Rangers Banter Archive February 08 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


08 Feb 2014 23:00:42
We have only failed to win one game in the League, and lead the 3rd tier by 23 points.

Rumour has it that we have no money.

Changing a management team is expensive.

Therefore, it makes no sense to change the management team as long as we appear to be on track to get back to the first tier in the minimum time.

Once we are back in the first tier, we will have a better cash flow and can consider changing the management team if results dictate - to do anything before then makes no business sense

Believable0 Unbelievable0

The change of manager is a no go ally is doing brillant we have scored 96 goals in all comps so far conceded 13 everything's going good from here.

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree. Ally is doing a good job. He has a lot of critics on here, and I feel a lot of it is harsh.
People need to remember this is his first managers job and its hardly a normal managers job. As the club has been through so much in the last few years.
No manager starts out amazingly, its about working on it over the years and learning as you go. As far as I am concerned I think he is doing a good job.
Rangers fans will always pick faults with whatever manager we have. Remember many fans used to get on Walter Smith's back from 1993 until 1998 after we didn't recreate the same form in Europe as we done in 1992/93.

Agree0 Disagree0

So what your saying is that Ally is only in the job as there isn't enough money to sack him? If so your spot on mate. As for doing a good job well if you consider the resources he has had compared to the clubs in the bottom 2 tiers then is it really that good a job. I would have expected Rangers to have done the same with a far less wage bill, playing more attractive football and having more young players in the team.

Agree0 Disagree0

With the amount of players and resources ally has at his disposal its a no brainer that there winning games amonth wages payment probably equals the bubget of all the rest of the clubs combined if u listen to all the football pundits etc they all condem rangers tactics also the amont of platers (55) and amount of coaches I am led to beleive kitman on 1k aweek we are aleague I club at the minute therfore the budget should reflect this my biggest fear now is gates drop to half around 20k at best then where do we go with the current budget u speak to anyone who regularly go to games the standard for 90%of games is dross we have been on the crest of wave powered by loyalty and abismal tretment from the rest of scottish football there has to be some sort of new impteous to galvanize everyone because many many supporters feel they have been ripped off again couple that to bad football I fear for attendances

Agree0 Disagree0

Ally is doing a good job but let's be perfectly honest we all would do a good job in that League with the resources ally has at his dispose. we have had an easy run in the cup.

we will see how good we actually are when we meet one of the teams from the top tier.

Agree0 Disagree0

I totally agree with all three of you ie. original poster & the two that have replied directly below the original poster, you have all made good, valid points regarding why our manager ally mccoist should be staying as rangers manager for the foreseeable future, cracking posts guys

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree with most of the posts Ally is doing just fine makes me laugh all who go on about we should be playing younger players these same people would be on here having a go if we played young players and lost and young players we don't have enough good young players remember they all left when we went into liquidation in fact Ally didn't have a team 18 months ago we don't have a scouting system that was the first to go so where do we find them I for one is willing to let Ally carry on get us back to the top league let him BUY some players remember he hasn't had that all players came in for free we had to pay over the odds in wages to get them but no transfer fees and I think the players he brought in this season have done well

Agree0 Disagree0

Real question is:

if ally wins ramsdens, league and Scottish cup - will he be manager of the year?

s

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Feb 2014 15:30:55
I'll tell you what if Ally McCoist wins the Scottish cup I will refrain from any more posts about his lack of technical abillity.

Agree0 Disagree0

N8 he is the only manager in scotland that has any chance of winning a treble

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Feb 2014 18:04:26
was at the game last night great result and performance, think alley gets a lot of stick on here considering not even 2 years ago wee had nothing, the leagues in the bag so think that the reason for the performances over the last few games. though temp was class last night hazard like. good to see deno back in about the goal. great start to the weekend and a even better day today W A T P

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed039's Note - Hazard like? Goodness me)

Daisy, Luke, Bo or UJ?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed039's Note - lmao)

Let's be honest mate, hazard is like temps not the other way round.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed039's Note - Always good for a laugh lads, I needed cheering up as well)

Another Ally master plan, ignore the punters re Templeton until he improves and then bring him in, let's be honest we do not appreciate that you cannot always play the guys that have a bit of class. however hazard like, boy I wish.

Agree0 Disagree0

Definitely brightened up my day ed lol. Why not ae.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Feb 2014 17:20:58
Now the "biggest and best" is out, who do we want in the next round? i'm sure our friends can get us a home tie against dumbarton or alloa. Or even at a push they could give us raith rovers lol.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I would say one of the biggest but certainly not the the biggest club is in the draw for the quarter finals

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Feb 2014 14:45:42
OK at the risk of getting ahead of myself - can anyone confirm that Rangers are definitely eligible for Europe next season. I know it's been established that the three years of signed off accounts is a myth but still am not 100% sure on our eligibility.

P. S. Nice addition to Derek Adam's CV today. As I said last week he's undoubtedly the manager of the year in Scotland at the moment.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed039's Note - The Ross County manager? What did he do?)

OP its Derek McInnes for me- at the moment. But earlier in the season it would have been Jackie McNamara so it's probably best to wait until the end of the season.

Agree0 Disagree0

Think u got your dereks mixed up

Agree0 Disagree0

Op if we go by lord nimmos ruling that our membership of the association was never broken then yes we would be eligible (should we qualify)

If we go on the principle that we renewed membership and we only have two years, uefa would have to grant an exception,
let's just take the cup games one at a time, if we manage to win it then it would have to be worked out

JG

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Feb 2014 16:19:55
Derek Adams? LOL. Must still be the alcohol in my system from last night.

Derek McInnes I should have said.

Agree0 Disagree0

Thats right to many banana skins in front of us yet or as it could turn out to be dillutions of grandeur

Agree0 Disagree0

While there is a very long way to go in the cup before europe i'm pretty sure that the dispensation to enter europe without 3years accounts also had to be agrees with the nations football authority - sfa.

Agree0 Disagree0

I don't believe Rangers are eligible to play in Europe, regardless of any transfer there is not 3 continuous years accounts, the previous company did not file their final year accounts.
Could be wrong though.

Agree0 Disagree0

If we had to depend on s f a to stand our corner we woulld get the same a s what the governing body stands for s f all

Agree0 Disagree0

If rangers where to win cup then the sfa refused us permition to play in europe that would let everybody know that they have no time for rangers them refusing us would prove it

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed039's Note - I dont think its up for discussion, 3 years audited accounts is the rule I am sure, newco or no newco)

Ed my post above was in relation to n8 sorry I should have posted so

Agree0 Disagree0

All above - I am sure we done this to death last year and here we go again

To remove all doubt, read the uefa licensing regulations article 47 and 48. There is no requirement for three year accounts

However we do not meet the requirements in article 12 but exception to this can be granted as per article 15

Go to uefa.com and read it for your self

JG

Agree0 Disagree0

Ed 39 - let's not go back to this again, 3 yrs accounts not required, 3 yrs membership required, uefa can grant exemptions, let's just go one game at a time though

JG

Agree0 Disagree0

ED your right we don't have the needed accounts years to play in europe so no point winging. As for who we get are we still boycotting if we get Aberdeen or Utd? Can recall being at tannadice forgame and getting dogs abuse? Or is it all forgotten by our knuckle draggers and glory hunting back as the norm? Intresting times to come? And on the point of utd game did that rat Green give the ticket money to charity as promised or is that another bloody lie that goes against our great name?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed039's Note - this is my understanding but I might be wrong as per JG, I will ask Ed002, he will know for sure)

JG. a Belfast club went newco, and in 2nd year qualified for Europe.

UEFA told then to eff off.

No 3 years accounts was the reason. was it not? Or some other reason - but they did not play. 2nd team got place.

UEFA does not like newcos.

Agree0 Disagree0

Again, read article 47 and 48

Jg

Agree0 Disagree0

Google - "Malaga: Europa League ban upheld by CAS"

Banned for failing to pay creditors. no mention of article 47 or 48. its how UEFA apply them that's at issue.

Or we will take UEFA to court (Sion tried that). its an expensive route, and you get personted if you follow that route (and we already have, using law courts against SFA).

Agree0 Disagree0

Sammy stay focused, we are discussing the requirement for 3 yrs accounts, ed says required, I say not required
Your on about Belfast club, Malaga, google,

Have you read uefa, s requirements, remember green made sure all football debts were paid, that's article 49 by the way,
Our issue is the three year membership, that's the requirement we don't meet!

JG

JG

Agree0 Disagree0

Heard a tape of green and whyte discussing getting back into uefa, as green had approached uefa as ceo.

doubt we will get fair hearing with that conversation in existance

Agree0 Disagree0

@18 you got me beat there, I can't find the article in uefa licensing requirements document that is related to taped conversations, that's us humped
JG

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Feb 2014 15:10:32
I thought david templeton, dean shiels & ian black were exceptional for us last night against the pars, it was a very good team performance but these 3 in particular were a step above the rest, there's no doubt that rangers have quality scottish premiership class players ie. temps, deano, wallace, black, law, daly etc, temps & wallace in particular could play for any team in the big league even including celtic because wallace is a better left back than their lb & temps in my opinion is a better winger than any of celtic's wingers

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Calm down mate. Templetons had two good games lately prior to that he wasn't upto much. He should be performing like that every week. I agree though, what an improvement.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ls, you say calm down, about what my friend? I'm perfectly calm, remember david templeton has been injured practically all season & hadn't a pre season behind him in what has been a stop start season for him, I would like to think I know my football and praising wee temps because he's now getting back to his best because he's now injury free is not over the top & of no need to calm down, wee temps is the best winger at ibrox by far buddy, so I hope I've given you sufficient evidence to why I was praising him

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Feb 2014 15:03:07
Queue the Derek Mckinnes for Manager posts every day for the next fortnight.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

And why not Larky he has taken a shambles of a club and turned them into a real force in Scotland. Was unlucky in his first visit to Porkheid but did the business today. In the final of the League Cup already will probably finish second in the league- no bad for a young un.

Agree0 Disagree0

With all due respect larky bear I'm a bit sick & tired of continually reading posts regarding the rangers managers position, at the moment we don't need to change our manager, we've got ally mccoist, try giving the man some credit & backing, if it came to pass that eventually in a few years rangers do decide to change manager then in my opinion both billy davies & terry butcher are streets ahead of derek mcinnes as managers & that my friend is my opinion and check their cv's which will back me up

Agree0 Disagree0

Why not because were not changing our manager right now? Because every time someone gets a win over Celtic that should be our next manager, these posts happen all the time I was just stating what will happen without actually talking about Celtic & Aberdeen because I have no interest in talking about them. Big Ram I don't know of you took my post the right way I'm not Ally's Biggest fan as a manager but it's clear he's going no where. I was trying to stem a wave of threads coming in about how Derek McKinnes should be brought in. Then you always get that one legendary BS post where someone says that it's a done deal will happen at the end of the season Ally will be his assistant blah blah blah, Bit like After we signed Law & Daly etc when the window closed it was a done deal for Leigh Griffiths to come to us in January. Might even have been you that said it Big R I can't remember.

Agree0 Disagree0

Fair point larky bear, and for the record my friend it most definitely wasn't me regarding the leigh griffiths signing for rangers post, I do totally grasp your point pal

Agree0 Disagree0

Sorry to accuse you of such a heinous Crime Big Ram.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Feb 2014 15:01:54
What a difference temps makes to the team when he's on that kind off form. pleased for ally and pleased for Derek mc innes. looking forward to cup draw tomorrow. My prediction is winners of the hibs/ raith rovers tie

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I would be happy with anbody as long as it was at ibrox

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Feb 2014 14:43:31
Ya dancer, put a daft couple of quid on abdeen @20/1 when they were down 1-0, get in there

Jg

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Well done took them on a both teams to score an dons to win. other 3 games playing just now

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Feb 2014 14:40:04
Looks like we won't be playing scotlands most expensively assembled team in the next round of the cup.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

“If you bet on the biggest and the best then you will always win. There is nothing else to it. "

Not the case today Peter?

Agree0 Disagree0

@1 Do I detect a trace of gloating Gaz? And why not- good fun isn't it

Agree0 Disagree0

Gaz seen it myself you beat me to it and though we have all put our foot in it at some point in our lifes pl takes the biscuit to say the biggest and best then get fecked whow cracker lol lovl

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Feb 2014 10:52:28
am I being to simplistic here or what

Rangers as a business need cash we all agree then why don't the people who own the business, the people who call all the shots at ibrox ie the major share holders the institutional investors pump some of their cash in, because let's not kid ourselves if we where making money they would be quick to shout about a dividend

i used to own my own business and on more than one occasion I needed investment to upgrade facility's replace equipment etc so I went to my savings and the bank to finance these things I didn't go to my customers and say i'm going to have to pay for xyz can you pay me a year in advance.


i am a rangers shareholder I don't own a lot of shares its more of a token holding but the bottom line is I own part of Rangers, so how about all us share holders big or small invest say £10 for every £100 worth of shares we own in our business that should see us through to the end of the season if Mr Wallace wants me to drop off my £20 then I will be happy to do so

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Lb companies raise capital from shareholders all the time, they do it by issuing a rights issue, if RIFC did this you would get more shares for your 20quid

A rights issue is a way in which a company can sell new shares in order to raise capital. Shares are offered to existing shareholders in proportion to their current shareholding, respecting their pre-emption rights. The price at which the shares are offered is usually at a discount to the current share price, which gives investors an incentive to buy the new shares — if they do not, the value of their holding is diluted.

I can see the possibility of one of these coming soon

You are spot on with one thing though, we the shareholders, no matter how big or small all own our own part of the company and therefore the club

JG

Agree0 Disagree0

Why give money to the "cash cow" we are at the moment? 120 days Wallace said to get the debt down when and if he has done his job right then will be the time to give money over.
If he hasn't surely you can not be serious about giving these robbers more funds?

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree but before that can happen the club has to give some clear indication of how the buisness is performing after thinking about things and looking at all stories etc I don't think the club is in a critical situation we could not go out and spend £3m on aplayer but I think there is enough funds for the club to tick over and with the amount of shares changing hands there are moves being made by someone to try and get control the problem I can see without any further investment getting players to match everyones ambitions on return to s pl and maybe closer to the crux to compete with our old foes in the east end and to end things I don't think ally is the man for this task

Agree0 Disagree0

At the agm, the board said that they had investors lined up. where are they?

Agree0 Disagree0

@4 the board said a lot of things at the AGM and many have been found to be hot air. They are only interested in their own stake, the SPIVS are still driving the bus. Wee jack is still drawing from the well and remember the ST are due shortly and as I strongly suspect (if we are still in business) there will be some smoke and mirrors to try and dupe the fans to thinking all is well. Just a thought

RR

Agree0 Disagree0

N4 posted the same thing myself a few weeks ago and n5 I totally agree

Agree0 Disagree0

Ally - we don't have debt so he is going to have a hard job brining that down

We are overspending, that's what has to be stopped

JG

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Feb 2014 01:23:34
I live 500 miles away from Glasgow so it was a rare chance for me to watch Rangers play last night. I thought Templeton and Wallace were different class and can play at SPL level no problem. Bell, Shiels and Law were very good as well. Black and Aird are a bit of an enigma. I think the team is looking good for the next 18 months. Get McLeod, MacKay and Hutton back and we won't need to sign anybody to get back to where we belong. We need two good centre backs and a manager!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Midfield needs bit more craft and guile otherwise u might be not far away one of the better performances last night

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent