10 May 2020 12:53:34
Just read Douglas Parks post well put and to the point. I have read a few other articles by other clubs including WhatsApp message seems different outcomes promised to a few clubs. Favours being sought. Indeed even handedness required. Surely there are still true honest men in all clubs who could run a league.
10 May 2020 13:37:42
Now we have Park saying Rangers will pay for the investigation "SHOULD" the other clubs vote to hold one when he knows full well they have already indicated they will NOT support our request.
Is this just more hot air to please our supporters with little substance to back up the damning evidence the board say they have.
How long will this saga be dragged on to make our humiliation ten times worse.
10 May 2020 14:05:51
If cost isn't an issue then what reason do clubs have to say no? That's what they were hiding behind before.
10 May 2020 14:08:31
Bluebilly, rangers must keep full throttle on this mob, even IF they don't get the required 75% vote from the other 41 member clubs on tuesday! Douglas park and john bennett have given in-depth, terrific interviews, over the last 2 days and i certainly back and believe them! If its a marathon to take these useless f*****s down then so be it! We've got our feet on their throats, now let's take the air out their windpipes! Doncaster, mclennan and chubby checker mckenzie couldn't run a sunday morning youth league.
Lets take these 3 OUT! They're absolutely out their depth, there's no question of that. We're by far the biggest football institution in scotland and very capable of squeezing the life out of these f******s, let's do it! We are the ESTABLISHMENT, of the scottish game!
10 May 2020 14:53:12
SGL well said. As I posted earlier in the week Rangers must go for the jugular and get rid of these people. ðŸ´ó §ó ¢ó ³ó £ó ´ó ¿ðŸ‡¦ðŸ‡ºâš½ï¸ðŸ˜ŽðŸ‘.
10 May 2020 15:03:13
I don't think there's any 'humiliation' in what rangers have done.
10 May 2020 15:23:45
I'm definitely not defending Doncaster, McLennan and co here as I want them gone but the SPFL clubs should never accept one club offering to foot the bill for an inquiry.
If anybody disagrees then please tell me hand on heart what they would say to Lawwell offering to do the same.
10 May 2020 16:06:28
just read inverness caleys take on it, that should answer your question for you, more crap to hit the fan yet.
10 May 2020 16:18:36
Hi Steven G L.
I will be over the moon if we can get rid of the corrupt SPFL board members .
Only thing is, I feel like a few others do on here that if we do have damning evidence it should have been made public before now surely.
10 May 2020 16:38:02
So bluebilly, you don't see any foundation in our dossier, no blatant lies from the SPFL, no panic from them, been on the tabloids every day pleading their innocence, and trying to belittle our Club, without I may add, giving any contradictory alternatives to what we have stated. There is a growing discontent amongst these other Clubs now, and the SPFL Board know it.
10 May 2020 16:57:50
You don’t get it do you billy . you have swallowed all the hype that the spfl have been spitting out about smoking guns and corruption and of them bullying ( quite clever really ) non of which was ever claimed by rangers .
The inquiry is the vehicle for finding the corruption and factual wrongdoings. If we had that evidence we wouldn’t need an inquiry ðŸ‘.
10 May 2020 17:08:25
Iv'e not seen any dossier Irvine ger.
All I am saying is surely the damning evidence should have been made public long ago, not that we Do not have "any" evidence mate.
Where Have I said we do not have any evidence although I have said I have my doubts we have enough to topple Doncaster and his sly cronies.
10 May 2020 17:25:34
you've lost me Mols,
So now you tell me we don't have evidence of wrong doings the enquiry is to "find" evidence of wrong doing and if we had the evidence we would not need an enquiry.
As I say you have lost me mate, or are you just at your one upmanship game to your fellow supporters.
Your Quote.
(The inquiry is the vehicle for finding the corruption and factual wrongdoings. If we had that evidence we wouldn’t need an inquiry)
10 May 2020 18:20:06
Blue billy have you watched John Bennett interview and read Park Q&A then the Falkirk ICT and Partick thistle statements you read them if you can’t see there’s an issue not much point in trying to argue.
10 May 2020 18:38:04
Geronimo all it’s doing is closing an avenue they (SPFL) were attempting to use to by once again using financial fear to try and control the vote
Does it not show how seriously we’re taking this?
Doncaster still using project fear again today
So again as I and many ask if you’ve nothing to hide why so vehemently attempt to obstruct the granting of one
All the Tim’s worry about use the tainted 9iar and the fact They potentially lose their leverage by losing the 3 Lawell stooges.
10 May 2020 19:05:22
Bluebilly I don’t mean any disrespect but you don’t seem very well informed it sounds to me like you are reading headlines from red top rags and coming up with your own conclusions. At no point did anyone at ibrox say they had proof of bullying nor proof of corruption that is why we need the inquiry what we did say is we have proof of poor governance witch I think was proven in the dossier the rest has been hyped by said redtop rags. I believe an independent inquiry would prove bullying and corruption and that is why the SPFL spin doctors have been working overtime to try and discredit us in the media and you one of our own, and your not the only one on here, have been sucked right in your calling your own team embarrassing and humiliating if that’s still how you feel maybe you should just stick your head under the duvet till all this blows over, we’ll give you a shout when all this is cleared up ðŸ‘.
10 May 2020 19:06:11
Geronimo, mr park is offering to pay for this inquiry, he is not asking for walter smith, derek johnston and ally mccoist to do the inquiry, he is willing to pay whoever the authorities would use, ie, qc, and sll legal bodies, what's the problem with that mate.
10 May 2020 19:33:57
Highland. put a lot better than ever I could and exactly what I was trying to say .
Blue billy . sorry my friend no attempt at one up manship
The mistakes I have made during this episode are embarrassing including phoning Clyde about votes being changed . when it is allowed under company law .
I didn’t even know the spfl were a registered company and thought they were an independent body . so we have all learned a lot during this episode.
The fact that the spfl are bound by company law is their downfall right enough . and every point we have put forward, and other clubs for that matter, is that they are evidently not representing all members fairly. This is the smoking gun . not corruption . bullying. cohesion etc which are all deflection tactics put into the call oark by them .
Stuart Robertson is duty bound by company law to whistle blow from the board room if he sees infallibility.
Cheers blue billy no offence meant my friend.
10 May 2020 23:00:06
Bluebilly, I wasn't having a go mate, there are transcripts of the main points against Doncaster and McLennan and Mackenzie in the papers, and also 19 pages of summary points somewhere in this Banter section. You may have a point on the timing of the release of our information, I felt the same, but, it is having some positive vibes from other Clubs now.
11 May 2020 00:54:13
Irvger, the club can't announce what we have just yet, telling them the story only gives them time to get there side of lies ready, just like a court case, you don't know rhe evidence until the last minute, giving the accused less time to try getting an out for it, fact, mate.
11 May 2020 12:04:02
all evidence that will be used in a court case has to be declared beforehand to both sides FACT Park will pay for investigation will it be Nimmo Smith again.
11 May 2020 12:31:02
highlandbear you claim no-one at ibrox said they had proof and that the investigation was to uncover the proof yet they called for Doncaster and McKenzie to go before any proof is it not innocent until proven guilty in this country.
11 May 2020 13:25:38
Sporting integrity Douglas Park suggested they should be removed for poor governance and also as their were accused of bullying and coercion, you are correct in a court of law you are innocent until proven guilty, however if you’re accused of wrong doing in a work place quiet often is the case that you will be suspended pending an investigation. If no wrong doing is found you would be reinstated and paid in full for your time off, if on the other hand you are found to be guilty then you would probably be removed from your position permanently. Hope that’s cleared things up for you ðŸ‘.
11 May 2020 16:12:12
Sporting int, i know that more than most on here i'd imagine, but the courts keep the accused guessing for as long as possible, that is why they must give an accused person 30 days notice, of the evidence, if the accused is in custody. fact.