Rangers Rumours Member Posts
Zeus79's Profile
Current Avatar:
Zeus79's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Zeus79's Posts
To Zeus79's last 5 banter posts
To Zeus79's last 5 banter replies
Zeus79's banter posts with other poster's replies to Zeus79's banter posts
21 May 2016 17:44:03
I say play halliday at rb let tavernier sweat for a few game so that he knows he's not guaranteed a start woeful today absolutely woeful.
1.) 21 May 2016 18:24:27
He set up the miller goal! I don't think he's a right back maybe a winger or a RM.
2.) 21 May 2016 18:43:44
RfcChri
He also allowed Stokes to beat him easily in the air for their leveller. Apart from that cross he was awful today and can't defend.
18 Apr 2016 11:06:26
Over the moon with the result yesterday but gutted for Dominic Ball now having to miss the final.
1.) 18 Apr 2016 12:14:47
I didn't realise that's a shame for the big man he's been a good player for us hopefully get him back up next year again if Spurs don't have other plans for him.
16 Apr 2016 21:05:25
Watching the live from "murray" park on sky news the other day got me thinking whatever happened to the training centre being renamed to something like the Davie Cooper training centre or something similar even something pretty straight forward like The Rangers Training centre (home of the world's most successful team)
1.) 17 Apr 2016 08:30:44
Really surprised the training ground not been renamed yet. Think naming it after Davie Cooper would be a fitting tribute to a club legend.
17 Apr 2016 00:03:02
Don't understand why we let mcgregor go he could've been the lynchpin in our defence this season because he was our best player last year and at very least if we were willing to let him go for free why didn't we use him as a make weight when we were trying to get allan we could've offered the amount we did and threw mcgregor in as part of the deal as we let him go to them for free anyway.
1.) 17 Apr 2016 08:25:43
Was surprised with that one myself. Decent enough centre back who could fill in at right back in an emergency. No worse than Wilson or Kiernan and a bit more versatile.
2.) 17 Apr 2016 08:35:38
That's a good shout zeus. Maybe MW thought the two we have now would've turned out better and therefore no need to keep a hold of him. As you say too, could of acted as a make weight for the Allan dea .
On a side note, still the funniest line all year has got to have been Stubbs telling the world he wouldn't sell to a rival. Turns out it's Falkirk he should have been fearing! Also he effectively ruined the boys career, him and Delia.
3.) 17 Apr 2016 09:02:52
He was way too below average, couldn't header, couldn't stay goalside, he was only decent going forward. Still to this day have no idea what he was doing for celtics first goal last year.
4.) 17 Apr 2016 09:03:36
Pieandbovril
Totally agree there was no chance he would have broken into that team and I think they only came in for him to make sure he never signed for us. Won't be the first player to think of money before football and it's likely he will be loaned out or sold next season. Unfortunately for him having played so little football I'm not sure what kind of teams will go for him.
17 Apr 2016 00:00:12
Wouldn't touch mcginn or cummings not good enough for our squad and Hibs wouldn't sell to us anyway even if the gaffer was interested in any of them too much baggage with cummings and he'd disrupt and be a bad influence in the squad and sorry but the guys from dundee utd I would give them a single bean let them struggle couldn't care less if they went out of business because it's all about rangers for me always has been always will be.
1.) 17 Apr 2016 08:27:51
Don't agree with either of your comments both players are better than some of the players we have. Your not saying Cummings isn't a better player than Clark or McGinn isn't better than Shiels or Law?
2.) 17 Apr 2016 09:03:38
I would rather have vaulks than mcginn.
04 Apr 2016 14:00:30
Sorry don't agree about giving Forrester a 3yr deal because he could basically down tools once he has the security of 3 years wages I agree that it should be short term contracts max 2 years which would also allow us to get rid of underperformers sooner without having to wait 3 years or pay them off and it'll also push players to perform at their best at least every 2nd year to try and win a new deal the drawback is that we could lose good players for nothing after 2 years.
03 Apr 2016 09:21:21
Shhhhhhhhhhhh! Guess who's Back, and we're coming for you.
LOL.