Rangers Banter Archive July 25 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


25 Jul 2012 20:30:25
Amdy Faye is a free agent. Played for us before. Surely may be interested in a move.

Believable1 Unbelievable33

Hes played with yous before? Im guessing you mean he played in one of the bounce games you've had at Murray Park recently? As thats the only games your team has played in its history

Agree0 Disagree0

If we get the membership transferred. Then it's the same rangers. That's what's causing all the hold ups. That's why your on the rangers rumours website and not sevco. That's why we will always be rangers the most successful club in Scotland. RTID

Agree5 Disagree1

25 Jul 2012 20:04:48
Rangers SFA membership transfer will be refused after SPL reject proposals. This isn't significant in terms of football next season as SFA can't invite any other club forward at this late stage and will grant newco a new license.

However, it means all history cares and new rangers, as a club. Eggins day of issue of 'new' license.

Also, Craig Whyte is main debt creditor for green who has not put a single penny in (all Loans etc)...just like Murray (a disgrace that Gould be wiped from club history) and Whyte (a bigger disgrace). Craig Whytes dad is controlling Craig's interest (as he passes fit and proper test). {Ed039's Note - Source?)

Believable15 Unbelievable15

You have a good point at the start. I lost interest after that though. CheltBlue

Agree2 Disagree4

Oh the Drama tonight!

Agree2 Disagree2

25 Jul 2012 19:57:14
Celtic fan here....I thought it was good of Robbie savage to say he would play for rangers for free, I think ally should bite his hand off,as Robbie says he feels he could still be useful in the Scottish 3rd

Believable12 Unbelievable9

I think he'd be a great signing. Div 3 is no place for the faint hearted. We're going to need our share of seasoned pro's to look after the youth players on and off the park.
VHSS

Agree4 Disagree0

25 Jul 2012 19:54:35
why are rangers stalling on ebt investigations as at this stage that is all it is , surely this must mean that they think they are guilty so i say sfa/ spl must proceed as rangers would demand this if it were another club . remember no agreement no licence = no football and no club

Believable20 Unbelievable5

They may be guilty or they may not! SPL want Rangers to waive their right to appeal over any punishments! Could be the SPL's evidence is very shaky at best and if they hand out a punishment based on it and Rangers appealed in court then Rangers would win! SPL know this hence waive the right to appeal!

Agree2 Disagree8

This week it turns out the BBC use ebt's,everone uses EBT whom can afford a good accountant, The UK set up the whole EBT system so why dont you just get a life and go and bother someone else for gods sake.

Agree2 Disagree7

@2. You still misunderstand this. The point is not the ebt itself but the fact that rangers players received non-contractual payments. It's a sort of catch 22 and there is no doubt rangers are guilty. The only question is what to do about it.im amazed so many people don't understand this yet.

Agree2 Disagree0

25 Jul 2012 19:28:53
it still amazes me to read so called bears not willing to renew or buy ticketswhile greens in charge.i have no problem with green selling us on in 5/6 years time for a profit.i think its time for us to put up or shut up.i gave up going to games years ago because i couldn't stomach guys like edu,lafferty and whittaker getting payed thousands and who were not even good juniors(no offence).i have decided to get a season ticket for 2 reasons.1.because they need my money to survive.and 2.because there will be a chance to see some promising youth players get a chance and the excitement of rising from the ashes back to the top.so stop the greetin get the hands in the pocket and dont let our club die before we even have started!

Believable7 Unbelievable9

Whyte has already said he wants to be away after 12months, after quote from King months ago Green agreed "if no sooner"

din 22

Agree1 Disagree0

Tim here i think if you dont get behind this guy the bhoys will not be seeing you in 3 years joes bhoy

Agree3 Disagree1

25 Jul 2012 18:43:45
I read rangers are going to offer contracts to these players but wonder where the money to pay them is going to come from?

Believable9 Unbelievable4

25 Jul 2012 18:41:56
I saw Walter smith and another guy driving away from ibrox tonight at about 5 o'clock. Any one any idea why?

Believable2 Unbelievable3

Giving Souness a lift. That was the last envelope...

Agree6 Disagree0

Delivering another 5m bid i guess fekin chancer lol

Agree5 Disagree2

Going home for their tea.

Mac2.

Agree1 Disagree0

Picking up free season tickets to stop slagging green. But £3m for 30% of club.

Agree0 Disagree0

Going home maybe ?

Agree0 Disagree0

Pity no picture you could be making a wee fortune from the daily scratchy.

Agree2 Disagree0

25 Jul 2012 18:20:09
Celtic supporter here (one of the honest ones),Quick question for ed and rangers supporters that may know?
will the new Rangers be releasing a different strip than the one just now? Or changing crest? Or any other datail with being a new co.?
If its a stupid question I apologise but I've not heard anything! Don't want to say good luck, but hope to see use back in the SPL or whatever it'll be called by then?! {Ed039's Note - It seems to me that the strips being sold in the shop are the same as the ones released at the end of last season, there are some that have the sponsor and some that dont)

Believable2 Unbelievable6

We are not a newco. Accept it and move on. {Ed039's Note - Erm, yes we are)

Agree2 Disagree17

You're not just a new company but a new club under everybody's rules and regulations, as the footballing club and the company are one and the same, and have to be.

Agree12 Disagree6

Erm no we're not. Rangers are still Rangers. Not The Rangers or Newco Rangers or Rangers newco or any other slant you wish to add to it. Cheers. {Ed039's Note - I dont disagree with that, but its a newco, i dont know how you can argue with that? Listen I am a Rangers fan and I can admit it, whats the problem?)

Agree5 Disagree12

@2 lets make up our minds in the we hate Rangers Alliance-We are either new therefore no sanctions or we are Rangers with sanctions.The we hate Rangers Alliance cannot keep having their cake eating it and throwing it out their high chairs like all naughty toddlers its time for your bed!!!!

Agree5 Disagree6

Your team are a newco... Obviously YOU can't accept it, I asked a genuine question and you couldn't even answer wether you knew or not! Cheers ed for your reply on OP

Agree7 Disagree1

@4 the problem with that is if your not Rangers why should we make special allowances to let you play in the SFL with out the required 3 years accounts. Like Bill Miller planed your a sort of mad hybrid of old and new. Your a new company that wants all of the old football licences transferred. No one has ever done this before and no one knows how to deal with you. The SPL and SFL decided to treat you exactly like a newco, no punishment, no special treatment. The SFA is trying to treat you as inheritors of the SFA membership which means that all of the existing penalties and liabilities should be transferred with the membership. I understand your frustration but the people responsible for this are rangers.

Agree6 Disagree0

Your club is a newco. The probl is that the reason it is a newco is to avoid paying debts. This is why sanctions will be applied. Otherwise Craig whyte will have cheated thousands out of money owed and got away with it. Personally I would refuse membership until its clear whyte is not involved. At this stage it looks like he is. The sfa and spl have actually done a good job in foiling his plans up to now.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ed, you are wrong! The corporate entity running Rangers is in the process of being liquidated, i.e. Oldco. We are now being run by a new corporate entity called Sevco, i.e. the Newco. We are still Rangers as a club. We are not New Rangers, we are still just Rangers! There is a big difference between being a Newco and a New Club!!

JD {Ed039's Note - So why does even the owner acknowledge we are a newco then?)

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Jul 2012 17:20:34
I think Ian Black will be a cracking signing. I would have had him if we were still in the SPL. Beattie could do well aswell. Its pretty good we can still attract these players even though we are in D3. Some good business should see us easily reach the SPL again in maybe 4-5 years.

Rory

Believable10 Unbelievable10

Beattie is a no go.

Agree8 Disagree6

Chance for these boys to become legends helping take us back up the divisions. If they sign its not going to be for the money as i'm sure they could earn more elsewhere. I'm actually looking forward to the SFL campaign and seeing some players playing for us simply because they want to and not for the cash.

Terry The Toerag.

Agree9 Disagree5

All the Legends had double secretive contracts and got paid through a tax haven offshore for working in Glasgow, will the new lads do the same?

Agree5 Disagree7

3.)
Think you should check the ebt list & payments b4 u jump,on the 'kill rangers' bandwagon!
The majority of payments over a number of years were for small sums to guys who were not even guaranteed a game FFS! e.g. Dan Egen! , the big payments were to SDM & co & almost half were for back room team & directors.
READ ABOUT IT yourself, if you can? don't
listen to the B/s**t

bil72

Agree1 Disagree5

Post4# are you really that far in denial? Does not matter how many games they played,it is all about the contracts that were lodged, And half were for backroom team? are you having a laugh?

Agree0 Disagree1

Ferguson named
Amoruso named
mccann named
dodds pay off

etc etc
#din22

Agree1 Disagree1

@4. You are kidding yes ? I've read the list and it covers every match rangers played for years. Even if a player only got a quid it makes him ineligible in every match he played. You just don't get the signifigance of this. I think you need to read the list mate.

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Jul 2012 17:03:38
RANGERS' players continued their summer programme this morning by taking to the brand new Ibrox pitch for the first time to train.

In sunny conditions at the stadium, the group warmed up on the magnificent surface then took part in three 30-minute matches while they remain unable to play pre-season friendlies.

Thanks RFF for the new pitch.

Believable4 Unbelievable6

Was that thanks to the RFF a joke. If it wasn't I'm sad for Gers. That money was meant to pay off small creditors. You remember them. The people that really got screwed.

Agree13 Disagree5

@1 And the HMRC didn't help them either by refusing the CVA. The creditors get even less money thro liquidation than they would have got thro the CVA.

Agree4 Disagree11

No (1) which one of the small creditors hasn't been paid yet since your in the know, I for one would be interested

Agree6 Disagree6

@1, the RFFF was not there to pay off small creditors, that is just one thing some of the money was used for. It was their to help meet essential running costs ie. things Rangers need as a football club.

Agree4 Disagree5

To number 3 celtic still to be paid {Ed039's Note - All creditors still to be paid, thats the point of liquidation)

Agree5 Disagree3

@5 as yet celtic have made no request for payment.try and keep up with whats happening at your club

Agree1 Disagree1

@6. Rangers fc were billed as normal by celtic but so far the bill has not been paid. There is no need to make a request as you put it, as its out of Celtics hands.

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Jul 2012 16:14:49
GREEN TO SELL TO KENNEDY, charles green will sell to brian kennedy in the next 48 hrs, green cannot agree to all sanctions the sfa and peter lawwell demand, he will cut and run leaving kennedy to pick up the batton, ally made it clear he would not accept the titles being stripped and this was the last straw for green who wanted to cave in, and this would have been to much for him to fight..........hallelluja.........

Believable2 Unbelievable20

What difference would it make if Green sells to Kennedy? Utter nonsense!

Agree12 Disagree1

I think not.

BARNEY BEAR

Agree10 Disagree2

25 Jul 2012 15:29:35
Rangers Bid for Licence

"SFA chief executive Stewart Regan is being cautious – and hints that the whole issue could move closer to Friday’s deadline.

But the entire issue of whether Rangers get a certificate still has to go before the SFA board and Regan revealed that nothing had been decided.

He said: “It could possibly be settled in 24 hours but there are still a number of issues to resolve and it will require a lot of action from our lawyers.”

Believable3 Unbelievable2

25 Jul 2012 14:54:31
newco set to not recieve a penny
steve davis,money will go to sfa
source evening times

Believable9 Unbelievable4

25 Jul 2012 14:53:24
RANGERS today released the following statement:

Charles Green, Chief Executive of The Rangers Football Club, said: "We have reached agreement with the SFA and SFL on all matters but not with the SPL.

"As a result, talks are continuing to secure our SFA membership which we are hoping to receive today."

Source: RFC website

Believable0 Unbelievable1

Is the SPL the ruling body in Scotland? This whole application business is a complete and utter joke. A waste of time. You might get agreement with 2 but not all 3 until we just say yes, yes, yes and do what they want.
I hope that it is good grounds that RFC are holding out for because if it is and the SPL still say no then I'll back RFC dropping out for as long as it takes. Enough is enough.
Too many hidden agendas and everyone says they are acting in the best interest of Scottish football.
Wake Up it's a joke.

Agree10 Disagree6

Do Rangers fans kike you actually dthink for yourselves and seek out facts rather than the ones you're fed from the west coast mafia media!

It's incredibly straight forward. the spl were charged with investigation into dual contracts. the sfa took a step back and awaiting the result of the investigation. newco want to transfer the sfa membership, to circumvent the criteria required for a new sfa membership.

your club needs to make up its mind... If you are still to be rangers, you can keep the history, but that should mean if you are found guilty, then the title are stripped. and ur still getting off lightly as you have also received prize money and additional incomes associated with successes which were effectively stolen from other clubs! Or, if you do not want ur club to receive any sanctions, apply for a new membership.... and that will stop all this nonsense bargaining over tv rights and sfl can tell the spl to sling their hook. unfortunately, new licence is very unlikely to be granted. this whole situation is smoke n mirrors. if the rules were just followed to letter, this situation could have been resolved weeks ago

Agree0 Disagree1

25 Jul 2012 14:43:10
YAWN !!

another day , another load of tripe.

We will get the licence we need, but NOT BEFORE we give in to EVERYTHING asked of us.

For God's sake Charles, just say yes and lets get on with picking up a few players and playing football.

Wee Bill

Believable9 Unbelievable13

25 Jul 2012 14:35:37
Black signing today.
Beats unlikely to be signing now, because Little has re-signed out of the blue (cheaper option)
Looks like he's on his way to Notts Cnty or Sheff Untd, despite his best efforts to become a Ger.
At least he was willing, unlike some. {Ed039's Note - Need a licence or nobody will be signing anytime. I know its something different to talk about, but there are no absolutes here)

Believable0 Unbelievable4

Black paperwork all done today after the 3x30 90 mins at Ibrox.
Beattie not offered a deal, as Andy Little rejoined the night before.
Beats not happy, but now moving to Notts cnty or Sheff utd.

Agree1 Disagree3

25 Jul 2012 14:08:25
Has any one heard what is happening with mcgregor, its all gone quiet since the turkey talk, my mate says he realy does not want to leave glasgow. saying that hes too good to be playing in the 3rd tho. Ed? {Ed039's Note - Not heard anything yet, he has been in talks with Besiktas. I think the uncertainty over the validty of the deal might be holding it up, and perhaps some reluctance from Greegs as well)

Believable0 Unbelievable1

25 Jul 2012 13:38:24
Have rangers notified season ticket holders to renew and pricing cos ive heard nothing and obv have to soon

Believable0 Unbelievable1

Can't until licence is granted.

Agree1 Disagree0

All depends on the licence being issued

JG

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Jul 2012 13:32:48
I think Ally is mischief making again with his stance on trophies being stripped. "He will never accept...". What exactly is he saying there, if sanctioned his mind will ignore it? Or that he is prepared to, dare I say, WALK AWAY. Or, as I suspect, is most likely the case, it makes him out to be the good guy while Charles Green gets the flak for accepting it. The reality is that the quicker this is done and dusted, however painful, the quicker Rangers get back to playing football and more importantly putting a squad in place to do so. But as with every turn in this so far Rangers, or elements within, seem to think brinksmanship is the best policy. Appealing the transfer embargo, delaying the documents to the SPL regards double contracts, where did it get you? Another shortsighted, we're above the rules stance but who is surprised anymore.

Believable17 Unbelievable16

Theatrics to cover the fact that they have already agreed with SFA/SPL to allow the dual contracts investigation. By end of week they will be saying that they had to agree to the investigation to be able to continue playing football and it's not their fault. Watch this space!

Agree4 Disagree1

Ally looks after his own interests first,remember he has backed every one who stepprd forward including whyte. {Ed039's Note - Does he have a choice? Does he have a crystal ball, or a private eye that can give him reports on every tom, dick or harry?)

Agree2 Disagree2

I think Ally is trying to manufacture his own exit here. There is absolutely no way that the authorities are going to say yes to no titles being stripped. At the end of the day the club was mismanaged and wrongs were committed, therefore sanctions have to be handed out.

The records may show that we have been stripped of titles, but they cannot erase the memories of these special days. Pipeman

Agree6 Disagree2

There won't be any stripping of titles until the result of the Big Tax Case. Even then nothing is certain.

BARNEY BEAR

Agree2 Disagree5

@4 Barney the dual contracts is a different issue to the BTC and punishment by SPL is not dependant on a BTC result.

Agree3 Disagree0

Barney the EBT case and dual contracts while the same thing are not connected in this context. HMRC can rule without any footballing impact and vice versa, could get away with BTC and still be found guilty by SPL.

Agree4 Disagree0

25 Jul 2012 13:18:02
Just wondering what chances Rangers
meeting Celtic in early rounds of cups
to keep t.v companies happy

Believable6 Unbelievable12

If RFC get through the rounds and when the spl clubs enter the draw then it's a cert!

Agree2 Disagree1

You mean match fixing? {Ed039's Note - You mean rigging the draw, not match fixing)

Agree5 Disagree2

25 Jul 2012 13:07:45
How many more kicks do they want to have at us, the latest is changing the game from a saturday afternoon to a tuesday night, this is clearly going to affect the crowd and therefore the revenue from this game, you have to wonder who is making these decisions and why

JG

Believable16 Unbelievable7

It will probably also mean the game is televised, presumably meaning more cash from TV than gate money would generate, engage the brain before the keyboard please.

Agree2 Disagree1

Need the broadcast money, that's why.

Agree2 Disagree1

Maybe cos your licence wont be granted in time?

Agree2 Disagree0

Celtic are calling all the shots, Lawlell land his SPL and SFA cronies, everything is being driven by them,

Agree1 Disagree1

@1 and @2 tell me what channel the game is on?

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Jul 2012 12:55:10
Celtic Fan in Peace
You know Bears why does it feel that there are still more questions than answers after all these weeks, I think we all need an end to this. The past has let go of and we now all need to move on, if folk like Sally are going to keep going off on one, and others Like Kennedy keep popping up I fear the Gers could end up the way of Third Lanark, and for those WATP mob yes it could happen, never say Never.

Believable7 Unbelievable15

Are you getting bored at last? CheltBlue

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Jul 2012 11:50:13
As a Celtic fan I've had enough. Give Rangers a license and lets get on with it.
Do the majority of Celtic fans want titles removed? Yes. Have we quietly enjoyed justice being served? Mmmm, not really. There is a difference between apt punishment and a farce. Whilst some of our kin would like to see the end of Rangers the majority do not. The punishment should have been clear and final, the ongoing saga of incompetence by the SPL, SFA etc has just damaged the game further. I'd give up title losses to see this come to a close now and we can start to look forward to a competitive league in a few years. There is not one Celtic fan who will honestly tell you that it will be the same without the butterflies in the stomach four times a season. The only good thing that can come out of this is that the bigotry fades and the journalists who peddle it are replaced by real sports reporters. The SFA, SPL etc are cleared out and revamped. Then, come 2016 we can have a healthier league with the Old Firm fixture we will all miss so much back.

Believable19 Unbelievable11

Title losses?

Agree3 Disagree0

25 Jul 2012 11:28:55
Alex ferguson has been asked by a jouno on man u tours what he feels about all the things that have happend scottish footballb his reply '' its a shame to see scottish footbal being dragged thourgh the gutter. then he then got asked if he would help in any way '' i have lots of youngster who would love to join a team like rangers with the facilites they have and what they can offer them inthe deveoplment there learning form us her(mann utd)

Maybe we should take his offer and get a few of his youngsters to learn there tricks of the trade.

It was on man utd tv this morning

Believable9 Unbelievable7

Or why not just give the kids we have a chance.

Agree1 Disagree0

How many of these facilities will exist in a year? We need to offload cost and Murray Park is one that needs to go, can't be afforded playing D3 or D2 football.

Arguably Ibrox as well, but not as easy to resolve either way.

Agree4 Disagree2

25 Jul 2012 10:04:59
Know this won't be printed, Green has secured deals for outgoing players(pretty nominal fees) BUT, deals for current squad, season ticket money, plus assets now outstrips price paid. Winding up time, watch this space..

Believable12 Unbelievable10

WILL THIS SORRY SAGA EVER END?
Latest from English FA:ENGLISH football chiefs have ordered Southampton NOT to give the fee for Steven Davis straight to Rangers.
.SFA poised to freeze Rangers cash for Steven Davis
Wednesday 25 July 2012 Text size SFA poised to freeze Rangers cash for Steven DavisMichael Grant
Chief football writer.ENGLISH football chiefs have ordered Southampton NOT to give the fee for Steven Davis straight to Rangers.


Saints agreed to shell out £750K to land Gers star Davis
Custom byline text: EXCLUSIVE by MICHAEL GRANT
The agreed sum of around £750,000 has still to be paid and the FA last night told the Barclays Premier League club that, for the time being, the only place they should send it is to the SFA.
Well looks like even English FA feel we should pay our debts first to other clubs .
Green guessed totally wrong again, he will get nothing ?????? think he more like Mr Bean than Green {Ed001's Note - no, it is simply to ensure the money goes to the right place, no one knows whether it should go into the Oldco pot for creditors or Newco pot. Until that is resolved, the money won't get paid.}

Agree2 Disagree2

Southampton said they paid a 'nominal sum' for Davis. I'll believe them rather than any Scottish sports journalist so will be interesting to find out how much they really shelled out. £800,000 according to the Record. We shall see. I suspect it will be nearer £80,000.

BARNEY BEAR

Agree1 Disagree0

25 Jul 2012 09:57:01
Delighted about Little. The boy done well for us last season and i can see him thriving playing off of big McCulloch. If we manage to sign Black and get him in alongside Hutton then the centre of midfield looks very strong, with Perry and Broadfoot we have a centre half pairing with plenty of expierence and overall the spine of the team looks very good. Bedoya i imagine will play wide with Mitchell, McLeod, Naismith or even Wallace on the other flank. Cole, Wallace, Perry, Broadfoot, Hegarty can all play rb/lb so if we pick up a few injuries/suspensions then ally can shuffle the back 4 about to accomodate. But i still think we need a few guys for cover in defence, 1 more midfielder and a striker to be ready for the new season.

My starting 11 for the new season

-----------Alexander------------

Cole---Perry---Broadfoot---Wallace

McLeod--Hutton--McCulloch/Black--Mitchell

-------Little-------McCulloch/Naismith

J1985

Believable3 Unbelievable6

Cole couldnae get any games on loan to Thistle last season, might be ok in div3, but certainly not long term stuff, Thistle didn't want him back

Agree0 Disagree0

I cant contain myself with the thought of broadfoot in the heart of our defines and most likely captain or vice captain

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Jul 2012 07:26:33
I can't understand how the old club's license can be handed across to Charles Green's new club when the last accounts for the old club was April 2010. The April 2011 and April 2012 accounts were never produced. So new club cannot possibly use the accounts of old club.
Old Club are officially out of SPL with Dundee taking Club12 slot.
Lord Carloways tribunal still to sit and could rule suspension.
Big tax case still to hit the news.
EBT title stripping imminent.
More EBT names to break.

Believable14 Unbelievable17

Old accounts not required for a transfer of membership! Oh and Lord Carloway resigned from the tribunal board! Try and keep up to date with goings on before posting! haha

Agree8 Disagree6

I think the problem is that you not kept up to date with the current state of play.

If you want to understand, read and digest the various reports and information widely available.

It would have answered most, if not all of your points.

Agree5 Disagree3

Have you been living in a bubble? This has been explained numerous times , surely you cannot be devoid of enough intelligence to research your question before actually posting it, although saying that the very fact that indeed you have posted it speaks volumes.

Agree5 Disagree2

I cant understand why you are more fascinated with my club rather than your own

JG

Agree7 Disagree1

They never produced accounts for last year and got punished for it. They got a fine handed to them. That's why last years accounts don't matter. Go to stv web site for questions and answers it's all ther.

Agree4 Disagree2

..Desperate stuff timmy...looks like your nightmare senario where Rangers survive and come back up to the top of Scottish football is strarting to come true...

Agree6 Disagree5

Brilliant ! Love it when a desperate obsessed mhutant get put in his place , we haven't been found guilty of EBT's . Only in this corrupt country your "guilty until proven innocent" . Onwards and upwards for Scotland's number 1 institution . IT'S ALL ABOUT THE RANGERS !

Agree2 Disagree2

Technically he may have point? it should be the last three years accounts of company if these were not upto date then deal should not have went through.

Agree4 Disagree1

Getting fined for not producing 2 years annual accounts is one legal issue. It does NOT mitigate the fact that now, for a new issue, accounts are required.
If you cannot see that both issues are totally different and separate then your not very smart.
The SFA are linking both issues for the low on brain matter to be satisfied in order to do Rangers a favour.

Agree5 Disagree1

@6: how'd you know the OP is a Celtic fan?

Agree2 Disagree0

@9 The 3 yrs accounts are required for UEFA not the SFA. Don't mix up the two. {Ed039's Note - I'm fed up trying to explain this one)

Agree0 Disagree1

25 Jul 2012 00:06:35
just not long on bbc sport that rangers ar no closer to sfa membership even tho green claim to have progressed why cant green not keep his mouth tight and stop all these lies he is playing us like a fiddle

Believable13 Unbelievable4

What do you expect Mr Green to do,just roll over and let the vultures pick over our bones.no,he is trying to save honours won fairly playing football,as a newco,we have a right to defend ourselves,so.Get a grip,stop blaming him for our demise,he is showing the SPL,that he is not prepared to put up with their blackmail.I for one think he is doing a decent job.

Agree6 Disagree4

Didnt expect any progress anyway ,dealing with people like reagan and doncaster ,as ive said before call their bluff ,they have got more at stake than the gers have doug t.s.o

Agree5 Disagree6

Super ally's played the fans like a fiddle since feb 14th mate.

Agree7 Disagree3

"he is trying to save honours won fairly playing football"
The SPL aren't trying to remove honours won fairly playing football, just the ones that weren't.
Al

Agree4 Disagree0

Poster 4 how many times have you and your fellow snipers got to be told if you put the ball in the net more than the other team you win ,or for that matter if scott mc donalds pops 2 goals in against you in the final minutes you have lost ,if you give your employee an extra bonus even if its in a legit tax loophole that hmrc forgot to close ,you hope to get a better performance from your worker as he is happy with his wages ,its all down to sour grapes cos your lot werent good enough on the day ,so for once gie the matter a rest cos your on a loser doug t.s.o

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2012 23:53:51
According to the BBC, it would appear that Mr Green has been conservative with the truth again.

They are reporting that talks have stalled regarding membership due to Rangers refusal to accept future punishment regarding operating dual contracts.

Believable13 Unbelievable0

Refusing to accept? Never knew this was an option. So if someone is alleged to be guilty of murder and charged, they have to accept this before prosecution can begin! What a strange land we live in. Servco can play poker all they want, but, they just don`t have any aces and the clock is still ticking..

Agree6 Disagree2

The SFA/ SPL will not blink on this.
Green will take it down to last minute but the authorities won't blink first.
It shouldn't even be an issue for new club. It concerns the old club's record. The records need to be adjusted to provide integrity to the history of Scottish football across all competitions.

Agree8 Disagree2

Integrity would be waiting to see if rangers broke any rules before finding them guilty dont you think..mark.

Agree2 Disagree4

24 Jul 2012 23:31:39
Now on BBC, according to "someone close to the discussions" we are no closer to membership than we were last week. According to this source the agreement is no further forward. Either CG thinks we button up the back or the SFA/SPL are trying to attach more conditions to our entry. How hard can it be for all parties to be honest so that everyone knows what the feck is going on.

Believable13 Unbelievable1

24 Jul 2012 23:09:01
I am sick of all the negativity regarding our position, we will survive in some shape or form and will grow from the ruins. Always remember Glasgow Rangers are an institution and snipers will try to bring us down, but always remember '' tho' the road be broad and narrow it's follow we will, follow we will, tho' the road be broad and narrow we will follow in the footsteps of our team. God bless them.''

Believable12 Unbelievable13

Great.Just whats needed,verses from a song.

Agree7 Disagree1

No snipers, the club self destructed

Agree7 Disagree1

..."we will follow in the footsteps of our team"

They walked as well my friend.

Agree7 Disagree0

I agree with you sentiment, but God, whoever he is, has nothing to do with it.

Agree2 Disagree6

24 Jul 2012 22:57:37
Chris McLaughlin tweeting:

"Sticking point in way of #SFA membership is #Rangers insistence that they are not prosecuted for dual contracts."

I cannot see how Rangers are not prosecuted if the SFA/SPL have already admitted that a prima facie case exists.

Mac2.

Believable14 Unbelievable3

To the Op you do realise what prima facie means don't you? Even in a court of law the alleged guilty still have the right to a fair and unbiased trial .

Agree5 Disagree2

This is Green's way out!

Agree7 Disagree0

Well they can prosecute the old owners Murray and Whyte. The question is in regards to the new owner Charles Green who so far hasn't done anything wrong yet. Thats the major sticking point and the problem.

DO

Agree2 Disagree4

Even if the football authorities agree now, what`s to stop any person or club raising a private prosecution at a later date.
chasaboy

Agree3 Disagree4

A private prosecution for what? Breaking SFA rules. It isn't against the law to pay people bonuses, tax issues are another matter.

Agree1 Disagree0

Correct chasaboy. The SPL need to hammer rangers over the EBTs as its not going away simply cause wee Sally has an emo outburst.

Agree4 Disagree0

@1. Where do I say that Rangers are not entitled to a fair trail.

If a prima facie case exists, it means there is a case to answer.

If there is a case to answer that means is should be prosecuted. It does not mean that the party being prosecuted is necessarily guilty.

Mac2.

Agree3 Disagree0

@5 Rangers took the SFA TO COURT because they didn`t like their rules, can`t have it all your own way. I know it`s agaist Fifa rules for clubs to go to court, that is why i mentioned an indivdual could do so, and in the guise of any number of issues.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2012 22:55:51
posted the pick of the new 2012/13 3rd kit on the rangers sightings tab, it is avalable to buy in jd sports but for some reason it's not been unveiled by rangers yet? I wonder why?.. *ksd*

Believable2 Unbelievable4

Its in the rangers shop

Agree2 Disagree1

24 Jul 2012 22:28:25
Cant believe some guys would have Riorden instead of Beattie.
Apart from anything else, his attitude stinks, also....Beattie has won 3 SPL titles, 4 Scottish cups, 1 Championship play off, 2 promotions from Championship, 20 English Prem games and over 100 Championship appearances + 7 full Scotland caps and he's still just 28.
Riorden, has one league and one cup medal, and hasn't played really outside Scotland, and he is well known for his off field stuff and his attitude on it, and he's a year older at 29.
Beattie is also desperate to play for Gers...it's Beattie all the way for me.

Believable25 Unbelievable7

Do you really think Beattie will play more than 50% of games in the third division? Heavy pitches dont help with hamstring trouble

Agree0 Disagree3

24 Jul 2012 22:17:17
heard neil lennon took a canary tonight ,celtic are now serious contenders to take over the mantle of partick thistle nil lol doug t.s.o

Believable15 Unbelievable15

Nope Mr Lennon was away watching our CHAMPIONS LEAGUE opponents and not at tonights friendly. How are your pre-season preperations coming on Doug? Oh thats right............

Agree6 Disagree10

Neil Lennon was in Finland last night scouting our european opponents, what was Ally doing last night?

Instead of trying to mock Lenny's team for loosing to a decent EPL team, you really should be worrying about your team not having a licence, players, a strip or sposonrs!

DazzaBhoy

Agree6 Disagree11

Lennon was not there mate.Should you not be praying for your licence to come through for your big cup clash at Brechin?

Agree5 Disagree9

Lmao and how's your friendlies going against top opposition? Oh wait a minute no one decent wants to play your shower. See ya in about 5 years jog on silly boy

Agree7 Disagree10

Celtic`s potential to get better is a bit ahead of servco.
chasaboy

Agree6 Disagree10

 
Change Consent