Rangers Banter Archive November 16 2013

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


16 Nov 2013 18:57:37
A grovelling apology and a resignation from the sfa from a post which requires impartiality is the only thing that can earn mr lawell any respect from his pathetic comments. Hopefully the sfa do not wash this under the carpet as usual.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Oh dear what has Lawwell done now to upset you? Sold arms to Syria? Caused Typhoon Haiyan? Commenced fracking in Cessnock? He really does get under your skin doesn't he? Lol

Agree0 Disagree0

@gaz (90's) you suggest that pl resign, what about campbell?

Also charles green was forever commenting on celtic! Was he obsessed?

Agree0 Disagree0

P Lawell jibe pre-meditated, in the hope rangers board take the bait and report him to the SFA.
Now forces sfa and rangers to debate old/new club question without him being involved.

dont report him boards then accused of being spineless or afraid SFA say, pl statement/jokes factually right.

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm a rangers supporter and have been for over forty years. to be honest i couldn't give a flying f**k what peter lawwell says to stir up the natives at breeze block towers. tongue in cheek and point scoring, could we move on bears more important issues with our club to worry about. getting rid of the easedales for a start! my thoughts only!

Agree0 Disagree0

3) I think it's much more simple than that. To coin a phrase convince a little man (or hundreds of them) you'll have them eating out of your hands. Their new song should be puppet on a string.

Blueice

Agree0 Disagree0

@4 pb1 You talk about "point scoring" in the same breath as "natives" and "breeze block towers" are you for real? Your in your forties/fifties and that's your game point scoring.

Agree0 Disagree0

@1 Here is something else to get you laughing out loud played 13 won 3 - oops. I'll not mention falling faster than a brides knickers on her wedding night in case that causes you offence

Agree0 Disagree0

@5 Nearly fell off my chair laughing at that one. It would appear irony is lost on you
Tam

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Nov 2013 11:43:39
All these questions are we the
same Rangers or not well it
says it all when we dominated
proceedings at there agm
yesterday. 54 titles and still
going strong!
billy h

Believable0 Unbelievable0

You didn't dominate proceedings. One person asked a question peter answered it.

Agree0 Disagree0

Who cares what they think.
We were The Rangers and still are The Rangers.

Agree0 Disagree0

@1 oh that's a relief we were only mentioned once at Your AGM. Was it a fan from the looney wing who were terrorising the Advertising Standards Agency after they upheld The Rangers as "The most successful club in the world" in domestic trophies?
We were worried that you were by a mile the vilest most vengeful, bitter twisted fans in the world who still couldn't believe they hadn't completely finished us off.

Agree0 Disagree0

They don't seem to care about paying match day staff peanuts, you would have thought the great St Peter would have looked after his staff, after all being 'family'.

Agree0 Disagree0

@ 4 well said that man! They keep
trying to prove we're not The Rangers
yet they keep talking about us at agm's
and by coming on Rangers web pages
think they love & miss us really ;)
billy h

Agree0 Disagree0

Billy h you say "keep" and "agm'S"
Iam sure if the shoe was on the other foot youd be keeping a closer eye on things. If it is cheating, then that ain't fair. If the sfa did cost celtic £15M (cl monies) in 2011, then as I say would you be happy about that if the shoe was on the other foot?

Agree0 Disagree0

@1 Peter Lawell as an astute and very intelligent businessman should have stood up and stated that the Rangers issue was nothing to do with him. Instead he acted up to the baying crowd who are so desperate to see Rangers shut down. Mr Lawell has failed on a few occasion when the subject of Rangers has risen. Its bad enough fans of both sides doing it but Directors, Managers, players. They should think before they speak.

Agree0 Disagree0

2 words for you Charles Green

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent