Rangers Banter Archive April 10 2015

10 Apr 2015 22:17:15
Queen of the South have recorded two successive wins 2-0 and 3-0 this season at Palmerston, and if we were to meet them in the play offs do we play 4-5-1 away from home as the t

10 Apr 2015 19:52:38
After all were hearing about naming rights whilst going through the contracts I'm going to bring this up again and proba
Y get a few pelters but I still don't trust the last lot. This would only take 2 min to clear up and I know a lot of fans still would like to se this so, Mr Murray Please take 2 min of your valuable time and stand on the steps of Ibrox and SHOW us The Title Deeds as we've just found out and loads of fans thought we had the naming rights!

10 Apr 2015 15:36:51
As I stated below - the Intellectual Property will be returned once the £5m loan is repaid. Dave King needs to start his promised investment.

10 Apr 2015 15:50:53
Look closely at the dates those IP rights were transferred - 2012. These are not the same ones as are held as loan assets.

You think everyone would have missed that one?

10 Apr 2015 18:46:01
On closer inspection I agree. I don't think STV have looked into this fully. There is more to it.

10 Apr 2015 23:01:13
The IP rights were transferred on the 12th February this year not February 2012

10 Apr 2015 11:33:56
qos blocked both wings in defence last night leaving wallace and mc gregor no place to go, I think any team would have struggled against a packed defence like that, 1 shot and they score, I still think it was a foul on wallace, 2nd half gers pushed too many men up and left themselves wide open doug tso

10 Apr 2015 11:45:57
it was simple stuff again mate. Vuckic has NO right foot yet plays as a right mid where he WILL ALWAYS CUT in onto his left foot. Temps has no left foot and always cuts in on his right foot, it's pretty simple to play against that. switch wings and put in some low driven crosses, hits a defender the wrong way it goes in, a striker puts his foot on it and it'll go in. McCall likes to play with wingers, and normally likes a big striker to be upfront, personally for me miller is past it. I'd rather have daly up there as he can challenge for a ball, I love what McCall has done so far, it's a shame he has inherited such a bad team. Law was Hiding most of the game, same for Murdoch, McGregor for me should have made more runs down the wing, even if all it done was take a defender/midfielder with him. it opens up more space! as for Wallace, he was utter crap. I don't think he had one good cross.

10 Apr 2015 11:48:08
Inevitably there are going to be hiccups along the way. QOS had a good game plan and on the night it worked out perfectly for them.

At least unlike Ally, Stuart McCall will learn from any mistakes made.

Still firmly believe we will gain promotion.

10 Apr 2015 12:10:37
thats right but we should have been able to combat that but the goal seconds into second half put the ball up in the slates and we never recovered from that but to have as many corners as we did and failing to capitalise on them indicates lack of punch up front nicky clark gives a full shift but with not enough returns we still suffer from at the back from players playing out of position we need faure back at right back and macgregor back in central defence wallace had a bad game which is unusual but hopefully things can get back on track at the weekend

10 Apr 2015 13:14:03
I thought we were by far the busier team in the first half but didn't have a cutting edge. As somebody said I think they had one shot at goal and scored with it. Clark put in a shift but never looked like he'd score. Same with Miller. Boyd looks about 2 stones overweight. Crawford actually made a bit of an impact when he came on but then gifted the third goal. Moshni did ok for the most part but looked slow to react for the first goal. Don't know why Shiels was left out. Not the kind of game for Vuckic as he likes time on the ball. Forgot Law was playing! Wallace had his poorest night. McGregor did ok. Zal looked slower than me and i'm nearly sixty!At least there was some effort but we really need to do a lot better in the rest of the games if we hope to go up. Fingers crossed for a Hearts win on Sunday. The good thing is we're still in the best position below Hearts. I'm hoping this was a blip

10 Apr 2015 13:20:19
Bit of a shock watching us being taken apart, but agree that it will be fixed. Also agree that Faure better bet at full back. and tbh, didn't see Moshni doing much wrong last night, apart from one howler of a pass. Wallace looked unsure from kick-off, and their two wee guys ragged us all night. Daly could have been better bet up front,agree with poster last night saying Miller and Clark are too similar(aye. neither of then can score consistently!) Got caught p in euphoria like all of us initially, but reality is McCall has only had team for 5 weeks. games coming on fast, and he's under pressure to find players/systems that work. reckon we'll finish second, and then we'll see how McCall sets up for knockout games.Still mystified as to why he dropped Sheils, though, can't fathom that one.

10 Apr 2015 15:20:41
After last night's performance it might be an option to move McGregor to CB and play Faure at RB if he is fit
Shiels apparently was not in the starting 11 as he was carrying an injury.
Playing both Templeton and Vuckic are good offensively but not defensively.
For the match v Raith I would have Daly upfront or on the bench as he gives us another option.Against QOS how many corners did we have and failed to find the target.Hope young Walsh is available as he was excellent before he was injured.
Shiels for Vuckic,Daly for Clark and Walsh for Templeton

10 Apr 2015 15:38:02
Ed- Faure and Daly are not available - injured,but Shiels,Walsh and Bell are back from injury for the match v Raith.

10 Apr 2015 22:19:00
Why are people wanting Faure in the team he is rank rotten. He will never make the grade in the Premiership and hopefully his contract won't be renewed. If Faure is the standard some fans want to see in the team then heaven help us.

10 Apr 2015 08:04:50
Before I start I'm just asking a question, not giving an opinion on right or wrong.
On the back of J.R Tennant's post about Ashley owning the club badge etc I am interested to get folks thoughts on creating a new club/corporate identity, thus rendering the current one useless to Ashley.
I know this idea is likely to stick in the throat of most (and rightly so) but swallowing it down and moving forward may be the best option.
Let's face it, the fans are the fans and Rangers are Rangers to those that love them. There have been a few badge/crest changes over the years so why not now?
Basically what would folk prefer?
Accepting Ashley's dominance and being treated liked good little gimps or showing that Rangers fans can be adaptable, proud and strong by giving him the old two finger salute and moving forward. It could be the making of Rangers as a modern club.
For what it's worth, if I don't agree with something I refuse to simply moan and go along with it anyway. Remember, Ashley needs the fans to be good little gimps for this ownership to be worth anything. Without the fans he has ownership of nothing.

10 Apr 2015 08:52:39
if this is the case with Ashley and we can not get out of these contracts I would rather the club made a new cooperate identity than give Ashley another penny in the mean time we the fans should seek someone one to make us tops strips ect so that the fans can buy instead of filling Ashley pockets for the new season once tops payed for donate all the other money to our club so they can use it to invest in the club that way Ashley will have to come to the table and negotiate or his trademarks retail deal will be worthless this is one way to sort him and I think this it what it will take

10 Apr 2015 09:02:34
Agreed Bay. See my post below. A new identity need only have subtle changes and then registered as a trademark.

10 Apr 2015 09:53:30
i am quite certain ashley has thought of that and covered all the angles he will have something in place to stop anything new

10 Apr 2015 11:23:16
The changes would have to be significant not subtle. Also Sports Direct own the names Rangers and Glasgow Rangers. Ashley has covered most angles.

10 Apr 2015 13:01:09
i say if big changes need to happen to get best for the club and the fans then so be it we are being ripped apart by money grabber he is destroying our club as we no it enough is enough