and Hagi 4 mill.

Morelas 3 years left on his contract, consistently in top 2 of top goal scorers, one of the top strikers in last seasons europa league campaign, vital part of our invincible league win, Colombian internationalist. Vs French eddy 1 year left on his contract, Wanting away, constantly slated for not being interested and downing tools, thus letting his team down, total failure in europa league and CL and at 23 can still only manage the French u21s as deemed not good enough for a full cap even in friendlies. Yet valued at 10 more than Morelas according to our Celtic loving media.

But the facts are if it keeps getting reported on various media platforms and from ex rangers hating players and managers that morelas is worth 14 mill (and I've even seen go down to 8 mill) then that's what clubs will offer. Rangers will say no and we are left with a potentially unhappy player.
Imo our club and SG ect should be highlighting this is what's happening at every opportunity.

7.) 16 Aug 2021 13:20:59
Yately why would we lose money in conference cup? Wont be much difference than europa.

8.) 16 Aug 2021 13:35:24
Obviously we all wanted CL and it would have made a huge difference financial and status wise but I very much doubt we will have set our budgets based on qualifying. We are in the same position now as we were last season plus haven't spent the 10mill or so we have spent the last couple of seasons. With matchday income due back I can only see us being better off.

9.) 16 Aug 2021 13:42:00
Huey good post.
Income is coming in. 2 euro ties over 2 million, approximately 400k from Dunfermline game mb wee bit more from livi cup tie.
Qualify for Europa group stages potentially 5 million gate money and then add prize money, all much needed.

10.) 16 Aug 2021 13:44:39
Paul86, my point is this league could possibly be a disaster for UEFA and is it were you see Rangers playing in? How much interest is going to be shown to this competition?

11.) 16 Aug 2021 14:15:51
Its a european competition so would expect sides to show interest. Were not good enough to win that either with likes of spurs in it. Still a decent calibre of side will be in groups. But fully expect us to make EL group stages. If we lost to aleshkert would be up with with progres result.

12.) 16 Aug 2021 14:33:30
Failing to qualify for ECL was a major disappointment. Failure to qualify for the Europa group stage will be a disaster. Unproven, but don’t believe media value of Conference League will be great and unlikely all matches will be sellouts.

13.) 16 Aug 2021 14:50:03
Regardless of where rangers play or whom we play there will always be interest. I will be there, Come rain sun or shine. We have dragged ourselves up from the lowest league to champions. We will always follow follow rangers every where anywhere we will follow on. Don't care what competition we are in, as long as we are in it.

14.) 16 Aug 2021 14:54:23
I think the new europa conference league will be a huge success and widely accepted by every club who makes into the group stages. Especially your smaller clubs who have an unrealistic chance of the europa league. 6 European ties for the fans and 3 guaranteed full houses for the home ties. Teams like Hearts n Hibs for example making the groups will bring in a few extra million quid which is massive for them and can only benefit the smaller clubs across Europe. I can see it being a success.

15.) 16 Aug 2021 14:57:49
Bankie it would be brutal yes. have looked at the prize money and its pretty much the same as europa. Europa group stages u get 3.5 mill. conference u get 3mill. And if were in europe no matter what competition we would sell stadium out no bother.

16.) 16 Aug 2021 15:48:43
I agree with you Paul re sell out crowds.

17.) 16 Aug 2021 17:35:20
Losing to this Armenian side would 0ut huge pressure on the management team and so it should.

18.) 16 Aug 2021 17:42:33
John25 what do you think of the Veerman rumours is it paper talk or are we serious on it at the price being banded about I find it hard to believe unless we sell two or three of our top names which I can’t see?

19.) 16 Aug 2021 18:21:14
Twacoos I’m told gerrard wants him. Remember our finance when we qualified for Europa league and signed kent for near 7 million.
I see similar happening.

20.) 16 Aug 2021 18:28:20
John it took us nearly 3 years to pay for kent.

21.) 17 Aug 2021 00:20:05
Sweep almost every shining for decent money is paid over a few seasons in instalments.

22.) 17 Aug 2021 00:40:18
Sweep do you honestly not know how deals are structured across the whole of football.

27 Dec 2020 08:46:06
To ingerradwetrust. If kent isn't worth 7mil why would someone pay 15 mil.

Doesn't make any sense

I hope we keep him he is exactly the type of player defender's hate to play against. Ok he's not playing to his best but other players know he's a dangerous player and over commit to him witch opens up space for others.

1.) 27 Dec 2020 10:23:41
Who offered 15 million? Paper talk.

2.) 27 Dec 2020 12:18:35
Exactly sweep no one offered 15 million for him.

Stephen1988buchan has no Rumour Replies

Stephen1988buchan has no Banter Replies