Rangers banter 65910

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


(single word yields best result)


19 Jun 2020 16:57:28
Coully

Your talking singlefish, candiaes was full of endeavour, but couldn't cross a ball, end of story, we also need a couple of midfielders who can hit a ball from distance to many times we try to walk the ball in, no one can hit a ball,

Agree3 Disagree0

19 Jun 2020 17:35:52
No one has done better in that position that’s my point, him going is fine if replaced with better, if it was a barker/ candeias debate between Gerrard and Allen that caused the apparent fall out. I’m not saying candeias was amazing but he would have won his place in the starting line up back fairly quickly judging by how we have played on that right hand side this season. Personally I think Kent has looked better on the right the couple of times he has went there, and we should have the others fight if our for the left, hagi middle.

19 Jun 2020 18:07:54
We should never have got rid of candieas👍.

19 Jun 2020 18:41:37
Coldo what did we ever win with the candy man He was rid rotten we need more than someone willing to give 100%.

19 Jun 2020 19:00:32
Candies wasn't rotten.
He was very up and down though.

19 Jun 2020 19:12:51
Coldo, don't take no notice of KJA9 mate. He's TRYING to be a wind up merchant, which quite obviously AIN'T working!

19 Jun 2020 19:47:24
Have to agree though Candeias wasn’t the answer he was average at best and wanted to leave rather than fight for his place.

19 Jun 2020 19:53:24
We have a midfielder. who can shoot and score, his name is Docherty and he should be in matchday 18 every week.

19 Jun 2020 19:55:32
I thought Candy was very decent and I agree, he should still be here.

19 Jun 2020 20:35:58
KJA9, what did we ever win with candieas? Surely going with that theory then you imply that Gerrard and the rest are not good enough, because we haven't won anything with them either🤦‍♂️👍.

19 Jun 2020 21:29:07
If you think Candeias is good enough for our team then you are a lost cause he gave 100% and that’s it.


SGL I ain’t trying to wind anyone up, I am just posting opinions and asking questions like most do on here.
Problem is the majority of the time you post it’s utter BS
Also you have shocked me as you have went a couple of days with out mentioning the start striker that is Dykes.

19 Jun 2020 21:39:21
Really liked Candeias. He done a lot of work tracking back and I would have no problem welcoming him back.

19 Jun 2020 22:35:42
For the record pal i think your posts in general KJA9, are utter p**h! Forgot more about football and the famous glasgow rangers, than you will ever know and i genuinely believe/ mean that! Don't give up your day job pal, because you're utter s***e at trying to wind fellow bears up on here!

20 Jun 2020 08:37:48
Candieas was good enough, he proved that against celtic and in europe. He actually made tav look a lot better. I'm not saying that he was a world beater but he certainly wasn't as bad as you say. We'd have done a lot better with candieas in the team than ojo jones barker stewart etc. I'm afraid you're the lost cause if you can't see that. So how does your theory of not winning anything with candieas compare to Gerrard and the rest? That's a ridiculous statement to make, are you going to explain or defend it or are you just going to name call? 👍.

20 Jun 2020 09:47:33
Candeias was decent player but not good enough for us. He did help cover frailties of Tav though if you think that should be job of RW.

20 Jun 2020 13:55:48
SGL that’s good forgot more than I ever know lol don’t be ridiculous you don’t know anything about me for a fact and I am a coach of a kids team that have done pretty well thank you very much for saying everything I say is total pi) h because the majority in here think that about you.
Have a nice day auld yin maybe have a half and calm down.







 

 

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass