27 Dec 2020 13:13:04
Hi

Great result against Hibs but should have scored more goals.

Never a penalty for Hibs Hagi never touched him.

Celtic struggled to score against Hamilton Juniors in the first half, we beat Hamilton big team 8-0.

Win our next two games and we will be a minimum of 19 points ahead.

Happy days.

1.) 27 Dec 2020
27 Dec 2020 13:56:38
Usually watch timco games Graham mate, resisted watching their Hamilton game as was expecting them to bump up their goal difference like we did against Hamilton.

Only three seems great for our benefit.

2.) 27 Dec 2020
27 Dec 2020 14:27:33
Doesn’t matter if he touched him or not it’s dangerous play.

3.) 27 Dec 2020
27 Dec 2020 15:26:25
Never a pen. Wasn't anywhere near his head, although he reacted as if he was. Collum probably saw the reaction and said, naw.

4.) 27 Dec 2020
27 Dec 2020 15:52:05
KJ, if it was classed as dangerous play there would be no such thing as overhead kicks.

Can’t be both legal or illegal.

5.) 27 Dec 2020
27 Dec 2020 16:42:46
Your actually only allowed to bicycle kick or overhead kick if it doesny endanger sn opponent dk so kja9 is kinda right. As he doesn't touch him but puts him off would technically have been an indirect free kick if anything tho.

6.) 27 Dec 2020
27 Dec 2020 16:44:59
It was a penalty it was dangerous play, we got let off with that 1. Good 3 points in the bag.

7.) 27 Dec 2020
27 Dec 2020 17:15:21
55, technically if you don’t touch an opponent you are not endangering him in any way?

8.) 27 Dec 2020
27 Dec 2020 17:38:03
DK19 I am 100% correct on that matter it’s dangerous play and a lot of people on here need to take the blue tinted specs off as it’s dangerous play and he doesn’t need to touch the play for it to be that.

Also I don’t think it’s a pen I think it’s an indirect free kick.


If it was in the other box folk would be cracking up in here for not getting anything.

9.) 27 Dec 2020
27 Dec 2020 18:18:33
KJ, are you Coldo with your 100% correct comment?

Unless I’m mistaken, the rule is that you play to the whistle. The ref is 100% correct until it is overridden by a mysterious appeal committee.

If you were 100% correct, most overhead kick goals would be disallowed and by it nature it is dangerous play to have your foot above your head.

Obviously that is not correct whether your glasses are blue, green or pink.

10.) 27 Dec 2020
27 Dec 2020 18:33:52
100% fact. Correct! 😂.

11.) 27 Dec 2020
27 Dec 2020 19:32:00
Dk no I ain’t coldo and that’s 100% as well it’s dangerous take the blue tinted specs aff.

12.) 27 Dec 2020
27 Dec 2020 19:52:29
Why have we got to take our blue tinted specs off? If I want to stick up for one of our players I will, if you are saying that was a stone wall penalty then perhaps you should get some glasses blue tinted or otherwise. The player went down holding his head, why?

13.) 27 Dec 2020
27 Dec 2020 20:11:53
Correct jyf 100%.

14.) 27 Dec 2020
27 Dec 2020 22:02:14
Jyf take the blue tinted specs off and put normal specs on where in any of my posts did I say it was a pen?

Maybe take a deep breath an read the posts properly thanks.

15.) 28 Dec 2020
27 Dec 2020 22:53:31
I can’t find my specks.

16.) 28 Dec 2020
28 Dec 2020 01:13:23
whistler wullie said newell ducked, end of story move on, let the whingers suck it up.

17.) 28 Dec 2020
28 Dec 2020 08:29:18
Fair play KJA9, you did not say it was a penalty and I was wrong there but you are of the opinion that a foul was committed in the box I am not, you might be 100% correct in your mind that does not make you 100% correct, there are a few who don't think its a penalty including the ref. You also say if it happened up the other end we would be shouting for something that's not true, I don't see any posts about the foul on Tav where if he had gone down then surely a pen would have been awarded or the portious challenge on Roofe in the box where he went over the ball and into Roofe making contact with the ball with his thigh, a red card on its own. Rangers always seem to sit back and take any criticism thrown at us and when our own fans are happy to argue our opponents case then its no wonder.

18.) 28 Dec 2020
28 Dec 2020 09:24:38
Tavs wasn’t a pen and the one on roofe was a stonewaller and a red card I have said that further down.

It’s dangerous play the hagi one but it’s fine and dusted we won let’s move on to 3 points against st mirren.

19.) 28 Dec 2020
28 Dec 2020 10:03:18
Here here KJA9, and then to finish things off next Saturday.

20.) 28 Dec 2020
28 Dec 2020 10:37:18
KJ spoke to a former grade one ref this morning.
Hagi overhead kick is dangerous play. He says no contact therefore not a penalty. He feels it should have been an indirect free kick to hibs.
Also he said some refs may consider hibs player guilty of exaggerating contact and could have been booked for simulation. He said he would not have booked hibs player as can’t prove it.
I learn something all the time
Good call KA.

21.) 28 Dec 2020
28 Dec 2020 11:03:26
Retrospective booking for simulation?

22.) 28 Dec 2020
28 Dec 2020 14:01:32
Deemc you really need to try learn the rules.