Rangers Banter Archive May 09 2013

09 May 2013 19:48:38
Who are these Easedale guys?. Looks like they are actively purchasing an increasing stake. Heard all the 'own a bus company' stuff but I just can't see these guys having the right clout. Can u see a pair of bus company owners splashing the same type of cash Dave King could?. Doesn't make sense, and it makes less sense that I've never heard them mentioned around Ibrox since 8 months ago. If they were heavy hitters around Ibrox I'd have heard of them b4.

On the other hand, I hope if it goes ahead that I'm wrong.

Who are these people

Dave King

Have you done any research into this guy

Have you seen the charge list

Do you think we should sacrifice the good name of our club for an injection of hugely tainted cash

Dignity and the Rangers way?

What would Bill Struth have said?

Dave king put £20 million into rangers, and took out nothing for all his years at ibrox, which is not something you can say about the parasites inside ibrox now. dave & hugh

I've said it before at least king is a home grown villain who has put his money where his mouth is before.

10 May 2013 21:24:41
Tainted cash?? how do you know? he is a self made multi millionaire, from galsgow, and loves Rangers, Is that not enough for you?. / or do you know every other football directors cash and earnings are squeaky clean,? people at the top of business are there for a reason? Tommyblue

09 May 2013 17:10:14
McCoist says he is looking forward to working with the Easedales after meetings in which they shared a common view on how to take Rangers forward. Well he hasn't said it yet but he will, just like he did with Whyte, Green and Mather. I should imagine making the initial decision to sell yourself out to these sharks would be the hardest, but when youve done it a few times it must get easier, its a shame he couldn't pick up the football manager side of things as easy. We must not another summer of boardroom wranglings allow McCoist to slip under the radar again.

Mccoist has backed murray, whyte, green, and now the easdales. he was a legend as a player, but I have no respect for him at all now. get him, and all the board, management team out now. please, please let bdo come out on the 1st of june and cancel everything and sell us to the highest bidder. dave & hugh

As Manchester untd talk of a manager who can run a club on less money than those round about them. we get?

What a ridiculous post, first of all saying he backs easdales then saying well, not yet. really? then its the old chesnut he backed everyone that has come in but, didn't all the fans do exactly that as well and so easy to have a pop at him and make him the scapegoat whilst the real culprits slip away with their bounty. so get real poster and aim your venom in the right direction

I have a question. dave & hugh?

not taking the proverbial here, I am genuinely intrigued.

are you two guys who live/work together and share a computer, are you two guys who live/ work together and share all opinions or my favourite scenario.

you are a schizophrenic who sits there arguing with yourself about what to write, and if one half doesn't agree with what the other wrote, you have a fight and punch yourself in the face. shammy

I meant to say dave & hugh. you always write in the singular tense. shammy

Shammy. we are two guys who retired abroad with our families. we share the same views, and talk on the phone every day. when we post, we sign as dave & hugh so the other person knows who wrote it. sorry this didn't fit with any of your theories, especially your favourite one. i'll just let you retire to your darkened room again. dave & hugh

Cheers dave & hugh. I wasn't taking the piss. I was genuinely intrigued . but I have never ever had a mate who agreed with everything I said.
i don't live in a darkened room. my life is bright. we will get ten in a row. dave and hugh will continue to accept every charlitan con man, thief and scoundrel that takes control of shambles utd.

by the way, why is it always dave and hugh. ant and dec. does dave always sit on the left . hugh you are the lesser partner in this relationship. you are always second. shammy

If you bothered to read any of our posts shammy, you would see that we were against green from the beginning. two words, venture capitalist! we don't want any of the people green brought in, and certainly want mccoist out. we're hoping bdo nullify the murray/whyte/green sales. we are passionate about our club, and talk about rangers all the time. being reasonably intelligent, we share the same opinions. i'm sorry you have no friends who share your intelligence. oh, and I won't bother answering any more of your intrigues. dave & hugh

09 May 2013 14:44:45
Every time I see a picture of green in the papers, It makes me sick, I believe D&P will answer for the mess they have put us in, 2 venture capitalists, you could not make this up, all they are is asset strippers, and now we are seeing the work of the snake green, hope the liquidators cancel all previous deals because of fraud, and sell again to the biggest bidder, and before you all jump on the bandwagon about shares, I have some shares myself, I don't care if I lose them as long as the vermin from down south all lose theirs as well.

09 May 2013 12:47:55
As far as I hear and am led to understand, Whyte's case against Green will crumble. As has been stated on here and other forums, there is overwhelming belief the Sevco 588 documents are forged. I personally believe Green was not that stupid to leave himself exposed to such accusations of involvement with Whyte.

That said, the investigation will not clarify WHO does own the deeds to Ibrox, MP etc. So although we should avoid any further SFA repercussions we shall remain in the dark regards ultimate ownership of RFC assets.

Rather than investigating links between Green and Imran to Whyte, I hear the investigation could be more fruitful looking at connections between Green / Zeus and SDM / MIH.

Remember the most common trick used by "confidence tricksters" is to create distraction. I am being told that is exactly what CG/Whyte investigation is!

You'd think our intrepid news-hounds would be aware of this story circulating WITHIN Ibrox. or are they still in the pocket of SDM from the days of serving "succulent lamb"?

SPM

Why would the investigation not clarify who owns the title deeds of ibrox, etc? surely an examination of the documents would suffice? or are they owned by sdm and held in trust by green. dave & hugh

If what you hear is true where do Worthingtons come in? They had a QC and a deputy Judge assess the paperwork before deciding to back Whyte in the court action. I would have thought that the signatures on the document would have been the first thing they checked. Where I do agree is the distraction theory.

Cost £2m to prepare IPO - and that could not see the deeds.

So £500,000 on delliotes unlikely to settle issue - deeds in sunday mail?

Name on deeds, who that owner is (Blue Pitch? who they. murray by shadow name), and any chattles (charges) on it.

Should take 10 mins. no wait. its murkier than that

If deeds belonged to green/rangers Ibrox would have been renamed months ago as Green promised. its such a simple job to accept the money and change the sign. this is proof positive that green/rangers don't own the deeds - they can't rename something they don't own.

Whyte has a company of lawyers/ QC behind him being financed by another firm who believe he has a water tight case. Whyte has partners/ witnesses to signatures. He has signed documents and he has tape recordings of Ahmad and Green.
All Green has is a denial he signed a document. And he's been known to tell lies.

IPO prospectus states that RIFC plc "has the use of Ibrox Stadium". hmmm

(7) OP. the case as it stands:

CW has:
CG tapes conversations constituting verbal agreements.
Sevco directorship documents.
Financial transaction records.
Recorded delivery documentation sent to Charles Green on 12/12 advising him of what would follow.
and Cenkos, Malcolm Murray fuming and Lawyers investigating exactly how much other stuff Charles Green has done without telling them (e. g. lying to the SFA putting the licence in jeopardy) so they at least know how big the smoking bomb crater is before they start working out whether it can ever be filled back in.

And Charles Green basically has:
"That isn't my signature"
Now handwriting experts have been called in already. I expect in the next few days we shall learn their opinion.

The fact that Easdales deal to buy Greens shares was described as 'Delicate' on the tv recently lead me to suspect that some people probably already know the answer and damage limitation is underway by the Stockridge/Green/Ahmad faction.