Rangers Rumours Archive July 11 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


11 Jul 2012 22:01:02
14 SFL clubs have indicated their intention o vote for div3 and only 2 for div1. Dundee are prohibited from voting and Airdrie are to abstain.
We will require the votes of all the undeclared clubs to get a draw and a penalty shoot out.
Unless we are airlifted into SFL1 the bottom division beckons.
This is not some romantic journey b

Believable16 Unbelievable7

I fear the worst for us, suspension is coming too

Agree6 Disagree5

It's such a definite that a vote on Friday will be for div3, if SFL at all, that they are considering delaying the vote to see if the mood improves over a further 7 days. They tried this with the SPL but they didn't fall for it and voted no to Newco.
There is a strong sense of fairness in Scotland of what is right and what is wrong. Men don't abandon dignity and integrity for cheap promises of league restructures 2 years down the road when the likes of Regan and Doncaster have moved on.

Agree4 Disagree4

Just arrived back in Sydney this morning and went to get a coffee at the airport before my lift arrived. I got talking to a young man from Edinburgh Scotland who was waiting for his uncle to pick him up. The conversation turned to the vote this Friday. This young man told me that the vote will not be of any consequence. he is a sub editor with the Glasgow Herald Newspaper and he told me a big revelation is about to be revealed. Apparently 2 investigative journalists have been investigating the SPL vote from a couple of weeks back and have obtained the phone records of the chairmen for the two week period prior to the vote. These records show that several of the SPL chairmen received a large number of calls pertaining to be from their clubs fans and threatening boycotts, non take up of season tickets etc. if they voted the Newco into the league. The journalists have found that these calls did not in fact come from supporters of these clubs but rather a well organised and orchestrated plot to influence the original vote from supporters of another Glasgow team. They told him that several hundred calls were made from only three numbers to different chairmen, one from a pub in Ireland and two from venues in the east end of Glasgow. He also told me that four of the chairmen who voted against the newco being admitted clearly stated if this is indeed proven to be correct they will immediately demand that the vote of two weeks ago is rescinded with immediate effect and a new ballot held on the grounds that undue influence had been applied which unduly effected their ability to truthfully vote according to their fans wishes. He said the story is presently with the papers legal team and that the journalists are now investigating further evidence that will show a link to a certain organised brigade of people affiliated to a certain Glasgow club. So much for so called sporting Integrity.

Agree12 Disagree15

Still in denial of reality - no east end conspiracy required for Rangers(ia) to die - they have commited suicide!
All we are seeing now is the vultures feasting on the rotting carcas having a nip at each other

Agree7 Disagree4

And I thought there were no more belly laughs in this. What a load of malicious sh1t. You must really believe rangers fans are thick as pigs**t to try and promote that one.

Agree10 Disagree2

Sure it wasn't the bar at the airport you met him in mate. Never heard bitter twisted nonsense like it, it's sad really. Someone else's fault again.

Agree7 Disagree4

What were you drinking mate.Your on another planet.

Agree6 Disagree2

Had you said a govan taxi driver it would have been more credible than suggesting a scottish newspaper actually doing some investigative journalism

Agree5 Disagree2

Ok i admit it was me,i phoned from tipsy Mc stagger,s in ballygobackward,Co mayo, garlar07

Agree4 Disagree1

Wouldn't have made any difference even if true. 10-1 is a huge majority.

Agree3 Disagree2

Dont think you arrived back from Sydney mate i think you are just back from the moon,any excuse to have a go at Celtic, it was death by suicide caused by your own club without any involvement from any body except the SFA trying to break every rule in their own books to try and save the now dead Rangers 1872-2012.

Agree3 Disagree2

You might be back from Australia but your heads still upside down

Agree1 Disagree1

Excellent post, however I can only find a few flaws in an otherwise water tight story. 1. Why would Partick Thistle fans gang up on the glorious Glasgow Rangers. 2. Partick Thistle is not in the esat end of Glasgow and 3. I have no idea how an Irish pub fits into this. On an unrelated note I've heard the real story behind this is that the British government (the ones who own HMRC) sacrificed the super Glasgow Rangers to created a unionist uprising that would squash the independence vote and therefore the SNP couldn't reveal the real use for the trident submarine base. UFO's. True story. Someone just phoned me from an irish pub to tell me so.

Agree4 Disagree1

"the now dead Rangers 1872-2012"

The now dead Rangers plc 1899-2012. The still very much alive Ranger FC 1872-2012 - regardless of which company now owns us. I can't believe how much that really bothers people...

Agree3 Disagree1

That was me that phoned you told you you to keep it quiet,but oh no you could,nt could you,that,s it no more new,s from Mc stagger,s for you.garlar07

Agree1 Disagree1

Get a life fella! "A certain Glasgow club" & "organised brigade". How long did you spend coming up with that p*sh?!

WATP

Agree1 Disagree0

FFS you couldn't make that up, wait a minute you just did!

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Jul 2012 19:33:51
Rangers lost almost £4m while in administration
2 hours ago

Rangers Football Club lost almost £4m from the time it was placed in administration until the end of June.
An interim creditors report from joint administrators at Duff and Phelps has revealed trading losses at the Ibrox club of £3,956,375.
The report also shows administrators fees from 14 February up to the 29 June 2012 of just over £2.8m.
Rangers assets were sold to the Charles Green consortium for £5.5m after a deal with creditors could not be reached.
The club, which dates back to 1872, will now be wound up by liquidators BDO after a thorough investigation into its financial affairs over the past few years.

Believable14 Unbelievable2

And now the sh*t storm really starts. BDO aint no D&P

Agree14 Disagree1

And that loss included the wage savings they had over the past few months, i think we haven't seen the worst yet, how will the 3rd division help pay the rent!

Agree4 Disagree1

Zeus Capital/ Greens consortium to sue Duff & Phelps for £2.75m plus expenses for selling them duff players contracts unenfirceable due to TUPE.

Agree6 Disagree1

Makes you wonder what good came out of Administration ? If we had set a deadline of 7 days, then gone straight to liquidation thats 3 million more that creditors would have had to share out.

Agree4 Disagree0

"Zeus Capital/ Greens consortium to sue Duff & Phelps for £2.75m plus expenses for selling them duff players contracts unenfirceable due to TUPE."

1. Zeus Capital are advisers not part of the consortium - so this indicates your post is rubbish to start with.

2. If Green had consulted with the players and SPFA in accordance with the TUPE transfer rules they players couldn't have walked as they did and he would more than likely have been able to renegotiate them across. As it was Green didb.t follow the rules and shot himself in the foot so he can't turn around and look for compensation from D&P.

Agree0 Disagree1

Same report (if you read it!) clearly states that SEVCO have cash idemnified D&P for the operating loss during the sale/CVA proposal period.

Agree1 Disagree1

Makes you wonder what good came out of Administration ? If we had set a deadline of 7 days, then gone straight to liquidation thats 3 million more that creditors would have had to share out.

Correct but it would have been 3 million less stuffed into D&P's pockets and I doubt green and his "consortium" would have manged to have their "bid" in place in time to purchase over £150million book price assets for £5 million, or was it just £1.5 million?

The sad thing is scandalous as this is, its fairly normal practice. (with the exception of getting assets at about 1p in the pound)

Agree1 Disagree1

I know Green loves the courts and that's his worst facet but in this case I hope he gets something from D&P here. But I don't think he will. He should have done his own legal scrutiny. And legally any claim may be on the oldco rather than D&P. Let's wait and see.

Agree0 Disagree0

Green's consortium to sue financial advisors Zeus Capital and D&P for financial loss of £2.75m plus expenses due to purchase of players contracts agreements. Neither D&P nor Zeus advised players could walk under TUPE, whether a discussion period was held or not.
Fundamentally, players were sold as 'assets' and they were no such thing. They were free agents at the moment Liquidation was decided.

Agree1 Disagree0

Zeus Capital to sue D&P for in excess of £2.75m regarding players' contracts transfers.
D&P assured Green's financial advisors that players could be sold across. Zeus advised Green thereafter.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Jul 2012 19:32:13
Rangers agree to Ortiz departure
11 July 12 19:04

Rangers have reached an agreement with midfielder Juanma Ortiz that has seen the Spaniard's contract terminated.
The 30-year-old moved to Ibrox last summer from Almeria but returned to his former club on loan for the second half of last season.
Ortiz had agreed to have his contract switched to newco Rangers but now leaves as a free agent.
Rangers chief executive Charles Green is contesting the departure of five others who refused to join his newco.
International clearance for the transfers of Steve Davis, Kyle Lafferty, Jamie Ness, Steven Whittaker and Steven Naismith has been put on hold by the Scottish FA as Green continues to dispute the players' status.
Naismith has moved to Everton, Whittaker has signed for Norwich and Ness has joined Stoke.
Northern Irish duo Davis and Lafferty are at Southampton and Swiss side Sion respectively, while goalkeeper Allan McGregor is in talks with Turkish club Besiktas.
But Ortiz, who is expected to join Granada, will face no action from Rangers when he signs for a new club.
"The club would like to wish Juanma well for the future," Green told the club's website.
"The club will not have any objection to an International Transfer Certificate being provided by the SFA and the player has conducted himself in the correct manner."

Rumour Green let him go for free if he didn't take July wages!

Believable15 Unbelievable2

Rumour Ally didn't need him.

I thought the walking away stopped last week. Is it still going on?

Agree8 Disagree0

11 Jul 2012 18:09:03
THE Rangers Football Club has reached agreement with Juanma Ortiz to terminate his contract by mutual consent and the player is now free to move on with the club's best wishes.

The Spaniard, who spent the second half of last season on loan at Almeria, has two years left on his contract and agreed to transfer over to the new company.

However, an agreement has now been reached to the satisfaction of all parties that allows him to leave.

Rangers Chief Executive Charles Green said: "The club would like to wish Juanma well for the future.

"The club will not have any objection to an International Transfer Certificate being provided by the SFA and the player has conducted himself in the correct manner."

Believable21 Unbelievable8

He refused to change any of his previous contract with Rangers, wanted same pay etc etc ,Green didnt have leg to satnd on hence ...gone? cant afford old contracts .

Agree9 Disagree2

Bet gers are devastated. He was a great signing wasn't he!

Agree2 Disagree1

11 Jul 2012 16:48:28
If the 30% Scottish viewing figures for Sky subscriptions quoted on this site earlier in the week, are correct the Scottish Fan base on mass have a large degree of say on how much money is paid the way of the SPL. Presumably when the SPL went with Sentanta the Scottish viewing figures did not drop much due to everyone wanting to watch the Engligh Premier League. Thus the recent offers for Scotish Football have been low ball offers in comparison to the English Leagues (Championship, etc included)
Given the recent evidence of fan power to influence decisions in the Scottish game, could fan power to stop watching certain channels until Scottish Football gets a fairer slice of the TV money. However, more than likely that most of the so called SPL supporters are closet fans who watch English games more than they attend SPL matches.

Believable25 Unbelievable11

The SPL should have thought through these consequences before ejecting Rangers. As it is, they hope Rangers will only be away from the SPL for one season so the TV money isn't lost forever. Rangers newco meanwhile are happy to start at SFL3 rather than be treated as a cash cow for the SPL.

It's a mess and the SPL wants to have both sporting integrity AND exhibition football.

Agree16 Disagree20

Of course most watch English games, instead of the p*** we are served up here.

Example of the quality in SPL, Steve Jennings has joined a 3rd tier English team, before he would play in the CHAMPIONS LGE with Mwell.

Former ''boy wonder' in Scotland...john fleck, has loined 3rd tier Coventry.

Apart from Celtic, SPL teams are league 2 standard, and some are even conference...ICT have signed a couple of conference players to go right into 1st team, the standard is dross, and getting worse rapidly.

Agree13 Disagree1

Considering the population of scotland is only approx 10% of London I find the figure of 30% totally unrealistic bit dont let the truth get in the way of a good scaremongering story....JohnnyG

Agree1 Disagree10

Sky viewing figures are not based on football. A percentage of sky viewers watch football and a small percentage of those are Rangers fans.

Agree3 Disagree9

The SPL did not eject Rangers. Rangers FC was liquidated. The new co FC is making an application as tother clubs must to join the SFA then SFL

Agree5 Disagree3

The SPL should have thought through these consequences before ejecting Rangers. As it is, they hope Rangers will only be away from the SPL for one season so the TV money isn't lost forever. Rangers newco meanwhile are happy to start at SFL3 rather than be treated as a cash cow for the SPL.
Pure Delusion my friend. Rangers ejected themselves the minute they went into liquidation.

Agree7 Disagree4

The SPL did not eject Rangers, they committed suicide and died, Newco tried to take their place, but failed. Now no players, no season ticket sales, an every loonie in Scotland claiming to represent the Oldco's ghost, meanwhile their friends in high places trying to shoe horn Newco into division one.Stop imanining that you have been wronged, you have not , in any shape or form, any other club would have been allowed to die and that would be that

Agree6 Disagree2

I dont understand this whole TV money stuff. What would happen if one of the OF had a really bad season and got relegated? Would sky pull the deal then? Would the SPL change the rules to keep the team in? I would like to think they wouldnt but still since scottish football is now a laughing stock im not so certain.

Agree3 Disagree0

Sky has over 11 million subscribers this country has population of 5 million so your saying of the 5 million people in this country 4 million has sky ?? around 85% ?? away and raffle your donuts

Agree4 Disagree0

Do you really believe Green is "happy" to start in SFL3?

Agree3 Disagree0

As a Rangers season ticket (still not renewed due to the present ownership being as dishonest as the previous) I will continued to subscribe to Sky Sports to watch decent football not the dross which is generally shown on Sky. ESPN subscription has been cancelled though!!

Agree0 Disagree8

Are you missing the point of the the item above yours. It is saying that all Scottish football fans (not just Gers) have strong voice? It makes the whole scenari of Rangers fans being all powerful against Sky a sham. SKY have known from start that the numbers of armchair football fans in Scotland like watching {guess what . yes football} not just old firm thye like all especially The English Premier games. So any boycott by Rangers fans will be negligible. Bet certain bosses of SPL SFL ETC DIDNT WANT THIS LOT GETTING OUT, MAKES A MOCKERY OF THEIR DOOMSDAY SCENARIOS... FOR SCOTTISH GAME.Sky have been conning us for years ,now there's a suprise.

Agree2 Disagree2

The SPL did not eject Rangers 1872 - 2012 it was the 11 member club directors (except Killie ) brought on mostly by pressure from the fans and as for happy to start in SFL3 the newco first need a license which they have not got yet and maybe then try and put a team together, i think at best newco will not be playing in any league in season 2012 - 2013.

Agree5 Disagree1

"Considering the population of scotland is only 10% of London??"

OK... Population of Scotland ~5million
population of Greater London area ~7.8 million. Thats 70% not 10% near as dammit... but you were only out by a factor of 7... I've seen worse (... what was your old job, btw? Finance Officer at Rangers under SDM by any chance "-) ?)

Anyhow, population of ENGLAND is about 51million, so it is fair to say that the population of Scotland is about 10% that of England. I suspect this is what you meant...


but like you say... dont let the truth get in the way of...

Agree5 Disagree0

Tax official with hmrc ? ,they are used to over estimating things doug t.s.o

Agree1 Disagree0

"could fan power to stop watching certain channels until Scottish Football gets a fairer slice of the TV money"

no. How could it? its contradictory. and self-defeating.
It's like asking people not to go to the pub until there are more pubs to go to.

Agree1 Disagree0

If Rangers have died what are you all still so obsessed about?

Agree8 Disagree0

Why should us bears subscribe to sky sports so that the spl/sfa can benefit. div3 it will be for us.

Agree7 Disagree0

11 Jul 2012 17:27:31
Duff and Phelps say they sold player contracts to Green. This could mean Green is due some money for the players but could also put some of the clubs off depending on the amount.
Cannot believe spl still not named their 12th team. This should have been sorted out by now - why not let the fans have their say? Pity it wasn't a club with a capacity of 6,000 seats in the running as the spl could have used that old sporting integrity of your stadia is not up to scratch.
Goian apparently staying to see out contract, good if true.

Believable21 Unbelievable12

Cant sell players contracts rangers were liquidated and all those players by law are allowed to go and seek employment elsewhere so green and duff and duffer are fecked
paulcfc

Agree13 Disagree10

I've read all of that too. Can D&P sell these contracts? Or are the contracts void because Rangers didn't keep their side of the bargain? More money for the lawyers here.

Agree4 Disagree0

Green cant own anyone, you cant sell people its illegal he wont get a penny full stop sooner that is realized the better.

Agree12 Disagree6

If so did duff and phelps consult the players about a change of employer as employment law would state .they are no diffrent from any other employer

Agree4 Disagree0

Good to hear. Something else D&P will be investigated over.

For the last time the contracts can't be sold on or transferred. if players agree to transfer to newco it must be on existing terms. Green doesn't want players except to sell. He CAN'T afford to pay previous salaries. Oldco was losing millions per month (even paying no tax).

Players were/are free to leave as contracts would be null and void.

The fact D&P sold contracts to Green proves they 1) haven't a clue or 2) are conmen appointed by Whyte.

Remember, it WAS THEM who offered the players re written contracts (clauses) to take paycut in march!!

Agree4 Disagree0

Using your logic mate Dunfermline wouldnt stand a chance. They had to close a stand last year due to lack of bodies at theyre home games

Agree1 Disagree0

Paulcfc - nonsense, RFC are currently not liquidated but going through the process. For someone quoting the law you should know that.
Here is a part from the Telegraph -
Charles Green's £5.5 million purchase of Rangers' assets included a £2.75 million payment to purchase the contracts and registrations of the club's players, according to a report by the club's administrators.
So when you get a reply from the Telegraph and Duff and Phelps, post it.
Remember D&P were appointed by the courts.

Agree1 Disagree1

'green can't own anyone' - Yes you are right but they are talking about contracts.
See if any football executives or clubs cant own anyone/players, then players could walk at anytime, no need for transfers, no transfer money, no football.

Agree2 Disagree0

5.5 million now looks like really underselling the value of the oldco assets how did D&P get away with this?

Agree4 Disagree0

I would think if this was part of the contract then green would not have to pay the 2.5 million so he gets newco for 3 million wonder if the liquidators except that or re call it back when the creditors realise their being fleeced

Agree3 Disagree0

CG / sevco (either sevco) CAN'T hold a players registration, they are not a football club, they have no SFL license.
So how D&P think they sold the players registrations to CG/ sevco is beyond me.
The registrations would revert to the SFA.
Contracts - Players have the option to TUPE over, if they don't, they go on a free.
CG is just a chancer.

Agree5 Disagree0

Sounds to me like the negotiations to allow players to leave in cut price deals was a scam reducing the players value that allowed green to transfer players over for 2.5 million rather than them being sold either whyte is lurking in the background or duffs have got an invested interest in this... 8.5 was put on the table for cva 5.5 for refusing it if cva was excepted none if this would have came out this could be a serious backfire that could open up a can of worms

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Jul 2012 16:40:06
My brother in law works at Ibrox and is close to having a breakdown, my sister is not much better.
Everyone at Ibrox knows there will be wholesale redundancies only a matter of time and how many.
Serious doubts that Green has sufficient funds to pay this month's salaries. He will also have to find substantial amount to meet redudancy cost.
Metro Bank was chosen so affairs could be hidden from Scottish eyes.
He says atmosphere at Ibrox and Murray Park is tense and hostile.
Fears SFL3 will be the end for most employees .

Believable28 Unbelievable11

The scale of redundancies if the newco starts in Div 3 will be massive to reflect the new turnover.

Sad times for all concerned.

Anorak.

Agree14 Disagree4

Not sure how reliable that story is, but it certainly conveys the mood and suspicion around the Club just now.

Yes, I can't see where Green will get his working capital from either. There has been no income to speak of into Sevco so I hope Metro Bank give Green a good line in credit.

Agree9 Disagree4

That is a shame.these people are just getting caught in the firing line.although nothing to do with them,only people to blame are those who have mis managed affairs at ibrox.now innocent parties are being made to pay for the clubs misdemeanours.very sad for the small people.artybhoy

Agree10 Disagree1

Of course people will be layed off if we in division 3 as we won't need as many staff, that's just the way business runs. So this isn't a shock to anyone, if you didn't notice most companies in the uk are cutting staff!

Agree10 Disagree2

I can half back this up,i was working for a carer today & they got to go to ibrox/parkhead/hamden grounds as a tour for the oldies and said it was only rangers that done it for free as if they charged them £5 like CP/hampden then they dont knowwhere the money was going.also she was talking to a lady in the kitchen area her/her mother & grandmother have worked in ibrox over the last 30 years & said its just like walking on egg shells in & around ibrox as they dont even know if they will be in a job

no BS edd just the truth

lenny

Agree7 Disagree1

Again. I doubt your source but this reality of business life simply reinforces my belief that today's attempt by the SPL/SFA to "bribe" the SFL clubs to put us in SFL1 is to avoid the nightmare scenario of SFL3 or indeed worse. I cannot understand why some of our fans think that it is the other clubs who are driving this agenda - Those fans who are "hoping" for SFL3 are kidding themselves. The club who will suffer most will be oursleves. Stop the bravado and keep it real.

Agree2 Disagree0

The scale of redundancies at Hall's of Broxburn will be massive also. . . . . . yet Hall's of Broxburn wasn't guilty of corruption, cheating, thieving and fraud !

Agree2 Disagree2

Wasnt that in 94 when you wanted us dead and folk could have been made redundant good ridance to you all and enjoy your second death as sevco is going to die of a slow painful death soon as
JCGE

Agree3 Disagree6

Green and co and just more snake oil salesmen. Thats why they have had to go to a kiddy on bank, no major bank will touch them. Only good news is when we see the back of Green and the rest of his shoddy gang!! No season ticket renewal till then.. PS 3rd Division please and lets see the fun start at some of the SPL clubs

Agree3 Disagree3

Is no one mentioning that if we go first division there will also be large number of redundencies. Club was running at loss during administration of just over £3 million. In other words even though staff and players had taken wage cut they still couldnt make it work? which in essence means one thing! massive cuts in wages and people possibly more, such as close Murray Park and sell the parking area to private developer for hefty sum, but would Green and his backers put it all back into club? Cant see it happening, have been waiting on Green saying words like "we will have to cut our cloth to" etc etc and using the massive overheads as justification of selling parts club on? why are press not hounding this guy with questions on all this? they seem to have been fooled ( again) by his/and previous directors smokescreen .

Agree3 Disagree1

Wish these innocent people could walk away to something better just like the disloyal players did.

Agree4 Disagree1

Always the same, the b*stards at the top who cause the problems escape scot free back to their plush lifestyles. They have no social responsibility, they just carry on as if nothing happened. It's always the person at the bottom of the chain whose life is turned upside down.

Agree5 Disagree0

This is very sad. People forget that innocent individuals are being affected by Ranger's troubles. But wishing them and the Club all the best.

Cardiff City fan

Agree7 Disagree1

Can someone explain why Celtic can run at break even and we can't. When we both have similar income and overheads indeed their wage bill would have exceeded ours with their. Large squad of players ??

Agree2 Disagree0

Can anyone tell me what wages are being taken by directors at this time and in future? looking back at our old regime i see a massive wage bill for these "guys" that love our club? if they "love " our club surley they would work for next to nothing or in fact nothing as most of them have another job anyway? I s it case of invest next to nothing and take thousands or even millions out like ALL previous directors. Has any of them ever not taken a wage? this is the true nature of putting money into gers "easy pickings" .

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Jul 2012 15:42:55
the fans and clubs of the SPL who danced on rangers grave will have their day once scottish football becomes an irrelveance and Sky pull the plug. The anti rangers agenda is beyond a joke. How many sanctions can they make up. We will have our day and build again unlike the rest of the anti rangers SPL who are jealous of previous successes and took their chance of revenge. It will come back to bite them. Boycotting other SPL grounds when we return should only be the start. Revenge will be sweet

Believable37 Unbelievable36

Why do Rangers supporters continually state that they will be back in the SPL stronger and bigger and the clubs that have kicked them when they are down will suffer and possibly go out the game due to boycotting grounds etc. If other clubs go out the game there will be nowhere to come back too. A bit of a contradiction to see the least.

Agree34 Disagree30

Another deranged fan following the crowd.Everything that has happened is your clubs fault.You ran up debt you could not pay and are being liquidated.Every other club is now fed up with your bleating.

Agree22 Disagree20

"If other clubs go out the game there will be nowhere to come back too."
--

Of course there will be, more clubs will be promoted from the SFL to take their place. Don't be ridiculous.

Agree18 Disagree7

They will come back bigger and stronger because its fact due to massive support and resources and the determination to put things right. Boycotting other SPL grounds will be sweet revenge for the anti rangers agenda at present. If we can get into England through the Conference or other then bring it on. The SPL will sink with no TV deal and zero interest. Who would want to watch a one horse race?

Agree23 Disagree21

When the supporters of a club have been treated with disdain(that's putting it mildly)from their peers,then a backlash is expected, especially when they have done nothing wrong.Rangers' massive fan base will carry them back to the top.

Agree25 Disagree19

Completly agree does not make any sense, you made your bed now sleep in it!

Agree15 Disagree12

Whats sanctions?

The 10 point deduction was automatic for gong in administration.
The 160 grand fine was never going to be paid.
You need audited accounts and 3 years in operation to play in Europe, Newco Rangers don't have either.
Why should a newco jump straight in the SPL?

All these developments have nothing to do with any agenda against Rangers/Newco. They are the outcome of a football club that couldn't pay its debts and folded.

Agree18 Disagree9

I think the person who replied about their being nothing to come back to is wrong and misses the whole point. There will always be a top tier in Scottish football with Celtic there and we WILL be back.

I do wish though, that my fellow Rangers fans would stop the complete bitterness and bile, lets focus on putting our club back where it belongs. Lets focus on being positive.

All this talk of revenge is petty and childish.

The turkey's who voted for Christmas will pay, via administration/liquidation or indeed the quality of their team will plummet still.

Sick of the bile, we need to stop focusing on these other teams and start focusing on Rangers.

Agree17 Disagree12

What are the endless sanctions? Everything so far have been just punishments

Agree14 Disagree12

It was Rangers who helped create the SPL in the first place, through greed of wanting more TV money. The rationale of the SPL was tainted from the start and its demise is, not surprisingly, also being authored by TV money.

Agree5 Disagree1

Tbh.. I just look forward to the day th media start talking about something more positive.

Agree10 Disagree2

To the guy who says Rangers(?) will come back bigger and stronger due to the fan base ~I don't think too many fans will stick around if we don't get results in the 3rd if thats where we go. History has proved that our fans are not good at sticking around when the product on the pitch is not to our liking.

Agree5 Disagree3

It is all well and good wanting revenge on those who you think have wronged you but if the game in Scotland goes down the pan what will be left for rangers fans to boycott ? Not much of a league to play in with little or no progress in Europe because the standard of play will be lower.

Agree0 Disagree1

If we are a new co we should have ten points took off us if we get into sfl1 if this happens gers should look south, gazman

Agree1 Disagree2

Yes you will be back. I agree with that.
To all Rangers fans.
But not to Rangers however who can never be back.

Agree2 Disagree2

11 Jul 2012 15:09:11
Has McGregor signed for Besiktas? he is listed on their wiki page. {Ed052's Note - yes just to pass medical now

Believable12 Unbelievable6

Miller and Boyd now McGregor, I hope it works out for him but I doubt it, what a waste!

Agree12 Disagree9

Moving to Turkey just proves it was all about cash.

Agree10 Disagree4

Is this the same Beskitas that's banned from Europe ? {Ed052's Note - As far as I am aware of they are banned from Europe for 1 season

Agree8 Disagree0

Turkish crowds are some of the largest in Europe. There is a lot of money sloshing around the Turkish system. But it's such a dead end for players.

Agree6 Disagree1

Besiktas have no European football for 1 year,and both Miller and Boyd both made a quick exit after an unsuccessful spell in Turkey.
McGregor apparently has the same agent as Miller and Boyd,but was there any interest from any other clubs?

Agree0 Disagree0

Dont think McGregor will settle in Turkey. Its great for a holiday but that all

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Jul 2012 13:02:37
Charles Green has accepted a 12 month trasnfer ban we have up untill the end of the month to get a squad together for the 1st divison or 3rd,

source-bbc

Believable11 Unbelievable28

No! No! No!

Its ilegal. The court of session ruled they cudnae do that.

It wont happen. WAIT AN SEE.

Agree19 Disagree13

It's not illegal! The sanction was against Oldco and remains in place until the tribunal reconvenes.

If newco agree voluntarily not to sign players for a year as a condition of entry to the SFL, then that is perfectly legal.

Agree14 Disagree10

I think we should just wait an see what happens on friday then talk about signings after all no league no need for players , have faith in the sfl to give us a place an be back home at ibrox supporting our team next season ! what u think ED? {Ed052's Note - 1 step at a time mate, after friday at least we will know what leauge we are playing in. then we can go from there

Agree8 Disagree4

As far as I can tell we're going to be administration until the end of July and therefore can't sign anybody until then.

Agree5 Disagree8

Nothing on BBC sites or Twitter, where did you get this supposed story from?

Agree3 Disagree1

Its a stitch up job,place your bets the corrupt sfa will parachute sevco fc straight into divison 1..have sevco a liscence yet?sponsor?wheres the running costs coming from,who actually owns this new entity?

Agree4 Disagree5

To the guy above,the newco isnt in administration mate,

Agree7 Disagree0

Not illegal, just not specified as a sanction in the SFA's articles or whatever. However the SFA rule book does state that it can impose a punishment it deems fit (or something like that) and the court ruling was the opinion of one judge. However the alternatives are suspension and expulsion, if memory serves. Would that be better?

Agree0 Disagree1

Newco is also not a football club! They do not have a licence to play football so how can they sign players?

Agree2 Disagree0

People fall into the same trap over and over.
oldclub and newclub are TWO different entities.
newclub cannot be held accountable for oldclubs wrongdoings, unless as part of a dodgy deal (SFL1) CG agrees to it.

newclub can't sign players as it can't hold registrations, as it does not have an SFA license.

oldclub can't sign players as its still in administration soon to be liquidated.

The only punishment oldclub has definately been hit with is the 160k fine.
Transfer ban - has to be reconsidered by the tribunal.
No Europe - Not a punishment, it is a result of the newclub NOT having 3 years accounts.
10 point deduction for oldclub - Not a punishment, its a result of going into administration.
Demotion? - newclub have never played in the SPL, they can't be demoted they are applying to Join the SFL for the first time.

Agree3 Disagree0

It's all very well saying this will happen and that should happen but consider this for a moment.

It was HMRC that effectively forced the club into administration back in Febuary and the outcome of the big tax case is yet to be decided. So what happens if the old Rangets win that case. Surely the last 6 months has all been for nothing and the club were fined, players walked away and the governing body made an example so where does that leave the club? What compensation would the club get? From both HMRC and SFA and SPL?. Could it be argued that Celtic one the title because of external pressure on the bears purse that was later proved to be rubbish prevented the club from signing players and winning another title.
With the way this has been handled from the outset and still no result over the tax case just thought I would see what the reaction is.

Certainly worth considering

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Jul 2012 10:38:43
Charles Green's £5.5m agreement to buy the assets of Rangers included a £2.75m payment to purchase the contracts and registrations of the club's players.

A report from administrators Duff and Phelps has broken down the "asset realisations" of their sale of the business to Sevco Scotland Limited. It shows Green paid for the club's employees to transfer to his company under TUPE regulatios.

Numerous players have subsequently refused to take up employment with Sevco, exercising their right under employment law to terminate their contracts.

Green has vowed to challenge those who have departed, with the Scottish FA so far having refused to issue International Transfer Certificates to allow players to complete transfers to new clubs.

It is claimed Green also paid £1.5m for "heritable properties", understood to be Ibrox Stadium, Murray Park and the Albion Road car park.

The club's member share of the Scottish Premier League and its membership of the Scottish Football Association were each sold for £1. SPL clubs subsequently refused to allow Rangers' share to be transferred to Sevco at a vote last Wednesday.

The document, issued to the old company's creditors, also outlines the six "credible" offers received for the business between April 4 and the final asset sale to Sevco on June 14.

It also claims a last minute £6m verbal offer was received for the assets of the company from a previous interested party, following the failure of Duff and Phelps to secure a Company Voluntary Arrangement. This was rejected because of a "binding, contractual agreement" with Sevco

Believable10 Unbelievable10

You cannot buy a players contract.Trading in human beings(slavery) is illegal and generally frowned upon in these parts.
You can,however,buy a players registration.That's what happens when a player transfers from one club to another.
When a company is liquidated,however,contracts become null and void and an employee can refuse to transfer to a potential new company owner.Said employee will lose any pension,redundancy rights etc if they don't transfer.Doesn't mean much to the players as they're on short term deals anyway but suits the everyday staff.
When a football club is liquidated,the players registrations are retained by the governing body(SFA).They'll OK any transfer of registration to another club.

Agree11 Disagree9

We all know Green will contest it but in the end they will be allowed to transfer at this point but the amount of people posting on here comparing transfers of contracts to human trafficking & slavery..... really? I'm not sure slaves made thousands a week or had quite that standard of living. What a ridiculous comparison get a grip! {Ed039's Note - It is a very bad comparison and I think it should stop)

Agree11 Disagree5

If this is true then green would only be liable to pay 1.5 million to the administrators as the players didnt transfer if thats the case then i would expect the creditors to object and the liquidators to take back the assets ( which has been mentioned before as a worry )

Agree10 Disagree3

Anyone ever read a football players contract? As far as I know, the terms for appearance money and win bonuses specify which league or competition the match is played in. i.e it is borken down to £x per SPL appearance, £y per Scot cup/league cup appearance, £z per CL appearance.

I find it highly unlikely that any of the Rangers players contracts would have had provision for the club not playing in the SPL and therefore the "same terms and coniditions" element of transferring registrations/contracts to a newco would have been irrelevant meaning an inevitable renegotiation of the terms. It's not surprising then that practically the entire squad have decided not to transfer to the newco.

Agree9 Disagree1

Is it just me or is this whole affair now deteriorating into an unsavoury farce ?

It is impossible to predict anything positive.

Anorak.

Agree13 Disagree2

He is contesting that he bought players contracts allowing him the sales rights of these players. This could amount to £15m+ of income. For this he paid £2.75m.

If he is correct (which I seriously doubt) Duff & Phelps need to be hung, drawn & quartered.

Shug

Agree14 Disagree0

Remember he had guys as part of his consortium who were only interested in the buying and selling of players side and weren't interested in club shares. The players walking and dropping divisions will have totally scuppered those arrangements.

Agree3 Disagree2

Yes finally someone has agreed that this is a FARCE. You lot have nothing for Scottish Football for years, and now all your bickering over your rightful punishment is dragging what's left of Scottish Football even further down. Please for the sake of what is left, go to D3 or hopefully even further away, and let the rest of us move onwards and upwards.

Agree12 Disagree14

What does TUPE mean legally?
Employees who are employed in the undertaking which is being transferred have their employment transferred to the new employer. Employees can refuse to transfer (or "opt-out"), but depending on the circumstances of the case, they can lose valuable legal rights if they do. TUPE states that "all the transferor's rights, powers, duties and liabilities under or in connection with the transferring employees' contracts of employment are transferred to the transferee". This all-embracing concept encompasses rights under the contract of employment, statutory rights and continuity of employment and includes employees' rights to bring a claim against their employer for unfair dismissal, redundancy or discrimination, unpaid wages, bonuses or holidays and personal injury claims etc.
IN SIMPLE TERMS, PEOPLE HAVE RIGHT TO LEAVE ANYTIME BUT THEY CAN NOT EXPECT TO BE PAID "BACK MONEY ETC" OR TO TAKE NEW COMPANY TO COURT FOR PREVIOUS MONIES THEY FEEL THEY ARE DUE. simplzzz
How can Green not understand this ??
And as for ones who have taken the offer interesting reading as follows.
Employees therefore have the legal right to transfer to the new employer on their existing terms and conditions of employment and with all their existing employment rights and liabilities intact (although there are special provisions dealing with old age pensions under occupational pension schemes). Effectively, the new employer steps into the shoes of the old employer and it is as though the employee's contract of employment was always made with the new employer. For this reason it is essential that employers know all about the employees they might inherit if they are planning to take over a contract or buy a business and that they make sure that the contract protects them from any employment liabilities which arose before they became the employer. This is helped by the fact that the old employer is required to provide to the new employer written details of all employee rights and liabilities that will transfer .
Big part in this ? is their exsisting terms rights etc... same money same terms , if Green wishes to change he has to negoiate with players to take wage cut etc ? possibly not going to happen? agents will not allow? wonder what Ally saying to his Player/

Agree3 Disagree0

We want div3 it's all youre greedy lot that want div1 for us to keep the money coming in. There should not be any punishments for the newco. Straight to div 3 & start again. It is the SPL/SFA that are causing this FARCE....

Agree11 Disagree2

The Carbeth Hutters need to buy their land for £1.75M, so that's £250K more than the total value of Ibrox, Murray Park & the Albion car park to avoid Trump demolishing them.

This shows what a farce this is.

Agree7 Disagree1

Okay, the TUPE rules have been posted to death on here (no more please) We understand them, only Green doesn't.

Agree6 Disagree1

"Please for the sake of what is left, go to D3 or hopefully even further away, and let the rest of us move onwards and upwards."
--

What planet exactly have you been living on?

90% or Rangers fans want to go to the 3rd division it is the chairmen of the other utterly hypocritical SPL clubs which want to place us in the 1st division to save your pathetic clubs.

Why can't you understand that?

Agree13 Disagree6

Division 3 ? Be careful what you wish for, it is by no means certain that the newco could generate sufficient income to stay at Ibrox. In my opinion the sums don't add up, if both ticket prices and attendances drop then the newco may not be a commercially viable business.

Anorak.

Agree10 Disagree10

In any other country, any other sport, any other football league, this whole saga would be over, for RFC, any associates, any association of that football club would be disbanded, confined to the history books and corrupt, fraudulent, cheating directors, board members, players and associates of that former club pursued by the law courts on criminal charges, therefore you lot should be thankful that those other corrupt, blundering idiots at the SFA and SPL are bending over backwards to accommodate the zombie re-creation of a football team in any division !

Agree11 Disagree12

Well either it was a ...errr ... duff deal by D&P, selling something for £2.75m which actually had no value. Or Green has a point.

Can't see what he can claim per player, though. How can you say "Whittaker must be £200k, Naismith £250k" when that value of £2.75m could have been anything.

Seems to me there are two issues here, though. Employment contracts and player registration.

Agree0 Disagree1

£2.75m for 13 players doesn't equate to overpament. What type of player can you get for £200k?

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Jul 2012 09:53:35
Just heard that John Brown has set up a meeting at the Dakota Hotel, Eurocentral, at 2pm on Sunday with all supporters groups.
He is going to explain what is happening at the club and his business plan for the future.
Not sure who will be invited but I will keep you all posted when it has been confirmed.

Yours in SPORTING INTEGRITY!

Believable7 Unbelievable17

And what is JB going to tell us??? utter gibberish - Why do some fans keep hoping that a saviour is just around the corner. We'll know on Friday what is happening!

Agree19 Disagree2

Yeah im sure charlie green gets the ok from buckie broon before he makes any decision regarding his own bought and paid for company!!! sinking to even lower depths listening to anything and believing anything that clown brown says.

Agree13 Disagree3

Broon: "Just give me fufteh mulllyun pounds!"

Agree10 Disagree0

I loved Brown as a player, but he is acting like a moron here and is hindering the process of getting on with it as a club. Any true gers fan will tell Bomber to do one!

Agree10 Disagree4

I work in Dakota and haven't heard of this. Not saying its not true but were normally kept up to date.

Agree3 Disagree2

How's Bomber C Nesbitt doing with season ticket sales, has he secured money from anybody other than the pensioner from EK yet?

Although to be fair maybe somebody with even haf a brain has told him not to pursue that line as it made some of Del Boy Trotter's scams look legit by comparison.

Please Bomber step away before you make an even bigger clown of yourself. You're becoming a total embarrasment to our club!

Agree8 Disagree2

"I work in Dakota and haven't heard of this. Not saying its not true but were normally kept up to date"

He only does doorways....

Agree3 Disagree1

Dakota hotel is shut on sun for my 21st b/day bash so i doubt this unless there gate crashing it hey hey

Agree1 Disagree4

Price of bar food in there is scandalous. lol hope hes no buying everyone a pie and a pint with his millions

Agree1 Disagree0

How can an oraotor even of the Der Bomber's class match the classic lines like the ones he used outside Ibrox:

You are the investors the people who buy season tickets, the people who buy the strips, the people who buy the pies...… well not the pies, that was contracted out.

Agree4 Disagree0

I cannot find a video or transcript of Browns speech outside Ibrox, can anyone help ?

Anorak.

Agree0 Disagree0

John bomber brown. On you tube . The part where he says he'll be crashing through front doors with a claw hammer is priceless.

Agree0 Disagree0

£2.75m for player contracts? I have no idea how many contracts we are talking about in total but lets very conservatory say 30 = £91666 per contract. Sure the 11 that have scampered can easily come up with this just to get the minor irritation that is Charlie bhoy off their back

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Jul 2012 08:23:28
is this expulsion being staged managed

will there be any football at ibrox next season

Believable11 Unbelievable6

In order for it to be 'stage managed' there would need to be some clever moves and some clever minds coordinating it. At present I don't see that. All I see is confusion, people who cant make decisions as well as a lot of head scratching from the Scottish Football authorities, clubs and supporters. Seems no-one knows what to do or where it will all end.

We all have to remember that Rangers are where due to their own indiscretions. I'm a Rangers fan through and through but do feel that a one year ban from playing ANY competitive football is a distinct possibility and not in my opinion an unfair decision given the circumstances leading up to where we are today.

Very sad but we do need to deal with it as it's the previous owners of Rangers FC that have put the club in this state and we must make sure it will NEVER be repeated before we can move forward.

Agree16 Disagree8

That just won't happen, The football authorities won't allow it. SPL need the SKY contract to save the league and remember the othe broadcasting contracts riding on Rangers being back in the SPL next season.

Agree8 Disagree9

Look dont no why some fans think we deserve what we get end of the day us the fans have done nothing wrong its the ex owners who should be hit with fines scottish footys just a joke taking this long to decide what to do with us Rangers till i die

Agree12 Disagree12

The fans may have 'done nothing wrong' but the club has and that's the whole point here. I really don't understand why certain people don't think the club should be punished just because the fans are not to blame! Yes, unfortunately the fans suffer as a result but wonder if you'd feel the same way if this was happening to another club. Lets face it - we'd be p*****g ourselves if it was Celtic this was happening to. :)

Agree14 Disagree11

If you want to understand who's driving an agenda, look to see who's got most to lose and most to gain.

can think of only one club who tops both lists.

if we want a competative spl in the shortest possible time we must have rangers start from div 3.

if we want to ensure celtics domination of scottish football for the next 10-15 years, then the div 1 option will achieve that.

and in whose interest is that exactly?

Agree4 Disagree3

Why not that's whhat we're doing right now!.....Randolph

Agree0 Disagree0

No I think Celtic would be winning the SPL for the next few years even with Rangers there simply because Rangers can't afford as good a squad as last season. We might argue that Hearts. Motherwell and Dundee Utd have the most to gain with a chance of CL football (for which they will all go out in qualifiers anyway).

The best outcome for the rest of the SPL was a kneecapped Rangers as per the original SFA sanctions. But that's all gone now.

I'm not a Rangers fan but I think you guys are dead right with SFL3. The SPL can squirm in its own time and implode, maybe consigning a couple of other teams to SFL3 too in due course. Yes, dark days for Scottish football but perhaps necessary to go back to a decen SPL-free structure all over again. It's already happening with the SFA and SPL first bullying and blackmaining, and now grovelling to SFL clubs.

Rangers should have nothing to do with these self-interested governing bodies.

Agree4 Disagree1

If sporting integrity suggests we go to div3 then by all means lets just go and get on with things and see what happens it may take us a few years of hell but the wait will be worth it when were back in the spl and see which clubs fall by the way side as we slowly climb the leagues as we pass them by and laugh at the so called sporting integrity they keep talking about in my opinion we should have asked for div3 when we were booted out the spl but the spl know they need us because were a cash cow still think the vote on friday will send us to div3 and watch as all the other clubs slowly die

Agree2 Disagree2

11 Jul 2012 08:04:10
Does anyone know if Mo Edu is coming back or what ?

Believable3 Unbelievable15

Apparently if he doesn't we are due a fee, not sure why.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Jul 2012 22:34:44
Brown gets Rangers Meeting in Jersey ,announced tommorow

Believable9 Unbelievable7

More chance of brown in a retro rangers jersey next season.the guys deluded,wake up.

Agree8 Disagree1

 
Change Consent