Rangers Rumours Member Posts

 

Mm1990's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded



Mm1990's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Mm1990's Posts

 

 

To Mm1990's last 5 banter posts

 

To Mm1990's last 5 rumour replies

 

To Mm1990's last 5 banter replies

 

Mm1990 has no Rumours Posts

 

 

Mm1990's banter posts with other poster's replies to Mm1990's banter posts

 

14 Mar 2017 17:18:34
I know this will probably get shot down but For first time in a while I'm actually looking forward to seeing rangers play again, I'm not having a go at Old manager just things are starting to look up abit might be bit short sighted but with result against Hamilton and Celtic then getting new manager I'm looking forward to seeing us playing and hopefully ending the season on a high

Mm1990

1.) 14 Mar 2017 20:43:31
i think you speak for a lot of us MM good post


 

 

05 Mar 2017 07:13:41
Please say this is a wind up Ashley coming back? Whether is the right man to take us forward or not Ashley certainly isn't he has proved that already surely people don't believe he is good for this club, his interests are in Newcastle he is about to get them promoted and get premier league money back

Mm1990

1.) 05 Mar 2017 10:57:13
I know this will be a unpopular post but just opinion, I would rather have a wealthy Ashley, that could bankroll the type of transfers needed to stop 10 in a row . Than anonymous King who barely has spent. And living off soft loans like we're on the dole.

We could at least get a nomad again. We're stuck with him anyway at least this way we could have a chance of stopping 10 in a row. This Rangers team and board is unbareable.

If he could maybe re- evelute the merchandise deal as a sign of goodwill and really give us a transfer kitty.
Then I would rather have him. He just doesn't want to work with King, which I can't really see what he does or brings to the table?

Again this is just a alternative opinion.


2.) 05 Mar 2017 11:37:08
I do understand people wanting someone different but that man was poison all you have to do is look at Newcastle he has no interest in the club only in his own pocket, I live down south and the amount of Newcastle fans that were begging Ashley to leave and buy into us was embarrassing, I'm not saying king is the man to save us but I do believe he is better than the man who kicked us while we were down and took advantage of us when we needed help just my opinion on it


3.) 05 Mar 2017 12:09:31
It wouldn't have to be Ashley, but I just don't think it should be king either, King stating that he has spent vast amounts like 18 million I think he said.

I'm sorry but 18 million is not enough, even if true!
He needs to sell us on to someone with some clout or my worst fears will come true and we're going to struggle for years!


4.) 05 Mar 2017 12:49:43
Yeah I don't think king has any intention of being a long term owner of rangers from what I read about kings takeover was he wanted to take control of the club and over 4 years invest 30 million to sort the club out then sell us on to investors he did say at the agm that he has experienced problems that were unexpected and things has cost more than expected I. e the details of the Ashley contracts, repairs to Murray park and probably other things I wouldn't even begin to understand
I do think king is trying to help but can also understand the counter arguments against him, just think this link with Ashley is another embarrassing story for us to be mocked and ridiculed about


5.) 05 Mar 2017 13:21:35
Good point, what is kings long term plan?
I don't believe neither him or the other directors at this moment have the cash to take us were we need to be!

I mean he has been in since 2015 - and tbh I have been completely underwhelmed.
And worried more than anything . The first team are so poor they can barely compete with Aberdeen never mind Celtic.
And I bet the transfers in the summer will either be free transfers or bargain basement stuff. And if we won't a competitive team we're going to have spend a few quid especially on 2 decent defenders.


6.) 05 Mar 2017 11:27:30
I thought Ashley couldn't own more than 10 percent of the shares? Did the SFA not rule on that?


7.) 05 Mar 2017 12:09:29
He is maybe the only option. bringing in a new manager and a DOF won't make up a 33 point difference. The club needs serious investment or wait 5 years to build from the bottom up. In that time Celtic will have made 100mill in profits and be out of sight. Everyone has a choice. Back Ashley or stick with King. Stop hoping that a new manager is the answer. Need to start with a new board of directors then the rest will follow.


8.) 05 Mar 2017 13:07:44
If he owns the club and bankrolls transfers etc he can do what he likes with the merchandising deal. The merchandising deal on its own isn't significant enough to fund what Rangers need. Needs significantly more than that.


9.) 05 Mar 2017 13:05:33
Jeseca by the sounds of it if Craig Whyte offered money you would take it.
This man has raped rangers for money and you would take him back?


10.) 05 Mar 2017 14:40:25
From what I have read might be wrong or someone may know better but from what I read king plans on stabilising the club getting rid of people who have damaged the club (Ashley) and then when we are stabilised selling majority shares to someone who can offer "heavy investment"

I think Celtic went through a time like this aswell thou where they weren't spending money on players to try compete with us but they built the sorta structure they have now

I do agree the gap between us and them is unacceptable but it is expected maybe not by this much but let's remember warburton did bring in 11 players and almost all weren't suited to the way he wanted to play football and haven't cut the mustard when given a chance

Haliday was pushed as mr rangers and unfortunately he isn't good enough to fill that role I wish he was think he has the passion to be that man but not the ability


11.) 05 Mar 2017 14:52:36
Ashley won't bankroll anything, all this saying he will put 30mill + 30 mill into the club is nonsense
he just turns it into club debt and makes it look like he's the one spending.
newcastle are in an obscene amount of debt but because it looks like he's taken it on its not.
they will get 100mill for promotion and better coverage of his brand and the same will go for us. he'll use us for a marketing tool and no more.
hes looking if he gets full control that people will now buy the merchandise as it looks like he's now intrested in us.
50,000 + supporters buying tops/ kits. etc = millions all for him


12.) 05 Mar 2017 15:24:49
Stunngun all I'm saying is we need serious cash, of course it matters who it is and the conditions of there actions.
But King has not put up yet, when he said he would.
And at a time when we're looking for something positive to grab on too. I fear we're just to far behind now.
We need money, more than a supposed poxy -18 million.
You actually think that's going to go anywhere, make us better. Challenging for titles. NO, NO NO


13.) 06 Mar 2017 13:34:35
GArner should have saved his tackle for Scott Brown next sunday


 

 

03 Mar 2017 18:23:45
I'm a bit confused about this DOF thing I'm not having a moan at board just hoping someone can clear it up a lil bit
This is the 1st time we are doing this DOF thing so would it be wise to have a older experienced manager to spend a few years with the club to help us ease into it work out any bugs and such
And since we are getting a DOF do we need a manager or is it a experienced coach just as an example ferguson said he isn't experienced enough for the job which I agree with but if he's only going to be doing coaching and that wouldn't the DOF cover most the other sides of the club

Mm1990

1.) 03 Mar 2017 19:12:35
Yes their primary role would be taking training sessions and picking teams setting tactics etc but there is a little more to it than that, they still need man mangement skills the DOF is going to be more involved in transfer negotiations setting up pre season camps managing the scouting network


2.) 03 Mar 2017 19:39:34
no its not the first time we have used a DoF


3.) 03 Mar 2017 20:12:18
Ah sorry didn't know we had used one before


4.) 03 Mar 2017 20:42:38
Gordon Smith was our DoF for just over 6 months when McCoist was manager. Left soon after we went into administration.


5.) 03 Mar 2017 20:45:38
I think When we got MacLeish in 2002 i'm sure advacatt moved up to be are dof then


6.) 03 Mar 2017 23:04:49
That's good then so at least it's not a completely alien thing for the club to be going into that's all I was worried about really, looking. Forward to see what happens with it not expecting any miracles just hope we can stabilise abit keep us out of the news headlines for a couple of weeks


7.) 04 Mar 2017 11:37:08
Rangers have had a director of football before. Advocaat done it for a few months.


8.) 04 Mar 2017 12:00:52
Gordon smith and dick advocat were dofs


9.) 04 Mar 2017 12:04:09
I heard them say that on the the phone in but naw he didn't he went away to another club i'm sure did he not? I can't for the life of me remember advocat as DOF


 

 

11 Feb 2017 21:09:56
Correct me if I'm wrong but from what I hear in press and that we don't have the money to pay out any managers so need to go for someone unemployed and can't really afford people like de boer, pardrew and gio, so leaves us little choice, I would prefer to look outside of the normal past players and past managers but I think we need someone who understands rangers and what it is to be involved with a club like ours

Mm1990

 

 

25 Sep 2016 20:41:37
Does anyone know why waghorn plays on the right wing I always thought of him as put n out striker.

Mm1990

1.) 25 Sep 2016 21:10:31
He spent 1.8 million on a player. Has to start him. No ultimatum but you'd imagine that's the scenario.

Doesn't want to play two up front. Only way he fits Waghorn on the side.


2.) 25 Sep 2016 21:19:58
£1.5 million for Garner or £400.000 for Dembelle. A waste of money if you ask me.


3.) 25 Sep 2016 21:48:10
Looks a dead ringer for Joe Swash though Gor!


4.) 26 Sep 2016 06:18:07
If Warbs is going to stick with 4-3-3 then I think he should play Dodoo Garner and McCay up front with Halliday Holt Windass in midfeild, if Warbs wants to rotate my first choice would be O'halloran and Forrester if needed. Hate to say it but Nico didn't perform when he came on, thought Hill and Wilson done a job but think Warbs will ultimately replace Hill wi Sendaros. All in all thought it was a poor game and Both teams didn't show much quality, if anybody knows could u tell me how many shots both teams got ON target! So yeah think its time Warbs gave Dodoo a run out on the right as the guy can play there and think Waggon would be better through the middle if he's on the pitch yeah?


5.) 26 Sep 2016 06:46:17
Forgot about Rossiter! Anyways I think Warbs should go 4-4-2 against certain teams but if he's going 4-3-3 here's my starting 11 for what its worth.
Wes
Tavs. Sendaros. Wilson. Wallace.
Rossiter.
Windass. Halliday.

Dodoo. Mckay.
Garner.


 

 

 

Mm1990's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

17 Nov 2020 19:42:24
Yeah I’m desperate to know now lol.

Mm1990

 

 

Click To View This Thread

07 May 2017 09:51:43
I think That Izquierdoz would be quite hard to get we would. Need to get a work permit would we not? And he is valued about 2.38 million so don't know if we could get him

Mm1990

 

 

Click To View This Thread

27 Apr 2017 17:04:13
Don't think Naismith would be cheap
Dorrans I think would demand quite a high wage although i do think he would be a great player
And although I think Cummings is a good player personally I do t like his attitude, I like players with a bit of arrogance but I think his is a negative one and could cause trouble

Mm1990

 

 

Click To View This Thread

26 Mar 2017 16:22:24
I don't know if they still do it but i remember reading something years ago saying mole tried to use his contacts in holland to set up a scouting system for us don't know how much of it is true thou

Mm1990

 

 

Click To View This Thread

22 Mar 2017 21:59:57
Wouldn't be bothered if toral didn't come back. would like hyndman, but doubt and I would be a bit disappointed if waghorn left, I think he will have a big part to play in rangers season.

Mm1990

 

 

 

Mm1990's banter replies

 

Click To View This Thread

26 Mar 2017 12:30:02
Has anybody seen him playing lately I haven't seen him since Olympiacos so don't have a clue what he is like now?

Mm1990

 

 

Click To View This Thread

26 Mar 2017 11:22:14
I think that is a problem aswell the kids who do want to play and are dedicated don't get a look in cause the finance isn't there for teams to spend proper time with them and give them the proper coaching or support them through the times where it is hard

Mm1990

 

 

Click To View This Thread

26 Mar 2017 08:55:20
I personally think there is a lot of reasons for it happening in Scotland particularly
I think Scottish football is stuck in the past at the min we want to move forward but anytime we try something different it gets ridiculed and mocked wether it is the DOF at rangers or cathros appointment at hearts or even that lot bringing in players like toure that could help the younger players
Also the obvious influx of foreign players and I know every most nations do the same but leagues like England have strong lower divisions for the local boys to learn there trade

Also no one held accountable when things go wrong the SFA is a mess as an organisation, project brace has some good ideas and I hope it works especially the reserve league but so did project 2022 that seems to have just been swept under carpet no mention of what happened to it
and finally the commitment isn't there although this is international this problem my friend I work with in England plays for a non league club and got signed for a league team beginning of this season but cancelled the contract because he didn't want to travel 3 hours 3 times a week so returned to his previous club saying all I want is enough money to have a few beers at the weekend

Mm1990

 

 

Click To View This Thread

05 Mar 2017 14:40:25
From what I have read might be wrong or someone may know better but from what I read king plans on stabilising the club getting rid of people who have damaged the club (Ashley) and then when we are stabilised selling majority shares to someone who can offer "heavy investment"

I think Celtic went through a time like this aswell thou where they weren't spending money on players to try compete with us but they built the sorta structure they have now

I do agree the gap between us and them is unacceptable but it is expected maybe not by this much but let's remember warburton did bring in 11 players and almost all weren't suited to the way he wanted to play football and haven't cut the mustard when given a chance

Haliday was pushed as mr rangers and unfortunately he isn't good enough to fill that role I wish he was think he has the passion to be that man but not the ability

Mm1990

 

 

Click To View This Thread

05 Mar 2017 12:49:43
Yeah I don't think king has any intention of being a long term owner of rangers from what I read about kings takeover was he wanted to take control of the club and over 4 years invest 30 million to sort the club out then sell us on to investors he did say at the agm that he has experienced problems that were unexpected and things has cost more than expected I. e the details of the Ashley contracts, repairs to Murray park and probably other things I wouldn't even begin to understand
I do think king is trying to help but can also understand the counter arguments against him, just think this link with Ashley is another embarrassing story for us to be mocked and ridiculed about

Mm1990

 

 





Change Consent