Rangers Rumours Archive March 06 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


06 Mar 2012 23:46:43
Graeme Speirs on Radio Clyde tonight was led to believe that the Administrators at Rangers combined wage was around 230K a WEEK - now if they are first to be paid am I missing something or is that not around 1 million a month. This full thing stinks to the high heavens!

Gers1986

Believable19 Unbelievable7

This is terrible and a young lad volunteered to leave to help others disgusted

Agree0 Disagree0

It could be correct, I knew a big company that was in Administration for 2 years, it was making just enough money to pay the adminitrator, and nobody would buy the company.

Agree0 Disagree0

If administrators there till august that 6 million pounds gone strange

Agree0 Disagree0

I totally agree with you. We should have got Neil Patey in instead of these t**ts from Duff and Phelps as he would of found money alot quicker and made player reduncies quicker and paid our debts to dunfermline,dundee utd, caley and hearts some people seem to forget that better players than the ones in the first team have left before and we coped the one and only priority is the survival of our club instead of linen those t**ts pockets and risen as a phoenix club

Agree0 Disagree0

The survival of the club just now depends on younger players the administrators are going to make a fortune from the club at the end of the day this should have been done quicker something odd going on who agrees ?

Agree0 Disagree0

I just cant work it out the figures seem to be correct from the media reports on what they are getting paid - so many questions here on the way they have carried this whole process out.

Gers 1986

Agree0 Disagree0

They havent been as quick to point out how much their on! What if its their 250k a week that pushes us over the edge?

Agree0 Disagree0

The way its looking admin will be at the club for months ahead

Agree0 Disagree0

Remember that these are CW's chosen administrators and one's that HMRC put up a token fight to avoid. I have no faith whatsoever that these were chosen with regards to the best interests of RFC and not with whatever CWs agenda was at the time.
It may be that D&P have had to finally admit that in order to maintain some professional integrity they have had to take CW's interest out of the equation, but they may still be on the terms CW proposed in order to get the sweetheart arrangement he was hoping for.

Agree0 Disagree0

They've been there for 3 weeks and I've been saying it for 2 weeks! Has the penny dropped? CW will be getting a kickback for the business he's given. Also this player business is a charade to drag it out into liquidation. The team needs sacked soonest and duff & phelps shown the door quickly. Been saying it for weeks. Bears, keeping the players isnt a victory it's failure.

Agree0 Disagree0

Spiers is being careful, they are on 300k per week as they work 7 days incl. Sat & Sun.

Agree0 Disagree0

That'll be the £1m a month they're looking to make from the wages of others then.

Agree0 Disagree0

Speirs pointed out that D&P are chasing all the missing dosh and are earning their dough. When they find it the Tax boys will grab it (and rightly so). I'm sure PM and his Knights have been chatting to SPL chums to find the "New Gers" a backway into the premier league. One rule for one ..... but that's the way the world works. As for the players, they are just employees and will play for the jersey that pays the most money. C'est la vie.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 23:26:38
Today has been a very frustrating day. Earlier in the day, we believed we had agreed in principle a basis of cost-cutting measures with the players accepting substantial pay cuts and we are very grateful for their efforts in reaching that point.

Sadly this evening we have been unable to reach agreement on the personal conditions sought by the advisors to the players in respect of those wage cuts.


There is still some hope these issues can be resolved first thing in the morning but it is extremely disappointing we haven't been able to get there tonight.

Rangers site - dannager4life

Believable10 Unbelievable3

Just as I posted elsewhere the agents will scupper progress. They will be telling players to hold firm - i.e. club makes them redundant they owe them their redundancy money (remainder of their contract) else their contract is null and void and they can walk into another club on a pre contract agreement.

Agree0 Disagree0

Im diapointed in these players they are only interested in themselves and after the next 3 months ie possible new clubs there was a lad today put under the pressure to leave for the sake of non playing staff a credit to young people gregg should be one of the new up and coming stars for the club but thought of others instead good luck gregg your a star

Agree0 Disagree0

Duff and Phelps............truly the caring face of capitalism. No redundancy or wage cut without your agreement sir.

Agree0 Disagree0

My advice to Rangers fans is to set up a survival fund and use the money to buy up all empty seats at Ibrox before every game.

If these big players have to be made redundant then the only thing that can cause liquidation over the next 3 months is a drop in attendances.
The administrator will have built his rescue plan around average attendances, if they fall then the club run out of working capital, and it is over.

Agree0 Disagree0

I have just read the post about buying empty seats, and ask what world do you live in? Duff & Phelps MUST be paid first every week, so if you buy every empty seat guess who gets the lions share?These guys are on about 200k per week, according to Graham Spiers on Clyde ( see other posts) last night. So every day the squad fails to come to an agreement cost the club about 68K in fees that D&P could be using more productively, looking else where to keep the club alive, the only way to save the club is for these prima donnas who maintain they play for the jersey, is to step up and take the wage cut with no strings attched, then we can believe they are and always will be Rangers men, just like young Grieg.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 23:00:23
7 players scupper administrators offer of wage cuts with no redundancies - source stv 10:50pm

Believable10 Unbelievable8

Davis , mcgregor , whittaker , edu , are in that 7........AS

Agree0 Disagree0

To be fair the players, it appears their Agents and/or the Players Union is the reason for the breakdown....read D&P statement for more

Agree0 Disagree0

The future of rangers depends on younger scottish players it a tragic the likes of young greg had to leave our club today and some top earners are looking after their own interests why wany greg put in this position

Agree0 Disagree0

No loyalty to the club..Players only have loyalty to themselves

Agree0 Disagree0

Wylde put himself in this position as he has alreday got Blackpool and Southampton sniffing after him.

Agree0 Disagree0

I think it is safe to assume it will be 7 of the highet earners, they have the most to lose, if you can earn 300k in 3 months and they are looking for 75% off = 225k !

Thats a lot of loyalty if it all goes belly up.

Agree0 Disagree0

I would get rid of the 7 who couldnt agree with the cuts and bring Greg Wylde back because unlike the others he hasnt had a proper chance to prove himself and he was happy to give up his dream and help even just one worker at ibrox unlike laffaminute and captain chaos who has been nothing short of garbage for the last two seasons

Agree0 Disagree0

Bring back young gregg feel rotten for the lad

Agree0 Disagree0

The players and the people representing their needs are right to want terms added to the contract that the club or future owners cannot prevent them from moving for a (re-evalutaed) reasonable fee, so as they don't get stung twice by the pay cut.

Its not like the club have a good recent record of honoring debts?!

Agree0 Disagree0

Gregg Wylde is a self serving mercenary just like every other player, so don't feel sorry for him. He'll have another club lined up. I do believe however that any manager crazy enough to offer him a deal should be hospitalised for psychological tests. He's the worst player i've ever had the misfortune of watching in a rangers shirt. Truly an atrocious footballer. I was actually concerned this process would be painful, but in truth, we can trim a lot of the deadwood from the squad and start rebuilding next year.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 22:49:00

Talks break down between players and administrators and are due to resume tomorrow. Talks took place until 10.00p.m. tonight.

Seven senior players are refusing to accept wage reductions.

Believable14 Unbelievable6

It's not seven players n they ain't refused wage cut, the hold up is agreeing the clauses etc of contracts!

Agree0 Disagree0

Thats not what was said cloth ears,

Agree0 Disagree0

It is 7 players and they have refused wage reductions.

John McKay was interviewing Graham Speirs, Mark Dingwall and Neil (from Ernst & Young). During the interview he was getting up to date information through his earpeice and was updating viewers with what he was being told.

Agree0 Disagree0

They are refusing a wage cut - contractually they do not have to accept it and many of the good players will want to have their contracts voided so they can jump off the sinking ship

Agree0 Disagree0

Does it mean greggsy and davis and whitty may leave in morning

Agree0 Disagree0

If they do not accept the pay cut then the highest earners will have to go.
250k saving per week = 25 players on 10k = not possible.
7 players could be as much as 175k, leave only 75k less Ally' 25k=50k less 2 already gone=30k.
2 more players plus coaching staff will cover that.
Rangers will have 21 players left.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 22:44:48
if a newco was created would season tickets be valid for the newco?


ryanrfc

Believable1 Unbelievable15

No, the Ticketus deal would no longer be valid.

If liquidated during this season a newco would not play this season.

Agree0 Disagree0

Sorry mate would be a completely new club even though(hopefully ) surroundings being the same, but saying that they might carry a contract through, eh im stuck now craig+babybear totally + completely confused

Agree0 Disagree0

All season ticket 4 a newco are void

Agree0 Disagree0

No the season tickets would we monopoly money hence why Ticketus are desperate to make a deal with whoever indicates interest in offering a bail out.

Agree0 Disagree0

If rangers are liquidated to form a Phoenix club all standing assets e.g. Murray park, Ibrox and surrounding lands wil be sold to settle all remaining debts.

Agree0 Disagree0

If were liquidated and ibrox or Murray park ect has to be sold off to pay the debts, the main creditor has first choice on the assets and that creditor is Craig whyte, I'm sure this was his plan from the start. So we would have to give him a rent to play at ibrox.

Agree0 Disagree0

The administrators are currently working in taking secured creditor status away from Craig whyte. That's what the investigations into his takeover of the club are for.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 21:53:46
Hats off to super ally he must be fighting like mad in at Murray park to try and keep our club together - What a total mess - Sir David Murray has so much to answer for although he is the unintentional architect of all of this - as for Craig Whyte words cannot describe what I feel about that man!

Gers1986

Believable17 Unbelievable10

Calm down fellow bears our whyte knight will bring us through this we just need to believe mean wot have got to lose! Or am i on my own. w.a.t.p broxi bear

Agree0 Disagree0

Yeah hats off to the man , alway's been a good sort tho both sides of divide like him, good luck to him and the club

Agree0 Disagree0

Am afraid you might be on your own mate can't believe blindly anymore in a man that has told us so many lies

Gers 1986

Agree0 Disagree0

You are on your own

Wake up and smell the coffee aforementioned "Knight" a stranger to the truth

Agree0 Disagree0

Well said pal i think everyone is jumping on us but we shall not be moved

Agree0 Disagree0

Ally has been strong in all of this mess and those last night havin a go at his management defy belief. At this time his management skills off the field are what is important and his skills regarding motivation tactics etc well give the man a level playing field to be judged on !! SDM - he got us into a mess yes, but to be fair he had (Big tax case aside - it aint proven yet) he had reduced the debt to the bank over the past 3/4 years and we were heading towards the right direction with our debt reaching manageable levels, and he was obviously taken in by the conman as much as the rest of us were. Perhaps his silence is for legal reasons if Craig Shyte has not met his legal obligations regarding the purchase of Our club. As for the conman then thats a different story, he had no money, has purchased the club for £1 taking on the debt, again big tax case aside The bank debt at £18m &£1 was then really what was the price for the Club, which is realistic price. What did Murray pay for club (with less assets) or indeed Lawerence Marlebough before him? Whyte is the crook and has brought us down. If it had happened because of defeat with the big tax case then yes Murray would be guilty. Come on folks lets aim our anger at those responsible and not at others who are maybe hurting and victims to CW like we are. Final Question - if we are to go into Liquidation are the admin blokes obliged to announce this as soon as it becomes apparent ? would not like to think of us being taken for mugs and filling Ibrox with an outcome decided and our hard earned going into a black hole ! would rather put the cash into a fund for restarting the club or looking after the lower paid staff (cleaners etc) who are facing a cut in wages or worse. Bring CW to justice in court in cuffs - is there room in the barlinnie for him ?

Agree0 Disagree0

I must be watching a different situation unfold:

1) Ally's recent record even before administration has been pish
2) Ally has said next to hee haw since administration and saying he is not going to get involved with redundancies but he is there for support is pish
3) Ally has not officially said he will work for nothing until this situation has been sorted - i.e. set an example of leadership

In summary nice guy, great player for the club but he is nae a manager and he has distanced himself from the big decisions. He will not be manager next season of that I am sure

Agree0 Disagree0

Correct ally mcoist is a top man much repected by all fans its a shame he has this burden on his back in his first year i wish some of the top earners at the club have a good look at themselves we should have persuaded young gregg to stay at the clubs instead of some of these greedy players

Agree0 Disagree0

I think Ally should get some plaudits for working for nothing but there is a degree of logic in his decision.
He would be the first redundancy with 1 months salary and out of a job.
If he stays and works for nothing, he is still there when new owner takes over. He may also have accepted his redundancy payment which means only 2 months free, now he is a Rangers super- hero for life even if the new owner has the courage to replace him.

Just saying.

Agree0 Disagree0

If Ally did not accept his redundancy money then has given up 100k, but also makes himself unsackable for at least one full season under any new owner trying to keep fans happy.

Clever.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 21:50:20
All these Rangers supporters wanting Rangers to start of in Div 3 if they get liquidated and then other clubs will really feel the pinch.

I'm sure any would be investors will be delighted to invest in a Div 3 team.

Believable4 Unbelievable11

Big fan base, no debt, new share issue.Div 3, 2 then 1 and Spl, I smell your fear timmy, back bigger and stronger

Agree0 Disagree0

Get it into your thick skull. Rangers will not start in division 3 because Rangers will not exist. A new company may be created and apply to start in division 3 but it sure as hell won't be Rangers.

Agree0 Disagree0

It will always be RANGERS. Div 3 for me if and a big IF we need to reform.we will get on with rebuilding our team.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ha. It must hurt you knowing that it won't be rangers.

Agree0 Disagree0

Rangers must be kept in the spl at all costs the state of the game just now is dire all top clubs must work together and build a better brand

Agree0 Disagree0

Try this again, if Rangers are liquidated they are finished. No more rangers, it will be a new football club who may call themselves rangers 2012 (or something similar) in homage to the defunct club who once played in scotland. It cant be the same club

Agree0 Disagree0

Listen, to the chap Doncaster, SPl board, rangers cannot be relegated unless the other clubs in the SPL refuse the new registration,ergo Rangers go bust the parachute right back into the SPL because they are members of the SPL and not the SFA which runs the other football divisions. This of course now opens the door to all other SPL , with large unsustainable debts, who can do exactly the same as Rangers, go bust, reform and parachute back into the SPL

Agree0 Disagree0

An end to the "auld firm"? Sounds good to me. Not being linked to sellik has got to be good.

Agree0 Disagree0

I think you might have upset David Longmuir whose SFL actually run the lower divisions not Stuart Regan's SFA , if Rangers "survive" but are found guilty of breaking SPL rules one of the santions open to the SPL is expulsion from the league , so technically speaking Rangers CAN be relegated .

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 21:08:07
Jim McColl OBE is possibly interested in a Rangers takeover

http://hitthebyline.com/2012/03/06/exclusive-scottish-multimillionaire-mulling-over-rangers-takeover/

Believable16 Unbelievable27

It would be great but if anyone is going to put money in we need to get rid of whyte first and make sure we fill ibrox evey week putting our own money in as well

Agree0 Disagree0

Nobody will buy Rangers. Not until the BTC has been resolved.

Agree0 Disagree0

Very interesting read. Looks like he's broken ranks with the Blue Knights and is going it alone - or so it seems,
Chins up my fellow bears. Everything will be fine in the end. We'll be out of admin soon and there'll be no liquidation - Mr McColl will see to that

Agree0 Disagree0

Fingers crossed.

Agree0 Disagree0

Does any1 know how much money rangers make month e.g ticket sales merchandise etc?? cuz im thinkin with the players we have rangers are puttin out 3m in wages! So do they even make any profit?? Reason im asking is cuz i dont think we do and thats why i dont hink no1 will buy us!

Agree0 Disagree0

Really hope that's true, it really needs to be a heart over head decision though as it will be good money after bad for a long time to come.

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree. All going well. Follow, follow! WATP

Agree0 Disagree0

Ive already posted weeks ago jim mccoll not interested in any football team... AS

Agree0 Disagree0

Here here to the above post.

I have left a few postings over the last week stating that we won't go into liquidation.

Too much negativity from fellow bears, things cannot get any worse. Every man and his dog have had a go at us since administration.

There is too much uncertainly regarding the tax case, once it is resolved ( if we have a case to answer), we will move forwards and onwards.

There are too many bears around the world that won't allow Rangers to go under.

Hopefully Mr Whyte will get his just desserts, he is lower than a snake's belly, Rangers man my a..e.

Stu

Agree0 Disagree0

Jim McColl maybe the Blue knight in to come to the fore front! As ally said at the weekend, you can all kick us while we are down, because we won't be there for ever
WE SHALL COME OUT FIGHTING

Agree0 Disagree0

Say he buys rangers and gets stuck with £100M debt how long before he sees a return in his inestment

Agree0 Disagree0

There wont be 100 mill debt. inland revenue aint going to win!

Agree0 Disagree0

Administration has been coming for 2 years. Lloyds had the club under some control when they were running it. Sound-bites will not resolve the issue, neither will the old accolade 'too big to fail'

Unless someone has 100 million to burn on Rangers, i cannot see anyway out of this without a new Football club being created. That's without any fallout regarding financial wrong doings over the decade. If all you have to offer is a sound-bite, its of no use.

Agree0 Disagree0

How reliable is this info? Seems too good to be true. Why did he not buy a year ago? Sorry. Wish it were true. But recent events suggest we ain't that lucky. Also what's all this 100 million about? If we lose the tax case surely hmrc Will have to accept a percentage of the pound. Like other creditors. That's what would happen if I were to go bankrupt. Or other businesses.

Agree0 Disagree0

Most people close to events think liquidation is only about 50-50, these odds will change if Rangers make top earners redundant. It reduces the companys value and reduces the chances of a full Ibrox for the next 3 months. If attendances fall below the Administrator's cash flow projections then liquidation is inevitable.

Agree0 Disagree0

As soon as i saw cathkin braes i knew this was bs....jim mccoll plays golf and entertains at turnberry and royal troon. wtf would he be doing at a £30 a whack club in rutherglen discussing a multi-million pound takeover with some lame website 'insider'

speaks volumes that there's not a single quote from anyone

Agree0 Disagree0

Who is he? The old guy from beach grove garden? He'll be senile and throwing away his grandchildrens legacy.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 20:27:37
Av heard Bocanegra and Edu were two of the players who asked to be released from their contracts.

Believable14 Unbelievable10

Word today was Davis! AS

Agree0 Disagree0

Dont think so Bocanegra isnt like that

Agree0 Disagree0

Who would blame them? if you went into work tomorrow and you were asked to work on half pay would you? Scott

Agree0 Disagree0

More pish

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 20:25:02
does rangers need mccoist mcdowell and durrant surely they can let one of them go

Believable14 Unbelievable8

Ally is the favourite to go. Administrators have established this would save 50% on Ranger's catering costs.

Agree0 Disagree0

This should have been one of the first cuts. Walter should come back and help mccoist for free. Mccoist is handling all this on his own.

Agree0 Disagree0

If Ally is working for zero wages, I'm reasonably sure that McDowell & Durrant are working at least at reduced rates. Probably find it works out the three of them for the price of one. If it turns out that we will be using some of the younger players in the first team, then we'll need all three of them.

Agree0 Disagree0

Durrant will be ok! Big Eck' will take him to Aston Villa ... how do I think this ? well I was at 3 weddings last year and guess who was always tagging along with Alex ? you guessed it - he's blue he's white - he turns up to wedding nights ....Ian Durrant...

Agree0 Disagree0

Maybe the 3 of them will be playing again soon !

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 19:55:46
Davis is the next one away aston villa waiting in the wings.

Believable16 Unbelievable12

Plus Bolton and one other. {Ed001's Note - Wolves, Blackpool, Ipswich... Oh and Wigan.}

Agree0 Disagree0

R u joking struggling premier league clubs are ok championship clubs i rather stick at rangers even if they r in trouble u no why "Because we don't walk away"

Agree0 Disagree0

If these are championchip clubs, then what are Rangers and Celtic?
Stop deluding yourself, Scottish football is dying on its feet, mainly because it's Sunday League.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 19:40:27
Steve Davis has just arrived back at Murray Park! Wonder what for...
Reported from Clyde 1

Believable15 Unbelievable7

He has either - forgot his Cue ... or else he has taken a wee part time job cleaning the Gym at night.

Agree0 Disagree0

Because hes the club captain

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 19:19:59
Greegsy threatning legal action if there are any further claims that he refused a wage cut. BBC. He has accepted a cut to help the team well done Greegsy

Believable22 Unbelievable26

06 mar 2012 19:11:10
i want to put everyone on this board right by telling them that insolvency practitioners are paid by the creditors as they are recovering monies owed to them.

Believable5 Unbelievable12

Absolute crap. They are paid by the company they are administering for.

Agree0 Disagree0

Well im in liquidation /sequestration right now and my bill off insolvency practitioners kpmg in glasgow will come out of the sale of my house/ estate its the same as the das scheme debt arrangement scheme i still pay the practitioners if in doubt phone a.i.b in kilwinning doug

Agree0 Disagree0

That's cause you are not a company. If you were, the company pays for it

Agree0 Disagree0

Yes you are in liquidation/sequestration NOT administration ! administrators are payed hourly and paid before ANYONE else !

Agree0 Disagree0

If your right I am owed £13,870 as that what I was billed when I was liquidated after Admin in only 6 days for £73,000

Agree0 Disagree0

Sequestration is different from administration and different rules apply. Sewuestrations are for individuals, administration for companies. Sequestrations, the individual pays the insolvency ratio ions fees, administration the company pays it.

Agree0 Disagree0

The reason they are going for my house is im a sole trader and not a limited company and got equity in my house to pay creditors off and at the moment im still trading and paying a monthly amount to my creditors till my house is sold doug

Agree0 Disagree0

The legal fees get added to the creditors pot . fact check scottish law

Agree0 Disagree0

My earlier post didnt include the fact i am a company in road haulage for 38 years hmrc f me for 17,000 didnt even give me the chance to pay them in instalments then again their blinf=d to the fact theres been a recession going on from 2008 i am also waiting on a bill from mlm solutions ( insolvency practitioners ) for a short period of work they done for me regarding bankruptcy whatever comes out of this for the gers i hope hmrc get what they deserve f all doug

Agree0 Disagree0

Yes thats right they become an extra crditor same as lawyer and estate agent thats sell your house only difference is they are guaranteed payment as they already have rough idea by home report on property even allowing for drop in market doug

Agree0 Disagree0

The Administrator of a limited company is paid an agreed daily fee for the duration.
This amount is protected and is paid for from the assets of the Company, prior to any CVA or liquidation.

A receiver or administrator will not accept the appointment if there are insufficient assets-funds to pay them.

Agree0 Disagree0

So by that reckoning they work for mr w, the preferred creditor who still holds a floating charge over our club

Agree0 Disagree0

If there was a floating charge over the clubs assets then neither an administrator, receiver or liquidator would go near it, unless appointed by the charge holder(CW).
If any creditor wants to appoint one then they must pay for it, this means the fees are coming out of the assets, one way or another.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 19:07:29
A really feel sorry for cellik and wylde now, if they hanged on a bit longer then they wouldn't have had to leave, then again they didn't know this would positively pan out this way, all the best men, (LOYAL BEAR)

Believable9 Unbelievable16

Wise up man, they both wanted to leave a sinking ship, and have interest from other clubs. Southampton and Blackpool are after Wylde. West Ham and a couple of Swedish clubs are after Celik.

Agree0 Disagree0

Celik rejected wage cuts because he says that it's the club's fault and not his.

Agree0 Disagree0

We r better without them. they are both rubbish. wylde cant take the ball past a player and celik trips over the ball. i would rather play a nobody from murray park than play either of them. they are the worst mid players i can remember putting on a rangers jersey. i for one am glad they are gone. i wont.have to watch those muppets next season yessss!
watp

Agree0 Disagree0

Looks at us! No Left mids at all!

Agree0 Disagree0

They would ave still have to went 3 might still go


TB

Agree0 Disagree0

I think fans posting on here are a bit jaded/duped/blinkered by their comments with regards to Wylde and Celik. I agree with last poster. People have obviously been sucked in by Wylde's comments/statement. He clearly saw a way out to go to 'greater' things and had the perfect opportunity to do so, and had the perfect excuse to appease fans by his martyr-like words. Now I'm not saying I can't blame the young guy for wanting to better himself or get out or move on for regular football.... Wotever the reason. But I wish fans would start looking at this situation clearly and stop deluding themselves. This is reality!

Agree0 Disagree0

Kerkar is a left mid.

Agree0 Disagree0

And we have Bedoya...c'mon don't tell me you forgot about him :-)

Agree0 Disagree0

I thought Rangers only played left backs at left mid.

Agree0 Disagree0

Why don't you wise up! and geez oh why have we been sucked i to what he's said? eh? did he tell you that he wanted to leave?........ no didn't thinkso! come to freck guys shut up and stop givin everyone cheek includin me! They obviously thought it was the last straw when they left! ITS MY OPINION OK AND WHAT YOU ALL HAVE SAID IS YOUR OPINION! so stop treatin it as if your opinion is a fact, get a grip!, put it this way the wee man wouldn't have signed a 5 year deal if he knew it would have come to this, and guess what?......... he didn't! so he obviously didn't know that their could be a DEAL which can stop redunancies on and off the pitch. tell me this then. for the cheek of you, see if you KNEW thier would have been such a deal would you still walk away? if you loved the club so much then you wouldn't! so don't even dare patronise me! sorry ed tryin to say a positive thing about the lads and then a git hit with that! (LOYAL BEAR)

Agree0 Disagree0

Have to agree. Wylde was looking around in the summer and is trying to get out early. Will be surprised if he isn't in the championship within a fortnight

Agree0 Disagree0

Football players are mortgaged up to the eyeballs the same as everyone on here. Its all great folk expectin to hang around in a job with possibly no wage, romantic fantasy. we all want security football players are no different.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 18:48:44
deal on wages agreed with no more redundancies! is this good news from ibrox?? rtid

Believable8 Unbelievable24

No as the club need to save 1million a month so the rest of the savings come from were..administrators running up a bill of 250k a month they have been there 3weeks already ..And when they finally do finish they are the first to be paid ..could be well over a million alone

Agree0 Disagree0

I would not be sure that this good news, the things that are surprising me are that the administrtors are willing to do these deals, sky sports are saying that they players that are agreeing to certain deals are guaranteed a free transfer in the summer - so how can that be good for Rangers ? It would be better to get rid of players for free just now rather tha keeping them for another 3 months of a season that holds nothing, and still can not belive the time the administrators are taking. I would be really worried that the court of session might get pissed off and bring in theor own administrators.

Diamond Geezer

Agree0 Disagree0

Word tonight is no deal from rangers players , players will be leaving from tomorrow...100% FACT AS

Agree0 Disagree0

Terrible the lad had to leave what a great person he is a top bloke helping others keep their jobs respecccccccct

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 18:39:24
david murray to come out with a statement regarding the whole sorry affair(real radio)

Believable6 Unbelievable26

When? .

Agree0 Disagree0

When is this to happen?

Agree0 Disagree0

Come on tell us when!

Agree0 Disagree0

Honestly, who cares what Murray has to say now... the damage is done, I've got a feeling that it will read something like "it was never my intention for this to happen to Rangers" he can take his statement and "RAM IT"
SDM= "S"everely "D"amaged "M"ismanaged

Agree0 Disagree0

Would he interesting to hear the background to the deal with Whyte; why the investigation into Whyte's background was so poor; who covered this up; and how Whyte managed to dupe SDM into thinking he had £24m of his own money to put in; what the banks ' role was in the whole affair and whether they failed to comply with financial regulations to get the deal done.

There are lots of questions to be answered. The journalists in this country have been pretty useless in investigating this.

Gav

Agree0 Disagree0

Exactly. the jurnos are only interested in headlines relating to stripping honours, ending our wonderful history. tw@ts the lot of them.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 18:40:16
rangers players are close to agreeing a deal to cut wages and save any more redundancies with players getting clauses that they can leave in the summer if they get a decent bid.

Believable4 Unbelievable15

"decent bid" tell me how that would ever be written into a contract?

Agree0 Disagree0

A bid that matches the clause then lol which to be fairwillbe no more than a decent bid for any of those players

Agree0 Disagree0

How can this be good for Rangers ? Season is over, if players are going for free in the summer as per sky sports then what is the point in keeping them for another 3 months even if it is on a reduced salary.

Diamond Geezer

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 18:36:03
Radio Clyde saying 5 players in total to leave now.

Wylde and Celik plus three more.

They are speculating that one of the three still to be named is a top earner.

Other players taking a cut in return for a free transfer in the summer.

Thoughts?

Believable12 Unbelievable6

Davis has had three offers from EPL clubs. He will be off.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 18:06:31
Since we can't go into Europe for 3 years after forming a newco, does anyone else think it would be better off starting in the 3rd division, we wouldn't have the squad to compete in the spl anyway.

Believable19 Unbelievable13

Why?

More tv revenue in the SPL, higher payments for finishing league position, higher crowds, better experience for players as they are playing better teams.

What is the benfit of starting in div 3.

Agree0 Disagree0

Better off starting in english lower leagues and work you way up there leagues new eu legislation allows us to ply our trade in any country in the eu. fact

Agree0 Disagree0

Liquidation is not a done deal, it may be possible to trade while in Administration for 3 months, long enough for a CVA and sale to take place.

Its not over until the fans stop supporting.

Agree0 Disagree0

Only option really some new away days and spl can go rot

Agree0 Disagree0

Agree - would rather we fought our way back up than had to beg mssrs thompson and lawwell for a place in the spl.

great opp to really get the younger players coming thru.

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree, i have 3 season tickets for Copeland Front and think that we should pay our dues back to football by filling every away ground all the way up through the divisions. Also the SPL may lose the Sky deal if Rangers aren't in that league then see who suffers with no away fans turning up and the loss of revenue from TV while all the teams in division 1,2 and 3 will benefit greatly from Rangers. Think its the least we can do for Scottish football because we dont do walking away. WATP

Agree0 Disagree0

Yes start off in the 3rd division and let all the other clubs with a chance of the money. Would probably create a stronger league set up in the lower divisions and see who's still waiting for us in the spl you woul probably find half the spl in admin within a year without our superior away crowds keeping them going and depleted t.v. Money the tic would be weakened severely to!

Agree0 Disagree0

I dont agree with moving to england. We are a scottish team after all. I think we will win the big tax case anyway, hmrc spend hundrds of millions a year and win very few cases. hopefully we dont lose any more players. Ssn report we are close to a deal. UThen we can see what happens between now and end of season. We are the ppl

Agree0 Disagree0

How pathetic. SPL lose the Sky deal. And what happens when Rangers then get back to the SPL. I'll tell you what, your pathetic selfish club and supporters deserve to go out of business permanently.

Agree0 Disagree0

If an option, first choice would be english conference north. I know how the song goes but it really is true, up here no one likes us. If thats not an option lets start in scottish division three. At least we could build a young team and let them get some titles under their belts before returning to spl.

Agree0 Disagree0

I totally agree with the last post...I would rather give the east stirlings ,clydes etc the financial boosts than those t**ts that are liewell and penfold up in dundee, it would be nice to repay scottish football like you said but i suspect we will end up in the SPL with points deductions etc cos whoever takes over is a business man and like whyte and the rest of the suits they are only interested in the same thing...I hope im wrong though....

Tam-Sir has a real disliking for dundee utd and septic...wonder y

Agree0 Disagree0

I never thought I would say this, but I would be happy to work our way up through the divisions and give our younger players a real chance to shine. It would also hopefully once and for all do away with all the paranoia pf the establishment clud etc etc. It would be interesting to see what clubs would be joining us in the lower divisions with the loss of revenue too. Again this is assuming liquidation, which I don't think at this stage is a certainty. RTID

Agree0 Disagree0

3rd divison or not i will still follow on, and then we will see who the true fans are? And i agree let the spl rot because they will need Rangers before we need them....scooterboy rtid.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ive been reading almost all the posts on this site for 3 days and can't believe were still getting these bam pots who are saying we can play in england. If its not the cardiff and swansea argument, were getting sh**e about eu rulings. Absolute nonsense. IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN, NEVER!! Platini, the premiership chairmen, UEFA, English football rules...implemented after cardiff and swansea joined it about a hundred years ago all say you are talkin sh**e. go away. Just get behind the team and cross your fingers and go to the games if possible

Agree0 Disagree0

Quite right go to Div 3 where you belong. Its the least you can do to make amends for the cheating and dishonesty which if you hadn't noticed has smeared the name of Scottish football. BTW the Sky deal does not rest on yooz guys being present and as for the SPL rotting well it proves some of your fans are childish and puerile in the extreme. A few of you are getting the message at last but I have yet to hear even a murmur of an apology on your site. The arrogance is breathtaking.

Agree0 Disagree0

Why are people so damming on the english theme, rules are changed all the time, im not saying anything will be changed on the back of rangers plight but you knowalls become boring with your FACT statements who knows how this will pan out but this is a rumour come banter site and if your not happy with comments away and start collecting stamps

Agree0 Disagree0

To the no name poster saying "how pathetic, SPL losing sky deal" did you not listen to Neil Doncaster on ssn sayin all (key word being ALL) SPL sponsors have a stipulation that Rangers AND Celtic are present, to me that's him saying uh oh if Rangers are punted. Just my perception and not to change what he said.
Leeroy

Agree0 Disagree0

The new sky deal has conditions that there's 4 old firm games a season so yes rangers presence is needed

Agree0 Disagree0

Apologise for what exactly? nothing has been proved yet and if you believe that the spl will not suffer in rangers absence then you are in for a shock. It will then be on par with the irish league....

Agree0 Disagree0

If we started in div 3 then by the time we got back to the prem how many clubs would hav folded without sky , ticket sales from the mighty traveling rangers support and a massive reduction in advertising money , i think sellick would be couple years behind us , anyway apply to football league b the fa were not wanted up here anyway

Agree0 Disagree0

Nonsense. If Celtic or Rangers were relegated, sky would not rip up the contract.

As for playing in England, pipe dreams, that will never ever have an ounce of substance.

Agree0 Disagree0

Yes at least it would give us achance to win something as celtic will dominate for years sad bear watp

Agree0 Disagree0

Pipe dream maybe if yous expell rangers and wen i say yous i mean sellick , spl sfa n rest of sorry lot as one as it seems to be now then its at the fa councils descretion and with a club with nowhere to play it puts a whole different slant on things so do your worst

Agree0 Disagree0

The post a few up is spot on, rangers are not in a position to chose what way they will go they will be told! What makes rangers think they will even be allowed in the third division? Years and years of blatant cheating with the sfa makes me think the sfa will really hammer them to cover their own tracks. For all the fans with the blinkers on it's time to realize, rangers WILL be liquidated with many years of financial meltdown The fans need to catch up on the reality of the situation they are in

Agree0 Disagree0

Look the players were not cheating it was mismanagement of our club from the top

Agree0 Disagree0

I cant believe your lot , blame the SPL , blame the SFA , blame Celtic , have a word with yourselves , Rangers are in the mess they are in because of Rangers , no one else , Mr Murray's ego , trying to "buy" success by any means "fair" or "foul" , Rangers have run up the debt (not SFA , SPL , Celtic or any of the other SPL teams) , you cant seriously expect to blame everyone else , if as would appear to be the case Rangers have broken SPL rules (which all the other teams adhere to) you have to take the appropriate punishment , why should you be treated any different ? lose the petted lip and deal with it , whether in the SPL or Division 3 , s**t happens or in Rangers case s**t has happened .

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 17:55:47
Edu papac lafferty broadfoot are next.

Fraser

Believable17 Unbelievable7

Healy will be next

Agree0 Disagree0

Always good to have someone from duff and phelps on here.

Agree0 Disagree0

Fraser Wishart what you doing posting made up stories...go Chase yersel

Bluebear

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 17:46:40
I really think we are going to struggle to make these savings until the end of the season.. Admins fees alone

Believable4 Unbelievable3

Let's get this straight, insolvency practitioners are paid by the creditors as they are recovering monies owed to them.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 17:38:15
whittakers and naismiths agents arrived at ibrox in the last 30mins please be to slash there wages anyone but naisy

Believable13 Unbelievable7

As a celtic fan rangers need ther best players if not 4 the league then 2 sell them we need each other my best mates support the gers

Agree0 Disagree0

Do you really think naismith will play in 3rd div?

Agree0 Disagree0

Here's something to think about. Wylde and Celik combined weekly wage is 30k that means 120k per month. Meaning we still have a shortfall of 880k to find. Scary. Think we are going to lose at least 1 big hitter before this is over.

Agree0 Disagree0

Think u've over shot that figure by quite a bit there. wylde at best is on £7000 and celik wouldnt be on much more than £4000 if that

Agree0 Disagree0

Wylde and celik lucky if they are on £10k between them. £30k gies a laugh and keep taking the tablets.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 17:33:53
Goian going - stv

Believable15 Unbelievable8

It only said that he was the latest to leave the training ground. Learn to read in context.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 17:18:33
Naisy's agent has gone to Murray Park

Hate seeing anyone lose their job. Gut wrenching it is happening at our club.

Please, not Naisy.

Believable5 Unbelievable6

No he didnt! stop posting s***e

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 17:23:16
Agents of Naismith and Whittaker have arrived at MP

Believable5 Unbelievable3

Are naisy and whitty being made redundent

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 16:33:52
Kyle Bartley has returned to Murray Park
just on bbc sport

quabba

Believable14 Unbelievable8

Has bartley been made redundent

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 16:30:06
it seems players are close to making an agreement with the administrators so lets just hope we still have majority of our squad by the time the next game comes source BBC

campbell

Believable7 Unbelievable14

Is your surname Ogilvie? Unless the players agree to cuts and not deferrals which they havent been able to do so far then more players will go.

Agree0 Disagree0

Does it matter? We are going be in 3rd div next season anyway, let's get some of the young guys in.

Agree0 Disagree0

Something fishy with this admin process

Agree0 Disagree0

Don't get whats going on here at all. Can't understand how the players even have a say. Surely the Admin are supposed to cut costs etc straight away. Thats what happened at M'well. Top paid players went no arguement , no debate. Agree with previous reply..........Something fishy going on !

Agree0 Disagree0

No my surname is campbell

Agree0 Disagree0

Let’s face it, the young lads should have been given a chance to start with, instead of buying in a bunch of highly-paid dumplings (Ortiz, Bedoya and the likes) who are quite frankly, no better in quality than any youth players!

Agree0 Disagree0

The agreement is for their release im afraid. bbc sport just reported it

Agree0 Disagree0

Admin must be raking in a fortune daily

Agree0 Disagree0

Stv reporting this too

this set of players need to be commended. in an era of the greedy footballer, these guys look tp be putting the club first.

thank you guys, this won't be forgotten.

Agree0 Disagree0

If the administrators release a player before March 31st then they can sign for another club. If you accept 4 weeks redundacycy then you go beyond this date and are out of work until June.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 16:25:29
Kyle Bartley returns to Murray Park!
What's going on ??

Believable7 Unbelievable3

He was down at the Bookie's - placing bets on who was getting sacked...

Agree0 Disagree0

Arsenal are paying his wages.........its not rocket science

Agree0 Disagree0

He forgot his tax return form.

Agree0 Disagree0

Sally had sent him to Greggs for steak bakes. But they wouldn't accept an IOU so he came back without them.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 16:07:02
My mum works for Dr Paul Jackson and she Said he mentioned to someone that there has been meeting after meeting but they forgot about the wages of the staff at ibrox they never took into consideration!

Believable8 Unbelievable16

They forgot something as improtant as players wages while in administration
im a celtic fan but f*ck me thats bollox

cfc1888

Agree0 Disagree0

No the players ya tranny, other staff in ibrox!

Agree0 Disagree0

No way these guys missed that. They have put together all the outgoings and incomings related to the club.

Agree0 Disagree0

O apologies
not players but other staff again your full of bollox
so a team in administration and they forget about the "other staffs wages" because that makes perfect sense
tool

cfc1888

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 16:18:06
Kyle B on Twitter proclaiming how he isn't a quitter, nor will he ever be.

Believable11 Unbelievable3

Kyle is only on loan ... whats he bletherin' about ... he would just slide back to down to London no real worries for him..

Agree0 Disagree0

He should also proclaim he's no a centre half! I hope he is sent back to arsenal. another fringe player taking wages.

Agree0 Disagree0

Hot air again. I wish someone would let us know whats really going on, after all we have been paying the wages .

Agree0 Disagree0

I think you'll find it's not hot air in the slightest. I saw it early on BBC Rangers update. For some reason it's been removed now from his actual twitter - probably because he's been called back.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 15:40:01
Ally McCoist, Kenny Mcdowall and Ian Durrant is to be paid off this week also. John Brown will take charge of what is left of the squad cor the rest of the season

Believable19 Unbelievable30

WHIT?
awwwww dinnae be coming oan here and talkin' pure sh£&e man.
This I the biggest lot of garbage ave heard the day!
Away and boil yer Heid.
As usual....NAE SOURCE

Agree0 Disagree0

Keep piling on the pressure, it just gets better & better!

Agree0 Disagree0

No one gets paid off.... admin make savings! another muppet! they will be asked to take wage cuts. if they dont accept, they are free to walk away or they contribute to the club liquidating!

Agree0 Disagree0

No football club ever in Administration has ever retained the manager and his staff.

Using yesterday's logic, does this mean there isn't a buyer before 9 days time?

Agree0 Disagree0

Ally I won't take any pay McCoist paid off get grip...pure mince

Bluebear

Agree0 Disagree0

That will be the same Mr Brown who is our super scout

Agree0 Disagree0

You can't have people working for nothing hanging about. They still have opinions, and they still do cost money. Cars fuel etc...

Agree0 Disagree0

Ally is working for free, doesnt get much cheaper than that ffs!

J

Agree0 Disagree0

If Ally has cancelled his contract then there is no reason for him to leave.

Agree0 Disagree0

Why dae ye let numpty's oan here spout such bulls@$t. thats the funniest hing av heard aw day. jist anither celtic fan rubbin salt intae the wounded bears keep gloatin timmy we won't be in crisis for long.

Agree0 Disagree0

"we wont be in crisis for long".... yeah my left bollock!! you wont be a club ya numpty, stop blaming every damn thing on celtic ya cretin. to all decent rangers fans good luck for the future.MMI2009

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 15:30:25
fresh reports that coisty durranty and mcdowal team might not last

Believable9 Unbelievable11

Also hearing fresh reports fae jimmy doon the fish shop....noo, whit he kens is that there will nae mare redundancies the day...he kens...he kens evryhin!

Agree0 Disagree0

This story is on bbc website rangers latest

Agree0 Disagree0

Good as other than a good quote and offering to give staff made a redundant outside the administrators door. McCoist is offering very little value for £1M a year.

Agree0 Disagree0

Looks like duff and phelbs have had words with the coaching staff too very sad times ahead

Agree0 Disagree0

Wouldnt be suprise in mccoist and durrant ended up working for free and mcdowal was shown the door.

end of day if there is 10 less players to coach they dont need as many coaches

Agree0 Disagree0

Speirs has tweeted this story on bbc sport rangers latest

Agree0 Disagree0

Sorry I missed a word above: "Good as other than a good quote and offering to cuddle staff made a redundant outside the administrators door. McCoist is offering very little value for £1M a year." Anyhow has McCoist actually formally notified that he will work for nothing - seen this written lots of time but do not recall hearing this from Super Ally.

Agree0 Disagree0

At the end of the day you cant blame the players they signed contracts or the coaching staff to that matter

Agree0 Disagree0

No way will any player or manager work for nothing they have contracts this is how the player union was brought in these guys need paid too

Agree0 Disagree0

McCoist should give his wages back, he has been rubbish from day one. If he offers to stay for free, I hope it is an offer they refuse , but doubt all this will do for free stuff all'' hot air''. Talk is cheap.

Agree0 Disagree0

Is Ally on a rolling 1 year contract - i.e. "I dinnae do walking away as that's a fat pay off me an my highly paid duds would be throwing away"

Agree0 Disagree0

As we will find out there is no sentiment in buisness administrators are there to save as much as they can

Agree0 Disagree0

According to the BBC Ally signed a 2yr contract in May 2010. Hence can Ally please stand up and confirm if a) he is working for nothing or b) if he is holding out for his redundancy. I can see why he is not walking away when 15 months pay is over £1.25 million.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ed much are the coaching staff costing the club plus ally ? {Ed001's Note - I have absolutely no idea what their wages would be, sorry.}

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 15:12:33
Anyone know if the rumours circulating about Davis asking to leave are true?

Believable18 Unbelievable14

Yes on chick youngs website and clyde 1 big time sad day for us blue noses

Agree0 Disagree0

No - don't think so.

Agree0 Disagree0

There has been talk of him leaving sad to say hope this is not true

Agree0 Disagree0

I hope so and he can take laugherty "greegsy" mcgregor and the rest with him.

Agree0 Disagree0

I've heard that davis has indeed asked to leave, but not only that he and coisty will be leaving tonight

Agree0 Disagree0

He has asked to go apparently. Not surprising he will get another club no problem.

Agree0 Disagree0

Fringe players, not star players.... hence that muppet celik and wylde. others to follow - papac, healy, bedoya etc. these guys would be punted during the summer anyway.

Agree0 Disagree0

Could be true as he knows he would get good offer down south and weekly wage of the bill would help others keep there jobs. Dont think admin would allow though as under long contrart with a high sell on value.....

Sad day for all bears but whoever is left lets make sure we get right behined them, no matter what the results for the rest of the season..WATP

Loubear

Agree0 Disagree0

Davis on his way to Aston Villa, Aberdeen have offered Wylde a contract.

Agree0 Disagree0

Won't let someone go that would be worth 3-4m

Agree0 Disagree0

Listen bears other clubs will be holding out for these players its all buisness money talks

Agree0 Disagree0

He might be worth 3-4 million but Rangers cant afford to sustain his wages, no sell on value if the club gets liquidated.

Agree0 Disagree0

We cant transfer while in administration

Agree0 Disagree0

You can sell players you cant bring anyone in.

Agree0 Disagree0

You can transfer players out when in administration and transfer window open. Just cant bring anyone in.

Agree0 Disagree0

How true is it that you can't sell / transfer a player while the club in in administration? {Ed001's Note - not true at all.}

Agree0 Disagree0

He is worth 4 million dont make me laugh, just like jellyfish was worth 9 and went for half that and did you see any team in the transfair window coming in with a 4 mil or anything near that for davis. and to all these people that are hoping its not true yous all wanted his head a couple off months ago shoulting he was not good enough for rangers

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 15:09:40
Greg Wylde and Celik and all the other players that have asked to be released have had offers from other clubs i would like to thank them for their contributions while a rangers player but lets not kid ourselves this is self preservation and they are not doing this for the sake of the club ( i dont blame them for taking this decision but lets not kid ourselves that this is a selfless act

Fort William Bear

Believable16 Unbelievable12

Take it you meant selfish mate

Agree0 Disagree0

Some fans would argue that wylde and celik have contributed nothing to the team anyway.

Agree0 Disagree0

I think the players could have taken the cut to save jobs this is now very unlikly

Agree0 Disagree0

Poor players anyway. if wages need to be cut, I would rather fringe players wages were cut first! i am sure they will find clubs - to transfer fee, league one teams will snap them up

Agree0 Disagree0

Who can blame the players for looking after No 1......the days of players just happy to be playing for the Gers or The Hoops are long gone...

Agree0 Disagree0

Dont believe most i hear relating to Rangers these days except perhaps the possibility that we have cheated. Really hope i am wrong but at the moment the only thing i know is accurate is the weather thsat hangs over both Murray Park or Ibrox as i have been in both area,s so have no doubts on these counts,just wish i did not have doubts about all the other issues that we face

Agree0 Disagree0

Wylde been offered a deal at Aberdeen

Agree0 Disagree0

Wylde and celik have new clubs to go to

Agree0 Disagree0

Dont talk Shyte.

I have no doubt they have clubs to go to but they could still have gone to them after taking their pay for this month and their redundancy packages.

Agree0 Disagree0

Not fussed to see Wylde go at all, he was in my opinion really really poor, as for Celik i would have liked to have seen him in a few months after getting a run in the team, oh well.

Agree0 Disagree0

Gregg Wylde spotted jogging alOng the road where he lives!! In the rain!

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 15:02:46
harry redknapp and spurs are waiting to see the outcome of alan mcgregor's situation at rangers.

Believable17 Unbelievable10

Like all the Rangers fans are?

Agree0 Disagree0

We dont want to loose alan hes our no1 has harry said this

Agree0 Disagree0

Loada rubbish! McGregor will be one they'll defo want to keep, at least til summer, as he will have huge sell-on value

Agree0 Disagree0

Macgregor to Spurs, Davis Aston Villa, Bocsnegra to MLS, Wylde to Aberdeen.

Agree0 Disagree0

Huge wages too. Rangers need to save a million a month and McGregor going would bring them 80k+ closer to that. They need to lose the high earners now or they wont survive till the transfer window. Sad but true.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 14:54:54
Desmot Dermond has emerged as one of those who have enquired about Rangers financial situation in a "takeover capacity"....is this a genuine takeover, or a way to get hands on Rangers accounts.

Believable14 Unbelievable27

I think you should try and get his name right.

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm not sure if this is a serious post from a warped individual, or somebody trying to make us laugh

Agree0 Disagree0

Don't think you can have an interest in two clubs in the same league

Agree0 Disagree0

Cracker. think whoever told your that has been on the glue all day.

Agree0 Disagree0

I smell sh*te.

Agree0 Disagree0

Yea maybe he is wanting to turn ibrox into one of his 5 star care homes

Agree0 Disagree0

Hell in a hand cart would be preferable.

Agree0 Disagree0

Dermot Desmond even. And you need to stay off the drugs!

Joeshmo1888

Agree0 Disagree0

Would you rather get liquidated than have him save you?

Agree0 Disagree0

Wouldnt surprise me as it would be another opportunity to dance on Rangers grave!!

Agree0 Disagree0

That is the biggest pile of s**t av ever heard. i would rather have joseph frietzl as my chairman. W.A.T.P

Agree0 Disagree0

Josef Fritzl and W.A.T.P. ? ffs make this day even darker than it is .....clown.

Agree0 Disagree0

Interested in property development in the Ibrox area?

Agree0 Disagree0

Celtic fan here , Dermot Desmond has no interest in taking over Rangers , league rules (which we abide by) do not allow any individual "owning" more than one club .

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 14:36:45
kyle bartley has just left murray park, no decision on his future yet.

what is going on at ibrox.

feel terrible for the players and management, tough tough times.

Believable7 Unbelievable7

He's on the phone to SSN right now

Agree0 Disagree0

Very sad day for rangers fc losing player people losing jobs total lack of respect at the top for what has been done to our club

Agree0 Disagree0

Probably waiting to see who else asks to leave voluntarily.

So unfair although hats off to Wylde, wish him all the best for the future.

Agree0 Disagree0

We were told Bartley left days ago!
Anyway wonder if Ally is comforting them outside the door as promised!

Agree0 Disagree0

The situation is spirriling out of control bleak hours ahead disgracefull

Agree0 Disagree0

The situation isn't out of control. The administrators are fully in control and saving the club from liquidation. These guys are too expensive and Rangers cannot afford them.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 14:27:36
celik on his way to west ham .didnt take him long

Believable12 Unbelievable4

Says who? YOU?

Agree0 Disagree0

And your source is?

Agree0 Disagree0

If my work was in trouble and i was under threat of redundancy your damm right i'd have something else lined up. Good luck to the lad and the rest of the players who leave....through no fault of their own i might add.
J1985

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 14:26:36
Captain steve davis has asked to be released.is this guy a leader?

Believable14 Unbelievable11

No he hasnt stop talking s**t

Agree0 Disagree0

As selfish as they come!

Agree0 Disagree0

Never a Gers captain in my opinion

Agree0 Disagree0

And your source is?

Agree0 Disagree0

Heard mgreggor is leaving source clyde 1

Agree0 Disagree0

It is an odd on certainty the highet paid will go first and if they do not take their redundacy package they will save RFC a lot of money.
This saving allows the Administrator to reduce the number of redundacies.
The redundancy package of 4 weeks would add up to 1 million pounds.

Agree0 Disagree0

1st reply;still in denial?

Agree0 Disagree0

Source: phil mcgiollabhain

Let's face it he's been bang on about everything else so far.

Agree0 Disagree0

Davis and mcgregor would save the club a helluva lot of money as they are highest paid players. sorry to see wlyde go though. as for celik, goodness knows why he was bought in the first place!

Agree0 Disagree0

Davis & mcgregor are probably the 2 safest players as they have a bigger resale value come the summer if further money needs raising by then. the administrators want people to be interested in buying the club & wouldnt sell off the prize assets as it wouldnt be in the club's best interests, therefore they wouldnt be performing their duties correctly as administrators

Agree0 Disagree0

Its a shame he was shot down as a Timmy liar along with RTC when they were telling the truth about Whyte, EBTs, Administration, it was them who confirmed Burnley werent owed anything for Lafferty, that the poppy money story was bogus etc.

Just because they are celtic fans doesnt make them Liars.

Agree0 Disagree0

When are you going to get it in to your thick heads the highest paid players will go it has got nothing to do with sell on values ! Your club is in real trouble the administrators will have a hard enough job saving the club they can't wait till your out of admin it may never happen !!!

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 14:22:15
another 3 players have asked to be released any1 know who

Believable12 Unbelievable9

06 Mar 2012 14:08:25
Barry ferguson to sign in summer and play for free! Source Ian holloway.

Believable18 Unbelievable9

Not going to happen

Agree0 Disagree0

MORE CLAP

Agree0 Disagree0

Why even waste time posing rubbish.

Would be awesome though

Agree0 Disagree0

! Thats made my day ... The only place Barry Ferguson will be signing on - in the summer is down at the Job Centre Plus in Lanark...

Agree0 Disagree0

Im getting a game on saturday too!!

Bluepeter

Agree0 Disagree0

Ian Holloway has come out with some belters but thats the best yet!!

Agree0 Disagree0

Look open your front door take a deep breath buy a dog go for walks do anything but please please stay away from your phone or laptop if this is the best you can come up with utter clap trap "i hope"

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm getting a game too!

Agree0 Disagree0

If still in admin can we sign players even if it's for free and they agree to play for free?

Agree0 Disagree0

Barry ferguson has blue blood, wouldnt surprise me.

J

Agree0 Disagree0

Silly story

Agree0 Disagree0

PMSL ! more chance of his big brother playing !

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 13:31:52
Administrators are currently in talks with several players who have asked to be released from their contracts. One is Carlos Bocanegra who will join Vancouver Whitecaps. Source Calgary Herald

Believable18 Unbelievable17

06 Mar 2012 13:31:46
Radio Scotland reporting that Wylde has left and so has Celik. They are alos reporting that upto 8 first team players will be gone by the end of today and unless the other players accept a 50% wage cut, it could be over 11 first team players who leave by the end of the day.

It makes you wonder...if we'll be fielding Rangers Supporters at the weekend because there wont be a team left...wonder is McCoist and Durrant will play?

Believable13 Unbelievable14

Its just turned into a total fiasco admin guys will yeild the axe today sad to say

Agree0 Disagree0

"it just turned into a total fiasco".....where the f**k have you been over the last few weeks?

The day we entered administration it was a fiasco!

Agree0 Disagree0

As a Celtic fan well done to young Greg
Wylde. Pity it looks like the big earners may not want a big cut in wages But that young man may have saved someone's job
Well done young man

Agree0 Disagree0

They're not walking to save Rangers or save someone else's job.
From their own lips they're tired of it all. They can't sleep at night. They didn't sign up to play football to suffer this experience.
Also who wants to hang around Ibrox with all the dirt and investigations and be associated with it?

Agree0 Disagree0

Respect to greg

Agree0 Disagree0

Not got a game at the weekend go back to your own page timmy

Agree0 Disagree0

Who are you playing at the weekend that you would need to field supporters as you have a free weekend as you are out off the CUP.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 13:16:43
Youth players Grant Adam, Kyle Hutton and Aarron Watt are next to be shown the door.

will be announced shortly.

Believable14 Unbelievable14

Hutton is on loan

Agree0 Disagree0

Yea lets get rid of all the good youngsters so we will be left with an aged squad. There does not appear to much logic being applied here. We might have to fight our way up from SFL DIV 3

Agree0 Disagree0

Wouldn't make any sense getting rid of these three. combined their wages would be around 4k per week.

Agree0 Disagree0

Its hardly gonna get wage bill down eiether

Agree0 Disagree0

We aint even paying huttons wages just now hes out on loan

Agree0 Disagree0

Looking very very grim at this moment fellow bears prepare for the worst

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 13:10:04
Goian is next to go

Believable16 Unbelievable16

06 Mar 2012 12:49:10
Gregg Wylde has left Rangers, waiving his wages for March and deciding not to take any redundancy package.

Believable13 Unbelievable14

He and Mervan asked to go yesterday.

Agree0 Disagree0

Very commendable. Good young player. Sorry to see him leave att beacuse of whyte not paying tax and running away. UNBELIEVABLE

Agree0 Disagree0

Gregg Wylde - 10 out of 10 for standing up to the plate

Agree0 Disagree0

Good luck to wylde, hope he finds another team soon young lad takin the hit to save the average joes their jobs

celtic fan

Agree0 Disagree0

Good luck gregg wylde

mr w you have a lot to answer for

never to be forgiven

Agree0 Disagree0

Wonderful attitude to his fellow players...something he didnt need to do. Hopefully once this mess is sorted and were back to winning ways with some money, we can look at re-signing him, always thought he'd turn out to be a Scotland Star, hopefully he'll get a good break in the EPL

Agree0 Disagree0

From a celtic fan, tremendous from gregg wylde, good luck big man. These players are innocent in this and I will be taking no pleasure seeing people losing their jobs today

Agree0 Disagree0

Great gesture wee man, will never be forgotton, and you are always welcome to come back home anytime u want in the eyes of the fans. WHYTE SEE WHEN I GET MA HANDS ON YOU...YOU A RE A DEAD MAN WALKING!

Agree0 Disagree0

What a decent young man hope he gets fixed up with a new club soon and his career flourishes, maybe we be able to get him back one day and he can become a rangers legend.
billyboy
WATP

Agree0 Disagree0

Both will forever go down as a Rangers legends, personal sacrifice for the club, it won't ever be forgotten.

Agree0 Disagree0

What an idiot threatening people online.......... have you been reading news recently?
or can you read?

fool!

BluePeter

Agree0 Disagree0

Stand tall mr wylde hope you have a great future, and thank you

Agree0 Disagree0

Decent young man, in a world of greed and corruption its good to know that some people are still decent at hart. Be interesting to see how many take his lead.

Agree0 Disagree0

As a celtic fan, all respect must be paid to Wylde.

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree, I'm a Celtic fan and I think this gesture by Wylde is first class. Well done that man.

Agree0 Disagree0

As a Celtic fan i have to say well done young man, if your actions saves one person their job from the ticket office, secirity team or whatever then i take my hat off to you.It's time some of your collegues (the better paid ones) follow suit. maccabhoy

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 12:48:07
Mervan Celik Released!

Believable14 Unbelievable13

06 Mar 2012 12:45:53
Wylde and Celik have asked to be released from there contracts

Believable14 Unbelievable13

06 Mar 2012 12:37:35
Chris McLaughlin ‏ @BBCchrismclaug


A number of #Rangers players have already asked to be released. No confirmed decision as yet.

Believable10 Unbelievable14

06 Mar 2012 12:20:15
Breaking news - players offer rejected - discussions are now taking place with tegards to redundancies!!

Believable7 Unbelievable12

06 mar 2012 12:16:33
thats it lad the cuts have been made will be made public within the next three hours. eight prominent players to go including mcgregor amd alexander and from what we hear seven lesser but well paid players to go along with anumber of support staff. bad

Believable9 Unbelievable13

Don't be daft how can they get rid of both keepers

Agree0 Disagree0

Pretty sure they wont sake both of the goal keepers...

Agree0 Disagree0

Aye, McCoist is going to play in goal

Agree0 Disagree0

Basically right as somr of it is leaking out now we will see if both keepers are off, but it is looking like the numbers are right.

Agree0 Disagree0

Under the rules a club needs at least 2 goalkeepers so gettin rid o both mcgregor & alexander will not go. absolute nonsense

Agree0 Disagree0

Well, if McCoist does play in goal at least you will not lose any goals.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 12:07:57
Breaking News on Clyde1
Greg Wylde first out the door.

Believable10 Unbelievable11

06 Mar 2012 12:06:56
Grieg wylde first player made redundant

Believable11 Unbelievable12

No he wasn't, he chose to go in hope of saving others jobs, he has waived his march wages and chose not to take on any redundancy pack!

Agree0 Disagree0

I am tipping that a list will be announced. Even alphabetically, He wouldn't be first. And his name isn't Grieg. I think he was a composer. Peer Gint and that ?

Agree0 Disagree0

Was just on Sky sports.....true

Agree0 Disagree0

Took no redundancy money and waived his wages for march.
good luck mate !

Agree0 Disagree0

Marvin Cellik also out the door.....sky sports news

Agree0 Disagree0

Celik next

Agree0 Disagree0

Fair play to the lad for turning down his wages & the redundancy package. Good luck to you

Agree0 Disagree0

Apologies, I was the first reply. Am in Australia and can't get the radio or TV from home. Found it unreal that he would go first.

Agree0 Disagree0

What package...there is NO money.

Agree0 Disagree0

This makes no sense in regards to his wages and any redundancy due as any other redundancy it is not the administrators that pay any employee from there working cash any redundancy arising from an admin or liquidation is referred to DTI (Department of trade & industry) and they then pay any redundancy and monies owed not the club or administrators in charge of the finances in effect it is the Government that pay these costs so it wouldn't make any difference to cash flow for RFC(in administration)

Agree0 Disagree0

I believe you are incorrect, the DTI only pay redundacy in the event of liquidation, and not administration.

Agree0 Disagree0

He wasn't made redundant. He left by own accord.

http://m.stv.tv/sport/football/scottish-premier/rangers/299909-rangers-release-gregg-wylde/

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 12:04:53
On bbc radio scotland - no agreement, there will be redundancies

Believable10 Unbelievable10

06 Mar 2012 11:08:15
When you really think about, why should the Rangers players take a pay cut ? They had nothing to do with the problems & signed in good faith. I believe most of the players know if the club is liquidated, they will be picked up by other clubs anyway & in a few cases, will end up with better wages.

Believable21 Unbelievable8

I think thats the difference between us and them. If where we work goes into admin. then you would find alot of people would take cuts as it might be very hard to find another job and with small wages anyway we would struggle to pay bills. You would struggle at the start but atleast you would know your in a job. where as we have players getting between £5-20 a week. who would find a new job within days. So i understand them not taking massive wage cuts. But on the other hand if my boss was giving me that type of money and he told me the company was in trouble and i needed to take a reduce in my pay till the company got out of the money problems, even though i would be able to find a new job i think i would take the wage cut. As I would realise how lucky i am to be recieving such large wages.
Don

Agree0 Disagree0

Just think how many agents have already picked up clubs for our players... just hope they take the cut though... craig+babybear

Agree0 Disagree0

Players leaving has begun.
Wylde first player to go

Agree0 Disagree0

According to sky that's the pay offs started Greg Wylde Merven Celtic also

Agree0 Disagree0

They wont be picked up by ANY clubs at the moment, unless theyre in Asia or Russia as the transfer windows everywhere else are closed! So, dunno bout you, but I'd rather take a (hopefully short term) pay cut then not have any pay at all until at least summer!

Agree0 Disagree0

Looks like the player proposal was rejected by Administrator and redundancies have begun, and they must include high earners.

Agree0 Disagree0

The players leaving (Wylde & Celik so far) are now free agents and they can sign for teams as a free transfer as there is no deadline for that during the season. just double checked so I'm sure of that.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 10:18:05
Guys, I have just typed this all in after reading it in the ET this morning. It's not online yet.

I think you'll find this will smash to bits any SPL investigations and other bloodlust for us to be stripped of titles etc..

Players were NEVER paid through EBT's. Money went to the trusts, and were then drawn down as loans.

The agreements are NON-CONTRACTUAL.

These two experts are clearing up why the SPL did not need to be informed.

Get this emailed to Regan, Doncaster and all the rest of the people involved in this.

We need to start our own fightback.

EDIT: Full version from Herald now - this investigation from the SPL is a total joke.

By HUGH MacDONALD

Grey area which has become a lot darker . . .

When is a written agreement not a contract?

The answer may be: when it is an employee benefits trust.

The SPL last night announced it would investigate Rangers over its use of EBTs. It cited the following:

''SPL rules D9.3 and D1.13 impose a prohibition on players receiving payments for playing football or participating in an activity connected with football except where such payments are made in accordance with a form of contract approved by the SPL and require that all such contracts are submitted to the SPL within 14 days of being entered into.''

There is, according to experts, a valid case to be argued that EBTs do not constitute a contract. Richard Cramer, a lawyer with FrontRow Legal, a firm that specialises in sports business, believes the discretionary nature of payments under trust rules is the opposite of the normal understanding of a contract.

''Rangers could argue to any inquiry that the EBTs are a private matter between club and player because they involve a discretionary payment. They could say to the league: ''Why should we inform you of discretionary payments that do not fall under the umbrella of a normal contract?'' He added: ''For example, with EBTs there is no contractual enforcement right. You are relying on the goodwill of your employer and you could advance the argument that if there was no contractual obligation to pay money then there is no binding contract.''

Cramer said: ''EBTs have always been a little bit scary from a player's point of view precisely because it is a discretionary payment. What the player is relying on is the ability of the owner or company to honour the agreement. It is always a risk but it once may have been a risk worth taking.''He added, though, that this was not the case now. ''The taxman has put the frighteners on the clubs,'' he said.

However, he believed there was room for Rangers to manoeuvre with the SPL.

''There is an argument that the club could simply say that all EBTs fall outside the normal definition of contract,'' he said.Graeme Nuttall, recently appointed independent adviser on employee ownership to the government and an expert on EBTs, said payments made under the scheme were ''not a contractual right''.

''There is no obligation to pay the employee a certain amount of money,'' he said. ''Typically, there would be an expression that you were part of a bonus plan and that would be paid into an employee trust. So it is not a contractual right for the player to receive a sum of money.''He conceded, however, there would be documentation on both sides.

''The player would receive some documentation and there would also be a trust deed,'' he said. ''There could even be a document creating a sub-trust. You would expect letters of instruction from the club. The trustees would have issued guidance that is not strictly legally binding. It all works on a trust basis.''Nuttall, a partner for Field Fisher Waterhouse, a leading law firm, was keen to emphasise that employee trusts had useful benefits for the community,

''Employee trusts are essential to achieving employee ownership in many cases. There are a lot of good, genuine employee trusts out there,'' he said.

''It has been a constant frustration to me over the years that employee trusts have been used for tax-driven purposes rather for genuine purposes,'' he said. ''I do not know the details of the scheme at Rangers but I assume it was tax-driven.''

Nuttall, who was approached by Nick Clegg, the deputy prime minister, to advise on employee trusts, said of tax-driven schemes: ''Examples like this cause terrible problems to those trying to promote schemes to give employees more say in the running of their business.

''One businessman who I had been advising phoned me up saying: 'What are you trying to get me into? Look what has happened to Rangers'.''

He added: ''I had to explain to him that I was advising on trusts to be set up as part of a genuine ownership structure.''

Believable15 Unbelievable30

Good post sir.
Part of your statement. " ''One businessman who I had been advising phoned me up saying: 'What are you trying to get me into? Look what has happened to Rangers'.'' Just want to know are these EBT's used for high earners quite extensively.

Agree0 Disagree0

Unfortunately the side letters which accompanied the EBT arrangement makes them contractual as the players were 'promised' money throgh employee benefit trust, i.e. under scots law a contract was entered into.

Agree0 Disagree0

Side letters were issued to the players you dimwit. Letters stating that they would get so much through the books and the rest through an EBT.

Clutching at straws at this stage?
Listen, the tax case is lost and the SFA (if they have the balls) will penalise Rangers for their years of cheating.

Agree0 Disagree0

So Rangers gave themselves the option of not having to pay their players? If its non-contractual, then it's 'in good faith'. Seems to me it's more pulling at thin air in Govan today.

GoldCoastBhoy

Agree0 Disagree0

Yes the money was drawn as loans , but it was written in a contract that the loans would never have to be repayed.... if someone set up an ebt for me and i got tax free money from it , i would regard that as income . dishonest income , billybhoy

Agree0 Disagree0

There is lots of talk about these side letters...yet not one has been produced by anybody...no authorities, no clubs and no media.....so, until it is printed somewhere in full for all to see, it really isn't any more of a rumour than what is normally posted on this site.

Agree0 Disagree0

Wrong! These APPARENT letters said the loans would not have to be repaid. Yet where are these letters cos lets be honest if these letters were actually around would it not be a simple decision instead of a multi million pound investigation??
To the above poster with no name we all know that it was an income but Technically as the ebt payments were loans to be repaid they are not an income. These whether morally correct or not were legal. If these letters are proven to be present then yeah it will legally be classed as an income and were f*cked.
Leeroy

Agree0 Disagree0

A redacted side letter has been printed in the Sun on Sunday.

Agree0 Disagree0

I have had enough I won't be parting with another penny for tickets for future matches until we get some clarity it's mindboggling and disgraceful for a once proud club!

Agree0 Disagree0

There is an alleged "draft copy" of one of these circulating. This is one that a certain tabloid has handed over (an ed will verify I posted about this last week). A mate of mine forwarded this to me in an email, which was also doing the rounds on twitter. I did stipulate that there is no official Rangers letterhead on the evidence, which could suggest that anyone could have typed this up. Plus the names of the receiver and the signature of the sender were discreetly blanked out for anonimity.
I'm a regular follower of this site, but I not an active poster, as I don't like speculation over unconfounded rumours, especially at this "dark time" for our club.(ed will verify my lack of posts). I just want this torturous time to end asap and let the club move forward in whatever shape or form we will exist. As for all the Celtic supporters who feel the need to post "antagonsing" views/rumours....I enjoy banter with all my Celtic minded mates, but even they are keeping to talking about their own club and not having an "air" about them around the potential demise of Rangers. Maybe you should respect the unfortunate employee's who could face possible financial meltdown and other implications to them and their families if they lose their jobs. Take a leaf out of my friend's books and stick to your own pages if you can't be constructive. Thanks!

Agree0 Disagree0

Loan or investment or ebt. none of which as classed as income and therefore not part of an employees contract. I have a contract with the bank, they gave me money, does that mean i pay tax on it and class it as an income.... no its a loan. the fact the bank charges interest is not the issue. EBTs are not taxable in terms of income tax. Rangers will win the tax case. the issue is, will the taxman prolong the agony by appealling. hopefully the judge will tell them where to go! WATP

Agree0 Disagree0

Well well another week another fresh allegation!! what will it be next week anyone want to guess?
If there were any side letters stating Rangers intention to pay players using the ETB then why the hell has it taken HMRC so long to prove this surely they would have a copy of said letters or contracts and case closed by now....no all you thick sellik fans seem to think these will miraculously appear from someones arse just in time for SPL to strip Rangers of their titles that were won fairly over the course of 38 games NO CHEATING!
I would be very surprised if there was evidence of any second third fourth of fifth contract other than a draft copy of some letter that a 9 year old could have did on their laptop and some auld geezer that has a dislike to SDM for forcing him out of Ibrox some years ago.
Why is it only septic fans that are crusading for us to be stripped of our titles. Is it a jealousy or is it just pure hatred for everything Rangers.

Agree0 Disagree0

I remember seeing that eadacted letter - the one that nobody can any longer find traces of.

The same redacted letter that anybody could have knocked up off the cuff.

Further, Rangers used EBT's for years and years...that is technically paying them via a third party....so it was flirting with the SPL rules anyway...why has it taken so long for it to be looked into...

Further, if Rangers are found guilty of it...how can anybody prove that the money paid to the players via the EBY/and or second contract if they exist, was for "playing activities"......i;d say that is the biggest grey area of them all...after all, the contract lodged with the SPL was for playing for the club...right?

And all this talk of stripping away leagues etc.....well, taht will be good, because the SPL and all ovther clubs would have to prove that Rangers wouldnt have otherwise won the league and other clubs would have if they ahd other players instead...proving an unfair advantage or anything of that ilk is impossible...

Agree0 Disagree0

Clutching at straws ! no shame

Agree0 Disagree0

Bet you thought this was a scoop eh?If Ebt,s are non payable loans did they come in brown paper bags?Hugh Adams admitted they were dodgy contracts wi an 3rd letter for good measure and Darrel King said on radio he,s seen 2 such contracts!The one they omitted from the SFA remember?Does denial mean to completely ignore any mans word,statement,evidence or proof...It certainly doesn,t to most sane folk.lol

Agree0 Disagree0

I posted original just a extract from the herald story and the reporter has put his name to it. Posted to give rangers men a more balanced view

Agree0 Disagree0

To the above poster are you serious
If the boot was on the other foot YOU and all of the other Rangers supporters would be having a field day.
OK some banter goes beyond the realms but the ordinary banter is just fine

Agree0 Disagree0

Yeh, but the rangers players had CONTRACTS as exposed by Keith Jackson, see u in court....17 in a row..

Agree0 Disagree0

If there is any document that states the loans do not have to be repaid, then they are not loans.

Simple.

Agree0 Disagree0

Hilarious. Patently u have no understanding of Law and contracts. I wrot about this hear days ago but the ed refused to post it

It's PRECISELY because there was a loan agreement in place WITH A SIDE LETTER CONFIRMING THEY WERE NOT LOANS - as insisted on by players and agents agreed by Rangers, That the EBTs are not acceptable. And that's why rangers will be liquidated

Agree0 Disagree0

Well said... this will clear our name...dont listen to alll tyhe tims on here saying no no, u made a contract etc...they a re merely brain dead sheep who believe everything the read in papers and hear on radios. Brilliant best news this year

Agree0 Disagree0

Question to all knowing experts from the other side even if EBTS were not in use how do yous know Rangers would not have employed these players anyway.EBTs were and are still legal.just another extra sweatener to sign.So do us all a favour go away with all your jealously .54 and counting.

Agree0 Disagree0

Im not going to tell u who I am and I'm not going to tell u who my accountants but let me assure they are totally tapped into this

I discussed with one of their top people just last week what exactly was the problem.

Here's their response. : the EBT loans can theoretically require to be repaid. But the players and there agents wouldn't accept that and insisted on side letter that ensured the DIDN'T require the 'loans' to be repaid under any circumstances - rangers agreed to this

That's illegal and that why rangers will go into liquidation as they can't afford the lost tax case.

Agree0 Disagree0

Media pundits know nothing so don't believe a word they write on the subject. EBTs are legal but not when used in this way....that is why HMRC are challenging and have more than likely won their case given the disappearance of all the rats involved. Doomed............doomed I tells yi!

Agree0 Disagree0

Very good you can't tell us who your accountents are but you Can tell tax case is lost.jog on.

Agree0 Disagree0

Guy's Guy's Before HRMC could get anywhere near a court with this case they would have to have Evidence to get it into court, These people are specialist in their trade, Rangers will not be the last to fall within this investigation,

Side Letters were seized during a different investigation,Concerning a Football Agent and gave HMRC the proof they needed to proceed with the case against Rangers, This Evidence will not be available for public viewing it is Evidence, not in Public domain.
But Win the Tax Case or not We are Finished, as we stand, A win will certainly help us move forward but only after Liquidation it is too late in the day to save the club even if The Tax Case was Won Today.

Agree0 Disagree0

To the chap who said that they would have to prove that Rangers gained an unfair advantage: No they wouldnt, they would just need to prove that Rangers cheated. Not saying that it is definitely the case that they have but the evidence seems to be mounting.

The side letters are key to the whole tax case, if they exist the game's a bogey.

Mac

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 10:09:00
walter smith on key n gray talksport show approx 11.30. neil doncaster on just before him. thought id let everyone know. should be interesting.
j1985

Believable3 Unbelievable10

Cant get near a radio the now if your listening to what Walter says can you let us know on here.

Cheers

Gers1986

Agree0 Disagree0

WS said if liquidation happened it should not wipe our the history or achievement of the club, and cited Leeds as an example.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 09:00:01
FIFA rules would allow the players to join other clubs if they are sacked BEFORE March 31.

But if they are shown the door after that date they would be unable to find new employers until the end of the season.

Clark hinted he was eager to avoid mass cuts to the squad to make it easier to strike a deal with a potential buyer.

He hoped that would see the players accept huge hits on their wages — gambling they would soon have new bosses.

But when he was unable to give guarantees beyond the end of the month, it led to a stalemate.

Believable7 Unbelievable11

If they are shown the door after they can actually find new employers anytime! They just wouldn't be registered to play for the rest of this season!

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Mar 2012 08:21:42
Rangers could be stripped of up to 6 league titles

http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scotsol/homepage/sport/spl/4175023/Crowns-are-on-the-line.html

Believable19 Unbelievable27

Ebt is not income.... thats the point of arguement with HMRC. you could also argue money players made on image rights at a club is also income..... doncaster is a turd

Agree0 Disagree0

Image righs are all in contracts though mate, therefore should be sent to relevant governing bodies!
You will find players have this written into there contracts.
EBT is an income for the player as he reciever money at some point from it...INcome

if this wasnt made available for the spl sfa then its curtains for us.

this is different from why HMRC are after us.

the spl sfa dont care how much we paid, rather that they werent aware of it!

Bluepeter

Agree0 Disagree0

To the second poster. You are talking out your erse.
Of course the money from the EBT is income, what the hell else would it be?

Dafty.

Agree0 Disagree0

It's a loan from the trust which is supposed to be paid back but usually not until they have basically kicked the bucket. It's not supposed to be run like this but this is the way 95% of ebt's are currently run. So yeah the above poster is right of course it's income BUT here's the bit your missing, as it is a loan that's supposed to be repaid it is technically not income. You wouldn't put your loans down as an income would you? I'm not saying I agree with or condone it but that's it in a nutshell.

Leeroy

Agree0 Disagree0

Personally I don't read the sun cause there a shower of two faced b@#tards. Couple of my workmates are from Liverpool and nobody buys it there,most hated newspaper group in britain. Maybe the gers fans should stop buying certain newspapers as I fell there kicking us when we are down.

Agree0 Disagree0

Kicking us when we are down?

we have brought most of it on ourselves!

cmon guys we pride ourselves on dignity.

BluePeter

Agree0 Disagree0

I would like to see Rangers fans blaming the right people Not Newspapers Not BBC nor any other media...and not anyother football club. The men you trusted and paid your hard earned cash to made fools of you all.
They are the ones who should be on the receiving end of your written anger. I am not a Rangers fan but I hate the idea of the ordinary people who work at Ibrox worrying about their jobs, whilst the fat cats get fatter ..

Agree0 Disagree0

Not again ahhh..If an Ebt is a non repayable loan then why the hidden contract?Why didn,t A meet B and hand over a brown envelope?Would huv saved a lot of grief and given yer past and present record for honesty and morality..I know who i believe dumbasses lol

Agree0 Disagree0

Does that mean that if the teddybears are stripped of titles (notgonnaehappenbythesmy) then the great unwashed will think they have won more titles than us lol, dream on timothys, you's couldnt do it on the park and you'll certainly not do it off the park, 54 titles and climbing, liquidation or not.............WATP

Agree0 Disagree0

I kind of see where people are going with this......... oh no wait i aint got a chuffing clue but i can't wait till bluepeter goes to work (or the benefits office more like) to find out his employer has taken the lead of the extremely honest Glasgow Rangers and have therefore decided he no longer has a 40 hour per week working contract but rather his bosses will now pay him with a loan every week .............. and oh yeah it has to be paid back sometime ???????

Naive, ignorant, brainwashed views on things i'm afraid people. It's not all quite like i've said above but when broken down into layman's terms it is what it is

byeeeeeee !!

Agree0 Disagree0

Absolute tosh mckinley !!

Can't rewrite history and anyway EBTs were for discretionary, rather than contractual payments !!

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent