Please use our Rangers rumours form to send us your Rangers rumours

Rangers Rumours 12429

 

 

 

 

 

10 Apr 2012 14:45:48
Andrew Ellis to sue Craig Whyte over share issue, Ellis was promised 25% shareholding which never materialized, why would Ellis do this now? Are Whytes shares not meant to be worthless? A strange new twist.

(19)
(0)

I feel Whytes 85% share is more important than D&P are letting on, Whyte is a seasoned liquidator with years of experience of stripping assets before driving off into the sunset! Ellis is a intelligent man why waste money chasing worthless shares? A worried bear!


I think this is another delaying tactic and he is in this with CW. More delay will make potential buyers walk and virtually ensure liquidation which is what CW wants. Ellis is just another part of the plan to strip assets as is the administration team. All of them are associated with CW.


Dont you just love the stuff coming out of the big house just get the big wrecking ball and put yous out your misery


I cant honestly believe any right minded individual who believes the D&P spin that Whyte is an irrelevance and his shares are worthless. Whyte is the owner.


Why did Ellis not speak up sooner about his share of the club? is this just more delaying tatics? The questions just keep growing by the minute.



← Back To Rangers Rumours

 

 

We take no responsibility for the accuracy or otherwise of published rangers rumours

 

   Copyright © rangersrumours.co.uk All Rights Reserved.

.