Rangers Rumours Archive March 22 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


22 Mar 2012 22:11:21
Hope we go 4-6-0 on Sunday, is rather not play with a striker if its Andy little cause he's gash.

Mcshagger
Whittker, Perry, Boca, papac
Aluko, big jig, Ness, edu, kerkar, Wallace.

Believable15 Unbelievable56

Haha good joke

Agree0 Disagree0

I think we could play the under 19's and still beat this mob. They are rank. Kidding themselves on, hiding behind administrators and thinking they are world beaters. Actually I think I could play up front and score goals against there defence!

Agree0 Disagree0

Don't be so stupid, that kind of talk is just a red neck pal

Agree0 Disagree0

Davis? Maybe Lafferty fer a bit?

Agree0 Disagree0

Play your u 19s and we'll play our u 19's and we'll still humiliate you .....Stevie

Agree0 Disagree0

4-6-0, lol whats your name craig levin, and another thing wallace in left mid your having a laugh. We have tried both wallace and papac in left mid id does not work !!

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm pretty confused by this site ..It's called Ranger's Rumour's yet there seem's to be an awful lot of Celtic supporter's trawling on it ..It's true what they say Obsessed with Ranger's since 1888...

Agree0 Disagree0

As long as Rangers play a team on a par with Kilmanorck they will be fine.

Celtic aint any world beaters, would either team at their best this season compete against Wigan, Wolves, Bolton, Blackbun, QPR, Southampton, West Ham and Reading ?

I don't.

Agree0 Disagree0

Eh and whats kerkar? mccoist will balls it p anyway cheap mans wattie smith and his tactics were boring at most but granted great results against that mob

Agree0 Disagree0

And steve davis wont play!

Agree0 Disagree0

How are we hiding behind administrators ha ha so the fact we're unbeaten in the league since November has nothing to do with us being top. Ha ha Ok then. We know we ain't world beaters and we've never said we are. I pity you lot, if anyone is hiding behind the administrators its you. The tainted title talk is b****cks and everyone knows it, you were on the downward spiral months before the administrators came in and you blew a 15 point lead. Lets not forget your the one's under investigation so we all know who's really been winning tainted titles don't we lol

Agree0 Disagree0

I think Andy Little aint bad. He's no Jelavic but right now he's the Rangers centre forward and he's doing his bit for the team. Would love to see him stick one in the back of the net on Sunday.

Agree0 Disagree0

Who is BIG JIG?

Agree0 Disagree0

Nah man thats gash how can you not play attacking side when at HOME against the septic?

Agree0 Disagree0

I hope Whittaker and Laughatmy are playing on Sunday , neither has played for months and will not be anywhere near match fit , smacks of desperate measures .

Agree0 Disagree0

A team n par with kilmarnock, is tat the same Kilmarnock that beat rangers too?

Agree0 Disagree0

We will be out there giving it everything we have, Septic watch out because if we are dying as you all predict. We will die in a Blaze of Glory. Honestly we will do you 8-0. You lot will do walking away and most of you will be going home to melted Ice Cream another party ruined. The adimin should stick everything left in the kitty on Rangers half and full time. Oh you will get your tainted Title but Never at Ibrox.

Agree0 Disagree0

22 Mar 2012 21:33:38
Anyone else think it could be good to keep Aluko on bench again and bring him on to be an impact sub like last week?

Believable11 Unbelievable59

Id say we need the best players we have on the park to have a chance. same with any other team not just celtic

Agree0 Disagree0

No ure the only person that thinks its a good idea

Agree0 Disagree0

I take it you dot know anything about football. Ge should be on from the start

Lee

Agree0 Disagree0

Im allowed my own opinion and think if the game isn't going our way he can make a big impact but if he starts and doesn't get into the game he cant make same impact

Agree0 Disagree0

I think they are going to totally pump us regardless of Aluko starting or not.

Agree0 Disagree0

Does Aluko pay himself performance bonuses?

Are they structured offshore as ENTs?

Agree0 Disagree0

No Ally I dont but I'm glad you asked for advice.

Agree0 Disagree0

Impact sub?.?what as in the 2.1 defeat

Agree0 Disagree0

Yeah,he could come on and try to pull one back.

Agree0 Disagree0

He's GOT TO play!

Agree0 Disagree0

22 Mar 2012 18:18:02
Just when I thought the moronic element of our support can not embarrass us any more this ridiculous celtictaxcase blog pops up. And we say timmy is obsessed with us? This clown has no evidence and nothing to back up his libellous claims.
I urge every decent Gers man to get on this kn*b's case and tell him to pack in embarrassing us further. He is disgracing our wonderful club and every Rangers fan out there.

VB

Believable48 Unbelievable30

It's been on the go for ages so chill out ffs

Agree0 Disagree0

Not 100% sure what your banging on about , but Celtic have used the EBT's to pay Juninho's wages and stopped soon after.

Agree0 Disagree0

He's hilarious!

Du Wei/Celtic/Derek Riordan/China are all major players in some diabolical scheme according to him, apparently Celtic were trying so hard to cover up the link that they sent Riordan via Hibs (timmy co-conspiritors)!

Give the guy a break though he's obviously not the full shilling.

Mac

Agree0 Disagree0

Best just to ignore him.
Dont give the pleb the attention he desires.

Agree0 Disagree0

Like ideas on here post stuff without any proof to back up he would be better buying a red and black scarf, some flags or going to the legends game

Agree0 Disagree0

The guys got the Celtic fans annoyed anyway think that is his aim, so good on him ,some of the things he says about celtics attendances are more than likely true ,just can't prove it it was still a form of tax cheating

Agree0 Disagree0

The misrepresentation of actual attendances vs gate receipts at Parkhead started in the 1950s and went on for nearly 40 years. It was common knowledge mind you.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ha ha its a parody account
best laugh ive had in years
and they have even got people thinking its true

Agree0 Disagree0

Dont agree, the celtic tax case blog twitter jobbie whatever is a light hearted poke at our noisy neighbours which if nothing else relieves the tedium of 'no news is good news, no news is bad news'

Agree0 Disagree0

Just dont read the thing.

Agree0 Disagree0

Your noisy neighbours who aint in administration lol

Agree0 Disagree0

Why are you so annoyed? Its not much different to a lot of the crap the more crackpot tims are spreading about our club, which incidentally a lot of them are starting to believe. Cheats, stripping of titles- that sort of pish. Anything to get at us.

Agree0 Disagree0

I can see him getting sued!

Agree0 Disagree0

Celtic are the pivot point in an unholy alliance between Ireland and China! This guy is awesome!

Agree0 Disagree0

Totally agree.The sceptic fans are having a field day ripping the p1sh out him all day but are keeping him going. My mate told me that it is a sceptic fan doing it to catch out Gers supporters tweeting sectarian stuff to report them, the gb and the usual suspects are behind it all. He works with a guy in the gb so be very wary fellow Bears and spread the word. A parody of a parody can be very dangerous.

Agree0 Disagree0

This is a celtic fan at the wind up- well done Declan

Agree0 Disagree0

Sadly it is just vicious mud slinging which makes him look like a deranged fool and muddies all of our reputations by association

Agree0 Disagree0

No such thing as libel in Scotland, but you knew that really......just pandering to the Rule Britannia brigade

Agree0 Disagree0

Its called defamation

Agree0 Disagree0

22 Mar 2012 17:55:18
With the new tax laws kicking in on the 6th of April, that any company that has debt and goes into liquidation the debt follows to the new company. Also with hmrc holding back their result of the outcome (they knew the new law was coming) (win win situation for them) is it not best to go into liquidation now to avoid this new law?? Too many rumours of ppl want to buy the club but no action. The clock is ticking and a decision needs to be made now

Believable25 Unbelievable18

Its not HMRC who are holding anything back. The judges are the ones who will pronounce on this issue. ( probably for doom )

Agree0 Disagree0

100% agree with post, we will be a second rate team, paying of a massive debt for years, no Europe and to be honest second fiddle to Celtic for years. This law will hamstring us, and don't forget any punishment from the Spl investigation.

Agree0 Disagree0

Unable to carry out investigation using new law when original case was started under old law,therefore old law procedures must be followed,you cannot change procedures just to gain any possible advantage that a new law may provide,courts would be bursting at the seams if that was the case.

Agree0 Disagree0

Oh.my.god
this is the first time I heard about this one.

but hold on a minute. anyone can start a company. how do you prove a linkage between an old company and a new one?

all you need are a new set of owners, right?

Agree0 Disagree0

Re: "original case was started under old law" I think you have missed the point. Rangers are not facing liquidation at this point in time.

Agree0 Disagree0

Under British law once a case starts and there is an alteration to that law then it cannot interfere with the original case. So therfore the original court case stands.

Agree0 Disagree0

What original court case would that be? we are in administration, not liquidation

Agree0 Disagree0

I didnt say we where in liqudation, (was a rumour) as their is many rumours... i know the new law kicks in on 6th of april, fud face mr osbourn (how ever u spell his name says " the will hammer thos who avoid paying taxs)

Agree0 Disagree0

You cant change a law once the case has been heard in court of session and most definitley not after a jury or judge is deliberating on it so if its true about new law its shouldnt affect this case .

Agree0 Disagree0

As of the original case was started old law, this maybe true, but look at the ppl who went to prison as they didnt have a lawyer with them when they 1st got took in for questioning, then a new law came in saying u must have a lawyer when u get questioned 1st time around, ppl who where put to jail without a lawyer under the old law, got out due to the new law, (in that case the new law over took the old one, if u see my point lol)

Agree0 Disagree0

If after April 6th and the Club is liquidated for tax evasion(big tax case).....NEW LAW follows club.
Becase after that date the club will have been convicted of wrong doing and therefor subject to the new law, If the result of the big tax case is brought in before April 6th and club are liquidated the bids with an interest can start again with a new club debt free.

Agree0 Disagree0

The new law is simply to stop companys going into liquidatation and starting up the next day with a similar name.makes perfect sense to me.debts should be paid ,end of !!!

Agree0 Disagree0

There won't be a rangers if old debt carries onto new company.

Agree0 Disagree0

Scenario:
I steal a lamp from a shop today and get caught and get charged for stealing a lamp and i'm in court next week, however before my court date a new law is passed that basically says i can only steal ONE lamp and if i steal any more then its illegal. Because i was arrested under the first law (for stealing any number of lamps) i would STILL be charged under the ORIGINAL law. I would not be let off just because a new law now supersedes the original one.

Ok thats a bit simplistic but its never the less true. In other words Rangers cannot be charged under the New Law that comes in to force in April because they are already going through court proceedings based upon the current Law.

However goodness knows what happens IF we win and the TaxMan appeals ... i would assume that they could only appeal under the original law and not the new one ... Double Jeopardy would come in to play in that case i believe. Discuss?

Agree0 Disagree0

This law will apply to Rangers if it enters liquidation after 6th April, which is likely. Therefore debt will follow follow whoever owns Ibrox Murray Park (name change?) and starts a new Rangers.

Agree0 Disagree0

Where did you get this "information" from "any company that has debt and goes into liquidation the debt follows to the new company"?? Complete B******T!! companies have seperate legal personality! The debt does not transfer over! If Rangers lost the tax case (and its an if here as no-one can possibly know the outcome yet as it has not been decided! if they knew the outcome it would be released and we would all know ! if anyone could guarantee the outcome then why on hell did they bother going to court??) then they would go into liquidation and cease to exist! A new Rangers would start! NOTHING TO DO WITH THE OLD RANGERS!! it would be a completely new club etc etc! The debt of the old club would NOT transfer to the NEW AND SEPERATE/NOTHING TO DO WITH THE OLD RANGERS football club.

Agree0 Disagree0

You can also not get charged under new laws brought into force, the law used will be the law brought to Rangers at the first instance when they were issued with charges to appear in court! The law cannot be changed mid way through a court hearing!

Agree0 Disagree0

If this "scenario" were to exist then in a few years time every shop/pub etc in Britain would be lying empty as they would all carry debt!

Agree0 Disagree0

When D&P go to Court to start liquidation process, that's when the law kicks in.
They are not on Liquidation law at the moment. Hence if it happens after 6th April, it's the new law that applies.
Some of u guys really are dense.

Agree0 Disagree0

Not the well run profitable shops.

Agree0 Disagree0

I think you might be confused with the insolvency laws that were changed in 6th....April 2010!

Agree0 Disagree0

The new law DOESN'T come into force in April Ed Davey, minister concerned announced in January that the legislation is on hold Indef.

Agree0 Disagree0

22 Mar 2012 17:22:20
Rangers went into administration on the 14th of may 37 days a go. Now we have 4 bids to take over the club. Can some one tell me how they are going to get rid of Mr Whyte? He is the biggest share holder with 85% share of RFC. It seem to me this issue is just being swept under the carpet and everybody is hoping he is just going to go away. Does anyone have a clue? He did buy the shares for £1 which makes the shares his.

Believable21 Unbelievable11

14th February

Agree0 Disagree0

Could be be whyte bought the club fraudulently, certainly under false pretenses.

what is the current share value of rangers shares?

oh right we've been suspended from the trading market, wer're in administration and have 49m + 15m + 24m in the accounts payable column.

seriously how much legality has whytes shareholding let alone value.

Agree0 Disagree0

The man is no fool. He's open to offers.

Agree0 Disagree0

He was and still is a venture capitalist.
We will have to pay for him to leave.
He has covered all bases.

Agree0 Disagree0

The bidders are after rfc and the assets after liquidation

Agree0 Disagree0

I don't understand the question. Whyte has done nothing wrong, morally his ilk operate in a repugnant way, but all above the law.

What I think the real is the real question , Did SDM know how this was going to be funded and did they know each other - we will never know but the 2 Lanarkshire steel men probably bumped into each other at some point.

Agree0 Disagree0

Has the money everton paid for jelavic to whyte ever been traced yet ? doug

Agree0 Disagree0

Liquidation or extinction,you choose !!

Agree0 Disagree0

Come3 in peace bears well put mate wee craigo is alot of things but a mug he aint!
he bought gers with Ł1 out his OWN pocket so he has done nothing wrong in that,the other thing still baffles me in that people are saying that he got the ticketus money before he bought rangers,
NO LENDER ON THE PLANET WOULD LEND TO AN INDIVIDUAL WITHOUT SECURITIES either personal or against collateral , ie rangers,if he then wipes out the debt with MOST of that money exactly WHAT has he done wrong?
& if he has borrowed it on apersonal basis then hes cleared off the debt himself & can keep any monies left over to himself!
do you agree?
marty bhoy

Agree0 Disagree0

Geez a break it was 14 feb as for Whyte he screwed us our club hopefully the police will find him out prison is the only place for him ... Kenny bluenose

Agree0 Disagree0

Why would we want to get rid of Craig Whyte? Is this a rhetorical question? Craig Whyte is the guy who saved Rangers from extinction.

Agree0 Disagree0

Re: Jelavic money
We don't want that to be traced, and it can't be. (Because ultimately the assets our out of creditors reach but will feature in the takeover. It's not rocket science)

Agree0 Disagree0

Do we want to get rid of White? He bought a sinking ship for Ł1 paid of the debt with ticket us money, milked RFC for all it was worth pocketed the Jelavic money and the rest of the ticket us money. Then brought in his own guys to sort the mess out at a reduced rate. Then offers the club to the highest bidder who buys the club with little debt. I reckon in 5 years time we will think he is a legend!
Somebody had to do it! I did not see anybody else try to buy it.

Agree0 Disagree0

Whyte has reneged on the terms of the purcase , he hasnt declared his past bankruptcy which can also make a purchase null and void , however the most rediculous thing is the missing money that hhe may well be charged with so wait n see no way he will be allowed to carry on

Agree0 Disagree0

Jesus is this guy Marty McFly 14th May is weeks in the FUTURE it was the 14th February some fan he is!

Agree0 Disagree0

Can't believe there are still some people here who thinks Whyte was our saviour.He bought the club forŁ1 of his own money (which he probably still owes),and will walk away with millions.How does this translate into saving the club? Should we all bow down to him (if we ever get the chance to see him again)

Agree0 Disagree0

Whyte legally bought the club for a Ł1. so he is the owner. he done a deal to raise money to clear the bank debt which he saddled the club with. legally there is nothing wrong with this as this was done with the sale of mam un. & liverpool as well. but morally it is wrong

Agree0 Disagree0

22 Mar 2012 17:16:27
Hey guys. Thjought this was interesting. Especially as it shows what the administrators were charging a club on the brink! And they picked an investor who the fans clearly didn't have best interests @ heart? Ring any bells??
The firm which ran Plymouth Argyle while they were in administration says the actions of the club's fans put off a number of potential buyers.

The P&A Partnership made the statement in their notice of end of administration report filed with Companies House.

Businessman James Brent eventually took over the club in October last year.

But his takeover only came about after preferred bidders Bishop International withdrew their interest.

"The Joint Administrators identified several alternative interested parties between August 2011 and October 2011 but all withdrew their interest following a campaign instigated by the fans," the report stated.

Continue reading the main story
“Rather than hold their hands up and say they've got it wrong they wanted excuses and the fans were a convenient excuse
”

Chris Webb

Former Fans Trust chairman
Administrator Brendan Guilfoyle threatened to quit in October after saying he and his colleagues had suffered abuse from supporters.

But Plymouth Argyle president Chris Webb, who at the time ran the Plymouth Argyle Fans Trust, refuted the claims.

"Brendan Guilfoyle made the wrong decision in choosing Bishop International as the preferred bidder," Webb told BBC Sport.

"Rather than hold their hands up and say they've got it wrong they wanted excuses and the fans were a convenient excuse."

Webb added that all the fans had done was to campaign for the best person to be given a chance to take over the club.

"If someone was genuine and had the interests of the club at heart and put their money on the table we would have supported them," he added.

"All these things were doing was pushing the club closer and closer to the abyss and we took action to stop that."

As well as detailing the £300,000 that Gibraltar-based consortium Bishop International paid for exclusive rights to buy the club last May, it also shows that the administrators charged time costs of £883,634.70.

To date, the administrators have only received £238,010, but will get a further payment of £112,299 'in due course'.

They will also be paid £100,000 at the end of October 2012 and could get a further payment of £50,000 depending on transfer fees the club receive by the end of the 2013-14 season.

Believable11 Unbelievable2

Interesting ? I havent a clue what its all about lol

Agree0 Disagree0

Interesting? I lost interest after "Plymouth Argyle". WHO?

Agree0 Disagree0

Well worth a read

Agree0 Disagree0

Basically the adminsitrators lingered around like a bad smell racking up bigger debts while trying to find a reputable buyer, they were going to sell to a guy who didn't have best interests of club at heart. As a result the fans protested to get the investor in who would be better for the club and the dodgy guy bailed out.
It basically shows administrators milk clubs dry instead of trying to get the club stable and that is whats happening @ Gers. Today is a big day with Ticketus decision as it will lose 2 investors. It's really turned into a farce @ Rangers/Scottish Football & now the 10 clubs trying to claim more revenue. The Old Firm are the SPL, if we weren't here, they would have nothing. And in any case, IF the SPL & other clyubs didn't go ahead ageainst the Old Firm & Aberdeen in accepting the Setanta deal, we would have been on a better Sky deal and would still have had better players throughout the SPL. THAT is what I believe there is no money in the SPL. Coisty09

Agree0 Disagree0

22 Mar 2012 16:47:22
Am I the only one who believes, as he is fit, that Jamie ness should start every week? He is the sort of player, along with kerkar McCabe etc, that will gain value and become a good, if not better, player for us.

Believable35 Unbelievable15

Won't exactly fill the opposition with much dread. yes, jamie ness could turn out to be a future star provided he stays clear of injury but kerker isn't up to much.

Agree0 Disagree0

Not sure he is fit and anyway rangers are having problems getting insurance for the guy

Agree0 Disagree0

No ur not. Inthink if fit ness should be in the team every week, it's just a shame about his injuries. I dont know if it's true but I heard he has one leg shorter than the other and this is causing the problems. Hope he gets over it cause i think he'd br a star for us

Lee

Agree0 Disagree0

He does have one leg longer than the other and that is what is injuring him all the time. he has had special boots made but he is still struggling

Agree0 Disagree0

Jamie Ness has great technically ability, if he could stat clear of injuries hes surely the best CM to come through since Barry Ferguson (C Adam was usually played out wide b4 u all start lol) he oozes class and the range and accuracy of his passing is of a high standard
Theglasgowranger

Agree0 Disagree0

100% top post. Jamie Ness deserves his chance and this is as good a time as he will ever get to prove himself.

Agree0 Disagree0

Having one leg longer than another is actually a major advantage when playing at Easter Road.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ness is a cracking player but always injured. Kerkar is mediocre at best and for a wide player, he really lacks pace and toils to get past players. If whitty, lafferty,goian,bocanegra & papac r bak along with aluko from the start I'm a confident bear

Agree0 Disagree0

Agree that ness should (and probably will) get game time, but kerkar?? worst player i've ever seen

Agree0 Disagree0

Garrincha had one leg shorter than the other and it didn't stop him

DJ

Agree0 Disagree0

22 Mar 2012 14:13:02
Milan Mandaric is back in to try to pick
up the rangers plc group as the fourth
bidder as he is looking to a club that
he can use to make a move into
regular European football and will sell
his current club.

Believable18 Unbelievable34

Look what legacy he left Portsmouth with!

Agree0 Disagree0

That would be a huge step BACKWARDS !

Agree0 Disagree0

Aye and Harry redknapp is gonna be our next manager pmsl

Agree0 Disagree0

Another Tax efficient owner? What could go wrong?

Mac

Agree0 Disagree0

This is the most uninformed piece of information ever LOL

Agree0 Disagree0

Doesn't make sense.
There is no guarentee that RFC will even have a license to play in Europe next season.

Agree0 Disagree0

22 Mar 2012 13:58:17
League voting structure change: One of the league chairman is highlighting this as "beingabout democratic change". If it was about democratic change they would let all football supporters (season ticket holders and supporters club members) vote on league decisions. This is proper democracy and would ensure that the fans in this counry have their say. Given that 85% of the revenue comes from the Old Firm, I would think that 85% of football supporters in Scotland support the Old Firm, so give us democracy! The grand total of the supporters supporting the other clubs would never carry a majority, and this is why they do not a true a proper democracy like this!

Believable35 Unbelievable11

On the subject of democracy in the SPL and the SFA, without EVERYONE having a say it's not democracy, no one can say the Old Firm are not major players in the game but teams at the bottom of the league and the lower leagues of the SFL should be able to bring their issues to the table too.
It's important to all of us but in the grand scheme of things it's just a game, we should as reasonable people and be able to have our say on the format, fixtures and rules governing our game, after all it's our money and attendance that makes a fixture happen at the end of the day isn't it?
Rather than a Rangers fan group or a Celtic fan group or a Auchenshoogle Stanklifters fan group we should start a Scottish league fans forum who will bring the majority of all fans considerations to bear on the powers that be with the clout to say "If we are not heard we will approach our members to boycott fixtures and merchandise", like the unions can.
As soon as fan power is realised true change can come about, the racism, sectarianism, and general individual club mentality would eventually dissipate for one of solidarity that we as the fans can change the face of Scottish football for the future, make it a better if not finacially richer league.

But then again, that would put idiots out of a fat cat expense account job wouldn't it?

As a once proud khaftan wearing man said,

"Power to the people"

Charli3.

Agree0 Disagree0

What would you rather have two big fish in a load of minnows? Or a competitive league where we cant pick a winner? I'd rather the legendary glasgow rangers won trophies in a competitive league than swap it with septic every now and again.

Agree0 Disagree0

They talk about the greed of the old firm well what about the greed of every other chairman in SPL they would rather keep it a 12 team league rather than increase the league to 18 or 16 to look after their own due to loss of old firm gate receipts if it went to larger league ..so on one hand they want a meeting without old firm to discuss change and then on other hand are happy to live off old firm travelling fans every season .i would say to all rangers and celtic fans to boycott away games and stop giving these parasites money

Agree0 Disagree0

We will still have democracy no mater what they vote we can stay away from their grounds they over charge us they herd us like cattle we sit in cramped seats so lets see how they get on without the fans from the old firm because going by the home crowds ive seen they will be in grounds with about three or four thousand so party on without us

Agree0 Disagree0

What gets me is out with the old firm the other spl clubs have smaller support so they want the big 2 to help out but if and when any of the others reach a cup final they demand more tickets so there fans only want to come out in numbers if in a final,and the old firm do it every week home and away ....b

Agree0 Disagree0

The chairman in question is John Yorkston of Dunfermline FC. Radio Scotland reporting that Celtic's Peter Liewell, will be issuing a statement around 17:30 this evening.
Stevie-A-Bear

Agree0 Disagree0

We should just play the sellick evry week that would show the ungrateful swine

Agree0 Disagree0

Celtic fan in peace. The old firm should have there own channels and let the rest try to get a tv deal without us. Peter Lawell spoke well and also said it was unfair to rangers. We should tick together on ths one

Agree0 Disagree0

The hypocrisy of those teams outwith the old firm is disgraceful. It was the chairmen of those clubs (Aberdeen aside i think) who chose to vote for the Setanta deal over the original sky deal, which has subsequently cost the league countless millions. Had they followed the old firms lead and voted for the sky deal they would have chosen the deal far more suited to the LEAGUES intrest for example, with sky involved, the SPL would have been far better marketed, and reached a far greater audience among countless other benefits. Instead those chairmen took the selfish route and voted for a few extra million each at the leagues expense! They can f*ck off with their average 8000 crowds.

Agree0 Disagree0

Let's hit these incompetent would be spivs in the pockets.
A total boycott by all old firm fans of away games and instead buy more of our clubs merchandise.
A meeting of minds of old firm fans would be a powerful and terrifying thing.

Agree0 Disagree0

What is it with Directors of football clubs? They have this hubris that they are intelligent and cleverer than all the rest of us. When out here in supporter land there's by far cleverer people.

Agree0 Disagree0

22 Mar 2012 08:32:55
Ed have you any idea who this other bidder within the UK could be.

Gus {Ed001's Note - I don't mate, trying to find out now.}

Believable15 Unbelievable2

When do you think the takeover will eventually happen? {Ed001's Note - probably not until the season finishes now.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Once again "a Bidder" has been placed an intrest in the club but has not identified. What concerns me and other business minded fans, is why is the identity of the bidders kept secret? Surely anyone making their intrest known has nothing to fear, or it is just time wasters who think that there is some advantage to be gained by expressing an intrest but not following through? It suggests to me that there is more horrible relevations to come, as that is the only reason these "bidders" do not wish to be identified in the event that mud sticks and they will be guilty by association.

Agree0 Disagree0

Not wanting to go public doesn't have to be for sinister reasons. The people in question may want to go about theory business outwith the public eye until they have some form of clarity on the matter. Fully understandable.

Agree0 Disagree0

Im currently involved in buying a business and believe me I dont want anyone to know any details. Even typing this makes me feel uncomfortable. Imagine if it was multi millions involved and such high profile business? Everyone picking into your life and commenting on you would put anyone off.... Fair play to the current bidders but are they just media hounds basking in the limelight or serious bidders with solid business plans? CheltBlue

Agree0 Disagree0

Did not know buying a pitch in the Barras was that difficult lol

Agree0 Disagree0

Hard not to suspect that Craig Whyte is lurking in the shadows of this mystery bid!
But nothing would surprise us these days.

Agree0 Disagree0

Thats the point who ever wants to buy will be under the microscope, its not as if it is not a private bid, it is all supposed to be open and transparent, and any due dilligence is we are told by D&P in the public domain , so why all hush hush?

Agree0 Disagree0

22 Mar 2012 06:25:00
Herald reporting sources within the ebt enquiry have claimed that more bad news for rangers is on the way....just what we need

Believable29 Unbelievable22

It doesnt matter, if guilty it wont be paid, into luquid and start again, debt gone.

Agree0 Disagree0

Think you'll find that come 1st april when tax law changes - new company would be liable for the debt
so if we're gonna go down that route - unpallatable as that might be! - - we need to go now

bill72

Agree0 Disagree0

Reputation and history gone!

Always to be remembered as the 2011 Reigning SPL champions who went into administration and Liquidation and ceased to exist!

Liquidation is not exceptible for Rangers FC fans.

Agree0 Disagree0

Not true. As of the new financial year starting next month ie ASpril 2012 'New cos' ie 'Phoneix Companies' will be responsible for the debt of the old company the 'came out of'.

Agree0 Disagree0

Read it again, lots of could , buts , if and mebbes, but agree if guilty serious bother. Liquidation might be looking like the best option and hope for the future

Agree0 Disagree0

Oh what an honourable mob you are, have some decency & pay what you owe! even if need be sell what assets you have left.

Agree0 Disagree0

History will never be forgot, will still be gers and fans will accept when we are plus in cash, watch this space

Agree0 Disagree0

I think the sooner all of the worms come out of the woodwork the better.
It will be easier (though difficult) to save the club if everyone knows what they have to save it from. I seems that every day a new nail is hammered in our coffin.

No-one in their right mind would buy into any business if it's debt committment was unclear. We need the whole picture and we need it now!

After all if the Blue Knights win control they want us to provide the finance.

Paul Murray wants to buy the club but doesn't have the money. Every second week there are 40,000 bears inside Ibrox with the same idea! He wants the glory but we have to pay for it!

Agree0 Disagree0

What you all need to remember is that D&P are doing us a favour, the average time for a business larger than the club to wound down and assests sold is 3 weeks.

Agree0 Disagree0

Liquidation means Newco. Rangers 2012 FC. Starting off with 0 trophies and the embarresment.

Agree0 Disagree0

Would we be embarrassed? Yes! WOuld we loose our history and some seem to think? No of course not, history can not be removed.

GDog
WATP

Agree0 Disagree0

New laws set be to passed in paliment april 2012
any tax debts from liquidation will carry forward to any newco
so it wont be debt gone it will be carried forward

Agree0 Disagree0

History of the Old CLub.

Something to tell the grandchildren!

Agree0 Disagree0

Have until 5th April before new law, but if still in administration by 31st March will get penalized by UEFA, SFA and business authorities as still won't have filled last yrs accounts and held AGM all legal requirements for an ongoing business the punishments are only get worse , thanks Murray and Whyte!

Agree0 Disagree0

Legislation to improve the process for 'pre-pack' insolvencies, where firms about to collapse can be restructured and sold, has been put on hold while an "urgent review" takes place. The new laws, which were supposed to be introduced in April 2012, were designed to increase transparency and confidence in the pre-pack process, and clamp down on 'phoenix' companies that collapse and start trading again under another name while leaving former creditors unpaid. The FPB urged the Government not to delay the legislation, and to revisit earlier proposals in order to better protect creditors.


The Forum of Private Business is responding with dismay to a government announcement that legislation to improve the pre-pack insolvency sales process, designed to clamp down on ‘phoenix' companies starting again while leaving their creditors unpaid, will now not go ahead as planne

Agree0 Disagree0

The History will always be there for the club that dies, not the necow and everyone will always ask how much of that history was achieved through legal means...... the plot seems to be thickening every day that goes by. There will always be rangers fans?? Maybe but they wont be supporting rangers I'm afraid.

Agree0 Disagree0

The history will remain, wont go anywhwere, new com created, playing at ibrox, same fans etc, more cash, wont make a jot of a difference. We will always support Rangers, FACT and I beleive Rangers will keep the same name.

Agree0 Disagree0

New Co means New company.

Old Name has to be replaced.

Thats one of the rules of Liquidation.

Thats why Rangers 2012 FC for example.

Agree0 Disagree0

Enjoy sunday guys this may be the last time you witness the mighty hoops in your own place before you need to sell up and move out. the clock is ticking

Agree0 Disagree0

Bullsh*t. There is no way any "sources" would give out any information that would compromise the integrity of a trial. Any source found to have compromised a trials integrity can be tried as a criminal. We wont know the outcome until its announced. End of.

Agree0 Disagree0

22 Mar 2012 06:13:45
BBC Sport Scotland reporting online that SPL 10 moving for structural change to wrestle power and money distribution from old firm.
The 10 clubs wish to change voting from 11-1 to 9-3. Thus instead of one club having a veto 75% can push changes through.
Quote that it's not a case of civil war, it is civil war.
Rangers current situation highly sensitive as SPL will use new powers to redistribute income away from old firm. This will have adverse effect on Rangrs income and may deter bidders. Even uncertainty may deter bidders.

Believable23 Unbelievable7

At the end of the day this is the least of our worries. But I am still appalled.

Agree0 Disagree0

22 Mar 2012 05:56:28
The Sun reporting that Ally showed Kennedy Ibrox facilities and stated it was informal and doesn't mean anything. That he will do it for all bidders.
Tellingly, Kennedy is quoted on record 'I think the key could be what happens with ticketus. Let's wait see how that one works out'
Ticketus ruling due end of next week.
A fourth British based bid confirmed received.

Believable17 Unbelievable3

The ticketcase cant be won.

This is deluding the fans.

D&P are the main winners and the new buyers getting deal of the decade.

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent