Rangers Rumours Archive September 11 2013

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.

11 Sep 2013 23:16:18
Craig Conway linked with a loan move to rangers in january after offloading unwanted players within the camp

MANDERSON 1873

W. A. T. P

Believable6 Unbelievable66

11 Sep 2013 23:40:09
was advised this from a mate just a rumour don't see it happining

Agree0 Disagree1

12 Sep 2013 00:00:07
claptrap. he will go out to another prem club or top championship club.

Agree0 Disagree1

He will go to another championship club. That's his level which is a lot higher than the level we are currently at

Agree0 Disagree1

He turned us down flat in the past, we shouldn't go near this guy IMO.

He needs us to resuscitate his career, let him flounder I say

Jonno - STB Admin

Agree0 Disagree2

We hve just got season started and already you are talking about jan signings unbelievable

Agree0 Disagree1

12 Sep 2013 16:45:29
Whyte would not offer a contract, he didn't turn us down!

Agree0 Disagree1

Why wouldn't a fan want to talk about a rumour for the january window as it is the first time we are able to sign a player from another club since the embargo came into action. It doesn't seem to far from reality i'm afraid pal.

Agree0 Disagree1

Tbh folks we could have had him he wanted to much or whyte didn't give him wot he wanted u can't blame him pickin cardiff 1st the money they wur offerin him

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Sep 2013 23:06:57
My club rangers have lost out in the race to sign bosnian centre half boris pandza, he's signing for royal antwerp on friday 100%, pandza became very disillusioned with rangers over the length of time they took trying to close a deal out, I honestly can't blame the guy because rangers have been supposedly talking with pandza & his agent about concluding this deal from early July, I'm sure you'll all agree fellow bears fans that this is a shocking length of time with now no end result

Believable50 Unbelievable15

Ally wanted him. We can't afford him because crib or some other players couldn't be sold or taken away. For the past 6 weeks all we've heard is we are spending too much. Sledge hammer to crack a nut etc. So if the money men say that's it then. that's it. What's the problem?

Agree0 Disagree1

While we have guys like Perry and Cribari taking a wage we don't have the funds to sign better players. McCoist was put in an unfortunate position last summer where he had to take what players he could in order to field a team. We are now paying the price for this and should be thankful that we were able to sign some quality players this close season.

Agree1 Disagree1

You can't miss what you never had! Pandza may have been a decent player for us, but he isn't coming so move on! As for him blaming Rangers fully, he was made a firm offer some weeks ago and knocked it back in the hope that a "bigger" club would come in to keep his international hopes strong.

In my view, no loss to us - we have enough players of decent quality to take us back to the top league (whatever it's called) and we don't need others at this time.

Jonno - STB Admin

Agree0 Disagree1

He can't be that good if he hasn't been signed by some team until now. He was probably looking for some ridiculous wage anyway. The resale value of him would not be justified by the time we are back in the premiership, when he will be almost 30. I would prefer to bring on gasparratto ( sorry for spelling!), these young guys need 25 + games and then the potential will be seen.

Agree0 Disagree1

10 Sep 2013 23:54:43
Pandza talking to bosnian tv after game he said he expects to be at his new club with everything signed in the next 48 to 72 hours, now that internationals are out of the way, but which club will it be? I personal hope but don't think it will be Rangers now, have heard belgium's Royal Antwerp. (Spelling) are also interested amongst others what do fellow bears think? Will it be Gers or somewhere else? Thoughts plz

Believable11 Unbelievable26

Tbh mate I think if pandza was signing for us then it would have happened by now. Don't think we would be entertaining big zal only to sign pandza. The only reason I would favour pandza is because he's younger. Ruggy bear

Agree2 Disagree1

Would like it to be Panza because of his age, but I think it will be Zal, but he is a good tested player and would do well foe Rangers

Agree0 Disagree1

11 Sep 2013 16:02:11
If it is zal we get then why can't we gp for another player also, pandza reportedly wanted £8k a week I'm sure we would get zal for about £3k a week so if we can only get one player and they are thinking about pandza then why can't we go for zal and 1-2 others to make up the £8k a week? Any thoughts?
R. T. I. D!

Agree0 Disagree1

18,000 a month for this level of football. some mad people here.

Agree2 Disagree1

12 Sep 2013 00:02:58
one or two others? to play were exactly? are you on the baccy m8?

Agree0 Disagree1