05 Jan 2020 09:59:51
Has anyone else heard that the 17th of january, is when our kit situation with ashley and sports direct, will be fixed out? I've heard an announcement will be made on that day of a settlement between all parties!
God i hope so and feel so sorry for hummel in all this and puma before them! 🤔.

1.) 05 Jan 2020
05 Jan 2020 10:37:35
yea that's the final court date of how much we owe Ashely round about same time King about to bolt that's a worry.

2.) 05 Jan 2020
05 Jan 2020 10:42:27
Coop how reliable is your source? That sounds like an ammicable resolution which would be great news unless of course we end up with SD logo's everywhere, which I doubt as King wouldn't entertain that. You need to expand a bit more mate. 👍.

3.) 05 Jan 2020
05 Jan 2020 10:47:35
Big blue, is that right enough that the 17th is the final court date, I wasn't aware of that. Does anyone have an idea as to the compensation figure? 👍.

4.) 05 Jan 2020
05 Jan 2020 10:49:17
Coldo i've been told this by an ex employee of rangers mate. He's usually quite good with his info and still has good contacts himself, within the club.

5.) 05 Jan 2020
05 Jan 2020 10:59:17
SGL I have heard similar as court papers we served on SD and my means Ashley would need to take the witness stand. Something he does not like doing.
Here’s hoping we get a good outcome and can move forward.

6.) 05 Jan 2020
05 Jan 2020 11:06:40
I'm confused lads, how can we serve papers on SD in an ongoing court case or is this two seperate things? 👍.

7.) 05 Jan 2020
05 Jan 2020 11:16:23
Coldo. Papers are available on line, Rangers news site.
It extends to 106 pages where we challenge a number of facts, allegedly portrayed by SD.
It is backed up with emails sent by SD, RFC, elite and Hummel, it also clearly states that RFC are seeking considerable damages for frustration of trade.
I think both sides have been economic with version of dealings, papers make it clear SD were asked to match or better offer made.
The main reading is at end of papers highlighted in green, once again it’s for the lawyers to argue re level of damages.

8.) 05 Jan 2020
05 Jan 2020 14:29:12
Right so the papers are the defence to the SD compensation claim. When you said court papers were served on SD it gave the impression that there was a new law suit about to happen. 👍.

9.) 05 Jan 2020
05 Jan 2020 15:50:37
Sorry coldo, sometimes my dyslexia gets in the way of writing clearly.

10.) 05 Jan 2020
05 Jan 2020 16:05:16
Don't need to apologise mate, I was just trying to understand what was what. I thought for a minute that there was another court case on the go. 👍.

11.) 05 Jan 2020
05 Jan 2020 18:07:50
well technically new since its a countersue. but is aligned to the original case where we are using it not only for our defence to either win or reduce payout and along with the countersue if successful may actually not only release us from SD but put some money in the coffers.

12.) 05 Jan 2020
05 Jan 2020 20:41:00
Coldo, a few months back it was on lots of sites, predicting the outcome would be quite trivial, saying it will cost dave king just under 1 million, don't know how these people work it out, lol.

13.) 06 Jan 2020
06 Jan 2020 19:24:31
if countersuit involved then good news. indicates a repositioning may be more fruitful.