Rangers rumours 22206


Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.

(single word yields best result)

07 Feb 2021 22:48:57
Lundstram not signing, was a fabricated rumour by fans.

Agree5 Disagree0

08 Feb 2021 06:11:22
Thank F!, was never impressed, couldn't see what the noise was about tbh!

08 Feb 2021 09:16:22
Did u watch him v chelsea last night? Was excellent, first half especially him n fleck ran the show.

08 Feb 2021 10:10:49
Good player but not a great player. Certainly not worth the 40-50k a week someone on here said he was looking for. Someone in the EPL will pay him that though. Good luck to the lad.

08 Feb 2021 14:17:01
If he thinks he's worth 50k a week, and he can find a team willing to pay him that, then good luck to him. From what I have seen of him (admittedly It's only since there was reported interest from us) he looks like a good player who would enhance our squad, but there's no way we can afford those wages.

08 Feb 2021 14:43:09
Good luck to him, but that's 3 maybe 4 good players we could get for that kind of money.

08 Feb 2021 15:44:17
Not sure how u have a fabricated rumour re lundstrum.
Appears he has rejected rangers in favour of Burnley.

08 Feb 2021 15:55:17
Herewego55 must have been watching different games, mate. I watched it just to see him and he wasn't in the least bit impressive.

08 Feb 2021 16:50:07
Don’t believe was a fan fabricated rumour but I’ve never believed he would be coming to Ibrox and I’m neither overjoyed or upset that now appears to be the case.

08 Feb 2021 18:48:01
Til I think he’s a very good player especially last season however if he’s not coming I’m not bothered. Sure we’ll get someone just as good if not better.

08 Feb 2021 18:48:07
“ fan fabricated rumour “

On a fans rumours site, would you believe it?

Lundstrum will only have wanted 50g to agree to come to Scotland, plenty have added 10, even 20 grand to their demands to come here, it’s nothing new.

08 Feb 2021 19:40:19
Tavson we must have then, I rhot sheff utd were great first half last night, with lundstrum and fleck dictating the midfield 1st half. Admittedly 2nd half chelsea upped it but I thot first half he was excellent.

08 Feb 2021 20:22:13
Looks very much like we were never after lundstrum in the first place fellow bears 🤔 Social media fabrication again 🤔.

08 Feb 2021 21:13:10
He is a very good player don’t know what some of you watch to be honest but it ain’t football people just saying he is rubbish now because it looks like he ain’t coming.

09 Feb 2021 10:20:20
He's a good midfielder but if none of our midfielders were to leave in the summer tell me which of our current first team midfielders would lundstrum get a game in front of 🤔
Ryan Jack-no chance of getting a game in front of jacko, davis-no chance especially in the bigger games as such, kamara-again no chance so for me 40k-50k for a squad player no danger!

09 Feb 2021 12:03:26
Correct sgl however it’s a long season as you know so the 3 you mentioned wouldn’t play every game. We will sign players probably under the radar as is Wilson’s way 👍.

09 Feb 2021 13:41:29
He is a more complete midfielder than any of them, I sometimes wonder on here if folks eyes are closed to anybody outside ibrox. Proper box to box midfielder.

09 Feb 2021 14:31:26
He’s probably better than jack coops. Skk on would get in ahead of him. Different to davo and he’s essential to how we play so not ahead of him. Kamara I would say there both different but I’d rather kamara however if kamara left he could play on that left of our 3 in his place.

09 Feb 2021 16:17:17
SGL u say lundstrum no chance getting game in front of Jack, who is only available 60% of games
U say Davis no chance.
Zungu got a game in front off them.
It is about a squad.

09 Feb 2021 20:20:56
No way would ryan jack be making way for lundstrum.

09 Feb 2021 20:44:17
I think lundstrum is prob a better player than jack IMO anyway. However I’m perfectly happy with jack apart from his injuries. It’s not a case of he’s miles
Better I just think he’s better fitter and would IMO get a game ahead of jack with Davis and kamara. That’s the answer to the question u posed coops who would he get in ahead of. U asked the question mate u can’t then shoot people down for answering u mate? Would be great to have both.

10 Feb 2021 07:47:17
Its all about the fit guys irrespective of if you think lundstrum is better than jack 🤔For the way he fits into gerrard's style at rangers, i would have a fit ryan jack in our midfield before lundstrum, i've not got one shred of doubt about that fellow bears 👍.

10 Feb 2021 10:08:26
SGL u miss the point. How often is Ryan fit. We may be in champions league group stages Ryan is only fit 60% of games.
We need a squad.
U wrote last October how u would be delighted to see lundstrum at rangers, what changed.
Would u be happy to see zungu there,

10 Feb 2021 10:50:32
I've already said i rate lundstrum John25 🤔I wouldn't pay over the odds in wages for him and i personally happen to rate jacko a better fit at rangers than him. I think we could get a midfielder on much cheaper wages to be a squad player mate!

10 Feb 2021 11:45:57
SGL is zungu.

11 Feb 2021 11:57:24
Seen Lundstrum linked with us again in paper last night didn’t open the article am going to go try find it.
He’s also not asking for £50k a week he’s asked for £30. That’s what my understanding of the situation at she’d Utd is down to also.

11 Feb 2021 12:42:03
Ingerrard if we get him for 30 k a week he cleary improves team.
I’d be happy. Some on here want us to sign squad players, which does not improve team strange.

11 Feb 2021 13:44:05
At 30k a week would be a no brainer imo. Thsts only a tad over 6m over a 4 year deal, considering he eouldnt cost a fee it's very little for an established premier league midfielder.



Log In or Register to post

Remember me

Forgot Pass