Rangers Banter Archive May 23 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


23 May 2012 22:30:45
Not on to gloat after tonight's BBC programme, sadly all you bears are
now finding out what we Tims knew months ago, through RTC and especially CQN who were telling us these things even before RTc...
It looks like there is not one honest person within Ibrox, not even D & D
it is time for all the true, decent fans of Rangers FC to now stand up and
take your club back...
Sadly, your fans are being punished and your name tarnished by these
selfish greedy small people... Timalloy

Believable13 Unbelievable8

I would not like to read your comments if you were gloating, but you do refer to decent fans and that must go in your favour. Hopefully our club can get back on an even keel and eradicate the, once and for all, the shysters who have stripped our great club of it's assets but the dignity and respect for which we are recognised throughout the world. I sincerely hope that all those involved in the financial deception are dealt with and the whole fraudulent dealings are investigated by the authorities. When the culprits are exposed let THE GLASGOW RANGERS emerge as a co-op and give the power to our loyal fans. P.S. timalloy, don't be smug as you do not know what is lurking in your board room. We'll be back, bigger and stonger.

Agree6 Disagree9

@1, we do know whats going on for our board lets us know and have the right ppl in place, no one would EVER tarnish the Celtic name like your legends have to your club...i hope you dont let them off and indeed make it uncomfortable for them, seems like for most of your fans the love of your club over shadowed asking questions when dodgy things were starting off....we do feel sorry for the decent fans.

Agree5 Disagree0

How about next weeks lottery numbers while you're at it....hmmm....no didn't think so.

Agree4 Disagree0

23 May 2012 22:25:22
After watching BBC tonight I fear the worst . The rangers brand is now so toxic that it is only the current crop of " investors " IE venture capitalists , that will be waiting in the wings for thwe club to go into liquidation and then pick over the bones. I am a celtic supporter with a lot of friends who are decent gers fans . They agree with me in that what we are seeing here is good old capitalism in it's rawest state. these vultures do not give a toss for the ordinary rangers fan . they are only th ere to make a fast buck them bugger off. !

Believable13 Unbelievable2

23 May 2012 22:41:52
Has Green pulled out yet? What was exposed tonight was shocking. Look forward to Murray's next press release

Believable8 Unbelievable2

Green is part of the gang. Green and whyte.

Agree7 Disagree1

23 May 2012 22:40:37
After seeing the list of players on the EBT list, Christ we really made some bad signings.

Das Shadow

Believable10 Unbelievable4

23 May 2012 22:39:16
This might be a bit weird but id like to thank personally marc daly who undertook this mission to try and sort this mess, at first i thought what a plum but now he and the bbc are asking questions..... it is too late now i think but at least people are getting found out......
sad days
craig+babybear

Believable14 Unbelievable5

Decent fan,s like you are who i feel bad for you will be back it will take a while,garlar07

Agree3 Disagree0

23 May 2012 22:33:38
Let's be honest for once.

Murray is a liar, and a con man!
Whyte is a liar, a con man!
Souness is just as bad, as he has had a bung!
Duff & phelps are at it!

Know what, shut the doors, I am so fed up with the
whole lot of them. Maybe we should just be left to die in a corner. Too much with one thing after another, I have had enough.

Believable16 Unbelievable3

23 May 2012 22:32:39
Rangers Fans are like the man who laid awake all night wondering why the sun rose in the morning - then suddenly it Dawned on him !

Believable9 Unbelievable2

23 May 2012 22:32:38
Duff and Duffer are now going to sue the BBC . I can't wait. My prediction ? D @ D will be no more by the weekend

Believable11 Unbelievable2

23 May 2012 22:16:16
Tonights documentary was nothing more than those with half a brain already knew! This should of been highlighted and reported months ago! What a load of s**t, someone looking for thier 15min of fame! It is a scandal how nobody has come out to comment on these issues months ago, was any of that tonight a shock? No it wasnt!

Believable8 Unbelievable11

I agree, it doesn't really change anything other than making D&P look even more dodgy than they do already. Rangers-wise nothing changes.
McWulf

Agree5 Disagree5

1# Nothing changes? i would think the EBT nonsense was put to bed.GUILTY. or have all your legends paid their"loans" back in the last hour?

Agree7 Disagree2

23 May 2012 22:13:44
after bbc doc wee are finished gutted bear

Believable13 Unbelievable5

Bet you did not know that Sir David never spent a single penny during his time at greyskull, he borrowed it all, for every fiver Celtic spend my bank will lend Rangers ten, disgusting VEGIEBHOY

Agree2 Disagree1

23 May 2012 22:07:26
I do not know what I find more disgusting. Tonight's BBC disclosures or the fact the Fighting Fund is being used to pay for the maintenance of the ground!!

I am disgusted. I donated my own money in the hope it would help along with other contributions to repay small creditors in full.
Can we sink any lower?

It was bad enough keeping the gate money from the Legends match after originally announcing proceeds were going to a charity....

I appeal to anyone who donated money to the fighting fund to complain vigorously to Walter Smith as the Trustee and demand the monies used from the fund are repaid and are ONLY USED TO REPAY SMALL CREDITORS....

Truly pathetic....it seems my club truly has no shame!

SPM

Believable12 Unbelievable2

Absolutely spot on am disgusted by RFF. I like you donated to help pay small businesses who suffered at our hands. I did not and would not donate to grass seed, absolutely disgusting. We may have no players to play on the pristine pitch. I will be complaining tomorrow in no uncertain terms.

Agree10 Disagree0

OP and 1# Well said.As usual decent fans are getting the shaft. A real shame for people like you.

Agree7 Disagree0

23 May 2012 22:06:59
The BBC have spent my licence money on that sh*t! The programme with the so called investigative journalist only put out what was being posted on this site months ago.
So well done Rangers Rumours and all the Ed's, first with the news about Rangers. PB

Believable2 Unbelievable11

So did all the people who posted this on the site name people did they get proof this was happening no they didn't

so get over yourself and do something to help your club survive .........oooops. too late.

hail hail

Marco1888

Agree6 Disagree2

All posted by celtic fans who were told to jog on!

Agree6 Disagree3

23 May 2012 22:06:19
Don't quite know what to make of tonights program.....

If the taxcase is still ongoing, how did Mark Daly and the BBC get their documentations? Are they photocopies? Wouldn't the HMRC need these documents for their current taxcase against Rangers? Also, why would the BBC broadcast this instead of going straight to the SFA with their evidence?

I got the impression that Mark Daly wasn't 100% sure about the situation.

Perhaps I'm just being optimistic but it didn't really give much away. We all knew there were folk on EBT's, nothing changed there, and as I said the EBT case is still ongoing......

Duff and Phelps however, get them tae Fleck.

What's your take on the situation Ed?

TTG {Ed001's Note - I just thought it was a bit of a nothing program to be honest.}

Believable3 Unbelievable9

I think they broadcast because Doncaster and the SFA dont seem willing to act ,after this though they have no choice

Agree5 Disagree0

Ed how can you say this was a nothing programme.Are you having a laugh.It was a major expose of alleged fraud,deceit,lies and corruption.I would seriously question your position. {Ed001's Note - you can question what you like but nothing was exposed and nothing new came to light. I think you need to stop questioning me and try to understand a little, this showed nothing I didn't already know about. If you are so blind you didn't know about it, then there is no help for you.}

Agree9 Disagree4

Ed I'm with you, but I'm sure that ian Beales up to no good. You was watching that? {Ed001's Note - what are you talking about?}

Agree0 Disagree1

23 May 2012 22:01:39
couldnt help feel totally ashamed and as david murray would say "duped" by the people who have run our club into the ground.

everyone we idolised and worshipped has been on the gravytrain.

Murray not putting a penny into our club has hit home hardest.

D&P should also be legally removed as there is definate conflict of interest - everyone knew this from the start.


ryanrfc

Believable9 Unbelievable2

23 May 2012 21:15:01
put the lights out and lock the doors,ashamed at whats been going on,duff and duffer green whyte they r up to something asset stripping most probably think hmrc will get rid of them now,grieving bear what do you reckon ED {Ed001's Note - HMRC don't have the power to, they would have to go to the courts.}

Believable3 Unbelievable3

23 May 2012 21:23:19
Christ BBC, tell me something i dont know! What a childish and pathetic documentary! The data room aye! Are they just taking credit for the rangerstaxcase blogger?

Raab

Believable8 Unbelievable12

So you believe the RTC blog now? Side contracts proved,recipients named with not one denial.Ten years of financial doping.

Agree9 Disagree0

Yep denial.......one of the stages of grief. Youre fooling noone mate.

Agree7 Disagree0

Just watched it for second time. We knew EBT's existed.
Is there a case for HMRC to pursue Murray, his financial advisors, and The Murray Group? As i see it they done the deals,not RFC. Murray never put a penny into Rangers.He borrowed from the bank then repaid the bank with Rangers money.
Even the initial £6.5 million for the purchase of Rangers,was a bank loan.
Rangers may well have benefited from the playing side of things, but who committed the tax evasion? The Murray Group? A seperate corporate entity? Is this why the BTC has taken so long?
If BBC can produce information so quickly,what's keeping HMRC?
This documentary just raised more questions than answers for me,and it was the club that got sh*fted in the end.

Agree4 Disagree2

Side contracts proven how?yet to see any hard copy mr daly never even spoke to hugh adam why?didnt he have documentation of dual contracts or has he been found out,daly might just have done us a favour regarding d and f ,another couple of million we wont have to pay out

Agree3 Disagree3

Denial of what? Its pretty clear to see for everyone and has been for a while now you idiot. Im still unsure about second contracts tho? I didnt see any, did you? For the record i never once defended murray or whyte I just tryed to concentrate on the football. I will always rather be a rangers fan than a mhank obsessed with their rivals tho. Some of u lot really need to get a life. What do you guys talk about on ur site anyway? Ive never been on it....

Raab

Agree1 Disagree2

3) "rangers may well have benefitted from the playing side of things." isn't that the point of football teams? so your standpoint is we rangers football club benefitted as a football team but that has nothing to do with us. what is your alternate interpretation, a new team in scotland emerged for some years called the murray group rovers, won 13 trophies and buggered off! you truly are strange people.

Agree3 Disagree2

#6
Your analogy is rediculous.
If you are self employed and you hire an independent accountant to do your books,do you change your company name to that of the accountancy firm?
P.O.B.

Agree0 Disagree1

23 May 2012 21:09:57
Just watched, whilst Murray, Whyte, Duffers are being rightly exposed, what was the last hour about, nothing that has not been known already.

Duffers position is now untenable but with all due respect why has it taken so long for this conflict of interest to be revealed. we knew Grier was involved in the purchase, we knew that whyte wanted duffers and so what's new?
We know that duffers are earning a fortune, we know deep down that duffers are Whyte's puppets. Heard nothing new.

No doubt this will be all over the press but there is nothing that has not been mentioned before.

So much for taping, so much for the declared new revelations, so much for a waste of an hour.

The training ground MUST be renamed tomorrow, his knighthood must be stripped immediately. Duffers MUST be brought before FSA who MUST act on the conflict of interest, and they MUST be replaced immediately with no payment.

Have their intentions been for themselves, of course, but we all knew that. Are they working for whyte, of course, but we all knew that?
Is Murray a chances, yes, but we all knew that. Is whyte an asset stripper, yes, but we all knew that.

That's an hour I won't get back, what a waste of tv licence payers money, just read the papers.

Believable9 Unbelievable10

The newspapers did NOT reveal PROOF that the EBTs were used in a way that contravenes SFA/SPL regulations..smoking gun...

Agree7 Disagree1

Ah! Did you know about Prince Albert?

Agree6 Disagree0

Agree. And where was the evidence of the 2nd contracts were promised?

Agree2 Disagree3

Why are you jumping around NOW with all these MUST statements if you KNEW it all before??

Agree8 Disagree0

The biggest waste was your silly marches to empty buildings!All happened on your watch.Timmy conspiracies eh?

Agree7 Disagree0

The bbc never didnt proof anything either

Agree0 Disagree3

23 May 2012 21:24:48
Souness on the gravy train. When will basil boli be explained ?

Believable6 Unbelievable0

Main poster - when the chef comes back onto shift.

Agree2 Disagree0

23 May 2012 21:19:39
I feel like everyone has stolen from us left us with nothing and now they want to lock the door WELL ITS A BIT LATE white and all his pals and there pals have picked up clean duff and phelps out youve a vested intrest for white and his cronys just get out and give us the keys well fix it ourselfs royalflush

Believable4 Unbelievable3

23 May 2012 21:16:53
just watched the panorama episode ...through my fingers... and still trying to take all this in!! rangers fc are trully f****d and looks like we cant trust anyone,surely whyte along with many others should be investigated by the c.i.d

Believable10 Unbelievable3

23 May 2012 20:42:33
OMG Prince Albert of Monaco was supposedly going to invest in rangers. They called his office and his Royal Highness has never heard of crag whit.Oh whit is n ow a Motherwell born BILLIONAIRE. On 6 May he walked into ibrox as a hero.Speirs is dissing this big time. Uncritical gullible stuff

Believable6 Unbelievable0

23 May 2012 21:07:26
Wow what more can i say r we worse of now because of panorama i think with the amount of double dealing and stealing there wont be many want us and if they do they might want everthing all new

Believable7 Unbelievable4

23 May 2012 21:03:45
Well it would seem the two contracts or "side letter" issue has been put to bed.The consequences of this might be very severe,eg; trophy and title stripping,law suits from other clubs etc.There now is no doubt that rangers cheated financially.What price dignity now eh?

Believable9 Unbelievable6

Mark dalys programme taught us nothing new, Craig Whyte is dodgy ffs, spoke about the legal definition of a EBT .I honestly expected something worse for me most of it was purely speculative .I see that a few that had their letters typed before the programmed aired posted them anyway as I expected , no matter what the content, it was always going to be irrefutable because it suits their agenda.Waste of time really.

RS

Agree3 Disagree6

You never needed this programme to give u no doubt that we cheated.Its what u want to here it could be proved tommorow rangers never cheated and you would go see told u they cheated.Its what u want to beleive so even if u were proved wrong u would still believe you were right.

Agree2 Disagree4

Could you enlighting me where in the program it showed one side letter?All it showed were the amount of persons involved in EBTS.No side letters stand corrected if you can point me to which part of the program i should look at.

Agree2 Disagree6

3# ronald waterhaus? FFS how much proof do you need.Any players paid there loans back?

Agree8 Disagree0

23 May 2012 21:03:19
Prince Albert of Monaco?? Now I think the Whyte Knight might be a bit mad?

Believable11 Unbelievable0

Not as mad as the chap that believed him.

Agree11 Disagree0

23 May 2012 20:20:55
The Scottish Premier League insists that its investigation into alleged undisclosed payments by Rangers is being 'actively pursued'.

The SPL released a statement shortly before a TV documentary on the finances of the Ibrox outfit, which includes examination of the Employee Benefit Trusts the club used in an attempt to reduce their tax bill.

An SPL spokesperson said: "The investigation into the EBT payments made by Rangers FC is being actively pursued on behalf of the SPL.

"All relevant documents, materials and information have been sought from Rangers FC and we look forward to receiving full co-operation from the club and its administrators in providing everything that it and they have access to and which is required for the investigation to be completed."

So obviously all the documents haven't been handed to SPL yet? probably should have asked BBC instead of D&P?

Believable9 Unbelievable0

Your grand children will be Celtic fans.henke7

Agree8 Disagree4

Who should have handed over the documents ? I thought we have been in admin since 14th of Feb.I honestly could not tell you who is looking after the club at the moment ,D&P will be concentrating on the creditors as has been pointed out almost daily by the east end paranoids.

RS

Agree0 Disagree5

23 May 2012 18:55:29
I've supported Rangers all my life and I don't give a damn if the sh*t hits the fan after tonights documentary! I'll still Follow Follow if we go to Brechin, Forfar, or East Stirling, and that's NOT a rumour!

Believable18 Unbelievable10

23 May 2012 20:00:16
I hear Bernard Tapie wants s word with Walter Smith. Lol

Believable2 Unbelievable6

23 May 2012 18:49:28
There were 53 EBT's at Ibrox with Barry Ferguson pocketing 2,5 MILLION POUNDS. How many competitions did he playing improperly registered with the SFA?SPL? Still waiting to see if the men who supported the fund that asked hard up fans forin some cases their unemployment benefits to save the Club - we will see if Walter Smith and Ally Mc Coist got a nice little earner too! . Shame on the lot of them

Believable12 Unbelievable9

There is no shame, ebt's were perfectly legal, if the club failed to implement them properly, it is the club at fault not the players who received.
Gary

Agree12 Disagree11

Told you all your legends new what was going on and Walter Smith and Ally Mc Coist new things, is it still all Celtic Paranoia?

Agree9 Disagree6

Ebt is a loan. Come on bazza gie some back! Don't hold your breath.

Agree8 Disagree0

Simply put YES

Agree4 Disagree0

23 May 2012 18:24:54
The Scottish Premier League insists that its investigation into alleged undisclosed payments by Rangers is being 'actively pursued'.

The SPL released a statement shortly before a TV documentary on the finances of the Ibrox outfit, which includes examination of the Employee Benefit Trusts the club used in an attempt to reduce their tax bill.

An SPL spokesperson said: "The investigation into the EBT payments made by Rangers FC is being actively pursued on behalf of the SPL.

"All relevant documents, materials and information have been sought from Rangers FC and we look forward to receiving full co-operation from the club and its administrators in providing everything that it and they have access to and which is required for the investigation to be completed."

Lawyers
The SPL launched its investigation into the matter on 5th March, with the probe covering the period stretching back to the competition's inception in 1998.

SPL rules prohibit payments to players that are not made "in accordance with a form of contract approved by the SPL".

The league instructed its lawyers, Glasgow firm Harper Macleod, to investigate the matter.

The use of EBT payments was the subject of a tax tribunal in January with the outcome still to be announced, but Rangers could be liable for a bill of up to £75million.

The club previously admitted liability to the tax authorities for a £2.8million scheme which benefited Tore Andre Flo and Ronald de Boer between 1999 and 2003, although they did not pay before going into administration in February over an unpaid tax bill of £13million

Believable4 Unbelievable0

23 May 2012 16:27:53
Rangers are going to bring in Ian Black, from Hearts, IF the transfer embargo is overturned.

Unbelievable! How dumb are news papers?

We have no money, no owner and perhaps not even a club if Charles Green doesnt get his finger out.

CC

Believable14 Unbelievable0

23 May 2012 15:52:01
THE SPL war over whether a Rangers newco should face sanctions exploded last night as two club chairmen offered radically different views on the matter.

Kilmarnock’s Michael Johnston dropped the biggest hint yet that he would vote NOT to hammer Gers.

But St Johnstone’s Steve Brown is adamant he wants the Ibrox club punished for any wrongdoing.

Simon_RFC

Believable7 Unbelievable0

Kilmarnock have a vested interest ,with the debts they have, they could be next. so its no surprise they want to go easy if I am truthful the moral way is for Rangers to go to the 3rd and start again

Agree8 Disagree3

23 May 2012 14:17:19
Would anyone else not be more than happy to see a line up like this next year :
McGregor
Whittaker bocanegra perry Wallace
McCabe Davis ness/ fleck
Aluko McCulloch/little Naismith
Personally I believe that could comfortably guarantee us at least 2nd place next year.

Believable13 Unbelievable12

Whittaker! Surely we have enough problems

Agree3 Disagree5

Pull your head out yer a$$ m8,mcgregor davis,wallace,bocanegra,whittaker naismith aluko all be away to pastures new!!!a top6 finish be the goal for the dodo fc next season..stevo

Agree8 Disagree5

23 May 2012 13:57:00
Home
About

PostsComments


General






Doncaster Dooms SPL


22/05/2012115 Comments

Neil Doncaster’s intelligence-insulting interview on SSN this week places another few pieces of the jigsaw together as to how plans are shaping up to deal with Rangers’ corporate failure. Others blogs have already dissected this interview very well, so I will not dwell on the details. Instead, we will look at what is shaping up as the plan “to fix” Scottish football.

As we have discussed for several weeks, Doncaster wants Rangers in the SPL regardless of how much they owe HMRC or other football clubs. He wants them in the SPL regardless of whether cheating on a massive scale has occurred or not. Doncaster’s attempt to bluster his way to getting acceptance for the idea that a CVA and a newco-Rangers are the same thing is just stunning in its gall.

Doncaster is a key player in this dance. Therefore, I assume that he has been made aware of the Duff & Phelps plan. His interview this week was simply a crude attempt to blunt the impact of any accusations that might be contained within the BBC Scotland documentary to be aired on Wednesday night at 8pm. Either through an incredible degree of cynicism or playing the role of useful idiot, Doncaster’s cheer leading is key to a plan that will do more to destroy the Scottish Premier League than any loss of income from the temporary absence of a Rangers-type club from could ever do.

One must assume that Doncaster is actively delaying the report on the dual contracts. It would take less than twenty minutes for any lawyer to see that there is a prima facie case against Rangers FC. Demonstrating a prima facie does not require looking at every piece of evidence or even getting close to providing proof. It is literally a check that “on the face of it” there appears to be something behind the allegations. Doncaster denies that there is a “go slow” instruction on this investigation. In the fullness of time, it will become clear that something is amiss.

The law firm of Harper McLeod have been hired by the SPL to investigate if a prima facie case against Rangers on the dual contract issue exists. Let me help Harper McLeod out a little.

On 28 July 2001, Rangers played Aberdeen at Pittodrie. Rangers won the game 3-0. Making his debut that day was a German who would later go on to become General Manager of Bayern Munich, Christian Nerlinger. He also scored one of the goals. That game against Aberdeen marked the first game where the EBT scheme that is the subject of the ‘Big Tax Case’ interfered with the Scottish Premier League.

Harper McLeod should take a look at Nerlinger’s contract filed with the SFA. Next they should obtain Nerlinger’s contract documents and payment history from Rangers FC (IA)’s administrators. Comparing the contract to the payment history alone will expose payments of well in excess of £1 million that are not listed on his SFA-registered contract. There is your prima facie case, Mr. Doncaster. There is no need to investigate any further to demonstrate that Rangers have a case to answer and that an independent inquiry is required.

It is clear that Doncaster just does not care about the rules. He just wants a Rangers in the SPL next season. Doncaster’s “CVA / newco- what’s the difference?” routine presumably betrays some insider knowledge of how this pantomime will play out. My thoughts on how this will most likely end are laid out below.

Talk of a CVA is just window dressing to appease the less realistic element of the Rangers support. Whyte can pledge his shares in the club for £2 safe in the knowledge that a CVA is not going to happen. (Strictly speaking, Whyte himself can always scupper a CVA).

We are heading for a newco of some description. The key point, Mr. Doncaster, is whether Craig Whyte’s floating charge is still meaningful. If it is (and people with more advanced legal training than me cannot find a consensus on whether it will be) Whyte will be content to let this drama unfold. His friends at Duff & Phelps will continue to potter about while reality continues to sink in with the wider Rangers support. In the end, Whyte will play his trump card and call in a receiver who will sell all of Rangers’ assets to a newco for a sum that will go entirely to Whyte- stuffing all of the other creditors. A plan to achieve this outcome would explain a lot of Duff & Phelps’ actions over the last few months.

If Whyte’s floating charge does not support a legitimate debt (and I expect some court drama over this point), then Rangers’ assets will be sold to a newco and the proceeds divided among the creditors. They will be lucky to receive 5p/£ even in this path, but they would not get more in a CVA anyway.

A newco of some form is inevitable. The liquidation of The Rangers Football Club plc is also inevitable. The debate is not over whether the newco will enter to Scottish football, but over how. If Doncaster’s dream comes true, and newco-RFC just start playing in the SPL next season without any penalties, then Scottish football is dead.

There are many other possible formulae for a fair outcome. Many Rangers fans want the newco to start in SFL division 3 and play their way to their place in the SPL like anyone else. It is also possible to have the newco pay an “entry fee” over a number of years that would serve as a deterrent to others. It would also serve, to a degree, as compensation for the carnage wrought on the Scottish game by Rangers during the years of Murray’s excesses. There are lots of ways to arrive at a fair outcome. However, the money-men who might own newco-Rangers will not want that and Neil Doncaster has their interests at heart. Sport? Fans? Mere irritations


Paddy Malarkey(taken from RTC for discussion/information).

Believable9 Unbelievable6

Neil Doncaster and all the West Coast media backing a newco are only thinking of their own jobs in this sorry saga! Is anybody else uneasy with Doncaster at the helm of scottish football, with his 80s hair style? I can't take the man
seriously.

Agree6 Disagree1

Content good in places but too emotional.

Agree1 Disagree1

WOW that was nearly interesting but then it dragged on longer than what is happening at rangers lol.But it is good to see so many celtic fans educating themselves in the laws of the land.Bet they would never have done this if it wasnt for the trouble rangers are in.Ah well nice to see even when were on our knees we still provide a much needed service.

Agree0 Disagree1

23 May 2012 13:39:08
If we do have to go down the NewCo route, does the embago carry over?
DaveG

Believable4 Unbelievable1

If history does, it should.

Agree6 Disagree3

23 May 2012 13:13:13
Ticketus in the papers saying they are unlikely to oppose a CVA. I must say though, i hate that we are dodging our way out of paying our doos.

Believable4 Unbelievable6

Dont matter HMRC dont do CVAs

Agree7 Disagree12

What I can't understand is if cw borrowed the money of ticketus to buy rangers then how can that debt legally belong to rangers?

Agree5 Disagree2

HMRC do accept CVA's if they feel its properly put together.
The HMRC agency that decided on these proposals is called Combined Voluntary Arrangement Service (VAS). Currently it votes in favour of around 70% of proposals.

But the problem is it will only be accept if the plan is well structured and by a company that have been compliant with the tax rules in the past.

Agree3 Disagree1

Happens 'every day' in business.

If that's the way you feel, then let's dissapear, not even into the 3rd, just fold completely, because it doesn't matter what div we are in, we still havn't paid.

However, watch all of football falling soon, there will be loads more like us.

Why do you think the Killie chairman is saying, no more punishment for Gers?

That is because they owe 11m, which they can 'never' pay back, he knows they are next.

Oh, and just because you are not in admin, means nothing, because Killie, Dun Utd, Aberdeen ,Hearts etc etc are NOT paying their creditors either, if you owe 11m, 4m, 1.5m or whatever, you are NOT paying your bills,..just the same, so that is the reason that most of Scottish football, WILL back us (they may kid on and make some noises) because they know that they are on the next bus, and whats good for the goose now, will be good for the gander when the next bus arrives.

Agree9 Disagree2

@1: they're actually unlikely to agree to one with a business that has withheld tax monies. Doesn't mean they will or won't, though. No-one knows until they make a decision.

Agree2 Disagree2

@4: what if the other clubs are paying their debt off at a rate agreed with creditors? That means they ARE paying the bills so it's not the same as Rangers. Do you understand what serviceable or manageable debt is? It's what Rangers' debt wasn't.

Agree4 Disagree3

If Killie go into administration their fans will attempt to save them. Unlike a team based in Govan. Never before have so many "fans" done so little for their club.

Agree4 Disagree3

23 May 2012 12:15:23
May get shot down for this, but would it make more sense for the gers if we can keep the embargo but only can sign free transfers or that, yeah i know but look we wouldn't be buyin anybody so it wouldn't harm our money except for wages etc, what yous think bears? only writing for possibilities so please no negativity lol, steeeveRFC

Believable3 Unbelievable3

I think the point of signing only 18 year olds is possibly an sfa way of getting rangers relegated for a season. Then coming back with the hope of another tv deal and the sfa saying it wasn't their doing. In other terms taking the chickens way out.

Agree6 Disagree0

@1. yeah that's what i had in ma head bud, there just as sneaky as us, but i wouldnt put it past them if they DID. know what was goin on, steeeveRFC

Agree1 Disagree0

23 May 2012 11:40:05
Question, even with the tranfer ban, are we able to sign loan players or amature players? Statement, if we do have some money for under 18s there must be a few world class kids about who, even if young and raw, could make an impact for us next year and beyond. If your good enough, your old enough!

Believable9 Unbelievable1

Any really promising kid is never going to come to scotland.The next gen tournament is their shop window

Agree3 Disagree0

23 May 2012 07:32:27
Ticketus have said they will agree a cva deal when it is sent out later in the week, good news and a step in the right forward for the club. Ticketus understand that a cva is worth the exact same as liquidation and that's why they have agreed to a deal, hmrc will be next to agree imho if they were against it i'm sure they would have said something by now.

Believable3 Unbelievable9

23 May 2012 10:53:41
We are hearing a lot of "HOW TO PUNISH THEM" I'm talking about Rangers of course.I really think it's about time the SFA got it's act together and put into place sporting rules / laws which would ensure that this kind of situation NEVER happens again, the first thing they MUST do is put into place "fit to hold office" criteria and THEY should be responsible for ensuring all football club owners and office holders are deemed by them to be fit for the job, it is far too difficult for a club, any club to realistically do these checks, all we have to do is look at the Rangers situation to see that,other examples, who do think tells the owner of Chelsea / Man Utd/ Man city how to run their clubs, now imagine a club that is in difficulty, can clubs in this type of situation really pick and choose, and do they have the expertise to do this correctly, I'm afraid the answer is NO, so it should be down to the governing body, to ensure that clubs are being run properly there MUST be supporters on the Board, they would undergo the same checks as the office bearers , Directors etc and also why not put someone from the sfa on the board of each club that at least would ensure the the rules were being respected.This at least would ensyre that this kind of nightmare would never happen again.

Believable4 Unbelievable4

Laughable! For months you were warned about whyte but it was timmy at it.Remember? Your fan groups swallowed the "off the radar wealth" nonsense and cheered him down Edmiston Drive! Remember in Whyte we trust? 25m war chests? The info was out there but your arrogance was,and still is,astounding.

Agree6 Disagree5

To No 1, I wasn't talking about Rangers , only using them as an example to underline the SFA'S total incompetence in dealing with such matters, I also tried to underline the total absence of any rules covering this type of situation, why such aggresivity?

Agree0 Disagree0

23 May 2012 09:31:53
Question How bad do you think this programme is going to be tonight, is this the final nail or are they just going to go over what we all know.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

A tweet from Mark Daly says "Duel Contracts? Find out which Rangers players had side contracts promising undeclared funds through EBT"

Agree1 Disagree0

By the sounds of it, it will be bad but it will only confirm the rumours about David Murray, for a few days it will be a public out cry until the 30th of May.
If we're honest this as been in the making for years, anyone that went to AGM's would know certain questions wasn't answered or avoided, but we was happy to let it happen cause we was winning 9 in a row.

Das Shadow

Agree3 Disagree2

23 May 2012 09:26:02
The below is from today by Alistair Johnston.

SIR David Murray allowed his ego to run riot at Rangers, then made a “panicked” decision to sell the club as it teetered on the brink of ruin.
That’s the explosive verdict of former Ibrox chairman Alastair Johnston on Murray’s Ibrox “dictatorship”.
In an unprecedented and extraordinarily detailed attack on Murray’s stewardship of the club, Johnston claims the tycoon was warned extensively about the dangers of selling to Craig Whyte.
He says Murray carried on with the deal because of “significant pressure” from the club’s bankers.
And he says a senior boss at the bank told him that Lloyds, who were owed £700million by the rest of Murray’s empire, had “incentivised” Murray to hand Rangers to Whyte.

Johnston, 63, once a close ally of Murray, now no longer speaks to him.
In our exclusive interview, he said: “Chairmen and chief executives are often the subject of fans’ ire for selling players, or allowing guys to leave because of unaffordable wage demands and so on. On the the other hand, you take Sir David Murray.
“He got too immersed in the fans’ perception of himself – as well as his own ego and invincibility, probably.
“In the last few years he lost his business discipline, then panicked when he saw Armageddon coming.”
Murray, who famously boasted in 2000 that Rangers would spend £10 for every £5 spent by Celtic, sold Rangers to Whyte a year ago for £1.
The Record has told how, before the sale, a private investigator’s report on Whyte’s business record was passed to the Ibrox board.
And Johnston, who was ousted by Whyte soon after his takeover, spoke at length about how closely Murray and his Murray Group of businesses were made aware of what the detective had discovered.
His allegations are highly significant, given Murray’s later insistence that he had been “duped” by Whyte.
The SFA disciplinary panel who slapped a transfer embargo on Rangers criticised Johnston, and other men on the Ibrox board, for not doing enough to stop the sale.
But Johnston said he and his colleagues expressed their concerns about Whyte “very vocally”. And he insisted there was only one man with the power to keep him out – Murray.
Johnston said of the detective’s report: “It was made available to us and I did see it, like I saw a lot of other information and data that was presented to us or leaked.
“But all that information was shared with the Murray Group, because there wasn’t much we could do about it other than jump up and down and scream and shout, which is what we did.
“In terms of something to do about it – that is, not consummate the
transaction for these reasons – then David Murray really looks like the
only person who could actually have done something.”

Believable4 Unbelievable0

Johnston never accepts liability for any of this yet HE was Zchsirman of the Board!!

Getting the knife into Murray before tonight?

Agree2 Disagree0

23 May 2012 09:05:39
is it just a coincedence that 99% of the posters on here that are shouting the loudest about sporting integrity and how Rangers should not be allowed into the spl as a newco without sanctions are Celtic fans, is this because these guys believe in good honest fair play and sporting integrity (which is possible if you put aside their constant harassment of referees in order to gain an advantage in a game) or is it because they are the one club that will be able to function normally without the money Rangers bring to the spl and with Rangers out of the way they will dominate scottish football till the end of time. i wonder what sort of noise would be heard coming out of Parkhead if Rangers leaving the SPL was going to impact them in a serious negative way the way it will with the other 10 spl clubs

Lochaber bear

Believable9 Unbelievable5

@OP: have you done the sumes. It's not just Celtic fans. There are many fans of other teams who post on here who agree. Anyway, does it really matter who thinks that integrity should be upheld? Are you saying it shouldn't?

1903

Agree4 Disagree2

What a stupid post.You are generalizing all Celtic fans.Every one has their own opinion on this shambles but the one constant is your club.More than Celtic are starting to voice concerns that rangers(ia) receive suitable punishment.Stop deflecting and face the facts.

Agree4 Disagree5

Rangers debt, future potential debt, EBT's and two contracts all came about through one thing, Rangers desperate attempt to make ground on Martin O'Neill's 2000-2001 team. As posted earlier Rangers first dabble with EBT's was Christian Nerlinger, debut July 28th 2001. Why the lack of cash to pay him what he wanted on the level? Perhaps the huge £12m fee paid for Tore Andre Flo the previous November. All of it smacked of desperation, a team used to winning was now finding itself a fairly distant second. It is reported that between 2001 and 2010 Rangers paid £48m into EBT's (the rest of the reported £80m is fines and penalties). During this time Rangers won 4 SPL titles, 4 Scottish Cups, 5 League Cups and appeared in the Champions League group stages 4 times and the UEFA Cup Final. In November Spartans were kicked out of the Scottish Cup for fielding ONE ineligible player, how many games, how many players do you think Rangers done it with if the two contracts and EBT's are proved and regarded the same? So to OP, for all it may seem like Celtic fans are putting the boot in here you potentially "cheated" a number of teams out of progress, success, silverware, money. From Dinamo Moscow to Dundee, from QOS to PSG, the list is endless, so if this is all proved, trust me, Celtic won't be the only team looking for "sporting integrity".

Agree5 Disagree2

23 May 2012 08:40:12
Fellw Bears ...read Alastair Johnson's comments in today's Record re: Murray's stewardship. Truth starting to come out? Who knows. However the one sound bite which Johson offers ....stating Lloyds heavily incentivised Murray to sell to Whyte ...I believe to be true. In fact I woud go further an say Murray was given 117 Million reasons by Lloyds to accept the Whyte deal! Let's see if Mark Daly discloses that little tit-bit!

SPM

Believable1 Unbelievable0

Lets be honest lloyds would have sanctioned a sale to al megrahi if it meant gettin thur dough bak end of!

Agree3 Disagree0

23 May 2012 04:13:33
KILMARNOCK chairman Michael Johnston believes a vote on changes to SPL rules dealing with clubs in administration is likely to be postponed for a third time next week as the ongoing crisis at Rangers unfolds.

Johnston has also suggested that, if the Ibrox club fail to reach a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA) with creditors next month, there is a strong case for allowing a “Newco” Rangers to retain its place in the SPL without any further sanctions being imposed. The 12 SPL clubs have already called off a vote on proposed new financial fair play regulations twice and are due to meet again next Wednesday to re- assess the situation. The CVA meeting proposed by the Charles Green-led consortium, who have signed a contract with Rangers administrators Duff and Phelps to purchase the club for £8.5 million, is not scheduled to take place until 6 June.

“I think the vote will probably be deferred again,” said Johnston. “I don’t think there will be any substantive decisions made on 30 May, principally because the CVA creditors meeting won’t take place until 6 June. So in advance of knowing how that is going to work out, I think it’s likely the SPL resolutions will be further adjourned. We will reconvene at a later date once there is more clarity on the CVA proposal and whether that has been accepted.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

So according to Johnston, the SPL won't make decisions on future financial fair-play regulations until after current financial problems at Rangers have been fully resolved. Whit?! So the SPL are essentially waiting to tailor the new laws, applicable to all clubs, depending on how it might affect Rangers next season. I wonder what UEFA are making of all this.

Agree2 Disagree1

The Sfa/Spl are liable to make a pigs ear of any decision on sanctions before the full extent of the rangers saga is published .

They would more than likely miss something and not set down proper guidelines for anything they miss and run the risk of improper procedures if this ever happened again.

Agree1 Disagree1

23 May 2012 01:20:53
Reading yesterdays S*n, it is no wonder we are in the predicament we are in, Healy is being offered an extension on his present deal on pretty much the same terms.....£10k a week!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i know we cant sign anyone over 18, but surely we could pluck a couple of 17 year olds from the lower leagues who would bust a gut for the team and would cost a fraction of the price, just a suggestion to the prospective owners, I dont claim to be a business magnate but I mean, our expectations aren't really that high for next year (and probably a couple after that) so try and blood some youngsters, you never know they might shine and then we could sell them on for a few quid, but as I said I'm no businessman................maybe I'll get on the next board????

Believable6 Unbelievable4

If true,thats a damning statistic.No way is he worth that kind of money,mccoist dznt rate him either

Agree2 Disagree1

 
Change Consent