31 May 2026 08:23:57
I just for the life of me can't see us selling findlay Curtis and i think/hope the young man signs a contract extension and stays at least a good 2 or 3 years with Rangers ??? I wonder what transfer fee we would demand for him if we were to sell as a buying club would be buying a talented young footballer as well as potential to get better and better with his superb attitude ???
31 May 2026 10:02:05
Maybe Rangers won't have a choice. Findlay Curtis may want the move away. He started last season brilliantly and was pushed out onto the bench when he was playing well enough to start games last September and October.
Then he was pushed out on loan, some will say Rohl did him well, but who's to say if Rohl never kept overlooking him for Gassama, Olsen, Moore etc, he couldn't have done as well at Rangers as he did at Killie?
31 May 2026 10:10:23
The other way of looking at it is the club recognised that his game time and development would be better with a loan move. And that, in turn, meant he had a great second half to the season, which got him in the Scotland World Cup squad. I'm sure he's fairly happy.
31 May 2026 10:12:47
Pushed out on loan? When he asked for the loan, Yourtheman. Strange. Curtis won't be sold, and our manager did the correct thing loaning him out. Do you know Rohl didn't fancy him hanging around? Curtis will be a big player for us going forward.
He also supports our great club. Why would he want a move knowing he's got a great chance of playing many games next season?
31 May 2026 11:03:48
I take both sides of the argument, guys. I'm in the opinion Gassama should've been sold and Curtis should've started games from January onwards instead of starring for Kilmarnock.
31 May 2026 12:07:03
I hope we give the young lad a chance.
31 May 2026 13:12:04
What is with the sudden obsession regarding selling Curtis and the fee we would get?
The lad signed a new deal and is looking like he will be signing another.