Rangers Banter Archive June 30 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


30 Jun 2014 20:47:16
Ed I would just like to announce the first completely incorrect post award for June. Normally you see it is about opinions and you will have the worryingly numerous Super Ally men posting about what a good job their hero is doing and the occasional poster like myself who completely disagrees with that. But these are opinions and ultimately cannot be proved 100% one way or another.

But the completely wrong post which will go to a nameless poster to save his blushes was confirmed by the accused today a certain Mr Louis Suarez "The truth is that my colleague Giorgio Chiellini suffered the physical result of a bite in the collision he suffered with me"

The award winning nameless poster wrote correctly in the first part of his post "I must be the only person who has watched this several times and does not believe this was an intentional bite attack"- YES MATE YOU WERE THE ONLY ONE


But followed this up incorrectly "but I see it as a failed Glasgow Kiss"

Reminds me of my favourite winch Sue Perb well done nameless poster the best laugh of the month

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Thats the only glasgow kiss that could have ended up as a nooky badge eh lol

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jun 2014 22:15:29
Couldn't agree more, I wrote days ago that the animal should be locked up, and a long with bbab, another guy said it wasn't a bite,?? Couldn't make it up could you, wonder how he feels now

Agree0 Disagree0

Tommy45?

You are deluded m8 - never said it was not a bite.

My part in the discussion was to raise the issue that an elbow in the face / head was just as serious, and that the guy needed help not slagging off.

The OP sums it up - beware if you have an opinion that is not in common with popular consensus - says more about the OP than it does about the person he is denigrating, and you.

This site is all about freedom of speech with fellow bears. I was not aware that you need to be careful in what you post in case you offended someone with a different opinion.

We live in a democracy where opinions are encouraged not derision.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Jul 2014 10:47:24
@3 do you come with a government health warning? Never have I come across such a windbag with such a complete sense of humour bypass. Levity ya bufoon levity. So many words but so little to say. Och I will wait till the new season starts.

Agree0 Disagree0

When your humour comes at the expense of someone else, then it is not humour, it is derision and humiliation.

Read your post again and put yourself in the place of the recipient.

Where you hoping for everyone to come and slag him off as well.

I have a fantastic sense of humour, and like nothing else than to have a wee bit of banter, in the pub or with my mates - knowing what is right and what is wrong makes it funny or not!

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Jul 2014 12:02:00
@bbb, I never ment you said it wasn't a bite pal, let's calm down a wee bit here eh, it was another guy who said it wasn't a bite, not you, I just found the comparison of elbowing Simone and actually biting someone was not right, anyway as you correctly say m8, its all about opinions, and we, re all Bluenoses, hopefully, so have a nice day m8

Agree0 Disagree0

There is very little difference in the level of violence between a bite and an elbow.

There is a large moral/behavioural difference. In a competitive, physical sport I expect to be elbowed/kicked and a bit of verbal (doesn't mean it's ok but I do expect it). However there is something wrong with an adult male who bites other men. There's a psychological imbalance.

I work in an industry where physical violence is a daily risk and deal with it without concern. However the decision to bite another human, be it conscious or subconscious, is a sign of a deeper issue.
Yes punish a player for an intentional elbow but if both happened to me I would want the person who bit me to receive a far stricter punishment than an elbow.

Agree0 Disagree0

Bluegenius very well put mate an my opinion is the exact same as your own

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jun 2014 18:13:22
Scott Allen 22, don cowie 31 who will mccoist go for?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Looks like Cowie now, don't know what has happened with Allan.

Agree0 Disagree0

The boy is on trial at Derby - shame!

Agree0 Disagree0

He is at derby on trial

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jun 2014 16:30:28
I agree, the slagging of McCoist is unrealistic and unhelpful, he has held the club together and deserves a statue in his honour. I think the Boyd signing is fantastic and I am looking forward to the championship season. People talk about giving youth a chance but you need to get the right guys in now to get us to the premiership and set up a future for the youths and the club as a whole.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

J scott, The 'slagging' as you call it of Ally is not unrealistic, but may be unhelpful. At the end of the day he is a very poor manager and that will never change. However, the way we are going, with signings, is the easy option and a fortune could have been saved had we blooded the youngsters. Don't disagree with a blend of both but our balance is wrong.

Agree0 Disagree0

Some of the criticism has been unrealistic. Blooding young players is easier said than done, ok maybe a couple but Rangers will never do what Dundee utd do and field a handful at a time as although they are a better placed team nowadays their fans don't demand they win every match and therefore enjoy seeing fresh young talent come through while still playing pretty well.

Agree0 Disagree0

You miss the main point, Ally could have a new 'Messi' and not know it and his tactics are absolute crap. Sorry, what tactics?

Agree0 Disagree0

J scott have u been in the antartic with your namesake macoist is woeful

Agree0 Disagree0

Don't want to go on about it but if such a guy existed I think even Ally would have spotted it by now as he sees them every day as do the youth coaches.

Agree0 Disagree0

To 5] Yeh, Ally would know my ass. He would tell him to come back when he is old enough. Ally was a great player for us but he is a hopeless manager. He may have bridged gaps for us but for God's sake look at what he is paid. He wants to get a reallity check. Anyone can buy success in a mickey mouse league but come the day when he plays against the big boys he is up the creek without a paddle. He was backed by Green for one reason and that was to sell season books to the Ally loyal.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jun 2014 21:35:37
OP can you just explain what Ally did to hold the club together?

Agree0 Disagree0

He'd need to be not to spot a potential superstar and anyway, McKay, McLeod and Crawford have all been given a chance, McKay should never have been loaned out. My point is youth has been given a chance. It's not a case of just saying Oh This guy is under 21, let's play him for the sake of it.

Agree0 Disagree0

Stewie, he was there and he stayed there through all the crap. Yes he's not a great manager and yes there are worse pressures but being manager of Rangers is difficult enough without the circumstances he was in and I didn't see anyone else managing them.

Agree0 Disagree0

J scott we know some were givin a chance but they should have been givin a run in the first team especialy once the league was won instead of trying to go a season unbeaten against amature football clubs

Agree0 Disagree0

Wouldn't think it the way so e of you go on, honestly Ally must sometimes wish he had walked away. From all this criticism he gets for a start, who needs celtic fans when we have our own fans giving him the verbals andI so 'to care what anyone says, that's a fact! Bye BYe!

Agree0 Disagree0

J Scott, I am not an Ally fan but it gives me no pleasure whatsoever pointing out what is blindingly obvious, that is he is out of his depth at the levels we have been at and it can only get worse as he comes up against better full-time managers. I would hazard a guess some managers would have jumped at the chance of managing Rangers under the circumstances Ally had, I reckon with a £7 mill wage budget & £825K salary we would have had some real managers willing to take a chance and the only reason they did'nt is because Ally won't go. In the last 3 years Rangers have made Ally a very rich man and we have only had the minimum return. We are not progressing under Ally's Stewardship due to his inability to coach young players and his preference for Cowie, a seasoned professional, as opposed to Scott Allan suggests that ain't going to change.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Jul 2014 20:47:16
@9 you said it yourself he is not a great manager so why should the fans who pay good money put up with him? The standard of football under him has been woeful and his record in the cups is embarrassing. As for holding the club together that's simply not the case

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Jul 2014 20:49:06
@12 great post mate couldn't have put it better myself. It staggers me that there are still Rangers fans that can't see this

Agree0 Disagree0

@12 & 14, I'm with you guys, absolutely spot on.

@11 jscott, I also wished ally had walked away. Wouldn't have to watch the absolute dross that has been on display for the last two seasons. I watch amateur football that is more pleasing on the eye and these guys get paid diddly squat, as do their Managers. I would be quite happy to suddenly develop thick skin and take all the criticism that came my way for £800,000+ per year. I'd probably be able to get a team to play better football into the bargain, as would many others.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jun 2014 10:48:53
I see the posts slagging Ally McCoist continue. I am not an Ally supporter, far from it, but he has had to work under extreme pressure, and under the strangest of situations. He has had to work with Duff & Phelps, Whyte and then Greene, and now the Easdales.

My job has pressures, my life has pressures, but none would come even within a whisker of the pressure that Ally has come under. I remember my exams at uni, and thinking that the pressure was intolerable, but compared to Ally's pressure it was a cake walk.

Now I know a lot of you will come on a attack my post and then point out what Ally has not done or done, but it will not deflect from my position as having sympathy for the man.

Do you all remember his first year in relegation when his signings were leaked - I do not think one of them came on board. I think that was the wake-up call for Ally, when he realised that players did not want to sacrifice their careers in the lower leagues. Please remember that Ally's first and foremost remit is to win the leagues and get back to the Scottish Premiership without fail, nothing else matters, this is his only goal, the rest is icing on the cake.

Hindsight is a wonderful thing, he may have won most of his games playing mostly youth players, but he did not want, and could not take the chance.

As I have posted earlier if Souness, King or whomever comes on board and takes charge I do not think Ally will survive, but one thing in his favour is that it is him who stood tall and was counted when all around was falling apart, and if he was not there at significant periods I think it would have been much worse for the club.

Once Rangers are back at the top where they belong and all the various investigations and court cases are put to bed, I for one cannot wait to read the official and unofficial books about what went wrong and who done it!

Just some thoughts from a passionate supporter of the best fxxxxxg team in the world, and beyond.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

You raise a lot of very good points. My worry over the last two seasons has been around selecting the best 11 possible for each and every match.

Sir Alex was able to do it and to blood youth and it wasn't rocket science. It was about confidence and management skills and Ferguson didn't get these from Glasgow University. If " wee Blackie " or " big Jig " are off form, they're dropped and if a Gasparroto or the likes deserve their chance, they play. We haven't seen this from McCoist yet.

Agree0 Disagree0

Talking about the investigations, does anubody know what's happening on that front?? all seems quiet and yet d & f, cw, hmrc, and the rest all seem to be going about their daily business without a care in the world!!

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree, the slagging of McCoist is unrealistic and unhelpful, he held the club together and deserves a statue in his honour. He may not be the greatest manager but he's been there for Rangers and I think the Boyd signing is fantastic, I am looking forward to the championship. People talk about youth but if you don't have the right guys in now to take us to the premiership you don't have a future for the youth or the club as a whole.

Agree0 Disagree0

OP, I wish I had his pressures with his ridiculous salary. Pressure is when you operate a business and wonder where next week's wages for your employees are coming from. Not our ALLY, he just spends, and no matter what, his salary will still be there.
Also, forget all the peripheral crap, he is still a poor manager.

Agree0 Disagree0

I have always wondered why Rangers 'hierarchy' have never raised a grievance against D&F and CW, especially CW for misappropriating of funds.

Also, what has happened to the police investigation into who leaked HMRC paperwork which led to our freefall in football and the rest. If not for the HMRC case, which we won, we would perhaps not have got into this fine mess. At the time we owed the bank £18 million, whilst the press inflated the HMRC Tax case from £20 million to £140 million. Owing the bank that amount was not unsurmountable and could have been managed quite comfortably.

It was strange that fillmagobup got the information firsthand, not once but on several occasions.

Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we flatter to deceive!

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jun 2014 21:42:34
The remit of any Rangers manager should be to win the leagues and build a team fit enough to challenge Celtic in the top league. There is no evidence that the current Rangers team will challenge Celtic and even less evidence that a team is being built. All that's happened is that over paid journeymen players have been signed with the intention to get us back to the top league but then what? Daly, McCulloch, Boyd, Miller, Black, Foster, Hutton, Smith, aren't players with a longterm future or players that are capable of challenging for the top league. I fear we will be battling for a top 6 spot and with Ally's record in the cups won't be winning them either. Wonder how all the Ally's fans will feel when we are 20 odd points behind them in the league and fail to qualify for Europe? Y

Agree0 Disagree0

N4 billyb n5 bbar and n6 stewie all very good posts and very well put imo

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jun 2014 22:31:39
@5 I think had the other bidder "the Blue Knights" (or should it have been the Blue Squires) been successful a lot of the actions most of us expected/ hoped for some of which are listed by you may have happened. The wrong guys got the club of that there is little doubt.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Jul 2014 08:46:22
@5 bbab if you're seriously trying to suggest that it was "leaked paperwork" which led to our demise then it's you that's doing the deceiving mate. I also see some other classic tried and tested delusions crop up in your wearisome post - for the umpteenth time, the £140m wasn't a figure inflated by the press, it was published by D&P. It was the total of the £70 odd million that we potentially owed HMRC (a case which has yet to reach its final decision, as you seem to have forgotten) plus the £70 odd million we definitely did owe to creditors up and down the land. It wasnt just made up. We were badly badly in debt with no way to repay it, regardless of the bank debt (£18 mill on top of all that) and the hmrc case. Those creditors got stuffed by our club when we went bust, have some respect. The further we get from those sorry times the more most of us can simply accept that our demise was no-one's fault but our own. The club will just end up in the same sorry state again if people like you keep clutching at straws and trying to rewrite history. Man up and accept what actually happened pal.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jun 2014 09:10:18
does anybody think brian kennedy will make another move for rangers, as its been rumoured in the papers??

Believable0 Unbelievable0

30 Jun 2014 14:12:38
Doubt it. Had his chance 2 years ago and now he'd have to spend many more millions of his money to gain control.

Hope I'm wrong.

Agree0 Disagree0

I hope so, but I also doubt there will be any buy out of the current regime unfortunately for us.

Agree0 Disagree0

I don't think he will try cause the people that bought tickets today have probably geed these greedy unknown people a life line till the saeson ends

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jun 2014 08:11:05
A director of football for us would enable the current management of the team to be re-assessed. e. g. we could have a head coach and a sidekick and the manager's position would be redundant. Ideally for me would be Souness for director of football and he would soon sort out the adjustments required and who knows, maybe Brian Kennedy will do what Dave King hasn't and put his hand in his pocket.
It would be interesting to hear the 'fans leaders' opinions as they have been very, very quiet. Maybe they are on a silent protest or are they awaiting instuctions?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

30 Jun 2014 12:54:24
billyb if you take manager as manage plus an r then the position has been redundant since WS retired. We went bust and Ally thought it would be a weeze to ignore youth and go for experience wanting to bring in finished articles and not develop potential. Now that in my book ain't managing. That is "buying guaranteed success" in the two worst leagues in Scotland. But newsflash that ain't going to work if we get to the top league where there are better coaches with much more comparable budgets or in Celtics case much bigger potential budgets.
So yes if that team gained a controlling interest then savings in the dug-out could definitely be made.

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent