02 Jan 2022 19:15:41
Reports circulating this evening that the deal to take nathan patterson from us to everton is all but done🤔Rangers and everton talks in the very advanced stage, so it seems and his transfer should be completed within the next 48 hours or so🤔
There's different stories on the transfer fee everton are paying us for patterson🤔John25 have you heard anything regarding the fee we're receiving for him mate 🤔.


1.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 19:21:43
Sir Walter where have you read or heard this from.


2.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 19:40:02
Heard nothing walter.


3.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 19:41:10
Reports online that the fee for Patterson is 10 million.
I would think if the move goes through that we will target a right back as it leaves us a bit thin there.
Possibly someone out of contract or for a low fee.


4.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 19:44:33
Looks like it 12 million rising to 16 million with add ons
And a sell on clause yes this is a good deal but not happy as Tav won’t go on for ever and we now need a back up for him also would rather got rid of Tav to be honest just my own humble opinion.


5.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 19:51:24
Great piece of business. Being quoted as £12m rising to £16m with sell on. Doesn’t weaken our 11 as he’s never going to oust out Tav any time soon. Means we are in no rush to cash in on Aribo, Kamara, Kent or Alfie now unless a massive offer comes in. Love wee Nathan but he’s not a regular just now and the money is great. Wish him all the best he lived the dream and won the league with us.


6.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 19:51:54
I have heard it looks like 10mil + 25% sell on fee but the person that told me this is not always correct.

He has also stated we are going to replace patterson with Loan player till the summer.


7.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 20:03:21
12 mill rising to 16 according to heart and hand poscast. don't come much more reliable than that.


8.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 20:03:44
Liverpool écho say deal will cost 10m.


9.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 20:03:52
Just seen on sky sports news, 12 mil initial payment and a further 4 mil in add-ons, good bit of business for a player that's only played a handful of games.


10.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 20:08:17
Just seen that Mate 12 Mill going to 16 with most up front.


11.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 20:11:43
I know it was rumoured that we would lose Patterson and Hagi for a combined fee of £20m+, if that allows us to sign the likes of Veerman, Doehki, Olsen and Amuzu then I think we’ll have left the transfer window better than we joined it.


12.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 20:15:25
Looks like £12m rising to £16m with add ons. That's decent business for us but, I would liked him to stay. Who could we replace him with or do we gave anyone in the b squad capable to fill that 2nd RB spot?


13.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 20:27:36
Well if the apparent 16m bid sky sports are reporting is true; that's a hell of a lot of money for a kid that's barely played. Not sure how they've scraped the funds together, but as long as that ends up getting to us its not our problem eh.


14.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 20:30:42
Must admit after Everton's reported previous bids of £5M, then £9M
I am looking for £15M as they seem to be desperate to get him.


15.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 20:37:00
Seems deal done for Paterson 13 million, add ons significant sell on clause supposedly 15%.


16.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 20:42:08
Sky sports reporting the deal is worth 16m. That's an outstanding fee for our 2nd choice rb. Doesn't weaken our squad. Excited to see who comes in now 🙌.


17.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 20:43:12
12m rising to 16m with add onns.


18.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 20:45:13
£12m upfront with £4m in add ons, great bit of business for a player struggling to break into our first 11.


19.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 21:24:52
Anyone who thinks that isn't great business is mental, 12 million for a back up right back who has potential but a lot to prove, neither Gerrard or gio rate him highly enough to oust tav from the team, it doesn't weaken the team at all and allows us to strengthen during this window whilst holding on to our major players, a back up right back (maybe the young boy ramsay from Aberdeen) a winger and maybe a centre half or another striker would be great, only downside is that he's scottish and not too many Scots around the place.


20.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 21:33:28
We can all have our thoughts on the money that we will get for the loss of Nathan but all the best for your future son if you go you will always be a Rangers league winner.
Let’s spend the money on players Gio wants.


21.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 21:36:20
Everton have got themselves a bargain. This boy has huge potential shame we have to sell our most valuable assets to balance the books, but that's the name of the game.


22.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 21:38:16
Have you heard anything else john 25, i heard earlier there's not any of our players banging on his door to keave, however if proper bids come in there all for sale, gutted we haven't seen much of Patterson, however helluva bit of business and big it up for Auchenhowie and that is the quality we're now expecting, i'm sure our Dutch contingent know what to do with those facilities, happy new year to all my fellow bears on here, heres to a great 150th year . lest we forget our supporters who never made it home, our thoughts for the 66.


23.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 21:55:09
I agree everyone for sale if our price met, Paterson apparently has wanted away since summer. He thought he would start regularly this season.
Lot off money for a kid with less than 25 games. Good luck to him, less than 5k at Rangers to epl money, who can blame him.


24.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 22:18:47
If he isn’t going to play at Everton, do you think they might loan him back to us for the rest of the season?


25.) 02 Jan 2022
02 Jan 2022 23:17:13
Just watched Everton on motd and Kenny (who wasn’t even good enough for them) plays right back atm - so Patterson is walking into that team. No chance of him being loaned back.

Think we should put an offer in for the lad Ramsay at Aberdeen unless Gio knows of some up an coming players from the Dutch league.


26.) 03 Jan 2022
03 Jan 2022 00:07:13
Zikos, if you have read any of my posts for the last 6 months you will know that I have constantly mentioned the aberdeen young right back calvin ramsey for us🤔But like i stated in an earlier post, i don't think young ramsey will come if he's not going to get a regular game 🤔.


27.) 03 Jan 2022
03 Jan 2022 09:16:06
Stormtrooper mate, i know you would have preferred to get rid of tav but firstly if no club bids for tav, for what our valuation is of him, we just can't bin our no. 1 right back because patterson is a very good young right back mate, that's just not on🤔Tav has still his peak years in front of him and at this moment in time, a better right back than patterson! Tav's stats are superb and since gio came in and tweaked the way he wants our full backs to play,
both tav and borna have been sound defensively👌.


28.) 03 Jan 2022
03 Jan 2022 09:21:57
Why would they loan him back to sit on out bench.


29.) 03 Jan 2022
03 Jan 2022 10:01:44
Ssn saying 12m rising to 16 to be honest that’s a fair price for someone not in the starting 11 yet! Will be gutted he’s leaving but this is football and gives funds for gvb to play with! Although a back up rb will be urgently needed.


30.) 03 Jan 2022
03 Jan 2022 10:11:20
Sweep, I thought he would have had more chance playing with us than at Everton and he is obviously settled here but after watching motd last night I think he will be a starter for them right away.


31.) 03 Jan 2022
03 Jan 2022 10:36:30
Good to see to be honest. I would have liked him to have been first choice, but a rebuild of sorts is required. Looks like 2 natural wingers are being looked at now. I Expect more to go and come in. I can’t see Stevie not coming in for Aribo and Goldson.