Rangers Rumours Archive May 10 2012
Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.
10 May 2012 22:50:28
If white sells his shares for a quid and agrees to rent back the brox to new owners and cva agreed with creditors and spl vote us back in and sfa let us off and uefa ban us for just a year and tax man is ok with this and ticketus get next three years season ticket money and we don't lose all players after Sundays season end and we sell forty thousand season tickets and if we keep our history which means we stil have sold catering rights and strip rights and the administrators sort it all by tomorrow lunch time, a think, think, we might be ok!
Believable17
Unbelievable7
You are clearly bonkers!! Not even half of that will come true. Lay off the glue.
Campsie Bear
Agree0
Disagree0
Lol, see, you were all worried about nothing!
Joeshmo1888
Agree0
Disagree0
If a cva is agreed then the SPL wouldn't need to vote us back in as we would be remaining (for the time being) in the SPL (with additional points deductions if we start next season still in administration - not sure but I think it is 25 points if that is the case?). Otherwise you have summed up all my worries in a nutshell.
Anyone else heard the radio ad advertising that the kit for next season is out soon? Maybe JJB think its a done deal, lol? Would have to be a CVA though or the badge, along with the history, will be gone.
Brian
Agree0
Disagree0
To the first poster:
Priceless mate, I haven't stopped laughing since I read it. If carlsberg did dreams.............................. Quality.
Agree0
Disagree0
Are u dayin that wen &if 1 of these 2 bidders gets there hands on whytes 85% shares in rangers (which is all of his shares) then the new owers will not own ibrox??
Agree0
Disagree0
I think whyte should rent it back to us for nothing ,then again does the shares not include everything belonging to rangers ,even the arsenal shares ,i would like the new owner to try and buy back the arsenal shares ,they should have never been sold in the 1st place doug t.s.o
Agree0
Disagree0
I really hope that post was funny on purpose, absolute genuis! Best post iv read in a while dont even care if it was one of them that wrote it.
Class
Agree0
Disagree0
Nice one looking good for the future we are back roll on next season we will be even stronger great news
Agree0
Disagree0
If someone buys Craig Whytes shares for the nominal fee of £1, then they own the club, this includes Ibrox and the training ground, and if a stand alone CVA is agreed which is what TBK/Brian Kennedy and the London Consortium want, we will not need to reapply to the SPL we will still be in it as normal, if we manage to exit administration before the start of next season....which would be likely if we get a buyer at the weekend, we would start the season as normal without any points deductions, if we are still in administration its an automatic 10 points deduction again....the 25 points was only givin to Dundee F.C because they had entered administration twice in 5 years. We only need to Reapply to the SPL if a New Company (newco) was formed therefore relinquishing the current Rangers F.C from there place in the SFL and SPL, (what Bill Miller was wanting to do). Hope this has cleared it up for the original poster.
Agree0
Disagree0
To the op rangers might be ok in the future but you wont im afraid mark.
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 22:12:35
Not sure reliable this info is but ive now had 3 texts from guys who are usually spot on with there info claiming the man behind the uk group bid in Joe lewis on ENIC. Joe Lewis invested £40million into while David Murray was chairman. Don't shoot the messenger just thought I would share this info with fellow bears looking for answers
Believable31
Unbelievable27
I heard this too wud be great if true joes worth £3.6 billion himself!
Agree0
Disagree0
Started by posters on Rangers media.
Agree0
Disagree0
Does Joe Lewis not own (VIA ENIC) an 85% controlling stake in Spurs? Would this not result in a conflict of interest.... On the basis that Rangers ever play in Europe again, there would be a possibility that the teams could meet? Is someone even allowed to own 2 clubs from British based FA's (even tho they are standalone in their own right) or would it just be a case that if the teams met in a competition, a team (Obv - Rangers) would have to drop out of that competition for sporting reasons? To be fair if it was possible Rangers loaning non first team/good quality youth from Spurs would provide a great & cheap way of being competitive in the SPL.
Don’t think that this rumour will materialise tho.
Agree0
Disagree0
The poster talking about being able to own ornhave s stake in 2 clubs. I think this applies only to clubs in the same league, eg Scotland and England are seen as separate nations in footballing terms and we compete as such in internationals. Doosnt Vladimir Romanoff own Kaunas and Hearts? So I this this wud b possible, doubt it's anything more than a rumour tho, LB
Agree0
Disagree0
Lewis already chipped in 40 mill years back without any return, he didnt make his money by throwing it away.....once bitten twice shy.
Agree0
Disagree0
Is it not the case that JL has been linked to 'tax issues' or are the just accusations. Can you add anything ED {Ed002's Note - I assume that you sre referring to the ERM issue about 20 years back. I don't remember the detail but it is the regular bitch.}
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 21:52:56
Duff and Phelps, the administrators at Rangers Football Club, issued the following statement today.
Paul Clark, joint administrator, said: "We have continued discussions today with the parties remaining in the bidding process and good progress has been made.
"We can also confirm that Craig Whyte has confirmed that he will transfer his shareholding in Rangers Football Club to two of the parties and has indicated he would not be an impediment to a sale of the Club.
"We will issue a further update for supporters tomorrow and can say that every effort is being made to conclude the sale of the Club as quickly as possible."
Believable9
Unbelievable17
So what' about CW transferring the floating charge? As usual, a D&P statement that leaves you with more questions than answers.
Agree0
Disagree0
Alas, I smell a Typical D&P sh!t blizzard! The clue is in the 'Whyte is willing to sell to two of the parties". My worry is just that, he will probably physically attempt to sell to BOTH AT THE SAME TIME. Let's face it 'His word is his bond" isn't something you could associate with CW.
Agree0
Disagree0
Don't believe a word of what comes out their mouths.
Agree0
Disagree0
Thank god some of you are starting to see through Duff and Duffer, they were appointed by Whyte for Whyte and his dream is to own a club with no debt so that he can sell it on at a huge profit. These fake stories are and have always been a decoy. Down to Division 3 and rebuild a team for the future.
Agree0
Disagree0
Why all the negative d and p have done a great job keeping the club alive and are trying their best they only want the best bid for the club as we are begining to see we are lucky we were not closed down weeks ago give the guys a bit of credit
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 20:26:00
D&P saying no credible offers from bidders yet on the table. values being proposed so far are way of what the creditors would expect in a CVA. I'm worried now that we are running out of time and if is where the offers are today, how do they expect everything to be concluded by the end of the week.
Believable15
Unbelievable15
Once again basic facts. rangers potential debts are £134mm. no european income. season ticket income owed to ticketus. how can you make a profit that would entice an investor?
Agree0
Disagree0
Opportunists tring to pick up the assets on the cheap.
Agree0
Disagree0
£134M is buttons to Joe (I have more money than sense) Lewis!
Agree0
Disagree0
Given they accepted a bid of £11million to cover a potential libility of £134million then what kind of offer have they recieved. This is just the big boys prodding Rangers with a stick to see if it falls over. a CVA is not possible for less than £40 million. If Rangers go into liquidation then you would only buy the bits you want for your new co. If your new co is starting in Division 3 then you might want Ibrox (but not definately) you would not want Murry Park and to be honest you would not want many of the players. So you buy some of the history (trophies etc, even though the new co never won ithem) and maybe Ibrox (but ground sharing is an option). you sign a team for the third division, you make new agreements for kit and of you go. In a few year you have club in the SPL with little or no debt all ready to sell.
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 19:49:48
The new group contains figures who have been in involved at chief executive and chairman level at English Premier League and Championship clubs in the past and Whyte believes they are the only serious bidders.
Don't shoot the messenger!
Believable18
Unbelievable21
Its Doug Ellis, former Aston Villa owner
Agree0
Disagree0
Must be that wee feeder in Engerlund club that he gave the 250k to !
Agree0
Disagree0
Here is something that just dawned on me...could it be that Whyte went down this road of getting all the finances out in the open as he realized when taking over how bad it really was financially, that he may have been duped by SDM? that he thought well this is going to come back and bite us eventually, so lets get it done and sorted so we can move on? then i guess he did not take into account the glasgow media maphia would react so nastily towards him and protect SDM, hense the reason he is getting rid of the shares as quickly as he can as he knows he has no future with the club, but who he gives it too could in fact be able to finance the mess he found from SDM.....I guess only time will tell.
Agree0
Disagree0
Not sure if it was reliable, but somebody told me ages ago that SDM paid Whyte a large sum of money to take the flak for the fall that he knew was imminent.
Agree0
Disagree0
To not sure if it was - if that is found to be the case I think the polis will be knocking on both their doors shortly!
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 19:43:23
The new consortium includes figures who have been in involved at executive level at English Premier League and Championship clubs in the past and Whyte views the group as the only serious bidders...jsm
Believable14
Unbelievable17
That true but biggest one was at leeds & cardiff and we all no what happened there
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 19:03:59
So I just heard No Walter ,No Souness.I wish the papers would stop printing s**te..Listening to Radio Snyde They are saying they spoke with whyte today and he send about the shares .Not as simple as that ?
Believable11
Unbelievable6
CW has said it's dependant on achieving a stand alone CVA. press being selective on what parts are being reported building up the Bears' hopes.
Agree0
Disagree0
Doesn't matter if it's no souness or smith. At least this consortium sounds line they have money. Also saying on sky jst now that whyte will transfer his shares(not sell) to 2 of the parties that are bidding. This at the very least sounds like a step forward. We need a buyer very soon or it won't jst be liquidation of our club that we'll have to worry about because it won't b here. I've not really payed much attention to the nonsense going on as until things are signed and sealed we were still in the same situation. I'll only ever support the RANGERS no matter what, if it's a newco or what ever else I WILL always b there to give my backing. I'm a normal hard working guy, mediocre wages, yet still put £500 into the RFF and that's a lot to my family. I thought so many more supporters wld have put there money where there mouths are. This hasn't happened so it's a waiting and hoping for the best scenario.....
Agree0
Disagree0
The Scottish MSM have only one agenda: their own survival. They desperately want to keep their jobs and so they are happy to peddle any old rubbish( usually supplied to them by Dumb and Dimmer)to gllible rangers fans to sell newspapers.
If rangers go belly up, their newspapers will quickly follow suit.
Their circulation will collaspe, and with no rangers stories to exclusively reveal lamb will definitely be off the menu.
If you want the hard facts about the sad reality of the situation read Alex Thomson's blog and others, and don't pay attention to the lies coming from the MSM.
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 17:23:35
I must admit I am really fed up with all the rumour & counter rumour. With any luck by the weekend we will either be OK or bust!
Never did want Souness back - good player BUT crap manager.
I think we need a fresh start with new ideas and a clean slate...whoever that is.
Believable14
Unbelievable20
He was a great manager fur us ya clown u wanna talk about bad managers then look to our manager right now
TB
Agree0
Disagree0
You're the clown Graeme sourness was a good manager but to compare him to ally is ridiculous! Sourness was a kid in the sweet shop signing England internationalists wher as ally has had to hold the club together with ageing players, young guns and searching the bargain bins! Don't think ally would leave us when we were chasing a title with 3 games to go!!
Agree0
Disagree0
What is wrong with everybody Ally can't go cause no one would have him Souness was in a different class .
Agree0
Disagree0
Dont think SALLY has anywhere else to go m8...........SOOOO SAAALLY CAN WAIT SHE KNOWS ITS TOO LATE
Agree0
Disagree0
Well it's a bit much saying Souness was crap simply because he had a talented side to carry him through. That side played some great football. A crap manager would be someone like Paul Le Guen, by comparison.
Agree0
Disagree0
No, he is a clown because he is on a website called rangersrumours.co.uk and says he is tired of all the rumours and counter rumours WTF!!
Agree0
Disagree0
I love the rumours, as soon as they stop I am off, I am not a Rangers fan.
Anorak.
Agree0
Disagree0
Seriously you think Souness was a crap manager ? that man changed Scottish football for the better. He brought in some of the best English internationals & stuck two fingers up to all the bigoted idiots, by signing Mo Johnstone.
Agree0
Disagree0
....& then he said he is not interested in spearheading a move to save the team?
He did so well at Liverpool, in Turkey at Blackburn & Newcastle too a true legend - better off as a pundit!
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 17:11:47
Said on TV that English consortium been involved with an epl team, different from last night when stated Scottish football connections. I can't think of anyone, any ideas?
Believable10
Unbelievable18
As long as its not anyone who was involved with portsmouth ...lol
Agree0
Disagree0
Knowing our run of good fortune & Duff & Phelps incompetence probably 1 of portsmouths former owners. Who'll in turn bring in Sven Goran Eriksson as manager. I shouldn't be writing this probably true :-(
Agree0
Disagree0
The only name that I can think of is Milan Mandric
SPM
Agree0
Disagree0
Joe Lewis and Dan levy ENIC international ltd
Agree0
Disagree0
Hicks & Gillette anyone?
nr85
Agree0
Disagree0
Daniel levy is the chairmen on tottenham hotspur? honestly folk talk pure pi55 on here
Agree0
Disagree0
Enic international ltd, own spurs with daniel levy being a partner in enic with joe lewis, yes he is the chairman of spurs, but why would it be pi55 to suggest enic could be in for rangers?
Agree0
Disagree0
Bernie Eccleston? I note the comment made by the poster about involvement with an EPl team and Scottish Football connections - Funny emough Joe Lewis fits the bill on both counts. Remember AEG wanted to buy HIS share in Spurs......
Agree0
Disagree0
I hope its not that risdale fella who sunk leeds ?
Agree0
Disagree0
John Madejski? sold his 51% shareholding in reading to wealthy russian family recently for £40mil, staying on as chairman for 2 years but this is probably just to advise new owners i would think and wouldn't hinder him as they are not in same league and unlikely to meet in europe!
Just a thought.
Agree0
Disagree0
Here's one folks - did anyone pick up on the fact that the statements made by D&P yesterday were put out by a female senior partner based in MANCHESTER? Who do you know in Manchester in the EPL and also has links with Rangers? Who do you know is about to complete 25 years in the EPL and knows that his club can no longer compete financially with the 'noisy neighbours'?
Agree0
Disagree0
David Whitehouse is a partner at the Manchester office of D&P ya eejit. This is his admin office!
Agree0
Disagree0
I know for a fact that the consortium consists of at least 8 members known in British sport (not just football).. From what I hear, Sounass was one, Stephen Hendry another, Ex Portsmouth Chairman whatever that tossers name is and the other one I heard was as mentioned in every other bid, Bill Kenedy.. Not for minute am I saying this is true but I've heard from some reliable people who have no reason to lie.. My source came at a corporate do I have been at in Swansea, I also heard Cardiff Re the next team to reveal massive debts.. Only consortiums will buy Rangers.. Party of 8 are people who've vented interest.. Whatever happens, always remember WATP.. Take care.. NS
Agree0
Disagree0
To I know for a fact what are your motives for such an inate statement ' I know for a fact.......Not for minute am I saying this is true.......Whatever happens, always remember WATP....AHHHHHHHH silly me, it has all become clear!
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 17:06:43
News has just flashed that Craig Whyte has agreed to sell his shares to a London-based consortium which will be named as preferred bidder tomorrow.
Believable14
Unbelievable16
Key word there is sell. Noone except Whyte and the mysterious consortium know how much he is asking.
Agree0
Disagree0
It certainly won't be for £1 as suggested by the daily papers, where do they get this rubbish from? do people think he is going to sell shares for a £1 when he could be sued by ticketus for 24 miliion, wake up people, you're be taken for mugs.
Agree0
Disagree0
Shares, but importantly not the floats charge
Agree0
Disagree0
Preferred bidder reminds me of when i worked at the barras...... cmon who will give me a tenner .... ok 8 quid..... no..... what about a fiver surely a fiver ,,,,,,, SOLD to the man with the bowler hat ha
Agree0
Disagree0
The two key points are IF a CVA is arranged and he floating charge. If a CVA is arranged, TIcketus will have declared themselves satisfied, either that their original deal with Rangers is to run or that they are happy with pence in the pound. If this happens they wouldnt be pursuing Whyte, certainly not for 27M as reported. Thats why he'll seel the shares on conditon of CVA. The other is the floating charge. If he has that watertight then he is the creditor!
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 16:29:45
Brian Kennedy insists the Blue Knights' bid for Rangers stands and he has been informed he will hear by Friday morning whether it can proceed.
Kennedy says his lawyer held a meeting with administrator Duff & Phelps and was told it would "revert to us with an answer one way or the other" by Friday.
The offer is the same as the one beaten to preferred bidder status by Bill Miller last week.
"To clarify, we were asked to get to a quantum, which we did," said Kennedy.
"And, having been told it was acceptable, we made a written offer."
More to follow....jsm
Believable11
Unbelievable4
1.5m cash - on yer bike! Even Bng coming in with half his last offer still beats TBK/Kenneddy bid. More free publicity for Kennedy.
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 16:21:55
It's Blue Knights in worst case scenario!
Blue Knights bid for Rangers stands, says Brian Kennedy
Brian Kennedy insists the Blue Knights' bid for Rangers stands and he has been informed he will hear by Friday morning whether it can proceed.
Kennedy says his lawyer held a meeting with administrator Duff & Phelps and was told it would "revert to us with an answer one way or the other" by Friday.
The offer is the same as the one beaten to preferred bidder status by Bill Miller last week.
"To clarify, we were asked to get to a quantum, which we did," said Kennedy.
"And, having been told it was acceptable, we made a written offer."
Believable2
Unbelievable11
The Blue knights and B Kennedy have little funds. They want the club on the cheap.
Also the news Whyte is selling his shares to a London based group is very scarey.
What affiliation is he going the have with the London group. Ally demand clarity.
PS - Ally were you on EBTs?
Agree0
Disagree0
Then they stall and then they say that they will make an announcement next week then when nothing happens they say another bidder from Africa or Middle East or Central America has come forward and an announcement will be made on friday and then guess what? Nothing happens and D&P get richer and richer then they put an offer in but the fans protest and blah blah blah..............
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 16:17:18
emmm was it mid day or midnight the administrators where making a statement today lol....jsm
Believable11
Unbelievable4
It wuz aye but they didnay say wat year ;( Lee.
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 15:41:58
Seeing as everyone's assuming it's Souness ( who has no idea ) or Smith who's involved, I just had a thought that maybe one of them has managed to get John Greig on board. Could this be a possibility ed ?
Scoobs
Believable14
Unbelievable12
Why are you guys so obsessed with getting a football guy like Souness or Smith on board. This situation requires acute business acumen...totally seperate issue here, for god sake look at the big picture.
Agree0
Disagree0
Why would we want John Greig back he knew about all the dealings that have put us in this mess...In ideal world none of the old board involved ever again. So much sh@t has gone on over the last 70 days or so that the utter cra'p that went on before is getting pushed to the background David Murray is culpable for the EBTs the spending of money that was not there etc and dont tell me the board didn't know. I am a Rangers man but I will not be trusting in anyone right now..Fed up being led by the nose and fed b'llsh@t, we the fans have been treated badly and all we have ever done is support our club.
Agree0
Disagree0
Your a rangers fan and you come out with why would we want John gregg back have a word with yourself pal
Agree0
Disagree0
I will tell u why I don't want John G back,
he was my hero , best out against the eastenders, played his heart out a tru blue but, I am afraid mate he let us down as I said he was not in the dark about the dodgy dealings so I am dissapointed my hero has feet of clay and I do not want him or his like back in the boardroom...sorry I upset you and probably others ..WATP
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 15:27:41
Just a poser, is it believable that Whyte is going to hand over everything, walk away with nothing and then wait for ticketus to sue him (as personal guarantor ) for £30M. Got to be more to it than that!
Believable18
Unbelievable17
I agree, if CW sells his shares for £1 as suggested then he is effectively down £26M. If through the CVA Ticketus only receive several million, they will undoubtedly chase CW for the rest.
Either these guarantees are not personal (as reported) but against a company he is happy to liquidate or he will have to declare himself bankrupt.
Or he will retain the rights to Ibrox / Murray Park and the Albion.
Agree0
Disagree0
Surely White would not give up his shares unless the "preferred charge" to Ticketus was transferred over to Rangers? The shares are his only bargaining chip.
Agree0
Disagree0
Never gonna happen THE WHYTE KNIGHT will walk away loaded up to the hilt
Agree0
Disagree0
I think Ticketus are involved in the consortium, they have delivered Whyte's shares in return for them not taking any legal action against him ....... Big Dave
Agree0
Disagree0
He must have had something over and above his £1 offered to him. There is absolutely no reason for him to sell otherwise (unless he really needs that £1 !!)
Agree0
Disagree0
I think Ticketus are involved in the consortium, they have delivered Whyte's shares in return for them not taking any legal action against him ....... Big Dave
_______________________________
If you read Thompson's latest blog, Ticketus have categorically stated that they are involved in no bids whatsoever
Agree0
Disagree0
He will give up the shares if a CVA is agreed. This is what folk are missing. A CVA will get him off of all or most of his liability to Ticketus. At prsent Rangers owe Ticketus but Whyte is guarantor if Rangers cant pay. If they do pay via CVA or honour the deal going forward then Whyte wont be sued. Thats why he'll sell for £1 IF a CVa is agreed. Then theres his floating charge. Thats another story!
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 14:37:53
Can i just ask fellow bears why is it so bad to have an owner that knows all about rangers? tbh i think those days are past now, now is the time to back anybody that will potentially take us over the line back to normal, i think its unfair for fellow bears that are badly wantin rangers saved but there is a set few that goes “ NO WE DON'T WANT HIM BECAUSE HE KNOWS NOTHIN ABOUT THE GERS“ am afraid to say it doesn't matter. quite simply david murray “ rangers minded “ was quite bad, if he didn't sell our kits to a third party then we wouldn't have been in such a mess as we are now, am sorry to offend any bears but any tic fans willin to post vaguely how much celtic earn from their kits? and other possible stuff that rangers could benefit from? cheers guys, as i said no offence to fellow bears just a basic reply not a rant lol, steeeveRFC
Believable15
Unbelievable8
And don't forget the 10 year catering contract !!
Agree0
Disagree0
Like you, I think those days should be passed but the WATP brigade, fester on.
Agree0
Disagree0
Op,
You are a sensible poster. your comments make plenty of sense. i dont mean this harshly, but an old phrase springs to the cranium "Beggars cant be choosers". you have to go wth whoever comes in. Thats facing facts.
Cheers
Tony Bhoy
Agree0
Disagree0
I'd agree I don't mind who owns us providing they run us in a proper manner and have the capital to do so. You're completely right about the shirt sales thing, think how much money Rangers lost out on in 2008 when we made the UEFA Cup Final, merchandise sales would have gone through the roof, to the delight of JJB Sports.
GovanFR
Agree0
Disagree0
Murray wasn't that Rangers minded. He tried to buy Ayr Utd before he bought us, and we should never forget the way he ditched his basketball teams or his Sunday newspaper
Agree0
Disagree0
Aye and the caterin contract mate, forgot about that one, maybe this “ consortium “ should realise this where the money is made for the gers especially without europe for 3 years anybody agree? steeeveRFC
Agree0
Disagree0
I agree govan, am sure tic fans would agree aswell, would have been a few bob anyhoo lol, we shall see what happens in the comin weeks but if i was one of the supporters clubs they should raise there voice and let them know this is how to make money, and you wonder why we are skint “ in some sense“ put money in from your pocket and the rest is profit every year from shirt sales and possibly catering sales, steeeveRFC
Agree0
Disagree0
Clubs don't make much from shirt sales after the initial contract payments.
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 14:37:05
Listen you all read D&P's comments
about one of the bidders having a
Rangers connection and put 2 and
2 together and came up wae
Souness...chill out !
it wont be long now all will be revealed
Believable11
Unbelievable17
Waiting game is the killer mate. Nearly 90 days since administration. Us fans deserve to know who potentially maybe takeover our great club. We have been out on force every week at Ibrox and anywhere else. Don't get me wrong I've loved the amposphere at the games. But now is the time to tell us wtf is going on. Hope it's not another trick to string us along.
John1glasgow
Agree0
Disagree0
Aye? a Rangers connection?.......Ticketus have a Rangers connection!........while D&P top up their pension!.......talk about re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic....just TELL US WHO THEY ARE!
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 14:32:41
things are looking up bears, admin says the new bidders have rangers connections....jsm
who could they be ???...jsm
Believable8
Unbelievable19
That's terrible news...look at the mess they got us in first time around. Would you trust a bloke that ****ed your wife ?
Agree0
Disagree0
Maybe its her maj, maybe she thinks if she does a deal with whytey she might get some of the money shes owed
Agree0
Disagree0
No different from Bill Millar Bid . As soon as they look at the level of debt involved , they too will be off
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 14:29:26
Dont be in the least bit surprised if
Ticketus are not involved in some
shape of form with this UK based
consortium bid. There threat to sue
Whyte has done the trick and this
is the reason why he is selling his
shares for a quid in return for no
legal action being taken, Ticketus
will then have a deal in place with the new
consortium to recoup some of their
investment as they know going
chasing whyte who could declare
himself bankrupt would mean they
get nothing..watch this space !
Believable12
Unbelievable13
That sounds about right. The deal will be structured in a similar way to the one they had with TBK before they pulled out. Ticketus will put working capital in up front. Liquidation was never an option as the assets are worth very little in liquidation.
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 14:06:40
Souness has been interviewed by BBC, he has no knowledge of any UK consortium bid for Rangers and said even if i did know i have no intention of coming back to Rangers! Come on D&P what's happening? You said yesterday statement on new bidders would be made by lunchtime today.
Believable11
Unbelievable8
As usual another time point passes. I don't know wy D&P even bother to state when things will happen. They haven't got it right yet.
Agree0
Disagree0
On the 1st June the money runs out. It will cost a new owner millions with no revenue streams to tap into. This is what will put rangers into liquidation
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 13:38:07
Some of the papers saying that Souness and Walter are involved in this mystery new UK bid - this is the stuff of dreams, i hope its true. I think Neil Lennon would be so scared of potentially facing Souness, he may resign over the summer rather than deal with an angry tashmeister or Sir Walter again.
Believable12
Unbelievable31
Grow up what age are you Why would Lennon be scared. Sourness doesn't even have a tache now... Stupid post why did I even reply ?
Agree0
Disagree0
OH my god! The Lennon obsession again.You ever thought walter legged it cos Lenny had his measure?
Agree0
Disagree0
So your mickey mouse club is in melt down. You have no money, unable to pay wages, players leaving and unable to sign more, about to be fined millions, facing more sanctions for cheating and you wanna have a go at Neil lennon. What a Muppet you are an embarrassment
Agree0
Disagree0
Lol keep dreaming billy, only side o Glasgow not walking away is green, the big hoose is closing.
Tashmeister? Really? Lol
Jelly n ice cream
Agree0
Disagree0
Let's face facts - this is not going to happen. Souness not interested in return to Rangers.
Agree0
Disagree0
Who would trust these 2 EVEN if the rumours are true? watty is one of the main reasons you are in this mess! PS souness has already been on the bbc & said he has no knowledge of this D&P cr@p.
Agree0
Disagree0
You ever thought walter legged it cos Lenny had his measure
----------------------------------------
smith beat lennon as manager more times than lennon won so how can lennon the measure . jesus one league title and yu think the guy is a god
Agree0
Disagree0
Was a msytery to souness at least
Agree0
Disagree0
Ha ha ha oh the timmys are panicking big time, wont be long before you are back where you belong - Scotlands runners up.
Agree0
Disagree0
Why would NL be scared, would they start spending MORE money they don`t have?
Agree0
Disagree0
To the post 2 above - so Smith beat Lennon as a manager eh!
I think you will find they faced each other 8 times
The record is Lennon 4 wins Smith 2 wins and 2 draws
So yes Lennon did have the measure of Smith!
Agree0
Disagree0
The main reason we ended runners up was due to rangers cheating via financial doping. I suspect this isnt an option any more for rangers.
Agree0
Disagree0
Only hearing what yous want to hear. Dp say potential bidder have rangers connections and automatically assume souness. Then souness is on record saying he had no idea of a consortium and has no intention of a return to rangers? Clutching the straws young Williams lol.
Agree0
Disagree0
Timmy is pyoor beelin' about the above post! Face it, Lemon would run a mile than come face to face with Souness, never mind Sir Walter 'hammer of the celts' again - FACT, SIMPLES, FACT AGAIN.
Agree0
Disagree0
Yes I'm sure Lenny is going to run away scared from a knackered Rangers team.
By all means brig Grandma Smith back and we'll see how he does on a level playing field.
Agree0
Disagree0
Please remind me how many titles has smith won fairly, ie without the use of ebt,s/dual contracts
Agree0
Disagree0
Sir Walter* 'hammer of the celts'
*note: walter smith had the benefit of funds other teams used to pay the taxman.
you want to consider the following as the men who broke the gers:
Fergus mcann, Dermot Desmond & peter lawell - ensured excellent financial housekeeping.
Tommy burns - his excellent, legally funded team forced rangers to keep spending.
Wim Jansen - bought henrik larsson. enough said
Henrik Larsson - enough said
Martin O'Neill - forced rangers to spend even more
and finally - D murray, Dick advocaat, Walter, Ally mcoist - his inability to win anything & qualify for the CL. And Craig Whyte. they all played their part.
Agree0
Disagree0
LoL....
You mention Fergus McCann, the man who the greatest fans in the world booed (after he saved you're club,built you a new stadium,gave you a financial stable footing,funded a team to stop 10 in a row)
While he was unfurling you're first championship flag for 10 years...
Short memories bhoys....
Agree0
Disagree0
Fergus McCann was bood because the simpering Murray lickspittles in the Daily Rectum were writing about the 'buscuit tin' mentality at Celtic and how McCann was being too tight to spend any money on players when they should have been hailing his sustainable spending.
Rangers fans arent the only ones who were misinformed by the MSM
To mr FACT AGAIN I reckon Lenny would love Walter Smith back at RFC to see how he does without loaded dice.
Agree0
Disagree0
I was at the match when fergus was booed,it was probably a quarter of the ground. I was emabarrassed to call them celtic fans - but they were.end of day not all fans have the intellect to go beyond tabloid cac & unfortunately thats what shapes their opinions.
Agree0
Disagree0
I did mention fergus as I (tho not all celtic fans) recognise his pragamatic financial management. not sure if that fact that some thickos booed him changes that?
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 13:22:19
Ally has been very quiet! What's does he know that we don't I am very uncomfortable with these 3 new bids, Ally was very vocal over Bill Miller now nothing?
Worried Bear!
Believable16
Unbelievable3
Souness is coming and Ally is busy looking for new job - thats why he has nowt to say.
Agree0
Disagree0
It maybe has to do with the fact that Bill Miller had a not very thinly veiled dig at Ally in his pushing back from the table speech... He said something along the lines of, "I spoke to members of the staff who were more interested in what money was going to be available to spend" ...
Ally perhaps embarrassed about being called out for showing a bit of business immaturity in how the club moves forward...
Agree0
Disagree0
Ally does what he's good at.Looking after ally
Agree0
Disagree0
Maybe he is like us and has heard it all before and will reply when there is something to reply about.
Agree0
Disagree0
Reason he aint made any comment is simple, he is waiting for the guy who is working him with his hand up his A** to tell him what to say next!!!!!!
Agree0
Disagree0
Ally is still in Tennessee - he's not back yet from "looking Bill Miller in the eye". ha
Agree0
Disagree0
Maybe he has learned from Last Pre Season about shouting out about possible targets etc and that the best option is in fact to keep schtum until there is something to talk about!
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 13:14:52
Souness denies any link to Rangers bids! Its all i have heard today, Souness is back! Once again its all lies Who makes this sick stuff up?
SounessesThighs.
Believable13
Unbelievable5
Excitement is high and certainty is low. Doesn't take much of a rumour to go viral. Smith was probably just the first name someone thought of when Whitehouse said "someone popular with fans". Souness was probably the first name someone else thought of. Pure speculation, although those two were the most likely I suppose.
Agree0
Disagree0
If you were on the administration gravy train would you not be inventive to keep it going?
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 10:53:04
First time poster. All I want is a resolution to this mess and our great club be saved if possible although liquidation is a real threat. is a real possibility. Punishment is deserved although not to the degree being mentioned. How can taking 75% of taking earnings help a club in dire financial straits help. I would take a point deduction if our great club is served. I want the integrity of the club to return and would love debts paid esp our footballing ones. I'm rangers through and through and am disgusted by those who have brought our club to its knees. Once a ranger always a ranger
Believable19
Unbelievable12
Souness is not involved. Re: 75% reduction in payment. Surely you are aware the function of punishment is not to help the club in dire straits, but to change their future behaviour. Sanctions have to be meaningful and cause discomfort to act as a disincentive
Agree0
Disagree0
Why should anyone want to help. Name me one kindness shown by Rangers in the last 50 years'.
Agree0
Disagree0
So tell us what punishment do you think Rangers deserve
Agree0
Disagree0
Are you delusional?
Rangers have cheated their way to almost every title under the stewardship of Sir David Murray by way of Criminal tax avoidance and alleged double contracts.
Do you think the rest of Scottish football should help you now?
Rangers deserve every punishment and more for this continued breach of rules and clear cheating.
I'm disgusted with this and by the way I am not a celtic fan. I am a Scottish football supporter and rangers have been rotten to the core for decades.
I have zero sympathy as does just about every non rangers supporting fan in Scotland.
Agree0
Disagree0
Why did fergus help celtic then celtic were a joke with there dept at least we had great players at rfc
Agree0
Disagree0
To the non rangers fan, as you say alleged so how do you justify saying that Rangers have been cheating for decades. Even this, if proven, is only since 2000. As for the mess we're in at the moment there is only one man responsible - Craig Whyte, due to non payment of PAYE etc. If the BGT is found in HMRC's favour then and only then can you categorically say it's been happening since 2000. Just hate this attitude of all other fans that we've been cheating for years.
Scoobs
Agree0
Disagree0
Because Celtic were not tax avoiding cheats
Agree0
Disagree0
As I say scoobs you are clearly in denial. Are you 12 years old mate? Santa does not exist.
Rangers have cheated Scottish football for years and it's good to see justice being done. Your "proud" history is shameful.
On behalf of all fair minded Scottish football fans we welcome the punishments.
Agree0
Disagree0
I know a 75% is a punishment but how can the club trade with little or no money. I know we've being doing this. I would suggest a points deduction for the next say three years. Once a ranger always a ranger
Agree0
Disagree0
To Scoobs. Rangers have been found guilty of cheating. The BTC was awarded in HMRC's favour. The result we are waiting for is an appeal, not against the charge of using EBTs, but against the penalties for doing so. If I remember rightly, even if Rangers win the appeal they are still due to pay £24m in unpaid taxes. So you have been cheating.
Al
Agree0
Disagree0
I stand by what i said earlier. How can you say you're fair minded and insist we've been cheating for years. And please no more childish comments about being 12 or santa. I'm 38 and have been a season ticket holder for at least 10 years. Punish us by all means. I for one would rather go to the 3rd division. But please don't insinuate we've been cheating for years. Bit of a cop out saying you only support scottish football too. You must favour one team ?
Scoobs
Agree0
Disagree0
Rangers got what they deserved, dry your eyes and move on. Frankly with them not paying PAYE for a year they deserve the embargo. Signing Wallace, Bocangera etc with money they never had, they have cheated you plums.
Agree0
Disagree0
"So tell us what punishment do you think Rangers deserve"
as a celtic fan I think the punsihment should be stripping of all titles during period of financial doping & subsequent 3 yr european ban.
Agree0
Disagree0
Al, I never said we hadn't, but if you look at the origiinal post i was replying to, the poster suggesting it had been going on for decades and all the time that Murray was there. EBT's only satarted in 2000. I admit that i'd missed that this was on appeal now but what annoys me is the implications cheating was going on well before this time.
Scoobs
Agree0
Disagree0
The BTC was not awarded in HMRC' s favour. HMRC gave rangers a tax bill and said you owe us this much pay up. Rangers within there rights appealed the bill and where HMRC had proof of any wrong doing. That is as stands right now. The appeal court will either uphold HMRC's bill with penalties or find in favour of Rangers.Nothing proved about guilt yet although if it does go against Rangers expect all the evidence to then come out.
Agree0
Disagree0
Buying players without the money to buy is what just about every transfer consists of no club pays a full fee the pay over a agreed amount of time. Celtic are £6million in debt so how do they buy players they pay over an agreed timescale. As regards the Wallace transfer Hearts are not due the next installments until July I think. When the debt to other clubs is mentioned it is because if gers go out the game they can not possibly pay the next installment. The whole transfer system works on good will of clubs accepting a payment plan.Rangers are stil owed money from players that have left aswell.
Agree0
Disagree0
£6m in debt celtic may be but look at the saleable assets & also how celtic have lived within their means i.e. only buying what they knew they could pay for. or being honest you could say
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 10:43:02
Craig Whyte to give up shares for £1 but gets to keep Ibrox Murry Park & Car Park, which he will lease to UK consortium then use the lease money to pay back Ticketus through sale of season tickets, It's messy but it may just work!
Sounesses Thighs.
Believable15
Unbelievable27
If that is indeed the case, we then have to move on to the next big problem of HMRC.
Agree0
Disagree0
Ibrox, Murray Park & the Albion car park are owned by the club. If Whyte gives up his shares how does he get to keep assets of the club he would no longer own?
Agree0
Disagree0
His shares not his floating charge which is a completely different thing.whyte is going to get every penny (not as much as he thought) out of the rangers fans by leasing Ibrox & MP back to those that will charge the lifeblood of the club(the fans)to pay for it. Shame on him and im a CFC supporter but my bro in law is at the end of his tether with whyte.
David murray!!! well I will leave him to yous to decide, but i hope to be exchanging banter with yous next season
Agree0
Disagree0
If this is true then CW has brokered an excellent deal for himself.
However he'll have to fight HMRC and the creditors to keep those assets.
Agree0
Disagree0
Why did Ticketus not do this and put pressure on Whyte from the start? It would have got the ball rolling earlier. Ticketus must know more than us? more chance of a return from Whyte than a liquidated club!
Agree0
Disagree0
Dont get too excited. Reading the whole article, it states that HMRC will want to run the rule over any prospective buyers, Since Murray, Souness and Smith were all part of the alleged EBT,s they could say "not on your nellie" therefore Duff & Phelps continue on raking in lots more expenses, what do you think.
Agree0
Disagree0
I would take Whyte back into the fold if it means our club is saved!
Agree0
Disagree0
I doubt if HMRC would object on the basis of EBT history. They just want their money. (Taxpayers money).
Agree0
Disagree0
Whitey will want 3 million a year in rental income so another big hole in long term funding
Agree0
Disagree0
Whyte may be trying to get back in some way but SFA would put a stop to that.
Agree0
Disagree0
No chance. Whyte's floating charge has been set aside by D&P. Why would he be allowed to transfer £120million of assets (book value) to himself. I don't doubt that Whyte would love to make a deal like that, but then reality kicks in
Agree0
Disagree0
And who would own the stadium and murray park if ticketus were eventually paid off , craig whyte?, if so then what?, rangers would still be under his thumb,fancy that?
Agree0
Disagree0
I do not believe this for a second.
Unless an agreement is in place that we get the assets back once the £30m is paid then IMO this wont happen.
Also if he rents us the stadium, the tickets are nothing to do with him. Why would you pay rent on a house and then pay a mortgage aswell. If we lease it, all he would get was the lease money. We get to keep ticket money.
However as mentioned above, I dont believe this is the deal. However I like everyone else dont know facts, an TBH christ knows what this duff an duffer are playing at!
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 09:57:07
Yes its true, Souness is back, but just one problem, wasnt it he and SDM and WAlter who began this scandal? I cant see the Revenue just ignoring that fact and giving them the assets for just a few million !
Believable13
Unbelievable19
The scandal began after 9 in a row when SDM started chasing Champs League with the potential of joining ESPL to earn big ££££.
Souness helped awake the sleeping giant by bringing big names to Ibrox but at the time Rangers were one of richest clubs in Uk as SKY was still the big blue where the sun lived.
Agree0
Disagree0
EBT'S did not start till 99 nothing to do with sourness or smith on his first stint as rangers manager.!!
Agree0
Disagree0
Souness and Smith are not to blame. They are not accountants. They don't write the checks or figure out how to pay wages. They only requested players. If we couldn't afford them SDM should have said no. But that didn't happen. I welcome their return. Rangers minded forward thinkers will be our saving point.
Agree0
Disagree0
I would welcome souness back with open arms. That guy brought us the beginning of one of the most successful eras in Rangers history. Lessons have been learned. now we need a strong leader
Agree0
Disagree0
In a word no! if you are refering to ebt these were set up AFTER Souness and Smith
(first time around) had left the club so try to put blame on these guys is just stupid.
Gary
Agree0
Disagree0
EBTs started 10years after Souness left and Walter managed the team not the finances so what has it got to do with them. The only man to blame is Murray.
Agree0
Disagree0
According to bbc news souness is not interested in coming back to rangers
Agree0
Disagree0
I think you will find out soon about Smith's involvement with EBT's.Why would 'Sir' Walter need a bank account in the Cayman Islands?
Agree0
Disagree0
"EBT'S did not start till 99 nothing to do with sourness or smith on his first stint as rangers manager.!"
--
You are wasting your time, facts make no difference to them.
Agree0
Disagree0
Its not true Souness is NOT back! On speaking to BBC he stated he had not been contacted by any consortium nor would he be interested in a return to Rangers. The consortium from England stated they wanted Souness involved in any deal to take over the club when speaking to D&P. Who are these idiots another debacle!!
Agree0
Disagree0
Why would anyone want that man involved in anything? He's the arse of all arse's, for god's sake let's draw a line of how low to go!
Agree0
Disagree0
Re.. Cayman islands
Why would Any highly paid professional have a foreign bank account ie most people paid a highly excessive amount of money. Any 1 with a accountant pays minimum tax
Agree0
Disagree0
Do you think we will ever get clarity who was on the EBTs?
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 09:49:34
Whyte has agreed to sell his shares
for a quid to the group led by
Walter Smith.
Looks like timmy hasn't seen the
last of the man that's got the
beating of them.
WATP
Believable10
Unbelievable25
. The great surnameless one returns. Aye, he's gonna head up a team that's broke because he played a hand in causing it. Wonder if he's gonna work for free seeing as he had an EBT. Get a grip!!
Agree0
Disagree0
I think they call it cheating ,and have you lost your memory this is the bloke who ran out the door as soon as he clicked on it was comming on top ,i have no dout that rangers are in the sh=t when peaple like you are to do with any thing even comments on this page ,every time walter won any cup it was tarnished or shall we just call it theift
Agree0
Disagree0
And your daft enough not to rememeber that his and dicks spending killed you off !
Agree0
Disagree0
Do you mean the guy that bought Jelavic that he knew he couldn't afford and brought a team all on EBT's to UFEA cup final. Aye he's good alright. Cheerio Cheerio Cheerio Celtichampions and we have payed our taxes Bigirishmac
Agree0
Disagree0
Here we go the WATP muppets have returned, fair weather supporters
Agree0
Disagree0
Yeah Timmy is delighted that the great business entrepreneur Watty is leading the consortium...this is not football management, this is business. You guys really are so naieve...we are pissing ourselves with laughter
Agree0
Disagree0
I believe that Walter is a great family man who loves his children and grandchildren and would hold the same values as Bill Miller - will he squander his money away on Rangers?
Agree0
Disagree0
You truly are a muppet. Your team is vying for its life and all you can do is fantasise about a manager who hasnt managed a club for years. As if he will want to be associated Witt this lot just now. Behave yourself.
Agree0
Disagree0
Walter Smiths spending did not kill us off. Smith is only a manager the board sanction signings. As for jelavic he was affordable money was paid on agreed dates until final payment which was not paid by Craig Whyte at the time of the signing lloyds was running Rangers and would not have sanctioned the signing if unpayable. As for talk of taking away titles is irrelevant unless double contracts are proved.
Agree0
Disagree0
Re Muppet comment......The guy that posted wrote Walter Smith he managed last season you MUG... Learn to read before being sarcastic.....
Agree0
Disagree0
Back to the arrogant posts "WATP", my god do you guys ever learn...obviously not. You lot really are the most obnoxious set of fans on the planet and the sad thing is that you will probably be actually quite proud of that...sigh
Agree0
Disagree0
He didnt have the head to head beating of neil lennon
Agree0
Disagree0
Re Re Muppet comment: I think he was refering to Souness, not Walter (Legned) Smith.
Al
Agree0
Disagree0
Lets see how Smith does against Lenny when he only has money that the club can afford to spend for new signings. Rangers couldnt afford Jelavic clearly as they still owe Rapid Vienna money for him.
Agree0
Disagree0
ON games Lennons team has smashed Smiths... FACT
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 08:41:24
With 3 bidders in the frame I'm feeling more optimistic than last week. Love to see Soundness involved. Heard he has BIG money behind him.
Hopefully Dumb & Dumber will pick the prefered bidder today to allow the sale be completed by the weekend.
The transfer windy opens in a couple of weeks an Ally needs to no what he has to spend.
Believable3
Unbelievable24
Ally can have as much as he likes to spend but with a 12 month transfer embargo still in force then he isn't going to be able to do it. Also whilst the club are still in administration (with no CVA agreed) then they are unable to conduct transfer business.
Agree0
Disagree0
We cant buy anybody ..my god
Agree0
Disagree0
Will Ally still be there if this is the scenario? Despite criticism from some quarters,I think the guy deserves a chance. What other Gers manager ever found themselves in his position?
Agree0
Disagree0
I may have missed something here but,,, arnt rangers under a transfer ban ? Which to me means they can't buy anyone over 18 for 12 months ?
Agree0
Disagree0
I am feeling more optimistic today too given the names I am hearing, but only slightly. We have been here before, nothing ever materialises and there are still so many obstacles to overcome.
If Whyte is selling his shares for a pound then surely Ticketus will turn their attention back to Rangers to secure their outstanding debt? They won't just lie down and take nothing. The only viable option to effectively deal with them would be a stand alone CVA but we keep getting told that that is a long process and we no longer have the luxury of time for that route.
In addition we still have the results and more than likely additional sanctions (which WILL be heavy if proven) from the various outstanding investigations/court proceediings (BTC, Dual Contracts, etc) to face up to at some point too.
Furthermore, although the floating charge issue would become a moot point if Whyte did keep the assets and lease them back, I would still rather chase him out and never have him anywhere near us again for the things he has done to be honest. Unfortunately I can't see a way around his continual involvement with the club unless some mug pays him the 30million he is after or he somehow transfers his floating charge/assets to Ticketus to pay off his own debt to them, for no personal profit, and we lease the stadium from them until the debt is paid? Can't see it somehow but it would get rid of two of the more serious burdens in one go.
Even if that was the plan all along then why has it taken so long and why would a consortium proceed to buy a club whereby the only remaining assets worth any residual value are the players, who may yet walk away for nothing in the summer anyway if the PFA are correct in their assessment of the situation? The new owners would be left with little or no assets and a shed load of debt and would have to invest massively in the club just to keep it operational with no hope of breaking even or turning a profit. Who in their right mind would do that?
The situation gets more and more complicated and makes less and less sense to me with every passing day. If we are to survive then this sorry fiasco is far from over unfortunately. We will just have to wait and see what comes out and hope for the best.
One thing you might want to reconsider about your post though mate (before the Celtic fans tear into it unmercifully): unless you know the result of the appeal and it has been kept quiet then it is irrelevant whether Ally is given 100,000 or 100 million to spend, there is a transfer embargo in place and we can't buy anybody for a year.
Lets just find a way to survive first (thats the most important thing) and then take it from there. If that means starting as a newco in Division 3 (my preference), even with no history and the removal of numerous titles from the record books if these cases don't go our way, then so be it. To be honest we would fully deserve it as a club (not as genuine supporters) anyway for acting in the manner we have over the years.
Brian
Agree0
Disagree0
Glasgow isnt big enough for Souness and Coisty to work together!
Agree0
Disagree0
If my memory serves the only reason Ally got to be Gers legend was because Souness left for Liverpool. He hated Ally and did his best not to play him!
Agree0
Disagree0
"What other Gers manager ever found themselves in his position?"
Bumped out of five competitions before the end of Feb.
Al
Agree0
Disagree0
To the will ally still be there. - I hope not! He was not in an administration position when we got humped out of Europe and chucked away 15 points get real hes crap.
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 00:40:23
Seems to be a lot of rumours that Souness is involved. Wealthy as he is he does not have the money we need. I would think that it is likely to be involved with Brian Kennedy, he is big pals.
However that does not meet the statement that well known in Scotland. They would not describe Kennedy as that.
Duff and Phelps seem to suggest that they have the finances to do a deal, that would also suggest not Kennedy, as his bids have been low up to now.
I wonder if McColl is involved. He has stated that he would not get involved, but maybe the reality is that his team would die.
I know it is impossible to make money owning a club, especially in Scotland. I know people will say that the reason that he has all his money is because he doesn't waste money. That is true but if I was in his position I really believe I would get involved, apparently his fortune rose £150m last year alone to take him to a billion. If he spends £50 or £100m, so what he still has £900m. What do you do with £900m?
This is wishful thinking, I know, but it's nice to go to kip with nice thoughts.
Believable2
Unbelievable19
Souness has already said that he has nothing to do with it. It is Duff and Phelps just prolonging the process again, They cant get a bid sorted before the weekend, its impossible. Also another media nonsense saying the Watty is in as well. The media are playing us for fools.
Agree0
Disagree0
This is a difficult deal, and being badly managed. Unless there is sign of a euro-league or a brand fit that opens up Asia market, what are the long-term prospects weighted up against the debt and reputation damage being done. Even people with money will baulk at this deal; it would take massive management to turn this around. If you had the money, would you really want the hassle? Fans co-operative is the only way..otherwise it's Liquidation.
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 00:23:19
Big rumour, Souness on his way back and his group have bought Whytes shares.
Believable32
Unbelievable55
Always known for his philanthropical love of the underdog when it is in distress. Just the man to want to get involved with a club losing £1m a month. Know for his love of Ally. Made Ally the judge of football he is from the bench. Ready Aye Ready!
Agree0
Disagree0
Cool, he can explain all about the EBTs
Agree0
Disagree0
Who is behind this group?
What money do they plan to invest?
Is CW still part of this though hidden in the background?
Agree0
Disagree0
Rumour is that it's a Souness and Walter Smith consortium. One of the others is Bill Ng and the other is still a mystery. Apparently Brian Kennedy is back in the frame but not one of the 3 that have submitted bids. Anyone any ideas who the other one is?
Agree0
Disagree0
Hes coming over the hill! Its the Grand Old Duke of York (D&P) they march our emotions us up the hill; and then march us down again. All the names being mentioned don't have the cash needed to run Rangers the way we want Rangers to be run.
Agree0
Disagree0
It seems a CVA may be possible and when it is agreed, I would like all posters who abused me for my optimism to apologise.
Anorak.
Agree0
Disagree0
Lets not forget that Souness was the guy who kick started the wreckless spending that led us here today!
Agree0
Disagree0
Anorak - D&P stated that a CVA was not possible a few days ago thats why fellow bears don't agree with some of your posts. I don't think anyone is abusing you mate; have a cuppa or go have a lie down.
Agree0
Disagree0
10 May 2012 00:01:37
souness to return and whyte will sell his shares for a pound they have written documents wats he up 2
Believable30
Unbelievable15
So we are now into blackmail too, great
Agree0
Disagree0
1st he wanted 2 seats on the new board and millions of pounds NOW he will sell for a £1 as jim royal would say MY AR@E
Agree0
Disagree0
Blackmail how?
Agree0
Disagree0
I would take souness back in a heart beat. Souness and coisty.... cva.... has christmas come early?
Agree0
Disagree0
What's who up to? CW seems to have thrown in the towel. And if the Souness story is correct then I really think he's in it for the football. Just hope he knows what he's doing.
Agree0
Disagree0
In an historical sense was Souness not part of the over-spending problems of the Sir David Murray era!
Agree0
Disagree0
This is not happening. No Souness and no giving up of shares. This is Duff and Duffer at their tricks again. Souness has already denied it.
Agree0
Disagree0