Rangers Banter Archive July 27 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


27 Jul 2012 23:03:37
If The Rangers are being forced to accept and pay moneys owed to football clubs and fines incurred by Rangers(IA) and the SPL are still investigating dual payments isn't this going to leave the door open for HMRC to levy any possible fines from the FTT at the Newco door which would put us in administration again, I know all other debts including the tax not paid by Whyte will die with the old company but the newco accepting football debts to me leaves the door open for others to fleece the Newco

Frustrated bear...... When will it ever end?

Believable20 Unbelievable12

No mate it isn't possible for HMRC to do that - the important distinction here is that the company is not the company that owe HMRC ( newco as opposed to oldco who owed the money) - the footballing thing is different as the SPL, SFA and SFL have just proven by their decision making over the past 2 weeks that the club is the same - Rangers by name, Rangers till we die ....

Agree4 Disagree4

27 Jul 2012 22:55:24
Well I hate to say it but mr Green has sold us down the river? The ebt inquiry will go ahead and we will probably lose titles. This was our chance to call their bluff and stand our ground, but all mr green is interested in is money.Sad sad day. I for one will not be renewing my season ticket while green is at the helm

Believable23 Unbelievable27

Don't be so stupid. What was the alternative? No membership? No football at Ibrox at all?
At least now we can get back to playing football and trying to make a success of thing again.

Agree20 Disagree17

To the OP....

I may be in the minority but to be honest....

....Feck titles, if it's losing ALL the titles and still having my club to support or having history that ends dead NOW and no TEAM, I choose to buy my book and support Ally and the Gers of today.
All this bollo about standing our ground and protesting this that and the other is a waste of time and grey matter, they f*cked us, it happened, GET OVER IT AND MOVE ON!
I'll be buying a book and attending as many games as I can to support my team, call me a mug if you like but I know what I am........

A Rangers fan, come rain, shine or Junior football...I'll be there!

Will you.....?

Charli3.

Agree3 Disagree2

There was no bluff to call

Agree2 Disagree1

Op i must agree with post @1 Green fought our case but in the end if we did not accept the deal then we would not have seen the team on the park this season. would you rather have had that scenario?

JG

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Jul 2012 22:50:37
ed please post this, does anyone know the arrangements for tuesday? is it pay at gate?

Believable1 Unbelievable5

27 Jul 2012 22:45:10
GAME ON NOW LETS GET BACK TO WHERE WE BELONG SCOTLANDS No 1#
W.A.T.P

Believable20 Unbelievable20

I'm a Ger through and through, but you're bonkers mate, big time.....

Agree18 Disagree11

27 Jul 2012 22:34:03
If Robbie Savage pulls on a Rangers strip im getting rid of my TV, internet and getting a set of knitting needles.

Believable18 Unbelievable9

Well gonna knit me a rangers scarf ,im 5ft 11 inches ,48 inch chest 36 waist and weigh 14 stone 9lbs might place an order for troosers and jumper tae lol doug t.s.o

Agree9 Disagree2

27 Jul 2012 22:23:47
Ranger's home tickets can only be purchased by cash or cheque at present because Visa will not allow Sevco facilities and will not accept liability for refunds in the event Rangers are refused SFA membership.
They are also requesting legal guarantees before allowing facilities moving forward which have not been forthcoming from Mr Green.

This is a further potential impact on revenue as it puts pressure on fans to have cash available for all match day tickets. {Ed039's Note - Visa have nothing to do with it, the streamline machines are on licence from an organisation or bank and the machines are prob still linked to oldco accounts)

Believable5 Unbelievable5

Ed, negotiations with credit card companies are different from management of streamline facilities. ie you can choose which cards to accept and the rates negotiated vary by card company. Whilst streamline facilities would need to be set up with Metro Bank to process transactions, the individual credit card companies can either refuse availability or place conditions on their use.

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Jul 2012 21:51:48
Conditional license granted, and full one to be finallised by nxt friday

Bigjy

Believable3 Unbelievable6

27 Jul 2012 20:47:41
have any of us wondered why the spl and sfa are hammering rangers just now ...... could it not be the case of rangers and celtic have been bullying these bdies for years and are manovering us into a position where we wont be able to do so again , celtic need to take heed as it will also happen to them if they are ever in such a vulnerable position that we find ourselves just now

Believable10 Unbelievable6

Much as I'm still of the opinion that a lot of this was self-inflicted and that the governing bodies have followed well established rules in everything bar the disrepute charge. I do agree that under similar circumstances Celtic would have been in the same position as Rangers are. However where there might be one difference is that without a board Rangers had became a rudderless ship during those crucial early months with a number of PR own goals. Whatever you think of their loyalty, McCoist and Jardine are not, and never will be, diplomats. Threats of boycotts, marches, demanding names of tribunals bought Rangers no favours, trying to sign Cousin was crass at best. I'd imagine with a board in place Celtic would have avoided some of these landmines.
Gaz {Ed039's Note - Thats a great point Gaz)

Agree3 Disagree1

27 Jul 2012 20:16:30
I know this isn't a rumour but just wondering if anyone has any idea why Walter smith was at ibrox on Wednesday. I posted then and it never got out up do please show this.

Believable0 Unbelievable6

Someone has clicked disagree but I am not lieing I watch him driving away in his range rover with another guy in the passenger seat. And before the Weres the photos start I never had my phone as I was just picking my kid up from nursary

Agree0 Disagree1

27 Jul 2012 20:05:31
Doncaster should be ousted immediately from his precarious position. Let's look at some of his cock ups in this sorry affair.

He makes threats to SFL clubs to put us into div one with pictures of doom and gloom
He states that we were not allowed entry doe to sporting integrity.
He then bribes the SFL clubs with promises of hastily arranged league changes, to persuade the SFL clubs to put us into div one.
He then criticised them for coming to the same decision of sporting integrity as SPL clubs, and blames them for the potential demise of the game.
He then demands money from SFL clubs as Sky want to show our games in the third div rather than the dross of SPL. Our club is not wanted but our money is.
He apparently assured Green that SPL 2 would be started if SFL voted against div one. The SFL chairmen then called a motion of no confidence in him. So he could not do that.
We are now less than two days away from the start of the season and a temp licence will be issued so this farce can go on for another week.
He has not put one foot right in this whole fiasco and should resign immediately, and if he chooses not to take the honourable decision then he should be removed immediately.

He has caused a difficult situation to become a farce. We are a laughing stock, it is pathetic in the extreme.

Resign now!

Believable22 Unbelievable15

I've been less than impressed by both Doncaster and Regan over the last few months. All the interefering they've been doing. Both should leave.

Actually I think the SPL should be wound up anyway. It hasn't worked long-term and was only created for a TV deal which has long since expired.

Agree9 Disagree7

27 Jul 2012 19:47:46
Our club has been humiliated enough! Green has to draw a line in the sand now!.......then politely tell the SPL & SFA 'to sign on the dotted line or the padlocks go on the gates' and we all can get on with our lives.

Believable14 Unbelievable14

Lawless is trying call the shots on behalf of the SPL/SFA (Doncaster and Regan are mere puppets). Hope C,Green doesn't contemplate giving away our titles won or media rights gained. Stand firm,stay strong and the fans will warm to you.

Agree7 Disagree9

27 Jul 2012 19:28:16
who has been left in charge of the Big Tax Case its been left in the hands of the lawyers of Celtic, conflict of interest ? hmmmm
BALLYBOY {Ed039's Note - No its a financial matter not a footballing matter, all they are external contractors)

Believable7 Unbelievable13

27 Jul 2012 19:09:05
I don't think we should negotiate, to be honest I think we've been through the worst and now the SPL are flapping about the TV deal, no rangers no TV deal! They'll back down in order to keep the league, it's a complete catch 22, I'm with Ally we'll never accept stripping of titles!

Believable17 Unbelievable17

All true rangers fans must always be prepared to accept the truth,we must co-operate with any investigation into our club. To be obstuctive will be seen as an admission of guilt ,the investigation must be completed , who knows maybe all these allegations floating around in the media will prove to be a total load of garbage perpetrated by many of our mis-informed "competitors".

Agree11 Disagree3

A wonderful concept. allow the perpetrator to decide the sentence for his crime.
logical conclusion? next match with new rangers, a red card is issued to one of the opposing team's players. he rfuses to leave the field of play - and NOBODY from new rangers can object.

Agree5 Disagree6

27 Jul 2012 18:06:21
Today has justified my decision of many years,why i left Scotland,it has become a inward looking vengeful little nation,far removed from our previous reputation,as honest,hardworking decent people.The people at the top,politicians,football blazers,now make our country look like the iron curtain countries of the sixties and seventies.Persecution of Rangers,a ritual crucifixtion,a disgrace,let us play football,and let us the fans support our team in its hour of need.

Believable16 Unbelievable14

You cant be for real,i think you should hold such one sided rant for more pressings matters,
O I here a question whats views on tax evasion,the clubs unpaid,the smaller company the honest taxpayer that were fleeced,of all things to moan at must be

magic with you

Agree11 Disagree15

OP. Ignore the 'default' reply above. You're correct. Scotland's become a shameful little nation. I mean this holier than thou crap? Really? Show me the guy who says he's lived a puritan life and I'll show you a liar. The state this nation is in can be summarized by the fact that the Celtic manager calls Rangers tax cheats whilst trying to hide 200K of his own cash from HMRC!. But let's not get to worried about that. His acolites will try to reinvent history. As always.

Agree6 Disagree5

@ no 2, well said, sadly right. Tax avoidance happens everywhere at all levels, in many ways and rightly so ( if people really understood how the banking system really worked, they would agree with me, don't believe me, do your own research ). I bet Mr Lennon was told by advisers that it was legal, and he did not think he was doing anything wrong, just a thought, what advice did Mr Murry get at the start of this mess, did he mean to cheat or not, i'm undecided myself, what do you think ? P.S A central bank, the bank of england, which has share holders, loans the money that they make from nothing, to the government at intrest, the government then has to charge the population tax to pay the intrest and loan back to the bank of england, last year the bank of england was paid 45 billion in intrest alone, that money mostly went to them share holders. Its called fractional reserve banking...

Agree3 Disagree1

Did he not pay tax and nat ins on his money before he done this just a thought garlar07

Agree2 Disagree1

I strongly disagree with above posters who are attempting to attribute the disgraceful handling of the whole Rangers situation as a symptomatic reflection of Scottish society as a whole. While football may be the national sport in this country the opinions and attitudes of those who follow the sport should not be taken out of context. I feel proud of my country in our general approach to major social issues and do not think that the spiteful attitude of a vengeful minority should smear our national image.
James

Agree3 Disagree1

OP you're the worst sort of individual any country needs. Suddenly it's the whole nation at fault for Rangers' crimes.
Don't come back! We don't need people like you in the country.
Scotland Forever!

Agree1 Disagree2

27 Jul 2012 17:52:48
Not interested in sticking the knife in but just read a very detailed break-down of Sevco/the Rangers/whatever operating costs to merely get through the season and fullfill all fixtures. It was a fairly conservative projection and it also factored in every possible avenue of cost-cutting available, based on Duff & Phelps financial projections for Rangers. At present, Sevco face a season financial shortfall of circa £12.5m. With a bare minimum of three seasons without european football, severe wage and staff cuts, how on earth will the newco Rangers survive? It's going to take monumental investment without wish for a return and who is going to do that with Sevco in the third division? Rangers couldn't even get investment and/or a buyer when they were in the SPL and solvent!

Believable14 Unbelievable9

They will save that in wages ya nugget

Agree8 Disagree13

To poster number 1 , do you honestly think all the players that are being mentioned and who are still there are going to be happy with the average div 3 wage ... no and neither do i

Agree6 Disagree1

A 75% wage cut only amounted to a saving of about £1million per month. Even with wages at that rate you still lost money. yes there are possibly further saving to go but you've already lost about £4million in reduced ticket costs and that assuming you manage to sell as many tickets as last year. Then the two European ties probably earned about £4 million. The signing fees for new players will be in or around that region.

Newco will almost certainly loose money every year until they are back in the SPL and even then they will struggle.

Agree5 Disagree0

Not if they pay 7 or 8 grand a week on gates of 10000to15000 every second week

Agree0 Disagree7

27 Jul 2012 17:45:33
STV Website:

The Scottish FA are on the verge of granting a temporary membership to allow Rangers to play this weekend.

STV understands the governing body will allow the club to fulfil its Ramsdens Cup game with Brechin City, if holding company Sevco Scotland Limited agrees to meet certain conditions.

These include signing off on the transfer of the old company’s member share in the Scottish Premier League to Dundee, which Duff and Phelps have retained despite being compelled to hand it over to the Dark Blues.

Sevco Scotland Limited must also legally accept previous sanctions imposed by the Scottish FA, which will see the club banned from signing new players for one year from September 1.

The company must also sign to accept the full repayment of all football debt to other clubs. They have already verbally agreed to honour these conditions.

A source close to the discussions has told STV that the deal would allow Rangers to participate in matches until Friday, August 3. The transfer of the SPL share must be completed by this date.

An outstanding dispute between Charles Green and SPL chief executive Neil Doncaster has held up the permanent transfer of the club's Scottish FA membership to the new company.

The pair remain locked in discussions on Friday night to reach a compromise over the SPL’s investigation into alleged non-contractual payments made by Rangers last decade.

Green wants the probe to be dropped, while the league wants to be able to conclude the case and potentially strip titles from the club if found guilty.

If a settlement between Charles Green and can be reached on Friday night, full membership will instead be conditionally granted and the club will not be required to receive temporary dispensation to play.

Mac2.

Believable3 Unbelievable3

I think the payment of debts to other football clubs should have a time limit. A club with such a poor record of administration cannot be trusted to do things properly ! {Ed039's Note - Charles green has that for sure do you know? I keep getting reminded tht was the oldco, those people are gone remember)

Agree6 Disagree6

27 Jul 2012 17:39:12
Does anyone know the terms of the new deal that sky have offered to the SPL for premier league games minus the gers

JG

Believable1 Unbelievable3

Priceless - timmy even disagrees with a question

JG

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Jul 2012 17:24:28
Ed any word on sfa membership what sactions if any do you think we will accept ? Ger76 {Ed039's Note - Possible temporary registration as long as we accept footballing debt, fines on oldco and transfer embargo, but these are just ones that are to be promised to meet while other discussions are ongoing. Nothing signed and sealed so far though)

Believable1 Unbelievable0

27 Jul 2012 17:17:46
No Rangers in Div 3, replaced by club 10!

http://www.scottishfootballleague.com/football/third/table/

Also erased from Ramsden's cup tie with Brechin!

http://www.scottishfootballleague.com/football/challenge-cup/fixtures/

And the final twist, Club 12 back in the SPL instead of Dundee!

http://www.scotprem.com/content/

Looks like it's all changing again folks. Airdrie and Stranraer still sit in their promoted leagues for now but something's smelling very, very fishy!

Believable0 Unbelievable7

Better check again,Rangers are their.
AJM.

Agree1 Disagree2

27 Jul 2012 16:24:57
lawell end of last season we dont need rangers now he's begging to his on fans whom have paid more this season with no gers game ,

Believable13 Unbelievable11

Begging? Aye, whatever. Surely just doing what he's done every season but it's getting more publicity now, especially from those who want to use it as a pathetic attempt at oneupmanship.

Agree8 Disagree8

God are you thick? he is sensing the oppurtunity to make more money out his support.. if they fall for it? their as mad as some our fans.. its all a bloody GAME. The directors will benifit and the fans of every club will pay through their noses, including US ..Wise up .....

Agree10 Disagree7

Since when did we start listening to what he says?

Agree4 Disagree4

Begging? Buy season tickets to support the team,begging? Begging is what Green is doing for a licence.

Agree11 Disagree11

Think you may have struck a raw nerve there the beggers don't like to be called beggers lol

Agree13 Disagree3

Probably just filling up his war chest in order to keep his foot on the jugular of Scottish Football . I thought though that most SPL teams are reporting an increase in season book sales (same in other leagues) ?

Paddy Malarkey

Agree2 Disagree4

27 Jul 2012 16:01:06
Reports from Grant Russell , STV, on Twitter that to their knowledge, there is no one from Rangers at Hampden today.

Mac2.

Believable6 Unbelievable2

Can we ask russell grant to look into the crystal ball and see if there will be anyone there tomorrow (some younger viewers might not know who that is)

JG

JG

Agree1 Disagree1

Thats correct,as why would someone from the defunct rangers be at hampden! {Ed039's Note - Actually duff and phelps were there for a time being today representing the "defunct rangers" as they are still holding onto club 12s share in the SPL)

Agree1 Disagree0

Are you sure its not Russel Grant.

Agree0 Disagree0

And what right do they have to hold onto the spl share ed? Vindictive and disruptive to the end and u wonder why everyone has a dislike! {Ed001's Note - they have every right to hold onto it, until an agreement is reached to transfer it or the club is liquidated. Until that happens, that share belongs to them, nothing vindictive about it. They are not football fans, they do this for money, not for petty little reasons, unlike you pettily jumping to false conclusions because of your own bias.}

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Jul 2012 15:53:39
See for once can we talk about football seen as we are actually a football team? Think people forget that.. So the team on Sunday if we get this licence.

Alexander
Broadfoot goian boca wallace
bedoya edu hutton kerkar
beattie McCulloch {Ed039's Note - Kerkar was out of contract with oldco Rangers and last I heard he was on trial at Charlton)

Believable3 Unbelievable7

Feck me! are you sure we are not in the SPl with a team like that? Oh sorry I forgot we need to remember we are in the most competitive league in Scotland at the moment not the SPL.

Ozzie Al

Agree3 Disagree4

Had promise, but no great miss

Agree1 Disagree3

This guy is wanting to check who plays for us 1st

Agree1 Disagree1

Am not in to that mate,why play guys who bleary don't have any long term future with us,the 3 Americans will be away shortly once they can get themselves another club,and they command to high a wage so must go.let's put our trust in the youth and hope a few senior lads,big jig maybe black an Beattie can offer them a bit of leadership.for years we have went on about Murray park not producing enough well the times come now so let's get behind them.incidentally still no word on a licence!?

Agree1 Disagree0

Don't want to burst your bubble mate, but at the time of your posting, Rangers are not a football team.

That is why most people are more concerned with the SFA membership.

Mac2.

Agree4 Disagree1

Wallace left mid, cole right back then broadfoot left back

Agree0 Disagree1

Given that some these players are still on between £10,000 to £28,000 per week ,is it wise to play them ? how much money is currently being put into our wage bill at present. There is no way any team could afford to pay this amount through-out a season ? Shouldnt we be playing players from acadamy with small group old heads ie previous first div players etc(low wages bill)? this is insane! our wage bill at present must be sky high with all these guys still on books, and no reduction in wage negotiated, like tiime in admin? wages drooped by 75% to around £4000-£7000 then? and we still made loss.
This will see us bust before Christmas. Any season ticket money all ready in will be gone very quickly with these guys around? This is one major balls up on the cards............ {Ed039's Note - Whether they play or not they still get paid. If they haven't transferred then they need to play to stay sharp)

Agree0 Disagree0

@5 that's why the original poster said 'if we get this licence' so you are not bursting his bubble as like the rest of us he is well aware of the situation.

Agree0 Disagree0

Mac 2. I take it you are just being deliberately pedantic for the sake of your own amusement here? I will bite and be equally pedantic in return. I have read most of your posts and have noticed that you have a penchant for specifics when it comes to words, no matter how banal the argument becomes. It is also clear from how you write that you are intelligent and articulate enough to understand the following so please ignore the CAPS as they are for the 'hard of hearing'. Words can be manipulated to suit any argument in exactly the same manner as the politicians who mould statistics use the results to suit their own personal needs. I will give you two examples in relation to points you have recently raised to emphasise this point.

We ARE a football team. We do not require a licence to BE a football team. My five a side team is a football team, whether we are affiliated to a league or not, otherwise we would cease to exist every time the league ended despite playing all year round (we re-register yearly just as we did the first year we entered). However, we (back to Rangers - and it WILL always remain Rangers to Rangers fans) DO require a licence to PLAY our football team in the professional leagues.

Also, in response to the debate you were having with another poster re illegal parking and consequences/punishment. If the consequence of BEING CAUGHT (to circumvent the clever way you argued around the OP's point) parking illegally is a parking fine can you tell me what the punishment for said offence would be? I look forward to the answer to that question.

My point is that consequences can be positive or negative (reward or punishment if you will - Celtic rewarded with the league title as a consequence of collecting the most league points and Dunfermline punished [you can hardly call it rewarded if you are being honest] by way of relegation as a consequence of collecting the least amount of league points). Therefore, the consequences of an action can be found in the form of a punishment (or reward) and a punishment can be received as a direct consequence of an inappropriate action. They can be one in the same thing whilst at the same time retaining independent definitions dependent upon the context of the phrasing. In this case they are one and the same thing.

As a club we have behaved terribly in certain regards (and I include the 'alleged' Rangers fans who have issued death threats etc as well as the two chancers who caused the financial implosion within the club which has led us here) and we have been collectively punished pretty severely as a consequence. The punishment (or negative consequence for those still hard of hearing - of which I am sure there are many) for going into administration was the deduction of ten points, etc. Yes it was a consequence of our actions but it was also the pre-determined consequential PUNISHMENT for breaking the rules through those actions. I find it difficult to comprehend how it can be viewed as anything other than that.

Brian

Agree0 Disagree0

Wallace left i must have missed that ! {Ed039's Note - Left mid it says)

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Jul 2012 15:44:38
Do rangers have a say on any tv deal... Why would we want to support the s p l --- s f l should just get their own tv deal.

Believable10 Unbelievable6

Rangers get no say as they don't have necessary membership, won't gt say for 3 years minimum {Ed039's Note - Clubs dont make decisions it's the footballing body in charge)

Agree0 Disagree1

27 Jul 2012 15:39:07
What time is deadline to receive licence ?... Jam {Ed039's Note - From what I have read it is "close of business today" so maybe 5pm, no updates so just dont know)

Believable4 Unbelievable2

Just came a cross a wee rumour. We've all been slagging off Regan and Doncaster including me but... the SPL. SFA, SFL and Rangers still in administration as well as 'newco' Rangers all have to agree on everything before a licence can be granted.

But Green is supposedly going to sue Duff and Phelps part of the problem of obtaining the licence is a disagreement between Rangers in administration (D&P) and Green's Newco Rangers?

Just a thought

BARNEY BEAR

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Jul 2012 14:52:51
Hearing that Green has backed down over attempts to prevent SPL investigation into dual contracts.

Expecting SFA membership to be given later this afternoon, or in worst case scenario, tomorrow.

Mac2. {Ed039's Note - There will need to be some sort of licence by close of business today or there will be no game on Sunday)

Believable7 Unbelievable6

Why today Ed?

Thanks.

Mac2. {Ed039's Note - I dont think the SFA are open tomorrow to process the paperwork, same as if a player was transferred it wouldnt be done over the weekend. I had read this earlier in the week, plus there would need to be a cut off time for cancelling the game on Sunday)

Agree4 Disagree1

Ed - so scottish football can go into meltdown because the SFA dont work on a saturday unFNbelievable, if it wasnt so serious it would be an FN joke

JG

JG {Ed039's Note - I might be wrong mate but that's what I have been reading this week)

Agree0 Disagree0

Why should the sfa work saturday just to give rangers another day to back down and accept points put to them

Agree2 Disagree2

27 Jul 2012 14:48:50
Can some1 plz explain too me what the tv rights of rangers has too do with the spl? {Ed039's Note - Sky want the rights to Rangers games or they will not honour the deal offered to (but not signed by SPL), therefore the SPL want to buy the TV rights to Rangers games in the SFL to keep their broadcast agreement with sky viable)

Believable6 Unbelievable3

27 Jul 2012 14:32:06
Does anyone think the SPL are taking the stance now with Rangers because they might an almighty c*ck up the last time.
Neil Doncaster is on borrowed time hence the reason Lawwell is trying to muscle in on the Sky deal.

Believable6 Unbelievable6

27 Jul 2012 13:48:13
Aquote from Charles Green from Tue this week :

I'm really hopeful now that within the next 24 hours we can have this thing signed and sealed and Alistair can start loading his players on a team coach to go up and try to win a match on Sunday."

Much more guff do we have to listen to from this guy. He talks the talk but has has yet to walk the walk and deliver on anything.

Administration of the new-co not far off now and he and Mr Whyte will walk away, very wealthy men.

Its been the plan all along.

Port Bear

Believable8 Unbelievable10

They maybe wealthy men ...... But they never made any of it from Gers

Agree4 Disagree8

Disagree entirely mate and this is the kind of attitude we dont need just now. All im worried about is etting a winning team on that park. Cummon The Rangers.

Agree0 Disagree4

27 Jul 2012 13:00:10
Bbc reporting Rangers selling more Brechin tickets today.
Talk about telegraphing to SPL every intention to cave in.

Believable5 Unbelievable5

27 Jul 2012 11:47:25
Deal apparently in the bag. Statement to be released this afternoon.

TTG

Believable1 Unbelievable6

'In the bag.' You make it sound like a major victory for your new club.

Agree4 Disagree7

In the bag means it's done ..... What part of that sounds like a major victory - away and take your besotted interest to some other club ya leech

Agree5 Disagree2

Better than any hollow victories you lot will have this season!

Agree4 Disagree7

Poster 3 ,and your tainted title with no opposition doug t.s.o

Agree2 Disagree5

@4: and it's tainted in what way? What about any titles won by Rangers with players who were on dual-contracts (if proven)? They'll be tainted much more.

Agree4 Disagree1

' tainted' means to pollute or corrupt, why would winning a title without cheating be tainted? learn the meaning of the word before using it. johnbhoy79

Agree1 Disagree0

Poster 6 ,you been in the mitchell library again ,its your fellow supporters that have been using the word tainted in last 5 months ,look up the word cheating when your nex in there ,that word is more in line with what your lot have been doing for years doug t.s.o

Agree0 Disagree0

Ffs johnbhoy are you for real the amount of presure put on refs every season by your bottlers is tantamount to cheating alone ! Ger76

Agree1 Disagree0

27 Jul 2012 11:26:23
weak up and smell the coffie bears! savage is a tim supporter just tryin to wind us up, do ye think hed come an play in the d3. as for the rest o' the names bein bandied aboot a think we need a reality check! am ragin aboot the whole mess!!

Blue Baloo

Believable5 Unbelievable6

27 Jul 2012 11:22:53
As an outsider looking at Ranger’s player issues – would it not be best to try and keep a minimal amount of experienced players and the rest of the squad should be made of kids from the youth set-up? Ranger’s should easily win the league and playing at this lower level for a few years you will get the opportunity to blood these youngsters and get them used to the rough and tumble of Scottish football. You would also save the club a lot of money on high wages which would be spent employing SPL veterans and every other has been you are recently linked with. By the time you are back in the SPL these youngsters should be matured footballers and should be able to cope with life in SPL. You never know you could unearth a few gems.

Andydee mufc

Believable7 Unbelievable3

Well said Andy. All the best mate.

Agree2 Disagree1

Its the way we should be going about this , but surely we need a stronger manager

Agree1 Disagree1

27 Jul 2012 11:01:30
Should Rangers be found guilty of improperly registering employees for over a decade, the fear - as expressed by manager Ally McCoist - is that Rangers will be punished by having all trophies and cups won during that period stripped from them.

One might argue that such an outcome would not, indeed, be a punishment at all but merely the automatic result of having found to have cheated opponents during the period in question by fielding players they would not otherwise have been able to afford.

The real punishment would follow. Take, for example, the case of disgraced sprinter Ben Johnson. He set a new world record of 9.79 seconds in winning the 100m at the Seoul Olympics in 1988.

However, the urine sample supplied by the Canadian afterwards contained traces of the steroid stanozolol.

Johnson, whose coach, Charles Francis, admitted that the athlete had been using performance-enhancing drugs since 1981, was stripped of his gold medal.

That, though, was a consequence of having cheated: the penalty handed down to Johnson by the International Amateur Athletics Federation was a two-year ban from all competition.

Green, like McCoist, does not wish to be similarly inconvenienced for any wrong-doing on the behalf of his predecessors.

The SPL, for their part, wish to be able to deliver a sanction in keeping with the seriousness of the charges which have been brought and their lawyers, Harper McLeod, have already stated that there is a “prima facie” case for Rangers/Sevco to answer

Believable9 Unbelievable9

....so you take take urine samples from them now? lol

Luvgers

Agree4 Disagree1

Here we go another one of this is not a punishment but consequence of action brigade. Well you state that Rangers/Sevco, which is it?
If newco why should they be punished or a consequence for old co sins?
You can't have it both ways

Agree8 Disagree6

OP - therefore surely the titles are stripped as a consequence of the dual contracts and an actual punishment would still need to be applied - extension of transfer embargo?

Agree3 Disagree2

If its newco then you don't have any titles or cups to be stripped off

Agree3 Disagree1

A ban won't be an option. Thanks to Doncaster and Lawell a deal has been struck with Sky to show Rangers games for next 3 seasons. Ban us and they break the Sky contract. No amount of begging letters from Lawell could replace that money !

Agree4 Disagree1

@2 You bought the history supposedly and you are asking for the old SFA membership to be transferred across rather than applying for new membership - so good and bad has to transfer over -cake and eat it springs to mind! {Ed039's Note - Tell the SPL that with the TV deal then)

Agree3 Disagree3

@2

"Rangers/Sevco, which is it?
If newco why should they be punished or a consequence for old co sins?"

I didn't raise this an issue in the OP so why have you? I'm assuming that you are Rangers FFS!

Agree1 Disagree1

Why can they not have it both ways?
The old rangers should have titles stripped if found guilty and the newco should not be allowed a completely new slate as they had certain parts of the old club transferred over. Anyway surely you would rather have titles taken off if you were found guilty than keep tainted titles just because you started up a newco

Albhoy {Ed039's Note - So a newco can be parts of the oldco, that just doesnt make sense, which is it? It cant be a case of when we want to do one thing we can issue sanctions because we have decided that the oldco bit refers to the newco but when something that doesnt suit everyone else you entirely newco. So please which one is it?)

Agree2 Disagree2

@luvger,s why not you have been taking the piss for years,garlar07

Agree1 Disagree0

27 Jul 2012 09:47:34
Heard something yesterday from my old man who works at Ibrox. He was working at the house of an office worker at Ibrox, who noticed last week that a car, a range rover, that was leased to a certain Craig Whyte, was seen outside a side entrance at the stadium. The car was the exact vehicle that Whyte had hired when he was owner, the canny staff member noticed the car, because she did the paperwork on it...now, what I am wondering is, is bomber brown actually telling them truth, he reckons Whyte and green are in bed together? A few wee things have been niggling away at me... I reckon it's not too far away from the truth is it? They are both money grabbing b#%$#ds... It makes sense for them to be working in cahoots with each other... There's a lot of money still to be had in both Ibrox and auchenhowie.... As well as a few quid to be saved in wages wi edu, Goian etc... Any sensible gers fan think the same? {Ed039's Note - Sorry but I think this is bull)

Believable16 Unbelievable17

Do you honestly think green would have anything to do with whyte and risk everything he is trying to do for the club ,put it this way he is the only 1 thats done anything constructive so far and fought our case against the sfa and spl who were hoping we would buckle under pressure .ps. if we are playing this year id ask supporters to give the young boys a chance ,the ones that that dont give them encouragement stay away we dont need you doug t.s.o

Agree4 Disagree4

Oh god not more Whyte bull crap really, if it's a lease car is it not plausible that some one else could have leased it? Or is that too far fetched as well?

Agree2 Disagree5

Ed, u may think this is bull, but the sources are real, and the story is real.... Perhaps the bull part is that green and Whyte are working together,but my instincts tell me that Whyte is still involved somewhere, he is lurking... He still has some hold over rangers i am sure.... I don't trust green, not as far as I could throw him, granted, he came in when nobody else would show the money, like smith and Kennedy etc, but there's something still very very dodgy about the whole thing... Why was green picked in the first place when bill millers bid was better, even bill ngs bid was better... Anyway, back to the point... My old man has checked back the CCTV in the stadium, and has confirmed its Whyte, sneaking into the side entrance. Read into that what you like... {Ed039's Note - Glenn was picked because bill miller withdrew and bill ng had too many conditions attached to his offer. As for why're "sneaking" in, more bull in my opinion)

Agree1 Disagree1

What a complete load of rubbish.Green also drives a range rover,possibly he just picked up the lease on it from Whyte,who would have leased it through rangers anyway.

Agree0 Disagree1

It's not whyte that owns us it's ticketus. soon to be known !

Agree2 Disagree0

Why did you ask the question of only sensible rangers fans because i wonder if you are where are all these so called rangers men where is there money green though not my first choice is the only show in town and we must back him if not the club will go bust i will put a name to you fergus mcann he came in said he was here short time made a few mill but left celti in a lot better shape than it was when he started so i dont care if green retires on his earnings from rangers as long as we still have a team to support so come on stop all this mud slinging step up buy the season tickets and lets climb back up ;;;cooperboy

Agree1 Disagree0

Agree with you ED this story is pure bullcrap, all lease cars were returned as they under oldco, no monies to pay bill etc.

Agree1 Disagree1

So let me get this right, Craig whyte drives up to the door at ibrox, jumps out, goes in for a meeting comes back out jumps in his hired car and drives away and only someone who works in the office sees this, or sees the hired car mmmmmmmm why would we ever doubt this story

JG

Agree2 Disagree1

27 Jul 2012 08:10:02
Wit a fricking cheek mrlennon those who cast the 1 st stone oh and hartson too. Get rich quick scheme ( tax evation) haha. Front page d r,

Believable18 Unbelievable14

Tax evasion is illegal - such tax schemes aren't. If the DR is claiming he was evading tax then he should make his money back from them through a lawsuit.

Agree2 Disagree8

Still mugs biting on the record hook! Swallow this cos it suits you eh? old news and tax was paid on the sums,it is a tax RELIEF scheme.read up on those.

Agree1 Disagree6

Read the full article mate!

Agree2 Disagree3

@1, nothing wrong with using EBTs then is there?

Agree5 Disagree1

People on high horses have a long way to fall when they come off the high horse

JG

Agree8 Disagree0

Lennon and his pal Hartson according to papers been caught out in an illegal tax scheme.Never again should anyone listen to these two faced clowns.

Agree13 Disagree1

@1 The point is he was trying to avoid paying tax and got his fingers burnt. There are more ex employees of CFC who did the same. Some current officials to. Makes me think that they were advising the individual to try the schemes with their own money.
Now when the RFC went into admin smeltic fans were on here claiming using EBTs was a tax dodge/scam and morally wrong.
There is a similarity because the way in which Innovator One was administered was to dodge tax and its failing, similar to the claim by the HMRC that the way in which RFC administered their EBTs was to dodge paying tax. Lennon's was proven.

Agree9 Disagree1

HMRC have ruled that the way Rangers used EBTs was wrong and fined them but Rangers appealed. The current issue with SPL/SFA is dual contracts, not EBTs.

Agree2 Disagree1

@6: it wasn't an illegal tax scheme.

Agree2 Disagree6

@9)Well the tax man says it was.

Agree6 Disagree2

What is wrong with the Gers fans. The scheme was found to be against the rules, not the people who invested in the sceme. And the money that Lennon used to invest was his salary that he had earned and PAID TAX on. It was not an illegal payment scheme but an investment schem that Lennon lost money on. Unlike your EBT players who were illegally paid and paid NO TAX on large parts of their renumeration. BIG DIFFERENCE.

Agree1 Disagree3

@10: there will be prosecutions then if it was illegal?

Agree1 Disagree0

Lennon is being chased for unpaid lawyers fees, read the article properly! Paul Robinson, Joe Worsley, Jason Leonard, Hartson and Lennon gave money to a man called Bjorn Stiedl. He told each sportsman they could avoid paying as much tax by moving their money around. He lied to the sportsmen and was jailed for fraud. The sportsmen lost their money, and are suing the Lawyers that told them the scheme was legit! These schemes have been used by sportsmen all over britain every day.

The judge says they can't sue, so he threw the case out. The sportsmen have not paid the lawyers who were taking the case against Bjorn Stiedl!

You lot understand yet? I must say i find it hilarious that on the very day you find out IF you will be playing this year, you are all more worried about Neil Francis Lennon!

DazzaBhoy {Ed039's Note - I also find it funny after your chairman said your club would survive and prosper without Rangers he has been on begging fans to buy season tickets and has been to sky with tail between legs begging them not to cancel the deal. Funny how you are one of the most consistent poster on a site for a club you claim does not exist. Take a look in the mirror and engage your brain before you start typing Dazza)

Agree3 Disagree3

Consistent poster? Is that cause i have the balls to leave a name Ed? What does your rant have to do with Lennon being chased for Lawyers fees?

I think you should engage your brain, if you find Chairmen asking supporters to buy season tickets funny? Every club in Scotland is asking supporters to buy season tickets. So what is Green doing for Sevco? Is he not asking RFC fans to buy into his club? He came out in the press this very week and informed you all how much he wants for season tickets. Is that not him "begging". Lawell has asked supporters to make up for the money lost due to RFC being liquidated! No-one is denying that RFC, and their supporters, brought vast sums of money into the SPL, and the communities they visited. But that club died due to bad management by Whyte. Newco rnagers will come back to SPL and their supporters will start filling the coffers of Killie, Dundee Utd, Aberdeen again. But until then we all need to tighten our belts, and asking supporters to give a little more is hardly the worst thing.

Lawell has been down to Sky asking for the best deal for all 12 SPL clubs. He realises that Sky don't want to honour their deal if the league is diluted. Sky money is only 5% of Celtics income, so why has he got his tail between his legs?

DazzaBhoy {Ed039's Note - Dazza it's the last line of your post, it's a bit funny you are here ranting on a rangers rumours site about rangers fans and your assumption we are more interested in Neil Lennon. I think you will find your name on this site more than lennons. The rest of your post I actually agree with as with most of your posts, and I know the financial hardships are rangers doing and you will have seen me acknowledge such! My rant did digress a little but my point had to be made. As for tail between his legs, I think he thought everything was gonna be ok without rangers and the financial boost they bring to other clubs but it's not and I believe he is now panicking, he is not worried about rangers being in sfl3 but the clubs that thought they would prosper without rfc are now trying to get deals off of their carcass)

Agree0 Disagree1

27 Jul 2012 07:48:42
I always follow GB in the Olympics, but am sorry watching the game last night I actually wanted GB to lose. If Pearce is actually trying to tell the Scottish nation that no Scottish player was good enough to play in that team then he shouldnt be coaching it.
Don {Ed039's Note - Is he tryin to tell us the Bolton forward is better than Jordan Rhodes?)

Believable10 Unbelievable8

Couldn't agree more, Jordan Rhodes should have easily made that squad. Surely there should be some sort of rule i.e a minimum of 3 players from each nation, otherwise it should be called Team EW (England and Wales) but must say I enjoyed seeing Senegal score

Agree2 Disagree2

Naw the sfa didny want any scots playing {Ed039's Note - True, but sOme were ready to go against that)

Agree1 Disagree0

I fell asleep during that last night and woke up in the middle of Absolutely Fabulous wondering "What fresh hell is this?!!"

Agree1 Disagree0

Stuart Pearce could not manage a s**t. BlackpoolBear

Agree2 Disagree1

27 Jul 2012 04:15:29
There is two diferent papers one saying deal almost done the other is giving a mixed responce but until its comfirmed either way we can only wait and my stress level is through the roof I can't take anymore uuuuurrrrrggggghhhhh {Ed039's Note - Join the club mate)

Believable9 Unbelievable5

I would ignore everthing you read in the press. I think their covering of the whole saga has been a disgrace.

They have mostly written emotional claptrap, rather than investigating and printing the truth. If they have real information they are not printing, for whatever reason.

Agree1 Disagree0

27 Jul 2012 02:00:08
Was reading earlier in the paper that Robbie Savage would consider coming out of retirement to help rangers.. if true (which i doubt) would love it

Believable7 Unbelievable17

Your quick pal thats news from 2 days ago

Agree5 Disagree5

27 Jul 2012 00:26:34
Few posts Saying rangers have been removed from sfl league table , still on bbc website and on bbc alba tv list for Sunday what a joke once again 72 hours til match and still no membership , what's this got to do with spl ? We are in 3rd div seems sky are the ones wanting to show 45games over 3 years spl want to keep all the money haha that will be right don't back down green they need us in the sfl this year or the whole of the Scottish game will collapse quicker than team gb hopes of a gold medal

Believable11 Unbelievable11

Rangers must not cave in to the blackmail tactics of a Celtic driven SPL campaign to have titles stripped from Rangers,make no mistake this is the primary function of behind the facade of morality and sporting integrity.
I am discussed by the actions of clubs who in the past have had much worse actions carried out behind closed doors than any thing Rangers are supposedly have done.

Agree11 Disagree11

Unfortunatly the BBC are not Scottish Football League? and Green will back down or we will not be watching football at IBROX ever? do you really understand any of this? and just a thought on football collapsing in Scotland! do you know how many people actually support football ie play it or an involved in it in Scotland? do you know how many people are working in football related jobs? non Rangers roles! clearly not if you think it will collapse, because at the demise of one team? there are many other issues out their? that means football will always go on, no matter what or who dissapears. Time to realise this and stop falling for the "press" scaremongering tactics.

Agree10 Disagree8

@1: A Celtic-driven campaign? How paranoid are you?! If Rangers had players in title-winning seasons that were on dual-contracts (therefore ineligible to play) should they not be punished? Remember that if the oldco is found guilty, UEFA will push for punishment too - is the European governing body working to a Celtic-driven agenda too?

Agree4 Disagree5

@2 I think the OP is not meaning wipeout but a collapse of what is available or was available last season.
The SPL will be a one horse race with another race for second.
Crowds outwith CFC will remain about the same but CFC will through time see a reduction in their crowds for meaningless SPL matches. Meaning less travelling CFC support, less money. Look at the situ re the TV deal this now. CFC don't need the money - but they need the publcity and advertising that goes with it. All the other SPL clubs do need the TV money as it counts for about 30% of their revenue and they need the crowds.
Euro games will still be a crowd puller.
The level of football will be about the same, boring and dull. For years everyone has harped on about bringing young stars through the ranks - where are they? have they started doing it? What benefit has the national team had? none. Any 'star' will be off to England and quite rightly so which may help the national side.
The national team have not qualified for a tournament since the SPL was started.
Of course football in Scotland will survive even if CFC get their wish and move to England. It's the standard and quality that will be left behind.
The only competition in the SPL will be for second place. The 1st, 2nd and 3rd divisions of the SFL will probably be more competitive.

Agree2 Disagree0

"I am discussed by the actions of clubs who in the past have had much worse actions carried out behind closed doors than any thing Rangers are supposedly have done."
Care to expand on this statement?
I can't think of one club that has done anything close to even one of the things rangers were accused of, let alone the whole collection accusations.
Al {Ed039's Note - Juventus? Half of Italy)

Agree1 Disagree2

27 Jul 2012 00:10:11
Windlass has offered his services, he is 43. Whilst I appreciate the offer, really?

Thanks but no thanks.

Believable5 Unbelievable12

27 Jul 2012 00:07:56
Whilst I think it is ludicrous to strip titles, it appears that this is the issue that is holding up a licence.

Can somebody explain to me why Rangers seem to have the ability to decide what punishments we accept bad those we won't.

Since when does an authority give the accused the
right to do a deal or to argue what is acceptable.

Surely the authority is the body that needs to give the verdict and the punishment. Imagine in a law court where a guy is found guilty of a crime and the judge gives him a year in the pokey. The person can't say no I won't do time but I will do community service. I just dont get it at all.

I personally will never "accept" losing titles, as far as I am concerned we have won 54 titles and that is it, and when we win the next one it will be 55. I know those fans of other clubs will give it "newco, no history, no titles etc. well if they believe that so be it, I could not care less. They know who won the titles, I know who won the titles. That will never change.

So I say let the petty chairmen of SPL clubs do what they want, I just want my team playing, don't care where it is or who against.

I believe that the SPL chairmen have killed Scottish football, I truely believe that many teams will not survive, and after Celtic win the league for a couple of years the fan base will dwindle, not just for Celtic but for all teams. A competition where there is no competition is nothing.

But this madness has to stop, let's get on with it.

Believable9 Unbelievable14

How naive are you, authorities do deals every day and in all walks of life, i think we are taking the right stance, enough is enough, those running scottish football must take a serious look at themselves after all this, now they are even prepared to hurt small teams such as brechin who have the chance of a bumper pay day about to slip from their grasp because others cannot stop their pursuit of rangers, how does that help our game?

JG

Agree1 Disagree6

No not the sfa ,spl , celtic , al quada , or the man on the moon . YOUR TEAM is responsible for its own demise through financial mismanagement / doping and in turn if scottsh football dies then it will be your fault . you new owner is holding the process up by withholding information , i wonder why would it play right into his hands to have no license so he can then sell everything for a tidy profit .

Agree8 Disagree4

No one is threatening to strip titles. The condition of membership put forward is for Rangers to agree to an independent tribunal to rule on whether the use of dual contracts happened and if they constituted a breach of the rules in respect of player registration.

Rangers get their day in court and if innocent no sanctions would be applied obviously.

Honestly don't see what the issue is, surely if innocent you want the club's name/history cleared of wrong doing and in the interests of justice to the game and fans if guilty appopriate punishment given out? If that means titles won using illegible players being cancelled, then so be it, seems fair that stolen goods are returned after a crime has been proved to have been committed.

Agree12 Disagree1

Gotta laugh at Rangers fans always twisting everything to suit your point of view...

"I believe that the SPL chairmen have killed Scottish football, I truely believe that many teams will not survive, and after Celtic win the league for a couple of years the fan base will dwindle, not just for Celtic but for all teams. A competition where there is no competition is nothing."

What about when Rangers bought their way to 9 in a row (and by the way, tried to sustain that success, by 'allegedly' using EBTs/dual contracts) ... Scottish football dwindled a little then, as I'm sure it will dwindle a little now is Celtic run away with a few titles. But regardless of whether or Rangers re-materialise, mark my words, in 3 or 4 years time, a Hearts, Motherwell or United will push Celtic for the title...

Agree1 Disagree5

The issue is what happens if Rangers are declared guilty. Not only will they have stolen titles and cups but they will aslo have stolen prize money and european qualification. If clubs sue for lost income than Newco will be finnished.

Agree3 Disagree2

26 Jul 2012 23:24:18
Dean Windass the next retired has been who says he wants to help Ally.
I will not buy a season ticket to watch these geriatrics milking a last pay day out of us.
Give youth and decent level Scottish players a chance.

Believable6 Unbelievable10

26 Jul 2012 23:17:12
"The row between Rangers and SPL threatens to delay Dundee and Kilmarnock’s seasons. Green has been given the authority by administrators Duff & Phelps to act as a proxy for them in dealing with Gers’ SPL share.

But he is unable to give it up until Gers have their licence, meaning Dundee are still not official members of the SPL and have no right to face Killie on August 4".

Believable3 Unbelievable6

The other clubs can expel ranger if they refuse to give it up. And if they make Dundee and killie wait then there will be a huge back lash against your club.

Agree3 Disagree2

@1 you make me laugh mate, there WILL be a huge backlash against rangers, have you been on the moon for the last 4 months

JG

Agree5 Disagree1

26 Jul 2012 23:11:30
Who gives a f@*k about loosing league titles? That was in the past this is the future. We can win plenty more.
Fresh start boys & girls lets just get on with the fitba! Who give a f@*k what the rest of them think? I do not.
Green you need to agree to the terms your going to save Scottish Football in the long run.
Im fed up hearing on here how other clubs should be punished? Or "I hope they all go bankrupt"! "Bitterness Rising" were better than that surely?
Lets save all the other teams from oblivion, the staff & players all have family's to feed why make them starve because were bitter? I do not think so.
We need a strong SPL to come back to.
In the end every one knows the Gers are the glue that bonds the SFA together!
With out us whats it going to bel like?
I can see it from the Players side as well i no where Ally is coming from when he says i will not except stripped titles. GUTED
But it is time to move on for the people

Believable13 Unbelievable14

Allys an idiot , got to keep his mouth shut .... he is actually becoming pathetic ,and i for one would like to see him walk away very soon

Agree11 Disagree5

Correct its not even the same team

Agree4 Disagree2

26 Jul 2012 23:09:35
Looks like the SFL have agreed to allow the SPL to sell the media rights for Rangers games to SKY. This will allow the proposed SPL / SKY deal to stay in place. Fellow bears we have now been furnised with our first opportunity to strike back at the SPL teams that voted us out. I'm not renewing my SKY Sports subscription and in fact I'm going to cancel SKY all together if this deal is officially announced. Lets not feed the faces of those who have tried to destroy our team, our history and most of all us.

Vote NO to Independence in 2014.

Believable17 Unbelievable16

Good,FKN grief !

its the twilight zone!!

bil72

Agree4 Disagree1

And your reasons for voting no to independence for Scotland would be?

Mad statement mate would love to hear your thinking as to why Scotland is best run
From Westminster and is unable to look after our own affairs
Alex Mci

Agree3 Disagree3

So thats you on a diet then ,fab1

Agree2 Disagree1

26 Jul 2012 22:51:09
Hi fellow Gers. Just wondering how much longer all this crap can go on.Seems we get a wee speck of a positive and it's ripped from our hands. All the tv coverage and newspapers
filled with RFC over the past 6 months is getting me down.
Here we are @this present day squabbling for a chance to play in D3 ( with respect to all d3 teams )...how we " mighty
have fallen".

It's far to early in the day to make judgements on who's guilty or innocent or why is this and why is that ? I read lots of posts on different sights and independent articles from around the globe . You know what ?...you would find it
extremely difficult to find a solution to this that would suit
all parties. The great Clarence Darrow would wince at taking on the RFC case. There are very complex issue"s in this fiasco which will run for a long time.

When you open Pandora's Box all that that is left is Hope.
Nuff said.
Luvgers.

Believable5 Unbelievable7

26 Jul 2012 23:02:56
does it matter where alan mcgregor goes to, he didnt choose rangers and it was probably difficult for him not to, he had been with us for a very long time and i for one am thankfull we had him for so long when he helped us in the big games he played. too much crap on here about who left and who stayed, good players and loyal player have left in the past for whatever reason but the club went on and hopefully we get some sort of team to follow. dont forget the players who left never put us in the gutter and i dont think to be a ranger means you should never play for another club,more money for them or not they left at uncertain times and if we as readers and posters were good enough we would think long and hard as well to take the cash and start a new future wherever it may be
ps hope this doesnt sound like a rant coz its not just a view lol
to the futurejammydodger

Believable8 Unbelievable1

26 Jul 2012 22:51:24
SFL have removed all traces of rangers from there website. we now have Club 10 in division3

Believable6 Unbelievable2

 
Change Consent