Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
No Avatar image uploaded
Rangers Rumours Member Posts
JFM08's Profile
JFM08's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To JFM08's Posts
To JFM08's last 5 rumours posts
To JFM08's last 5 banter posts
To JFM08's last 5 rumour replies
To JFM08's last 5 banter replies
JFM08's rumours posts with other poster's replies to JFM08's rumours posts
14 Feb 2025 12:03:55
Did the marketing dept really send out a survey to fans asking them about their match day experience after the QP game. Surely not.
1.) 14 Feb 2025 12:23:09
Aye, I got one. Curse of the automated email I think.
2.) 14 Feb 2025 12:31:41
It's sent out after every game, probably an automatic thing that's set up. Some of that feedback would be 'interesting' right enough??.
3.) 14 Feb 2025 12:46:41
Sorry guys but this is just another example of how out of touch the club are with the fan base.
4.) 14 Feb 2025 13:07:24
I bet they've had more responses to that survey than any other!
5.) 14 Feb 2025 13:20:16
I got one myself ?.
6.) 14 Feb 2025 13:33:54
Surely it's worse if they don't ask for it. Like honestly what's the problem? Feedback should be given good or bad.
7.) 14 Feb 2025 14:01:57
Yes automatic Yo-Jimbo, deleted without reading.
8.) 14 Feb 2025 14:06:05
It is the ideal way for fans to vent their feelings if anyone has common-sense to see that - It would have been stranger had these routine requests not been sent out don't you think? ??then there could have been moans re conspiracies etc etc.
9.) 14 Feb 2025 14:15:43
It's not really though Red Arrows. It's an automated survey that is sent out after every game asking questions regarding match day experience. The whole idea of it is literally to become more in touch with the wants and needs of the fan base. Obviously the responses won't be good after the game on Sunday but when it's a general match day experience survey they aren't going to pick and choose which games to send them based on results. They will just always go automatically. Only being made a deal of because of the result in that particular game.
10.) 14 feb 2025 14:37:30
they won't change their systems and protocols b3 ause we lost a cup tie, its about match day experience a5 ibrox, your right rabbi/ floyd.
11.) 14 Feb 2025 15:44:32
Jfm, they have sent an email out for evert game we have attended this season, did u comment after we beat Celtic 3-0.
12.) 14 Feb 2025 16:08:26
Thanks John, I've said before I can no longer get to games so I didn't know that. Appreciate the info.
13.) 14 Feb 2025 16:48:37
Match day experience. Not the result. they asked basicly how you felt about ibrox the food the facilities the access to ibrox. Regardless of results ibrox is always and will always be a great experience for most. How dare Rangers seek fans opinions on it.
14.) 14 Feb 2025 17:13:41
Cool Jfm, u stay well mate.
15.) 14 Feb 2025 17:38:12
Thanks John, I'm doing g better now. I know I posted pictures of my car crash but I was injured more than I let on. I've finally after two and a half months if painful exercises got most of the grip back in my left hand. I know many of us have had covid but I caught covid while trying to recover and it hit my underlying health condition really hard. I never stepped outdoors the whole of January but I'm in better nick now and getting about.
Stayed off the site while I was so unwell although I was still reading daily.
16.) 14 Feb 2025 18:07:52
Mustcatin I already posted I can no longer get to ibrox and didn't know they did this but you still have to have your wee dig in your last sentence. Your post would have been decent without that wee dig. Some just can't help themselves.
17.) 14 Feb 2025 18:16:51
Jfm, glad u r doing ok, you have experienced a traumatic event, fresh air and exercise will get u to where u want to be, all the best.
18.) 14 Feb 2025 18:43:27
Keep getting better jfm good to have you posting again.
19.) 14 Feb 2025 19:05:10
Aye that crash was a bad un, mind the pics, big shock bud n then civid to boot, good you're on the mend?.
20.) 14 Feb 2025 19:16:57
It wasn't a dig at you jfm more the others complaining about it. I hope you are well. And hope you can find a way to attend a game or 2 in the future.
21.) 14 Feb 2025 21:08:20
I was bewildered myself actually laughed at it. Thankfully someone else was using my ticket. Sure they enjoyed it though.
22.) 14 Feb 2025 21:15:03
Thanks for the message, unfortunately my time at ibrox is done.
23.) 14 Feb 2025 23:47:51
Take care JFM. Can remember you posting about the accident.
24.) 15 Feb 2025 09:34:07
Chill chaps. It's an automated survey of your match day experience. Not the result obviously. No doubt if they didn't ask they would face criticism. I think we need to look up the word Banter. so much moaning ?.
25.) 15 Feb 2025 10:03:07
Maybe look up the word rumour as this ain't the banter site. ?
I asked because I had no idea they sent this out after every home game.
26.) 15 Feb 2025 11:03:25
Matchday experience can be for people to report how the found the facilities for elderly, children, disabled, staff etc. it's not about the result that's obviously not the point of it .
27.) 15 Feb 2025 12:14:35
All the best jfm I hope you're OK.
28.) 15 Feb 2025 12:19:26
Sorry JFM08 you're absolutely right oops ?.
29.) 16 Feb 2025 10:49:46
I went to Glencairn jnrs and the committee asked me in person, plus a cup of tea, I'm going back and so is the dug he also liked it.
JFM08's banter posts with other poster's replies to JFM08's banter posts
10 Apr 2025 22:04:50
Outstanding result under the circumstances. Shame for Baillie Rice who was having a good game. Thought Sterling was good but main man was Kelly. Superb display from him.
1.) 10 Apr 2025 22:40:49
Looked a sore one but he's up and about as BF said.
08 Apr 2025
New image uploaded to the
Rangers Player Sightings page entitled, For those that say rangers don't own the area that the ub plan to use on thursday
Click picture for larger image
1.) 09 Apr 2025 08:52:59
Are the stairs not in grey area.
2.) 09 Apr 2025 09:24:58
As much as it's a good layout jfm, crosschecking it with an aerial view on alamy, CoopsDa my be right bud, but I could be wrong?.
3.) 09 Apr 2025 11:07:34
Harrison Drive is designated as the 'Bucky Corner' and toilet.
4.) 09 Apr 2025 11:40:32
Just annoyed me Fork when certain posters were saying Rangers have no control outside the stadium.
I'm done with it now but you and I both know they are just out to antagonise uefa. Not sure what sort of party they think they can have. I hope if it involves pyro the police act on it. Drinking in the street is illegal in Glasgow so if their idea of a party is just singing then let them have at it as long as its not sectarian.
5.) 09 Apr 2025 12:13:44
Bucky corner, concrete lounge, that area been called a lot of things over the years before drink was illegal outside Dado, if police vans drove in the vans got bottled etc, generations of fans have caused trouble and let's be honest we have always had a reputation for bother long before the UB, they are far from the worst that's followed our team, going to games in the 70s and 80s could be a Wild West show especially away games.
6.) 09 Apr 2025 12:34:20
Aye jfm it's a thorny topic bud.
7.) 09 Apr 2025 12:41:11
Jfm so them walking the stadium now is to get under uefa skin Bilbao fans are also walking 2 the stadium so are they doing it to get at uefa or is it just our fans you don't like doing it.
8.) 09 Apr 2025 13:31:04
East Belfast maybe look it up. They are not just walking to the stadium. I'll leave it there as I can't be bothered with UB apologists.
9.) 09 Apr 2025 13:47:51
Jfm, shower of wee tannies, coke heads who the clubs and police do nothing about.
10.) 09 Apr 2025 14:51:24
UB apologists, come on a think most want them punished when it comes to fines etc but as I have said their has been worse elements to our support over the generations and have not gave as much in as the UB.
11.) 09 Apr 2025 15:00:42
The fact there has been worse in the past doesn't make them costing the club with fine after fine and being threatened with closure of part of a stand that will affect more than the people causing it okay. We can all harp back to the past. Doesn't make current behaviour acceptable.
12.) 09 Apr 2025 15:14:00
So what are the UBs doing exactly that can affect UEFA? JFM08, last night you were saying it was in ibrox then it was the ground outside ibrox now it's them having a party and should be arrested if any pyros.
JFM08, you're a grown man, you and fork having meltdowns over your own fans! You go on about what's legal in Scotland, drinking in the street, you actually should like a certain snp mp who tried to witch hunt our club with made up bs such as Rangers players singing sectarian songs in the dressing room.
So i'll ask again, what are the UBs doing that is going to affect Rangers outside the stadium?
13.) 09 Apr 2025 15:22:12
JFM08, you go on about costing Rangers money. wee question how much do Rangers lose each month through firesticks - fans not paying for Rangers TV sky etc. is it more than 25 grand? fire sticks are illegal last time i checked. are you ok with them do you know someone that's used it? should the poilce come arrest them or is it just the ub for drinking in the street?
14.) 09 Apr 2025 15:36:11
Broken glass thrown into the Celtic box from the Copland before the UB were even positioned there.
Nets up to protect the Celtic fans from objects thrown from the Govan and the Broomloan - no UB in these areas.
Objects thrown at the Celtic staff from the Enclosure - no UB in this area.
But we are going mental over a banner - which I don't agree with but would much rather read some words I disagree with than get rattled on the head by an object.
I've said it before - the ills of Rangers do not start and finish with the UB.
And see if the UB do continue to misbehave in the stadium, then the club will act.
15.) 09 Apr 2025 15:54:58
I see you don't list any of the things that the UB are guilty of. No surprises there. Christ we're stretching now, last night it was someone comparing parking tickets to pyros and sectarian singing. I haven't once commented on the banner. Did I say they should arrest them for drinking in the street.
You say East Belfast that they are just going to March to ibrox. That's not what they've said. When they marched to ibrox v fenerbace there were pyros used. I am fully against pyros. Support the UB all you want, see if your still as happy when we get a partial stand closure. Although you probably won't bother if it doesn't affect you.
I've said it many times but I'll repeat it just so you know where I stand.
The UB could be such a force for good for the club but they choose not to be, and yes it is a choice.
As long as the fines continue I'll continue to criticise them, don't like it feel free to scroll past.
16.) 09 Apr 2025 15:57:26
It doesn't fit there narrative mph your just a ub apologist apparently if you don't agree with certain ones a haven't see one post saying the ub should keep leting of piros or sign sectarian songs or bring more banners to ibrox. This is all because of the ub doing nothing illegal police Scotland have said this il be the first to condem them if the do anything inside ibrox or away stadium that jeopardize Rangers in any form what a, won't do is condem them for walking to the stadium having a good time especially if no laws are broken.
17.) 09 Apr 2025 15:58:48
East Belfast show me one post where I said it was in ibrox. I won't hold my breath as I would die before you find something that isn't there.
18.) 09 Apr 2025 17:19:27
Il ask u again what are the ub doing tomorrow outside the stadium that uefa can act on if u have answer you have deflected a few people on here with the ub apologists bs because they have a different opinion on your one a asked if you knew how much Rangers lose with fire stick Rangers tv is 240 a year so that's ok in your eyes?
19.) 09 Apr 2025 17:50:19
I didn't say it was OK same as I didn't say that they were doing something in ibrox. Your good at telling me things I said that I didn't. I take it you spent the last 90 minutes looking for something that wasn't there. If they march t ibrox from the 3 cheers pub where they are meeting for a game that kicks off at 8 and don't do anything wrong I'll be amazed.
And yes I do count pyros as being wrong. I have no idea how much they lose. But if you're talking about tomorrow as I am they will lose nothing as Rangers tv don't show European matches in the UK. Why would I answer something I don't know.
So I take it you're OK with the fines the UB have got the club and you'll be fine when we get a partial stand closure because the chances of no further offences from the union fannies are slim to none.
They are akin to the GB at the other lot and I despise them both.
20.) 09 Apr 2025 17:53:14
I apologise it wasn't you that said inside ibrox you said that Rangers should block and cancel ther tickets for doing something outside of ibrox, so i'll ask this - why should Rangers not allow them in the stadium? ?.
21.) 09 Apr 2025 18:37:30
Not once did a say its OK fines as a said a don't agree with everything they do but am not going slate them for something that hasn't happened unlike u with wanting their tickets took off them a actually can't believe you think just because rtv don't show Rangers euro games its ok to lose over 600000 pond per year threw illegal streaming a hope you have the same high horse with pepplr you know that use them.
22.) 09 Apr 2025 18:39:07
Again you're putting words in my post that aren't there. I asked can the club use the technology to block their tickets. I didn't say they should. I am a bit of a technophobe and wondered if they can do it if they need to. I hope they do behave themselves and enjoy the game and bring the atmosphere that they usually do. I would welcome them if they would just stop the behaviours that get the club fined. I detest the use of pyros whether it is in the stadium or outside. I'd put money on it that they will be used tomorrow. Like I said they should be a force for good and stop the crap.
23.) 09 Apr 2025 19:12:50
I would like to know the source of your Rangers lose £600,000 per year.
Once again where did I say I think it's OK. Putting words in my posts again that aren't there. That's turning into a bad habit. That's four times now you've done it. Anyway I'm done with this conversation, it's pointless debating with someone who constantly accuses you of things you haven't put in your posts. Have a nice life.
24.) 09 Apr 2025 21:16:43
Pointless Jfm best ignored mate, can't reason with lunacy.
29 Mar 2025 16:36:10
Cerny injured, not in squad.
1.) 29 Mar 2025 17:38:28
Injury or took out limelight after old firm.
2.) 29 Mar 2025 18:31:09
Hamstring issue.
3.) 30 Mar 2025 08:58:18
Cerny was holding the back of his left thigh after the Celtic game, he would have aggravated that playing in midweek.
27 Mar 2025 19:35:55
Given the club statement on 25th March stating they are issuing lifetime bans on the supporters responsible for the banners at the fenerbace game, how do they decide who is the responsible parties.
Is it the person at either end of the banner. Is it every fan along the full length of each banner.
It will be interesting to see how many bans are issued.
1.) 27 Mar 2025 19:54:16
A ban on all banners would sort this problem out.
2.) 27 Mar 2025 20:04:02
The Rangers Statement of 25 th of March is an attempt at Public Relations aimed at SF 49 ers . If we are to have any chance of getting San Francisco take us over we can't be paying out thousands we haven't got in fines . Club must be seen to clean up its act.
3.) 27 Mar 2025 20:06:45
It would sort out a bit of it Mark but I believe the club are fed up with the behaviours that see us fined over and over.
There are times such as armed forces day when banners are appropriate. It's not just the banners that has caused this, it's pyrotechnics, throwing things onto the pitch at opposing pkayers and of course the sectarian singing.
4.) 27 Mar 2025 20:59:58
100% Jfm??.
5.) 27 Mar 2025 21:08:13
That is a problem as u don't know whos seats are who. Is if you notice in there there's about 2 folk to 1 seat. Happens at many away games alsom they skip the barrier. Old trafford there was probably 500 more in the Rangers end than what the allocation was.
6.) 27 Mar 2025 21:28:02
Ban them all.
7.) 27 Mar 2025 21:54:21
Make it like a speeding fine then. unless you Gove evidence it wasn't you the fine sits with you. no sympathy whatever.
8.) 28 Mar 2025 01:37:17
People are gettjng caught up in racist aspect when it was simply a political banner which is also against uefa rules which they should already know as we were punished before si for me they intentionally went in knowing Rangers would get a large fine and possible sanctions as well as dragging club through mud
So for me bans are correct union bears seen to velieve they are above everyone else.
9.) 28 Mar 2025 07:12:01
And how would you do that Angus.
I've said plenty about what I feel about the UB and I am definitely not a fan of them but in this country guilt has to be proven, not the other way around.
10.) 28 Mar 2025 08:20:49
JFM any business has a common law right to refuse entry to their premises to anyone. the ban would just formalise that. also the burden of proof doesn't always lie with the accuser either as with the speeding example.
Forever 'Defend Europe' is a slogan used by the far right in Europe against immigrants into their countries. so yes a political ideology perhaps but one based on racism. either way you are right as does it matter if UEFA say they can't put these up.
11.) 28 Mar 2025 08:21:45
It's called "guilty by association (joint enterprise) " Jfm!
If anyone thinks they will turn on each other, and give up those who carried out the deed, then I think we're in for a long wait!
The UB's actions are harming our club, and as much as I believe action must be taken, I don't know if it will stretch as far as eradicating it fully?!
The best outcome would be for the UB's to see the error of their ways, make the decision to leave politics in football to those wee roasters in the east end, and just support the team/ club. If they don't, and they get banned, then in the immortal words of the legendary Terry Hall, I can see "this club, is coming like a ghost town"! I've obviously changed the lyric for effect, but you get where I'm coming from?!
12.) 28 Mar 2025 08:21:49
Guilt doesn't have to be proven its not a criminal act here. Rangers already had the power, if you look at the terms when you buy a ticket or season ticket it tells you that you can't transfer it (unless its via Rangers website) and you are responsible for that seat whether in it or not.
rangers does not need to allow anyone in to the stadium.
13.) 28 Mar 2025 08:57:16
Did we ban all the Copland when glass was thrown onto the pitch in an an old firm game before the UB even sat there?
Did we ban all the west Enclosure when a Celtic staff member was hit by an object in an Old Firm game - no UB there.
Did we ban the corner between the Govan and Broomloan when Engels was hit by a coin - no UB.
Why are we putting up nets to protect away fans? The UB don't sit near there but I don't see anyone wanting to ban those in the Govan and Broomloan as they must be responsible for the missiles.
I could go on.
But I'll say it again - if you think the ills of Rangers start and end with the UB then you must have your head in the sand.
And those that want rid of the UB are the same fans desperate for 7500 Tim's back in Ibrox with their own brand of bigotry, bile and sectarian nonsense.
14.) 28 Mar 2025 09:31:09
Their actions are indefensible as they hunger for the spotlight, others may well cause trouble, but they actively try to provoke disorder, and financial penalties incurred by the club, and possible stand closure, affecting all types of fans is completely unacceptable, how anyone can defend them is absolute insanity. Defend them when your at home when the Copland is shut, lunacy.
15.) 28 Mar 2025 09:33:09
I guess that means" bands won't play no more" either SS???.
16.) 28 Mar 2025 09:41:39
And how do u know fans want Celtic supporters back? Mind reading, crystal ball? Or just a pathetic excuse to defend them. What does your assumption have to do with punishment that could be merited out to the UB, nothing as the link is tenuous at best, if u want to support them then carry on, but in my opinion that is abject lunacy to be supporting a group that allows financial penalties and possible exclusion of fans. Believe it or not I'm not having a pop, just an opinion that varys from yours.
17.) 28 Mar 2025 10:08:26
MPH I am not advocating banning the UB but that those who are guilty of any offence either by carrying it out or by association; if by association perhaps a less lengthy ban. similarly those who commit the heinous crime of throwing missiles should be found and banned, not the whole stand they come from. If a missile is seen to come from around 1 small area and the person can't be identified then I would also advocate that those in that small area are banned, perhaps not for life. It wills et the tone and make others in the area realise that they have a duty to report such bad behaviour.
However you seem to want to defend them at all costs which I do find extremely odd especially since the fines and bans we get are at the cost of the club you support.
18.) 28 Mar 2025 10:13:27
Sunshine: guilty by association is not the same as a joint enterprise. Joint enterprise is as it says playing an active part in any crime by planning or action. Guilty by association needs no part in the crime but are known to the individuals. Just saying ?.
19.) 28 Mar 2025 11:15:20
Potatoe/ Potato! ??
I knew it had changed, but I'm sure joint enterprise used to be if anyone was found to be guilty by association?! What do I know? I'm no Perry Mason! ?.
20.) 28 Mar 2025 11:43:17
MPH I don't think the UB are the start and end of all the ills at the club. Unlike yourself though who, thinks the sun shines out their backsides I see the harm they do to our club over and over. I have said many times they could be a source of good for the club, instead they continue to do the things that gets us fined over and over. Now we are being threatened with stand closures You defend them at every turn be it Pyrotechnics, banners, song choice etc. It seems when it comes to the UB it is you that has ostrich syndrome.
21.) 28 Mar 2025 12:57:33
Where have I said I support the UB singing bigoted or Sectarian songs, JFM?
I wouldn't like to be hanging by the balls whilst you find evidence of that.
I've nothing against pyro.
I've nothing against the Tifos they produce.
I've nothing against freedom of speech whether I believe in the issue or cause people are supporting.
What I do find fault with is some of the Rangers support would rather welcome back Celtic fans and their bile and listen to songs about Smith, Ricksen etc than support their own.
22.) 28 Mar 2025 13:13:26
I could be way off, but I assumed that the club had identified those involved before releasing the latest statement - otherwise they could end up with egg on their face.
23.) 28 Mar 2025 13:20:49
Any fan misbehaving should be subject to the punishment, as i said its part of the terms and conditions of buying a ticket. if you sell or share your ticket without authority then you are still responsible for your seat.
24.) 28 Mar 2025 13:20:58
Well it's clearly union bears. Not hard to see that.
25.) 28 Mar 2025 13:56:53
You can't ban an innocent fan because he happens to be standing beside a supporter that puts up a banner.
Also it's not the other fans close by that are responsible for policing it.
The club have been fined because they don't do enough to make sure such objects don't get into the ground.
We noticed the banner from the opposite stand therefore the club staff should have noticed it from directors box and could have contacted relevant staff to seek out individuals with banner there and then.
We all know the area that pyrotechnics are likely to come from so target that area with better body search before entry.
The club needs to police it better.
It's not the innocent fans jobs to police it.
26.) 28 Mar 2025 14:00:16
Again how do u know that we'd welcome them back? You don't unless u speak for us all, I for one don't want them, and also get rid of the fools who cost the club money as their actions impact on fans possibly missing out, engage, follow the rules or be excluded that's the options they should be told.
27.) 28 Mar 2025 14:01:41
Oh and pyro happens to be against the law, so u support law breaking in the stadium.
28.) 28 Mar 2025 14:10:54
Pyros are banned from ibrox but you've no problem with the UB continuing to use them, says it all really. No problem with tifos that gets the club fined, we'll good for you. When you buy a ticket season or otherwise you agree to the rules that go with attending. But the rules aren't for the UB, are they.
29.) 28 Mar 2025 14:38:32
What Tifo has got the club fined, JFM?
Again wouldn't like to be hanging by the balls waiting for an answer to that.
A banner is different from a Tifo?.
30.) 28 Mar 2025 15:01:22
Banning individuals is fair enough but those wanting to ban all the UB are way off the mark, we have to follow the rules of UEFA and every fan should be treated the same across the board but let's be honest they put a more time and effort into supporting our club than the other 99% of us myself included, gave us a new songbook, displays that are shown round Europe, last people out the ground (subway loyal) , non stop singing (even when we are crap) which stops ibrox being a library at home games against the lower ranked teams, helped bring a generation of young people to ibrox, yes ban those that is needed (lifetime too long) but cooperation between them and the club is vital in future.
31.) 28 Mar 2025 15:51:34
Anything g to avoid the fact you're a union bears apologist. Always deflection.
32.) 28 Mar 2025 17:48:35
I totally agree coopersdad, I have stated it many times they have the ability to be a force for good for the club. Unfortunately some of them choose, and it is a choice, not to be. I started this thread with a question as I did not know how the club would decide who was guilty and how many. I never said ban all of the UB.
33.) 28 Mar 2025 19:44:13
Not youJFM, some would ban them all tomorrow tho and that's their prerogative, I've watched Rangers from the late 70s and every generation has caused bother of some kind for the club and put a lot less into the club, hopefully more coordination between the UB and club can be achieved in future, as for UEFA it's their rules and they will push their own political views on everyone else but the common supporter can't have a view and we will just have to live with it.
34.) 28 Mar 2025 22:15:15
Mph why you making this about Celtic fans? You do it all the time, any time the union bears are being spoke about negatively (which is all the time) you try to spin by saying "yet you all want Celtic fans back in" when was the last time Celtic fans got Rangers a fine?
Wouldn't like to be hanging by the balls while you find that. Football the world over has 2 sets of fans, it stopped because we rubbish the bed because they were battering us regularly, now it returns rightly so! If we get our own house in order then we can call out others, until then, we don't have a leg to stand on.
Please stop calling them ultras it's embarrassing.
14 Mar 2025 13:06:13
Fantastic outcome from last night. Big downside for me was something being thrown at their keeper from the usual area.
More punishment on the way from uefa no doubt. Will they never learn.
What brings someone to throw an item at a player. Don't care how high emotions get, its not an excuse.
1.) 14 Mar 2025 13:57:47
Club fines from union bears should be past directly on them.
2.) 14 Mar 2025 14:38:44
Said it many times, the Union Bears must be held accountable for their actions and made to pay if these actions reflect on the club and lead to UEFA sanctions. Nobody, no individual or no group, will ever be bigger than the club.
3.) 14 Mar 2025 15:06:18
I don't think it's from the UBs. I can't see them throwing anything whilst part of that group. Love them or loath them, they do abide by their group rules.
4.) 14 Mar 2025 16:02:04
Bs total bs, abide by rules my arse, so we didn't get fined for illegal in law pyro and fireworks, and after being told they were not allowed by the club they continue to do it. Aye right they don't break the rules, apologist comment.
5.) 14 Mar 2025 16:38:11
It was on the side of the pitch right in front of the UB section. I agree with you Fork, they think the rules don't apply to them.
6.) 14 Mar 2025 17:01:32
It's berrrs anyway Gers -berrs but those are mainly kids with a couple of odd old geezers.
28 Apr 2025 11:35:47
Rhol on the good times SWS.
27 Apr 2025 07:17:17
So how many managers did you actually bet on sws. You said you had put 40 quid on BF now you say you bet on Marco Rose. How many others did you punt on.
26 Apr 2025 21:37:07
Gersgirl I'm pretty sure posters said simular before the last two old firms. If the players can't get up for that game then they really have thrown the towel in.
24 Apr 2025 17:35:51
Not sure tgat were close to signing him, we are interested but that's about it.
23 Apr 2025 15:06:05
I'm certainly not annoyed by it. The announcements will be made as soon as allowable. Just pointing out I doubt any of it will be today.
28 Apr 2025 13:47:21
Bullaholics anonymous for you BB4.
28 Apr 2025 11:38:23
It's a Rholedendrum.
28 Apr 2025 11:37:30
That's a lot of bull. ?.
27 Apr 2025 21:29:51
I wish people would stop saying Steven Gerrard. I feel like it's a beetlejuice kind of thing going on.
26 Apr 2025 20:32:37
Asa, I have never asked to be on Liechtenstein as it cannot be regulated the way that the posts are. I saw in the comments that someone had a go, at you and them being called out as xenophobic.
I also seen someone saying too many foreign players who can't play in the SPL. I replied to that. Only one or two on here but that's too many imo. Most of us appreciate you on this site and the info you bring. Please don't let the one or two win.