Rangers Banter Archive February 05 2011

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


05 Feb 2011 20:47:51

Why did you get rid of the believable/ unbelievable buttons? {ed's note - they fried the server, we are going to try programming them a different way when we get the chance. Hopefully it will put less stress on the server.}
Cheers won't really need them when there in no transfer window anyway.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

05 Feb 2011 18:28:30

Roll on 5 in the morning ed. we will be making the pilgrimage to the shrine tu cheer on our beloved glasgow rangers. .belfast bear

Believable0 Unbelievable0

05 Feb 2011 18:24:55

Ed. i suggest you post no more rumours regarding the take over untill its official one way or the other, come on lads leave the s**ep talk to the other side.lets focus on reality at the rangers. .

Believable0 Unbelievable0

05 Feb 2011 17:31:26

"Please stop posting bs, HMRC investigation has been postponed untill next month so any chat regarding the case is mere speculation. Wait and see!

It has been postponed to may.Craig White has a deal in the pipeline that would see any tax liability from recent years covered by Murray International Holdings and Lloyds Bank. Source Scottish Daily Record"

Until Rangers or Whyte confirm the position it is all speculation.

The Daily Record talk about what their sources have said, what the Daily Record's understanding is, etc. etc. which basically means they can publish a lot of bulls**t for the purpose of selling newspapers. There is nothing official from Whyte or Rangers and nor can there be under stock market rules.

Remember, these newspapers were saying exactly the same before Christmas and the deal would be completed in January.

It's all b.s. and we simply do not know.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

05 Feb 2011 16:57:33

Awrit, was just wondering what everyones take was on the game tmrw? (scores, formations, etc)

I don't see us losing the game, but hope it doesn't go to replay as we don't need another game on the calender. In all honesty, defeat tmrw may not be a bad thing, as long as we win at parkhead.

Was also thinking, what are the views on leaving jelavic out tmrw? Id expect him to get chopped aw game (prob weiss/ diouf too), leaving him at risk of missing the parkhead game, a ploy that wouldn't go amiss for lennon. We need the big man more for that game than the cup one.

Id expect the team to set up this way;

Mcgregor
Whittaker Bougherra Weir Papac
Edu
Davis Ness
Diouf Naismith
Jelavic


But would like to see;

Mcgregor
Whittaker Bougherra Weir Papac
Edu
Davis Naismith
Diouf Weiss
Lafferty/ Healy?

The above team is still good enough to win the match, especially with naisy in amongst the middle chasin n gettin in broons/ kayals face.

either way, hope uz enjoy the game

TrueBlue

Believable0 Unbelievable0

05 Feb 2011 16:42:15

Forest won 2 european cups. does this make them twice the team that celtic are?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

05 Feb 2011 16:34:09

Dont forget bored bhoy. the league your team particapates in is dominated by rangers.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

05 Feb 2011 16:32:35
Re motherwell miner your speech about rangers reminds me bout. A certain Celtic player that said exactly the same about Celtic in the john Barnes era the player being mark viduka so really I think your. Bitterpersonwith a grudge to bear James beattie how. Dare how could he talk bout us being run one way then the other spent more time in stands I for one not sure bout diouf but willing to wait if he can handle next 2, games happy days your name should b motherwell mick and your lol is a total tosser Celtic have payed aberdeen 3 times now thsts why they look good for gods sake we will c where we all are at end if month.
SURELY THIS IS ONE OF MOST POORLY CONSTRUCTED PARAGRAPHS OF ALL TIME!? EVEN BY RANGERS FANS STANDARDS THIS IS NONSENSE. I COULD BARELY FOLLOW THIS DRIVAL. A CHILD WROTE THIS SURELY?

05 Feb 2011 16:31:23

To the begger banging on about going on to epl clubs web sights. are u claiming fame about the sixties cup win?. wise up to your self bhoy. you wud be aswell goig onto the offical england f.a website.you will feel at home.there still living in the past aswell.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

05 Feb 2011 15:39:13
And people get of with the ennglish harping back to 1966. the celts fans are just as bad

Go onto Man Utd or Liverpool pages and ask them what they think of your record. Even Notts Forest fans would have a giggle at you. Bet you don't though!

BoredBhoy

Believable0 Unbelievable0

05 Feb 2011 15:30:03

Ed.how many of the trnsfer rumours materalised durin the window that were posted on the bears and celtics rumours page? 99.9.pc were bs. now were onto the take over.i hope not but this cud be a 100pc bu. shi. er.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

05 Feb 2011 15:23:55

And people get of with the ennglish harping back to 1966. the celts fans are just as bad

Believable0 Unbelievable0

05 Feb 2011 13:22:27
Worlds most successful? Presumably that's a reference to the fifty three league wins. . an outstanding achievement, no doubt about it. But it's interesting that they chose to put five stars on the shirt to represent the first fifty. What was wrong with a star for the Cup Winners Cup win?. .like the rest of Europe would do. Oh, that's right. Because it's not as good as Celtics star! It's not even as good as Aberdeen's two stars! Still, if it makes you happy

53 league wins includes one shared with Dumbarton in 1890/ 91. It is a bit desperate to use league wins when every other club uses Euro success for stars? Why not put 52 1/ 2 stars on the top. Just as riduclous an idea as the initial one to use 5 stars. Probably didn't want to remeber their Cup Wiiners Cup success after the shameful scenes and the tag of being the only club who was not allowed to defend a trophy beacause of their fans behaviour. Some things never change. I wouldn't swap our Gold Star for your 52 1/ 2 red ones, is it only winners of majour tournaments that are allowed to use gold stars? Most succesfull club in the world lol 50/ 50 chance of winning the league and cups every season. One European trophy, the third ranked one and a club more famous these days for their fans off field bahviour than their team on the park. Real Madrid, Liverpool, Man U and Milan have rampaged across Europe winning major respected trophies for years, and are able to spend the money on one player that could buy your entire club! Real Madrids 31 league titles is worh more in terms of credibilty than 52 1/ 2 Scottish League titles, add that to their 9 Eoropean Cup wins, Liverpool and Man U with 18 titles each and 5 and 3 European cups respectively

Believable0 Unbelievable0

05 Feb 2011 00:28:32

Just how many chances is el-hadji diouf supposed to be given? He has acted like an idiot time and time and time again. I suppose it's possible that he might mellow as he gets older. He might even recognise that Rangers have given him one last chance to perform and he'll knuckle down. But you shouldn't hold your breath.

While I'm on. . . Rangers, the worlds most successful sinking ship? What does that even mean?

Sinking ship? Time will tell. .but it's certainly floundering.

Worlds most successful? Presumably that's a reference to the fifty three league wins. . an outstanding achievement, no doubt about it. But it's interesting that they chose to put five stars on the shirt to represent the first fifty. What was wrong with a star for the Cup Winners Cup win?. .like the rest of Europe would do. Oh, that's right. Because it's not as good as Celtics star! It's not even as good as Aberdeen's two stars! Still, if it makes you happy. .

Believable0 Unbelievable0

 
Change Consent