27 Feb 2020 12:41:27
hi bears
i read something somewhere this morning regarding liewell backing a plan to judge teams over the past 10 years in europe and not how the
collective teams from a country perform? not sure i like that? anyone have anymore info or thoughts on that? copenhagen was mentioned as well? sorry i don't have anymore on it .

1.) 27 Feb 2020
27 Feb 2020 13:37:01
Should this be the case Peter Lawell will have done his homework and Celtic will benefit from it. If they weren't going to benefit, he would not mention it.

2.) 27 Feb 2020
27 Feb 2020 14:14:49
Whether the mhanks benefit or no Bluetoon Lawell will make sure he does.
Have you seen how much cash the greedy git creams off them.

Mind you the more he gets the less lenny will get for transfers.

3.) 27 Feb 2020
27 Feb 2020 14:39:39
Haven't heard about this but I would rather be judged by our results than all Scottish clubs. What have the likes of Aberdeen and Motherwell and Kilmarnock did for our co-efficient in recent years and why should we be judged by their results?

4.) 27 Feb 2020
27 Feb 2020 14:51:35
Would be a good thing for us as well as them, judged on your own merits not dragged down by the diddy teams.

5.) 27 Feb 2020
27 Feb 2020 15:30:06
Lewell has no chance! I know what he is trying to do He can p aff with that one!

6.) 27 Feb 2020
27 Feb 2020 15:34:40
You can stick the co-efficient where the sun doesn’t shine!
I would much rather bask in Gerrard’s achievements with Rangers these last 2 seasons in Europe than continually get 2nd chances as a CL failure. 👍.

7.) 27 Feb 2020
27 Feb 2020 15:35:08
not sure lads as the last 10 years we haven't been in europe but i don't have a full understanding of what this is about? are we not being judged by our results now i think we are in a way? so if and a big if a non top team wins their league they don't have any record for the past 10 years so are penalized before they start? reeks a bit to me?

8.) 27 Feb 2020
27 Feb 2020 15:38:55
geronimo we would not be judged by their results and have not been. rangers being back in europe has raised the coefficeint tremendously and we will benefit from this. so i don't see why this should change?

9.) 27 Feb 2020
27 Feb 2020 15:48:49
Swagman, for once I tend to agree with you. These things, if they do get accepted, will take 2/ 3/ 4 years to come into force, which will give us time to catch up. We only have 3 yrs worth at the moment. Until the meat is put on the bone, nobody can say whether it will be good or bad.

As Geronomo says why should the tail i. e. Aberdeen, Motherwell, and Killie etc, have a say in where we qualify.

10.) 27 Feb 2020
27 Feb 2020 17:19:43
Swagman are you actually admitting that there has been merits?

11.) 27 Feb 2020
27 Feb 2020 19:36:22
Actually Brian gers we have 2 decent years at the moment and they are talking about 10 year history, so if it’s in 3 years time we will have a 5 year record against a proposed ten year record, bad idea for us, think about it 🤔.