Rangers Rumours Archive September 05 2013

05 Sep 2013 12:16:25
Former Hearts defender Marius Zaliukas joins Rangers on trial

Thoughts fellow bears. PB

So how many clubs have been chasing the signature of this player you all seem desperate to get on board, he's been a free agent all transfer window, looks like another Ally will be giving a bumper pension fund too.

That's a fair point I would have thought he would have been snapped up

I would have thought he would have been snapped up to one of the better centre backs in the premier league.

Was a good servant to hearts and is still only 29

05 Sep 2013 20:08:09
Yet another clown who uses the words ; YOU ALL; when he has no idea what we all want, don't be so infantile pal, you don't know what anyone wants, you simply get on your keyboard and scattergun nonsense, I havnt came across one gers fan who told me they wanted zaliuskas, no, one, and what exactly is your point about nobody wanting the player? TELL US HOW YOU KNOW?
Tommyblue

06 Sep 2013 00:27:25
@TommyBlue another good post by tommyblue totally agree with him 100% mate couldn't of put it better myself, I personally would of preferred pandza but it looks like we have messed him about enough now! keep up the good posts mate as you get right to the point and I enjoy reading them.

But why???

06 Sep 2013 07:11:33
Thanks Alex. this guy was only one of a few who post crap beginning with you all or everybody,
in truth he was probably only letting his hate out of his system and that was all he could think of, Rangers were mentioned and he was away like a rat up a drainpipe, none of us on here probably have any idea of the workings of a pro players contract or offers, MZ may have plenty on the table, I do agree maybe Pandza would be the better signing but to be truthful I have only read about him, and do we really need anyone right now? maybe Ally is trying to totally change the entire defensive dept so we will be stronger if and when we get up a division, he maybe knows the likes of Perry, Cribari etc are not of a higher standard, MZ is an international and is a good age so maybe? if he could be trusted (disciplinary problems). take care m8 Tommyblue

Agree with Alex

Ozzie Al

07 Sep 2013 16:22:31
Why do we need to give him a TRIAL? He has played against us for years for gods sake! Mind you our scouts probably haven't noticed that! Only his fitness won't b known but surely even our backroom team could sort out something as simple as that? Maybe not right enough!!

05 Sep 2013 06:34:01
A deal is in the process of being signed. Four new directors will go onto the Rangers board, but only if a request for and EGM is completely withdrawn and a vote of confidence given to the ones already running the club.

Dont see how they can possibly agree to a vote of confidence in a board when they have no idea what they are going to find when they get to see the accounts etc and are going to look a bit foolish if having agreed a vote of confidence the accounts and working practices turn out as expected to be horrendous, stinks of job preservation to me. BT

05 Sep 2013 08:16:45
What a joke, should be no strings apart from egm be removed just shows someone has something to hide!

Let's just agree and move on.
Agreeing doesn't preclude you from getting rid if you find evidence of wrongdoing or indeed mismanagement.
This just gives the current board breathing space to prove they have been maligned for no reason.
We shall see.

If this is the deal then many will see that Murray's prime objective has been to get himself back on teh Board without any meaningful investment.

I do not see how a vote of confidence can be given in advance of doing a thorough review of what has been going on unless there has been some form of due diligence going on in the background.

At present I would have thought that every, and I do mean every Rangers supporter with a modicum of intelligence would want to be fully briefed on the financial management of teh Club since the current FD took his position.

That briefing should be made Public so that the trail of where the monies have gone is there for all to see.

We do not want another situation like we had when David Murray was in control where contracts were circulated to other Businesses within his Group and to Companies controlled by teh wider Murray family!

The whole point of the requisition was to express no confidence in the board which Walter Smith described as dysfunctional. What information have Jim McColls group been shown/given to now give them "confidence" in the current board. Looks like another "deal" which leaves the fans short changed once more.

Did the proposed takeovers. Not stipulate recently that NO DEAL WOULD BE STRUCK WITH MATHER. Why are supporters accepting this?. no EGM. NO DEEDS. No transparency!!. Oh & no investment.

Mccoll has stated in todays press no such agreement ever took place he said wait till agm and the shareholders will either keep the spive on board or will vote against them holding their current possitions