04 Jan 2023 07:28:08
I'm told May Utd looking to buy Paterson for 50 million also interest from Arsenal May not happen till summer window.

1.) 04 Jan 2023
04 Jan 2023 07:40:50
Take it that is with add ons john.

2.) 04 Jan 2023
04 Jan 2023 07:47:29
Do we have a sell on clause in there somewhere @John?

3.) 04 Jan 2023
04 Jan 2023 07:52:51
That's great news for us if that does come to pass John27 ? We will get around £10million if either arsenal or man utd do buy nathan patterson ?.

4.) 04 Jan 2023
04 Jan 2023 09:27:12
Would most likely be summer, lampard said he’s likely had ligament damage and will be out for a number of weeks.

5.) 04 Jan 2023
04 Jan 2023 09:32:44
20% sell on anything over 16 million, may be a wee windfall coming our way.

6.) 04 Jan 2023
04 Jan 2023 11:47:42
As davie says we have 20% sell on clause over 16 million,

RFC that is flat fee Acton my Man U friend

Walter certainly not 10 million.

7.) 04 Jan 2023
04 Jan 2023 11:58:12
Just seeing Paterson done his medial ligament last night, out for three months, timing.

8.) 04 Jan 2023
04 Jan 2023 12:24:18
John i was told in the summer Man City were watching him.

9.) 04 Jan 2023
04 Jan 2023 13:16:35
There appears to b significant interest.

10.) 04 Jan 2023
04 Jan 2023 13:29:47
John27,i was correct with my calculation originally, as i didn't realise it was 20% sell on clause of profit over £16million my friend ?
So that would make it £6.8million we would get, if patterson was sold for £50million?.

11.) 04 Jan 2023
04 Jan 2023 13:51:05
Does anyone know if we would receive our add ons if sold? hopefully but if not still about 19m superb fee.

12.) 04 Jan 2023
04 Jan 2023 15:32:51
So Walter we won’t get around 10 million, but 6.8.

13.) 04 Jan 2023
04 Jan 2023 15:36:27
Beale depends how Wilson wrote contract, recent practice has been add ons need to be transferred, included in transfer, ie when Nathan hits, 25, 50, 75 appearances down south, we get fee. Via Everton, or simply it’s added in at time off transfer

Unlikely we lose our negotiated addons. One thing for sur Wilson is not daft.

14.) 04 Jan 2023
04 Jan 2023 16:22:49
Great news John could get close to 25m for him unreal business that would be.

15.) 04 Jan 2023
04 Jan 2023 16:52:54
Yes John27 if you're correct and patterson is sold for this massive £50million fee and the 20% sell on clause is the profit over £16million which would then make that profit £34million and yes my friend 20% of that is £6.8million, quite easy to work out mate ?.

16.) 04 Jan 2023
04 Jan 2023 18:29:27
Arsenal pay 50 million For ??? aye right as if arsenal are notorious for not paying crazy fees remind me much did they pay for zinchenko? Man u are not going to for out anything like that when owners trying to sell club too ?


I swear some people's logic on here is mental.

17.) 04 Jan 2023
04 Jan 2023 19:06:04
I feel exactly the same with some of you're comments gofor.

18.) 04 Jan 2023
04 Jan 2023 19:13:54
Agree Beale and Walter if and when it happens will represent excellent business imo.

19.) 04 Jan 2023
04 Jan 2023 23:17:23
Chelsea also very interested in Nathan ??.

20.) 05 Jan 2023
05 Jan 2023 15:09:19
We are talking about this window yes? So John saying if and when do you mean this month cause I'm going on the information we've already been hearing.

Several man United sources have said man u won't spend big in this window as club for sale and manager already spent a fortune start of season.

Everton are in a relegation fight can't see them selling at moment especially when Coleman not fit half the time

Also arsenal pay a fee like that I doubt highly in this window end of season then fair enough as they have a need for a right back but can't see them displacing Ben White who has made the spot his own arsenal are not going to do much to upset the team rythme also they will be putting most of Thier effort into signing mudryk

If Patterson goes for 50 million this window I'll eat humble pie but expect you to do same if he doesnt.

21.) 05 Jan 2023
05 Jan 2023 15:10:51
And I'm sorry can't see him going to Chelsea either unless they have given up on James . why would Patterson go to Chelsea when he would not displace James Everton was a fair shout as Coleman was starting to age out.