Rangers Banter Archive January 20 2015

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


20 Jan 2015 22:06:47
Bears did any of youse see the supporter on the news channel yesterday standing giving the board pelters outside the stadium, brilliant, the bar stewards must have got a fright, as the coppers came over and moved the supporter on, the supporter eventually got back in his car and I heard his passenger say are you all right (Ian) ime fine was the reply good on you mate.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

21 Jan 2015 08:01:48
He was on here yesterday telling people he was going to do it so he's obviously kept his word,pitty those who he directed the abuse at can't do the same!
Being vocal loud and often is what they need to hear until they are pig sick of it. Whoever you are mate good effort and keep it up.

Agree0 Disagree0

Realranger7 I seen his post saying he was up for it, and I was hoping the guy would have responded to my post, but he let them them hear him eh. brilliant,

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 21:42:16
hi folks

What would be an interesting "thread" would be how the current regime (if they avoid humiliation and defeat in the proposed EGM) manage to salvage the situation going forward, IE

How do they win back trust?
How do they create and sustain a decent (to high) degree of visibility
How do they get backsides back on seats?
How do they get "fans" to dig deep and give them the benefit of the doubt and buy (in bulk numbers) +£250 season ticket books
How will they motivate fans to purchase merchandise?

Basically, how does the current board turn their busted flush in to a full house?

As an outsider looking in with interest, the turnaround required would be gargantuan in scale; it would need to be a relentless charm offensive over a couple of years to CONVINCE those who mis-trust to get back to supporting the team

There is very little difference in my view (currently) between supporters who continue to go and "support" and contribute to the company coffers and the "support" who is going all out to rally resistance and starve the current regime of the oxygen (money) required to keep this whole debacle on track.

I see the same supporters and don't differentiate between the two. a rangers fan is a rangers fan and I know plenty that care deeply who are utterly depressed and bemused by events.

I love my team and I used to laugh at the RFC pantomime as it unfolded and whilst the majority of you won't care what I think, I can assure you that there is a silent majority (non rangers supporting) who think enough is enough and that the tide (if God is good!) will ultimately turn

Granted I might not be so interested in years to come when you pip us for the league on the last day, but this whole mess has now moved beyond old firm tit for tat

What is happening shouldn't be happening and no "football fan" deserves to go through this day to day. If there are RFC supporters out there who love their team as much as I love mine then you'll appreciate that we have an awful lot more in common than some would otherwise see

I don't know the answer but I do know that the whole episode is unsavoury, dreadfully depressing and is doing and has done a huge amount of damage to the Scottish football "brand"

For the sake of the national game, I hope you get your EGM and I hope that that well-intentioned (and wealthy) businessmen with RFC's best interests at heart secure control and provide the necessary stability so the whole game can move forward.

winning leagues IS NOT the same without you but the funny side of it is wearing thin

good luck

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Only problem you have my friend is you haven't won the league yet this season. Easy to be patronising when something isn't happening to you, however well-meaning. To answer your question, I think it would be admin 2 and possibly worse should the crooks in the Board room prevail.

Agree0 Disagree0

Paradise won 88 cheers for your post mate, if you have been following our woes on here you will know ime one that wants these dirty robbing bar stewards out, your post makes a lot of sense and seems honest enough to this fan, I think Ashley does not care a jot for us, as long as he has the retail contract he will settle for that, though the greedy person wants the lot for nowt or ver near nowt, anyway mate we will be back so will you make sure your club are keeping the trophy so clean as we will be back for them some day (hopefully soon)lol

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 19:22:55
Just noticed Nigel Adkins is out of work, he would do for me

JG

Believable0 Unbelievable0

20 Jan 2015 20:21:10
Is Bernard bresslaw still about fit right in

Agree0 Disagree0

Think rangers keep the job inhouse to save money fu@@ knows who will get it maybe durie, we won't bring in anybody to save wages

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 21:31:58
Mibee Alan Titchmarsh at least when he stands down in a couple of months he'll enjoy his gardening duties

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 17:28:47
Just seen Charlie Green interview by Jim White. You could not make this up. He is quoted as saying Ashley and his cronies plus easdales are right to take club forward and King is bigger crook than easdales. Also stated he left £18,000,000 in bank. So where is he other £54m Charlie. So called blue nose white gave him an easy time

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed039's Note - Jim White being a bluenose is a complete myth lol)

20 Jan 2015 18:40:55
Charles Green is the one that is the shameless liar here. Two things that jump out for me from that interview.

1. Why was it conducted at his hospital bedside? Is this the equivalent of turning up to court with a neck brace on pleading for clemency?

2. Leaving the club with £18,000,000. OMG what a laugh. Yes maybe on paper Charles but your good old buddy Mr Stockbridge seen to that for his golden handshake.

Your day of reckoning is coming and as much as being a hated individual, you will try and pull the wool over the eyes of the fans. Your a joke and done all of this for more than £340,000 per annum.

Shameless!

Agree0 Disagree0

The battle has well and truly begun, the usual lies have started, the 10 million is for players, Green saying that he does not like Ashley but thinks he is best for us (what he means is best for him)Sandy easdale is a good guy. The truth is at the moment if we support the team we support the regime, is painful as it is we must continue to boycott the football team until we have deposed this shower of leaches.

Agree0 Disagree0

All stinks to the high heavens, get them out

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 22:05:29
Green - if it wasn't so serious its actully quite funny. As big a bullshitting liar and Walter Mitty dick as his mate Whyte.
Hopefully they are allocated the same cell when they go down.
If not maybe he could share with Charles Bronson.

Agree0 Disagree0

Scottg65 Charlie is the biggest bum of feck I have ever heard speak, only difference between him and dick Turpin is Turpin wore a mask.

Agree0 Disagree0

Op. Did charlieboy mention the 50 million pound that in esters had on stand bye, I bet it slipped his mind, such a trivial am muon eh, fecking dirty lying bar steward, the lot of them, I still stand by my thoughts on them all being involved together, and instances like this make me think they are definetely, one crew.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 17:21:27
Thank goodness C Green didn't back Dave king ( no surprise there). I personally woudnt want him on our side, he is part of the reason we are in this mess. Says the current board are doing a good job although he then says that he left the club with £18 000000 in the bank. You couldn't make it up.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Vegas2410. I never seen the interview, but he was probably in getting a nose job, though it would have been grown bigger as he spoke, I wonder if anybody that seen the interview saw his nose grown, as he spoke.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 16:35:24
Hi fellow bears just seen on SSNHQ former CEO Charles Gren to make an exclusive in interview. What is this all about! Interview at 5pm. Not looking forward to this?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Desperate last move from the board?

Agree0 Disagree0

Attempting to end reports re his alleged arrest. Couldn't believe his backing Of ashley. By his own admission the club has gone backwards since he left and why is that? The current board person. He then goes on to have a go at Dave king, a man who previously invested / gave the club £20 m and recently purchased another 16% of the club.
Wish Jim whyte had asked about the naming rights and merchandising deal with Ashley which Green approved

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 17:40:04
green whyte ashley easdale can all do one do not no why these people get air time they are involved in this togother why else would he becoming back on the seen

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 17:50:33
He then spent a fortune trying to have that merchandising deal torn up.
I don't know what that was all about today,a wee bit odd.I think he's done his nut TBH.

Agree0 Disagree0

His comments about Ashley sound like something out of a Bond movie. Who does Easdale hold the proxy vote for? More importantly, why?

Agree0 Disagree0

Was that a hospital or a prison ward Green was pictured in? lol

Agree0 Disagree0

Any doubts I had that backing Dave King was the correct thing to do have been completely removed by Charles Green. What a bizarre interview, I assume his bed is in a mental health ward?

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 15:16:13
Scott Murdoch in the ET is sounding very bullish.

"You don't have to be a mathematician to work out that they will get more than the 50 per cent of the vote that they need. Ashley and the Easdales are history. There is no way the EGM will fail. "

I really hope this is true, just wouldn't put anything past the in control at the moment though. Hope for the best but be prepared for the worst.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

No you don't have to be a mathematician but you'd sure as hell have to have information on which shareholders will vote for whom.

If King and the 3 Bears hold 36% of the vote, where is the certainty of the remaining 15% we need? I cannot understand why the current shareholders wouldn't back the fans and that includes Board members as the support would flock back to Ibrox, income stream would flow and their investment in the club increase in value. Am I missing something?

Agree0 Disagree0

Cullin72 it could be 2 close to call too many shares changing hands

Agree0 Disagree0

Bigwull, I certainly would not get my hopes up too high. I personally don't like to hear this boombastic ' we will definitely win etc'. Quietly confident, but what dirty aces can the rats pull out of their sleeves before the EGM has to be called.

Agree0 Disagree0

Cuillin72 they have pulled there last rabbit out the hat a long time ago, they will be gone, that's my view on it, history.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 14:32:44
Something like 80,000 shares traded this afternoon and share price now and the 'ask' price is now at 29. 00

Believable0 Unbelievable0

20 Jan 2015 13:04:47
What about Alex Ferguson as next manager for 2 / 3 seasons
If DK takes over could this be an option

Believable0 Unbelievable0

He said in his autobiography he never would, because of the way his wife was treated by fans.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 14:48:34
We got rid of Ferguson because he was rotten.Remember the way he ran with his elbows sticking out?He was one of the worst strikers I've EVER seen.He can play this wife card forever,but he knows he wasn't good enough.It was different days then,fans never verbally abused women,sour grapes I think.

Agree0 Disagree0

1. )?

Was it not his brother who said it. As far as I can remember Sir A F has never mentioned Rangers or there fans in a bad way.

Agree0 Disagree0

We are obviously never going to get ferguson but a canny believe gkk says he doesn't want him cause he ran way his elbows sticking out

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 18:58:35
His managerial talent is not in question pal,he is a brilliant manager.I was replying to @1 comment that he would not return due to ill treatment of his wife by fans,a popular misconception as to why he left (in my opinion).I say he was rotten as a player,and the way he ran never helped matters!Read my first post again.I never mentioned him as a manager,I'd love to have him.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 11:22:21
Could he come back? Is he ready? He would certainly be up for it?

You never know considering the curve balls 'The Bored' have been throwing.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

20 Jan 2015 13:17:32
Who's that mate?

Agree0 Disagree0

Souness? Big Eck? Paul LeGuen? Advocaat? Lazarus?

Royal please put us out our misery. you have spoken we are here waiting for your mystic post to be explained.

Who do you mean. tell us please oh great one. ;-)

i am george

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 09:30:31
So Sandy Easedale increases his shares and voting powers to 26%, evidence that this board and Ashley are not going anywhere. I'm beginning to fear the worst for our club, I feel the EGM will not be granted or if it does go ahead the current board and Ashley will still have majority of votes keeping them at the club. Kenny McDowall also resigning, say what you like about his managerial skills he is a Rangers man with the club at heart.

WHAT NEXT?????

Believable0 Unbelievable0

20 Jan 2015 09:41:58
King has allegedly called them" dead men walking"it looks like its going to be won or lost by a baw hair.

Agree0 Disagree0

What I don't understand is who would sell their shares for a Penny each to Ronnie and Reggie sleazdale when they could have got way much more on the open market and more to the point WHY.

looks like some of the faceless regime backers are beginning to panic.

i think if King gets his way we should brace ourselves for some real shocks when he gets to look under the hood of Rangers

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 09:59:12
hi toon fan here I just hope for rangers sake ashley don't get his own way .the blokes a fat cockney *****

Agree0 Disagree0

Lochaber - Easdale did not buy 1m shares @ 1p each!!

He bought 1m 1p ordinary shares, there is a huge difference

JG

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 10:38:52
I hope King Park etc try and snap up another 5 percent between them.I don't trust most of these institutional investors.I think they might be afraid to vote against Ashley when it comes to it for fear of retribution from him.I read he has been known to bury people who go up against him in these circumstances.

Agree0 Disagree0

OP?

King stated yesterday that he has done his homework regarding shareholders voting and is of the opinion that he would win the vote. I think that is why 'The Bored' is trying to get DK's request vetoed by Stock Exchange under unfit to govern rules. However DK has countered by stating that he has the information to persuade the Stock Exchange; SPF and The SFA on previous ongoings at Rangers.

Agree0 Disagree0

Go I don't think it matters what the easdales or fat mike does, mr king has over 52p/c that leaves 48p/c. Of the 48p/c there are 18p/c sitting dormant at ibrox for next share holding, so from what I see the board and Ashley combined have max 30p/c, they can't buy more than they have, maybe they can buy peoples shares, but if mr king has 52p/c it's game shot and match to mr king and the three bears, now let's see under the bun net, and get a look at that retail contract.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 11:57:30
JG:This is your dept mate,do you know if 100 per cent of the shares are in circulation?If not, do you know the percentage unaccounted for?Cheers.

Agree0 Disagree0

FFS, has he got an undertakers business as well? The guy has his fingers in every pie going.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 13:05:44
Just read on tv that easedale bought these shares from a company that he holds proxy for so it does not increase his overall vote.
r. f

Agree0 Disagree0

It is going to be interesting to see just who is prepared to put up the big money for share trading over the next 39 days till the EGM.
King and Bears have an advantage over ashley he cannot directly buy any more shares they can!
Surely the wise thing to do at the most important stage in our history (this vote is the end game) would be to offer whatever any of the institutional investors want, they are in it for money only. River and Mercantile announced yesterday they were not happy with current running of things leading to vast undervaluing of Rangers FC so buy them out at 50p a share if that is what t take.
King has already dealt with both River & Mercantile plus Artemis.
These 2 institutional investors still hold 5. 77 (R&M) and 5. 26 (Artemis).
King having already dealt with both in an amicable and shrewd business move, should I think pull out the stops to offer them whatever it takes to sell this 11. 03% share holding it GUARANTEES him 45% of all shares teamed with the 3 Bears meaning only 6% needed which taking into account Rangers minded 'people' own well over 10% GUARANTEES them a victory in the EGM.
My personal feeling is that Dave King bought EXACTLY the amount of shares he has calculated that he needed with the current voting indications (please mind that the people voting on the King/3 Bears side are very clear votes due to hatred of current board) it is the only thing that makes sense as to why he bought that percentage from R&M and Artemis.
Regardless I think that this vote is so massive to save our club from a future or leasing Ibrox from Ashley which is his long term plan, that I think King should remove any doubts by buying the remaining shares from these two investors, they would sell for 50p a share and Rangers would be a King and Bears led boardroom!
Remember this the Blue Knights pissed about with their offer which allowed Green in the door please do not make the same mistake to save a few pounds Mr King

RTID BOARD OUT ASHLEY TOTAL BOYCOTT

i am george

Agree0 Disagree0

Gkk
what I do know is

There are 81. 4M shares issued in RIFC
There are 17. 5% not in public hands
The total votes counted (for, against and not used) for each resolution at the recent AGM was 63.8m or 79% of the total 81. 4M
The combined total for the main shareholders who have declared over 3% is 77. 51%
Based on the total votes of the AGM then the votes of 40% of all shareholders should carry a resolution at an EGM
King has 14. 57%
Three bears have 19. 49%
Easdale has proxy for 26%
Ashley has 8. 92%

What I don’t know is

Where are the 17. 5% not in public hands and can they be used at an EGM
Where are the other 3. 5% of shares (79% AGM votes plus 17. 5% not in public hands is only 96. 5%)
Will 3 bears vote with King at the EGM
Will the required 5% of other shareholders vote with King and the 3 bears at the EGM

Hope that helps some M8
JG

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 17:01:12
JG :Cheers mate,clears a bit up for me.
@9 Just noticed that pal,superb.

Agree0 Disagree0

Gkk looking at it again, the 3. 5% was probably shares that were being held by brokers at the time of the AGM and could be bought up since then, Magath for example just bought 1% and think rst and first bought some more shares lately

If we consider that, then I reckon 41. 75% of all shareholders votes will swing the EGM

JG

Agree0 Disagree0

I am George, I think mr king bought some shares from r, m and arm, because both these shareholder would be thinking that once mr king gets control the share price will eventually rise, so both sh mentioned will still see a pay of when and if they eventually sell.

Agree0 Disagree0

Gkk I don't imagine it will be close, ime predicting more of a land slide, and the board know it, maybe the reason for sleds dale buying more shares today was so as he will get a bigger pay day when he sells up, I also know that with 26p/c he could block a lot of votes in future that's why we should boycott his taxi and bus service, the only way to get them out is to boycott there places, that includes sports direct, we should call it sports undirected lol.

Agree0 Disagree0

Other george

Yes amigo you are correct I think that explains why the percentages were so exact they have agree a seal in 'principle' so King knows what his total support is to win EGM and saving him using valuable investment in Rangers money and as you say increasing the share value for R&M and Artemis.

My figures on logical support we have a minimum of 55% and the fact Scott Murdoch and King are SO confident tells me that is the case. Why else would the board be trying everything they can to block the EGM.

BOARD OUT ASHLEY TOTAL BOYCOTT

i am george

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 08:44:55
Sandy sleazedale has bought more shares.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Mcc the knife probably just moving shares about, they are known for that, they are trying to let us think they have some support, feckin liars every last one of them.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 08:24:49
Just read Q&A with KJ of daily record with Robert Saver. Really believe if we get rid of this current board this guy will join up with 3bears and dave king.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Really do hope so - xmas would come early.

Agree0 Disagree0

Bearatheart - I don't think Sarver does joining up, his offer was for 100% and that's probably the best thing that could happen to us

One guy owns the lot, clean slate and start rebuilding but the shareholders not the board! (aye that includes 3b and king) will never accept his offer)

JG

Agree0 Disagree0

Jg. Complete agreement from this wee guy lol.

Agree0 Disagree0

Jg I should let you I was in agreement with mr Sarver wanting to own the lot, I don't want him owning the lot as I would prefer rangers supporters to run the show, rangers support being mr king and the three bears, as this makes more sense to me, guts willing to invest, but more so guys we can trust IMHO.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 08:03:44
Genuine question but does anyone know where Sandy has bought a million shares at 1p each from? The stench from that boardroom is getting worse. Does anyone reckon they will now push through the 10m to Ashley deal citing they need to attract a vibrant new manager now that Mc Dowell has gone? Best of luck to Kenny terrible situation to be in and has made the right/bold choice.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

As I understand it he has bought them from within his proxy vote so he has not increased his voting powers but has increased his personal stake or if you are a cynic he has increased someone else's personal stake

Agree0 Disagree0

Mmm not sure, the stock exchange says his voting right has increased to 26% all in? Confused.

Agree0 Disagree0

Easdale originally had proxy for 17 million votes now his proxy is 16 million so you can take it he has bought a million shares from within his proxy so his overall voting isn't any higher it's just his personal stake has increased

Agree0 Disagree0

He has a proxy vote from other shareholders. Which means he has a piece of paper which states he can use other shareholders % to vote on issues regarding Rangers.

Agree0 Disagree0

Bt61 yes mate you've got it right, mr king and the three bears have over 52p/caccording to another site so bring it on, cause with the dormant shares lying at the stadium, I re con the bad guys own 2/8pc. Max.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 06:40:09
Memaself

You are 100% correct on the share issue the whole Green "No none likes us we don't care" was a very clever marketing trick. give the people what they want to hear and a wee cup of hot tea in the queue of money. sorry fans you have lining up to swallow any PR type stunt.

What you are so so wrong about is understanding the emotion and LOVE that are involved in this particular "business model". Just because Rangers fans LOVE their club so much that they were prepared to support the team and the "business" investing their hard earned wages does not make them the fools you are implying. It just means that as in life LOVE is blind. I am a business person with years of experience but because I LOVE Rangers FC I was prepared to gamble on Green being honest. It has in hindsight (LOVE has no hindsight) become obvious NOW (easy for you to jump on the "you blind persons" bandwagon) that every person involved with my beloved club since whyte deal till current board of selfminded charlatans have been cr**ks and everyone has been played by using the heart strings of a people who LOVE their club.

I think certain clever know it alls should try to understand the emotions and passion involved in a WAY OF LIFE it is to be a Glasgow Rangers or any big city football fanatic, before you try to belittle them and their apparent naivity

BOARD OUT ASHLEY BOYCOTT

RTID (soon at the rate my heart is being pained;-i am george

Believable0 Unbelievable0

20 Jan 2015 08:25:32
Agree to a point George but love aside, the evidence of how dodgy these folk were was presented on several occasions by many. Some of our own, fans of other clubs (Scottish and English clubs), Legendary Rangers players, and former employees of the club; not to mention the odd media outlet.
Although we were duped in many ways we can't now pretend that we had no clue. The truth is we rounded on anyone that dared say anything negative about Rangers and our own defiance has come back to bite us on the erse. We could've starved them out years ago but we chose to ignore the difficult truth.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - you are right there, I remember getting loads of abuse for mentioning Green's record at Sheffield United. No one wanted to hear it, they just wanted to be told he was great or they refused to listen.}

We suffer from a serial saviour complex. Every sugar daddy that comes along we think he's the messiah and they all turn out to be only very naughty boys.

I felt the same way about Green at the time, Ashley, and I definitely feel the same way about King, I have no idea why the fans are falling over themselves for him - he devalued the club by calling for a boycott, then snapped up shares at a cheaper price - that is sleazy behaviour if you ask me, and I don't care if it's for a good cause, a sleaze is a sleaze and disqualifies himself.

Collectively we need to accept that we need to build from the bottom up again. Once the sharks have bled every penny of love from us, they'll move on to better pastures, and we will be left to build a team from the bottom. I for one can't wait. Celtic can wait.

Agree0 Disagree0

Totally agree with the three posts and Ed001 comments. The most salient, imo, being letting the heart rule the head as many of us have been guilty of that. Sad days and a rocky time ahead.

Agree0 Disagree0

I totally agree the heart can rule the head in football, most supporters just want to go to the game, watch a decent team challenging for cups & leagues.
I just feel rangers need someone stable in charge, and to be fair to Ashley love him or hate him, he is that, no one would loan rangers £10m without collateral. Newcastle are now a stable profit making club albeit without any aspirations of winning anything.
The thing about king, he came out last year talking about throwing £ms into players etc that surely must ring alarm bells again.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ed between yourself telling us about charlieboys, and George telling us there grand plans, I paid attention and have done my thing (abandon)and that's how it will be for me until we get the great stadium robbery to come to an end.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 00:12:34
Bears I for one wanted ally mccoist out of the managers seat, as we all now know he wasn't good enough to fill that role, a great player for us and contributed to many a trophy, but I think it is terrible the people trying to ruin our club have banned him for ricks ends testimonial, thoughts bears

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I agree totally other george but in showing more and more people what type of disgusting people the board are to a man this functions perfectly, anyone that has the tiniest doubts should at look at poor Fernando's life as it is now and then judge what type of a man you have to be to bar ANYONE from coming to that poor lad's testimonial. The fact it is a man, despite all my personal opinions on McCoist s a manager, who actually could cheer anyone up at their lowest ebb is for me beyond contempt.
I would say the board are very much about spin and trying to seem like they give a f**k so do not be surprised to hear irvine of tweedle dum or tweedle dee announce they are "pleased to welcome one of the Rangers 'family' back home to Ibrox at such atime of emotional distress for our brother Ricksen"! They are beyond sick in the head nothing would surprise me.
Actually Ashley is such an arrogant c**t do not be surprised to see him take his seat at his throne "IbroxDirect" any day soon, it would not remotely surprise me if he does it at Fernando's match just to show he doesn't give a flying f**k about us fans and our protasts.

i am george

Agree0 Disagree0

As a player I loved Ally McCoist, but I lost a lot of respect for him during his managerial role, not just because he was a bad manager but I believe he tried to treat us fans like as if we were stupid, but a lot of fans saw through his rubbish. (maybe one day when the truth comes out I will be proved wrong). I agree he shouldn't turn up at Ibrox for the testimonial, but only for the reason that they're are still a lot of fans who love Ally and with emotions still running high at the moment, it will probably turn into the Ally McCoist show, when the day is for Fern

Agree0 Disagree0

Royalblue : this all about Rickson and i'm sure if you asked him if he would want Ally there he would say yes this is about the Rangers family getting together to help out ex Rangers player who needs our help its time for 90mins we put all this boardroom crap to bed get as many ex players on the park and raise as much money as we can I will return to my seat for the first time since shareholders meeting but only for this game and I hope Ally will be there for god sake its a TESTIMONIAL

Agree0 Disagree0

Fellow posters I was probably as guilty as anyone in the criticism of ally the manager, but had total respect for him as a player. There may be conditions in his contract's termination clauses that stop him. However, this night is for a great ex-player having difficult times and ally should be allowed to take his place in a night to assist Fernando in his fight.

Agree0 Disagree0

He should never be allowed back into Ibrox, he has made far more money from Rangers misery than the Easedales and a lot of others, he was an integral part of their plan and was (and still is being) very well paid. It was his choice all the way down the line, he could have walked or talked instead he stayed and got paid and then shafted us one more time because now we are genuinely paying him for nothing compared to technically nothing before. Good riddance to him l hope he reaps as he has sown.

Agree0 Disagree0

Smokey bear it's not about what mccoist done or never done for me it's about fernando, his testimony match, not ally's, I bet if they asked ricksen he would like ally to be there, and it is after all about fernando. its his night, it's like having a party and being told who to invite, and he you can't invite.

Agree0 Disagree0

George123 you are right, if Fernando Ricksen wants him there he should be there for his match. Beyond that l stand by my post, l believe 100% that McCoist was deeply embroiled in all of this and when Dave King checks the dodgy deals done by past boards, as he has already said he will, l suspect McCoist will be exposed for what he really is. The shear amount of money he has already had is obscene, the fact that the club is still paying him while putting up lbrox against a payday loan to survive is just plain disgusting. He was supposed to be on our side to my mind that makes him worse than Green, White and all the rest of them put together, they screwed over strangers for profit McCoist did it to the Rangers family he claimed to love, which is up there with "l will play attacking football" and "youth will get a chance" and my personal favourite "l will walk if it's best for Rangers".

Agree0 Disagree0

Smokey bear I always said on here his wages were ridiculous, and that he was never going to be a manager of any description, but it's fernando I feel for, when I saw him on TV show when his agent was interpretations for him, it brought a lot of tears to my eyes mate, as it does now as I type and think back, terrible disease, mate, though ime not a church goer I wonder if there is a god when we see people we know suffer like this, especially known there is no cure what so ever for this disease, terrible, but let's give fernando a good night, and that's why I think mccoist should be there as ime pretty sure fernando would be expecting him there, I also think the board have punched themselfs In the throat with there keeping mccoist from the game.

Agree0 Disagree0

Smokey Bear

I am 100% in agreement with your post on the wondeful superally BUT this testimonial is neutral and ALL about Fernando Ricksen, for me anything that cheers him up or makes him feel loved is good and that includes mccoist being allowed to go. If as you point out he has plundered us for millions (he has and continues to) that is for his conscience to deal with.

i am george

Agree0 Disagree0

I am George, total agreement from this wee guy, I seen in todays paper fernando would like mccoist there, so let's see if these heartless bar stewards allow mccoist into the stadium, as I think he will turn up, in defiance to the board, and in support for fernando.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2015 00:49:38
so kenny is resigned but working notice same as mccoist will the board now trying go out and pull a fast one and get a good manager who the fans will back and who shareholders will be happy with or will end up with durie no disrepect to him the board have started trying to comfuse the fans already please for sake off the future of our team to the fans and shareholders please do not be fooled by this mob in charge

Believable0 Unbelievable0

 
Change Consent