Rangers Rumours Member Posts

SimplyRangers's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To SimplyRangers's Posts

To SimplyRangers's last 5 banter posts

SimplyRangers has no Rumours Posts

SimplyRangers's banter posts with other poster's replies to SimplyRangers's banter posts

05 Oct 2016 18:01:49
Would love to see a starting team with foderingham in nets, a back four of tav Wilson senderos Wallace, midfield of Halliday windass kranjcar and McKay ohalloran dodoo up top with dodoo through the middle just to see how it worked. I have a feeling this would be our most exciting attacking team. I would swap kranjcar with Holt or Forrester in a game where we will need no slackness in the middle of the park. And if it never worked at least we would know couldn't be much worse than what we have had so far.

1.) 05 Oct 2016 18:13:00
Would swap Rossiter/ Barton (if he can actually get his head in the game and put in a performance) for Haliday but other than that I 100% agree with you.

2.) 05 Oct 2016 20:20:04
That is what Warburton did with Halliday and even he noticed he was missed.

3.) 05 Oct 2016 21:04:03
I would never let Barton in the team again.

4.) 06 Oct 2016 00:11:18
I like Warbs and think that he should be supported and given time, but why is it that a huge amount of supporters prob more than 50% agree that 4-3-3 isn't the way to go, sure against some teams at Ibrox go for it and it is great to watch when a team has the system nailed down! But playing 4-4-1-1 or 4-4-2 isn't exactly boring. This is what I can't get my head around as we know Warbs is a intelligent man, playing 4-3-3 at the Methadome with players making their debut was bold but suicidal especially with the team he fielded. Really hope he does not dig his heels in and becomes stubborn which we have seen Managers do, persisting with a player or system because others have said it isn't working, again I regard Warbs as a great Coach definetly someone who is brilliant at nurturing young talent and loves to play the game passing from the back and attack minded but were not at that level yet. Think the nxt time we play the tic we should possibly even play with 3 CB's with our wing backs alternating between bombing up the flanks. Anyways I'm sure I'm not the only Bear who is frustrated and perplexed at Warbs as he must know about our venting our opinions on our formation, pundits too but f**ck them its our club!

5.) 06 Oct 2016 02:29:31
Think we need to keep the same defense and attack, we can rotate midfeild depending on opponent but back line of Tavs Sendaros Wilson Wallace up front Dodoo Garner Mckay But I would think about replacing Mckay at half time if needed but we have to settle the squad.

6.) 06 Oct 2016 08:26:32
I can't see how Holt cannot be in the team. He gets into the box more than any our other mids and will score more goals. My starting 11 right now is:
Wes
Tav
Wilson
Senderos
Wallace
Halliday
Holt
Windass
McKay
Waghorn
Dodoo

It was hard leaving out Rossiter, Garner, Forrester and Barton who I think will become good and turn things around.

7.) 06 Oct 2016 11:14:57
dodoo? over mckay and ohalloran? why?

8.) 06 Oct 2016 13:40:00
benny I like your team selection but formation for me is why we are not getting the results. bring rossiter in and and play 4 in middle something like .

! wes
! tav senders Wilson Wallace

! rossiter
! forrester halliday
! holt

! McKay
! garner!

sub to bring on would be miller for garner, windass for holt, and moh for forrester.

9.) 06 Oct 2016 23:20:07
So you would pay him the rest of his (relatively expensive) contract for nothing in return Gary? Sounds bit daft to me when we aren't exactly rolling in cash.

Need to get off the idiots back, we all know he is an idiot, he was before he signed and he will be afterwards.

I'm one of the very few who can honestly say that I saw this as a really bad idea from the start. Shame MW couldn't, but we are lumbered with him and need to make best of it- paying him for nothing isn't that.

SimplyRangers has no Rumour Replies

SimplyRangers has no Banter Replies