Rangers Rumours Archive May 03 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


03 May 2012 21:56:25
Just read that the Blue Knights may make yet another offer, for some reason the majority of posters on this site seem to think they are the answer, really do not know why other than the fact they talk a good game that appeals to the fans, how many attempts do they want, the bottom line is that they have had numerous chances to put up or shut up and do not seem able to put up.

Believable50 Unbelievable17

Its got to be the blue knights fellow bears im not happy with this miller bid hope blue knights and kennedy up their bid any thoughts ed ?

Agree0 Disagree0

What are they offering this time? Magic beans? A used car? Fake ciggies? What?

Agree0 Disagree0

Ive some thought`s get the Blue Tights tae fk.

Agree0 Disagree0

How after its took an eternity and a weekend to get to this preferred bidder stage can they possibly turn around and say oh we fancy changing the preferred bidder now to TBK's. What would be the point in settling on or calling it a preferred bidder. Its nonsense. I don't know if any of you have stopped and taken a minute with all thats been going on to think about how much of an absolute F@*KIN farce this really has been from the start. DUFF and PHELPS are F@*KIN clowns. The lack of transparency is an insult to good rangers fans, the embarrassing deadlines never met. can anybody tell me honestly that they look like they know what they are doing. Someone will writer a book about this one day and hopefully by then we will be safe and sound but i bet only then will we realise what a mess the admin made of the job the embarrassment this has been.

Agree0 Disagree0

The blue knights are hopeless! They keep coming in with joke bids! Time they did one and stop messing about. I for one will go with Miller and hope he comes good.

Agree0 Disagree0

How can they make another bid? They had their chance and failed the due diligence and expectations of D&P the appointed admins. The books have been handed over to Miller now and unless he drops out, forfeiting his £500,000, He is well and truly in the driving seat.  TBK's have blown it. Time is the issue now, and faffing around with a yeah but no, but yeah but no TBK's is not part of the plan and detrimental to the survival of the club.  

Agree0 Disagree0

the BKs had their chance bill miller all the way

Agree0 Disagree0

Too little too late... Bill Murray has exclusivity.

Agree0 Disagree0

TBK-BK should make a liquidation offer of approx 22 or 23 million and guarantee saving the club, forget the history.
Once you deduct the secured creditors ( debentures and redundancies), there will be 12 or 13 million left for the ordinary creditors, more than BMs bid.


Its fairly obvious from the bidding process that the actual sell on value of the assets is only about 20 million.

Anorak.

Agree0 Disagree0

It appears the assets of Rangers are worth nothing near the book value, and Rangers is a loss making buiness facing current and future penalties with obvious financial consequences.

BM's bid effectively values Rangers at approx 20 million, add his 11.2 million bid to the debenture and redundancy liabilities he has taken on.

All this talk of billionaires is cloud cuckoo land, Rangers are a tiny loss making business with a breakdown value of 20-25 millon.

Nobody even offered 20 million as a liquidation bid for goodness sake.

Anorak.

Agree0 Disagree0

Trying to work out the debenture part. So if debenture holders (£8m?) forgo their rights to oldco assets and become creditors to newco does that really add £8m to BM's bid? I don't think so. Just adds £8m to newco's debts.

Agree0 Disagree0

The VAT etc has to be paid in Full, same as D and P, same as football debts, thats more than his bid even before thinking about a CVA or CW. Pluse he HAS NOT given the 500K mearly placed money into a bank account that rangers or D and P have no access to. Impossible for this to work.

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree with the last poster, TBK has ample time to put in a proper offer, all this "I love Rangers" it was either put up or shut up, and they've shut up, I'm surprised the way Brian Kennedy got on, maybe that's why he never got Hibs, strange because obviously he's a very astute buisness man

Agree0 Disagree0

If you remove secured creditors by transferring their liability then its effectively the same as paying them. In other words, a liquidation bid of 19.5 million would pay the debentures and leave 11.5 for unsecured creditors. The same principle applies for secured redundancy debts, by not liquidating you are removing them from the secured creditors list..


A liquidation bid of 11.5 million would pay the debentures(8 million) and the redundancies( 2-3 million) leaving nothing for the ordinary creditors.

Anorak.

Agree0 Disagree0

Anorak that is still only 11.5m of actual real money being injected into the club whether it's oldco or newco. Besides, the debenture holders might want their money back now rather than risk newco.

Agree0 Disagree0

Suddenly you are all happy with leaving the debt behind ....... dignity fc sure.

Agree0 Disagree0

Will nobody state that ticketus pulled out not to leave 27 mill behind but to wait until assets are held in long long legal battle.

Agree0 Disagree0

But the debenture holders do not want their money back and the bid total reflects this position.

Anorak.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2012 21:41:27
With all the talk about Bill Millers bid, how many players will actually say with the newco club?
"And given PFA Scotland believe players are not legally obliged to join a newco, Miller may struggle to assemble a squad"

Believable25 Unbelievable19

Indeed, miller is paying the money for ibrox, Murray park and car park, but the players are free to do whatever. And what will the new wages be? Or what can he afford to pay? I hope he has a plan

Agree0 Disagree0

Is this miller guy the real deal or is he just keeping the seat warm for a previous owner once the dust settles? The one who said on Feb 14 ' when this is all over rangers will be in a much better position'.

Agree0 Disagree0

He must secure the issue with ticketus fast. If the CVA is agreed then he can sell season tickets to pay the players . If  not then its sunk. 

Agree0 Disagree0

If he is planning to run the club within budget you might get some of the under 18 boys staying !!

Agree0 Disagree0

ThOur squad plays for the badge and the fans not the owner. Some will leave some will be offered a pay cut wage to allow them the option to stay. Davis, Lafferty, Papac Broadfoot will be gone. Shagger, Naisy and Whitts are maybe's just because of wage cuts. As for Miller at least he has a plan. I'm decide after the summer.

Agree0 Disagree0

Looks like some of you are starting to realise that Kill Bill is having the strings pulled by none other that Craigy Whyte. He will be back at the helm with the newco.

Agree0 Disagree0

If you look at the amount of players released e.g. Leeds this season its almost half a team . Now this is just one team in England. Therefore if I was a player in Scotland I would very carfeully watch what I wish for. Most of Rangers players are mediocre at best so maybe its better the devil you know.

Agree0 Disagree0

If the players are not legally obliged to join the new company and there is a transfer embargo on signing new players, then who is going to play for Rangers this season ?

Does BM expect the embargo and any other penalties to only apply to the oldco ?

Is it realistic to expect the newco to be devoid of all debts and all penalties, and yet in football terms to be recognized as effectively the oldco ?

What a freakin mess.

Anorak.

Agree0 Disagree0

According to D&P, Ticketus is only an ordinary creditor and of no concern to BM.

This is odd because Ticketus pulled out of a consortium CVA bid, this suggests they are confident of their position.

D&P also stated there is no CW floating charge which means Ticketus have to get their 26.7 million from CW in another way.

Its all very confusing.

Anorak.

Agree0 Disagree0

This guy miller transfers assets over to now co. no cva agreed by old co therefore old co will liquidate. Newco begins has ibrox Murray park etc all to millers name but no players. He then decides to sell ibrox and Murray park and all the assets of newco off and makes a quick buck and turns roud and says sorry guys it didn't work? Oldco gone and newco gone? What's stopping this guy from doing that?

Agree0 Disagree0

Players will stay if Miller makes up the 4 month shortfall in salaries realting to the pay cut. Also depends on whether there is any chance of relegation in the next year due to sanctions/liquidation. I suspect most of them will move on.

Agree0 Disagree0

I get the impression we will continue to operate as Glasgow rangers and we will be out of administration. The players stay with rangers on the contracts they were on. An we won't face any points deductions or fines at the beginning of next season.

This new co will only hold our debts which BM will agree to pay back over a few years. It will be alot more than they wud make via liquidation so the CVA can be agreed hence no sanctions on the team we all know and love.

Hopefully on appeal the sfa see sense and withdraw the crazy penalties they imposed on us because of Craig 'Celtic fan' whyte

Agree0 Disagree0

SFA and Scotish employment law stating contracts are not null n void if newco started. Only upon liquidation of company do contracts cease.This will be why BM is keeping old company open for the moment. Transfer assets inc players to newco.Try and agree CVA for Rangers if not taken up old company will be liquidated.BM can then state he tried to keep oldco running " Not his fault CVA could not be agreed".. PFA are the only association to mention contracts null n void.

Agree0 Disagree0

Stop scare mongering about BM selling off assets of a newco. He would struggle to get his money back for Ibrox & Murray park. Houses can not be built on Murray park site. The land for Ibrox has not got much value due to location. I honestly think he has come in to do the same as McCann did at Celtic get rid of the debt cut cost have a share issue and sell up. Making 2-3 x his intial investment. Would not suprise me if wee sleakit McCann was in with him. He's dont it before made good money... LOL

Agree0 Disagree0

On paper Bill's plan is great. Transfer the SPL share, the Stadium Murrey Park, Players registrations and all assets to a new co. Leave all the debt with the old co.

But

1. Ticketus have a claim on an entity called rangers playing at Ibrox. I doubt they can leave that debt behind

2. Players contracts are non transferable, some might go to the new club, but what are the terms and conditions. Will Bill honour the agreement to pay back wages agreed with the old co. I think not as he is not liable for the out standing wages.

3. Who actually owns Murrey park etc. Whyte is likely to claim that he owns them as part of his preferred creditor status. He is also likely to say he would prefer to own the assets than to accept £11 million.

4. The tax bill. HMRC would get nothing effectively from this deal. Why would they even consider accepting a CVA which pays them about 2 million pounds if even that. It's a no brainer

4. The "Hybrd" new co is either liable to punishment for rangers financial irregularity (no europe, no player transfers) or it has to be treated as a completely new entity (no Europe for three years start in the third division).

I cant see this working

Agree0 Disagree0

SFA and Scotish employment law stating contracts are not null n void if newco started.
---------------------------------------

Really ?

If you say so.

Agree0 Disagree0

I am not sure about the legalities of treating players as assets, transferring their contracts to a newco without their agreement seems counter intuitive.

Maybe if the newco pays them their wage cuts back then they may agree or maybe not ?


One thing is for sure, if gers fans were hoping things were getting simpler, they are wrong.

Agree0 Disagree0

True. This is very confusing and contradictory. However I think ill wait and see what actually happens instead of being worried by all the tax and corporate law experts on here.

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm pretty certain that TUPE legislation will apply. It basically means all employees of the old company automatically become employees of the new company on the same terms and conditions. TUPE definitely does apply if a company's assets are sold to another company - which I think is the case here.

Agree0 Disagree0

Miller's plan is for Newco to buy the assets from RFC leaving the debt behind in RFC. It is within the power of the Administrators in theory to sell assets to any third party to pay the creditors of RFC.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2012 19:40:34
talkin to my dad earlier, anybody heard that Fergus McCann was at Ibrox last week

Believable20 Unbelievable41

Indeed he was. Fergus was in Scotland for 9 days (I think) and took a friend for a tour of Parkhead and Ibrox.

Agree0 Disagree0

As a Celtic fan I think he should be brought in to put Scottish football on a more secure footing, he would get more than 80m out of Sky and make sure no clubs go they way of the Bears.

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree. A lot of Celtic fans and other fans slagged him when he saved Celtic. Quickly he started to prove me wrong. He taught Celtic that when times are hard you just have to step back and get your house in order. And boy did he do a good job!!

Agree0 Disagree0

Yes he was hope bill miller is the next bunnet woulld prefer the tbk and kennedy tho

Agree0 Disagree0

The BK & Kennedy are a joke, both are full of hot air.

Agree0 Disagree0

You cant sign him, he is over eighteen

Agree0 Disagree0

Maybe hes mates with miller who knows!!

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2012 19:39:38
News just in
There is a court case tomorrow, in Edinburgh Friday May 4th just announced.
Lord Hodge presiding for 1 hour, a petition in connection with RFC administration.
Wonder what it's about?

Believable21 Unbelievable15

Admins seizing control of whytes shareholding hopefully, shouldnt be too hard to convince any judge its in the creditors best interest

Agree0 Disagree0

Should be feedback on creditors meeting and resolutions..........

Agree0 Disagree0

It is not up to a judge to give up craig whyte shares. You are living in a dream

Agree0 Disagree0

The Petition is listed as 'Starred Motion' which means it is contested. As Biggart Baillie are appointed on behalf of the Administrators it is also conceivable that other parties, such as HMRC and/ or Ticketus may also be present.

Agree0 Disagree0

Wrong, the creditors CAN control whytes share through the court of seesion by showing that its in the creditors best interest.

you will note the legal distinction between ownership and control.

Agree0 Disagree0

HMRC are contesting proposed sale.

Agree0 Disagree0

Why would HMRC not want the sale go through they would actively want a company to go bust when they are not the creditor who gets money back first so they will effectively get f*** all?

Agree0 Disagree0

"HMRC are contesting proposed sale" source or your talking utter pish. If HMRC are contesting sale they would have played there hand before now becuase as every day goes by less money is available for creditors. 

Agree0 Disagree0

Creditors best interest?
Nothing that has happened so far is in the creditors best interests!
The whole administration has been run SOLELY for RFC's interests.
An 11.5m bid for -
a) Ibrox
b) Murray Park
c) Players
Tell me if all those had been 'sold' off that they wouldn't realise more than 11.5m?
It has been an excercise is getting RFC to the end of the season, creditors interests have been ignored, or as D&P are fond of saying 'irrelevent'.

Agree0 Disagree0

Could be Whyte's first swipe at preventing transfer of assets to a Newco.

Agree0 Disagree0

I had a look an RFC Administration order is scheduled for today.

A starred motion indicates that an appearance is required - not that it is contested per se. Only the Administrator's lawyers and listed as "appearing" which suggests that it is uncontested.

Not familiar enough with the process to speculate on the detail of what it actually concerns.

Agree0 Disagree0

Tell me if all those had been 'sold' off that they wouldn't realise more than 11.5m?
---------------------------------------

OK, they would not realise more than 11.5 million. Although the bid is worth 20 million since he has taken over the debenture and redundancy liabilities from the oldco. They are secured creditors who would have to be paid from any liquidation asset sale.

The evidence is no bidder offered more, nothing stopping anyone makng a liquidation bid for 21 million and picking up the assets.

p.s. you can not sell players in liquidation, they go free.

Anorak.

Agree0 Disagree0

1 hour
Pet: Rangers Football Club Plc for an Administration Order


Biggart Baillie LLP

Agree0 Disagree0

The redundancy liability are diddly squat. Just ask the thousands of workers who have been shafted by comapny liquidation. The latest example is MG-Rover workers who finally got their much contested redunandcy compensation of 3£3 (yes THREE POUNDS EACH) after 7 years of legal infighting. The unpaid wages are in the creditor pot. As for Debunture holders, their is an arguement that as long as football is played at Ibrox and they wish to buy tickets they are owed nothing. (i.e. debentures are a debt that would move with ownership Ibrox)

Agree0 Disagree0

I'll give £5m for Murray Park today if they'd sell me it.

Agree0 Disagree0

Agree with Anorak, £11.2m and £8m debt transfer (if debenture holders agree) is best offer for assets. Anyone is welcome to call D&P any time and offer more than this. But they haven't.

Why? My bet is that BM has thought of some sneaky way of extracting value from this deal just as CW did in his takeover.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2012 19:13:10
Duff and Duffer cannot guarantee no liquidation
news.stv.tv/scotland/98034-rangers-administrators-cannot-give-100-guarantee-over-liquidation/

So much for 'newco'

Believable24 Unbelievable10

Yes and if you read it all,they say that they dont need a CVA to continue,"the CVA at some later date-some months,not days or weeks" ,to me that means they will send out the season ticket renewals now and we will all pay for them and then once they have all the money then they will tell us that the old company has to be liquidated, i think that it stinks for one ,what do you all think,because the history will be GONE.

Agree0 Disagree0

Something not right here guys! Bill Miller has NOT had to put up an exclusivity fee and tonight on Sky Sports Paul Clark (D&P) implied that they would still listen to 'further bids'!! Betwwn this and the court case in front of Lord Hodge tomorrow morning I reckon things are far from clear cut. Further twists and turns await methinks !

Agree0 Disagree0

The Newco idea reminds me of Only fools and horses episode when in Sid's Cafe trigger announced he was getting an award for services to the council.....apparently he had had the SAME broom for the past 25 years.....in fairness he did mention it had had 45 NEW heads and 55 NEW poles and 36 NEW handles, No one had the heart to explain to him it was not the same broom.

Agree0 Disagree0

Its still a mystery why miller wants the club caution to the wind fellow bears

Agree0 Disagree0

When will the trophy sale start ?

Agree0 Disagree0

To the guy talkin about only fools n horses, that's exactly what it's like. It stinks to me

Agree0 Disagree0

Bill Miller believes he can stabilise the business and make money but he dosent realise in football u never make money

Agree0 Disagree0

Think theres a few Triggers at Ibrox mate lol

Agree0 Disagree0

I dont like the duff and phelps statement. mr whyte has a floating charge over the company????? but he cant block any sale? makes no sense to me what so ever. something not right there

Agree0 Disagree0

It is liquidation lets stop fooling ourselves.

Agree0 Disagree0

I for one will not be buying a season ticket - I smell a rat too!

Agree0 Disagree0

Bill Miller believes he can stabilise the business and make money but he dosent realise in football u never make money

To be fair Fergus MaCann did. But you are currently running at a £10 million deficit. Miller clear thinks that either he can add £10million a year to the income stream (unlikly in my opinion. The talk of bring Shirt sales and catering back in house is all very well, but to rebuild these streams needs considerable investment).

Or he wants to cut £10 million from expenditure. Thats about a 20% cut in expenditure. To get that into perspective our so called savage govenment cuts are about 10%.

Agree0 Disagree0

Course they can't. I don't think it's as certain as some here make out otherwise BM wouldn't waste all this time and money doing something about creating newco.

Liquidation of oldco is a strong possibility, though, if newco can't get hold of it's shares, currently in the sticky mits of CW.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2012 18:15:40
Hope with Miller taking over this doesn't mean we have to keep mo edu, I couldn't handle another 3 year's of him, hes rank.

Believable30 Unbelievable53

Hes been playing well and set up another goal yesterday, think you need to watch rangers a bit more pal

Agree0 Disagree0

If he was that rank, he wouldn't be in the team every week.

If Bill Miller intends to market Rangers in America then Edu, Bocanegra & Bedoya will be key.

Agree0 Disagree0

Don't growl at me bears, but edu has grown on me the last 6 months. Strong, fit mobile. If he can learn how to pass he may be a player.

Agree0 Disagree0

No worries because you can't afford to keep him

Agree0 Disagree0

I would rather keep edu and get rid of miller

Agree0 Disagree0

Hes the most athletic player on the pitch - and when on his game he can be really good. dont start turning on players that have taken wage cuts and shown undoubted loyalty to the club.

one of the points above - about marketing in the US is bang on.

ryanrfc

Agree0 Disagree0

You can't slag edu and leave little alone, little is not good enuf full stop.

Agree0 Disagree0

Forget all this American marketing nonsense. They held a world cup there to try and promote the game, it didn't work. Yanks have no mass interest in what they term soccer, I can only relate it to the same
Level as us Scots have in say Cricket. The Asian market is like most things these days the only market that matters, even Man Utd agree to that. America is not gonna make us millions.

Agree0 Disagree0

To original post. Miller hopes to take over he still has to deal with whitey boy

Agree0 Disagree0

You're very much mistaken if you think america could not be a market rangers could break into. This is probably one of bills intentions and could bring in GOOD revenue for the club. When the world cup was there it did have a major impact they even had to start clearing farmers fields to make pitches because there was so much interest in "soccer" you should do some research buddy before posting. One thing americans aren't shy in putting money into their sports.

Agree0 Disagree0

Remember the very same FANS who hounded the "RANK" Charlie Miller?

Agree0 Disagree0

Charlie Miller was rank. What's your point? As was Charlie Adam, as was Gregg Wylde. Mo edu is a horrific footballer. I'd be thrilled to see the back of him.

Agree0 Disagree0

Get off the guys back, he is no oustanding but he is a good honest pro who took a hell of a wage cut to help see us through, and he scored an injury time winner against Celtic so he is a legend in my book

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2012 17:21:41
rangers administrators say they believe bill miller has been given assurances by the spl for rangers to continue in the scottish premier league.bc)

Believable19 Unbelievable39

SPL say this isn't the case, that they've given no assurances.

Agree0 Disagree0

Okay first duff & Duffer speak on behalf of Hector now they speak for the SPL, who else to they converse with, God as they seem to speak for everyone else.

Agree0 Disagree0

None have been given as yet......seems a familiar road is taken here...

Agree0 Disagree0

SPL told BBC tonight that no such assurances have been given.

Agree0 Disagree0

Yes and whyte said he had money

Agree0 Disagree0

Who are these people who are saying these things at the SPL? We need to know!

Agree0 Disagree0

They may be going on what STV reported the otherday  "SPL chief executive Neil Doncaster has given a strong hint he would be amenable to a newco Rangers joining the competition." 
However that means nothing. 

Agree0 Disagree0

We need to name these people from the SPL online so that everyone knows who they are. Here we go again.

Agree0 Disagree0

I am confused, if the old Rangers are not playing in the SPL next season then its just the same as beng liquidated, I cant see any practical difference. In both cases a newco takes it place as if it WAS liquidated.

I think this iis a clear case of liquidation evasion, and I just dont see how the SPL can do anything else but penalise Rangers as if they were liquidated. Apart from anything else the original SFA-SPL member is technically still in administraton ffs !

How Rangers plan to get this past UEFA is beyond me, the rules state you have to be a member for 3 consecutive years. You cant just say the old Rangers just popped out for milk but will be back next year merged with a newco, as if not trading for a year under administration is of little consequence to being a continuos member of the SFA.

Assuming Rangers stay in the SPL, they could face a 3 year ban from Europe, 3 years of 10-15 point deductions and 3 years of 75% withheld prize money. Take your pick which penalties will relate to EBTs or newco entry. Bearing in mind the original member is technically still in administration, or are we just supposed to forget about it for a year or more.

B Miller talks about running a tight ship( no excuses), it will be a sinking ship if he expects 45,000 fans to turn up at Ibrox to watch affordable-average players struggle to compete for nothing for 3 freakin years !

This deal will fold, once BM realises the financial consequences of the penalties for EBTs and using an incubator company, he will withdraw and we will be back to TBKs and Ticketus and CW.

I cannot believe CW was never asked to secure the Ticketus money, and he failed to do so, the guy has to be insane not to secure it with the BTC looming.

No deal, or newco Rangers under Miller will last a year and then more administration.

Agree0 Disagree0

Its the same old everyday all speculation its like the grand national too many hurdles are we any further forward whats this millers long term plans ?

Agree0 Disagree0

D&P claim CW has no floating charge over the assets of Rangers as security for the Ticketus 26.7 million. If this is the case then why were Bill Ng and TBK wasting their time getting into bed with an unsecured creditor for ?

Something just does not add up, I assume a court case is looming involving CW against the administrators, they do not accept his 30 million floating charge and have just flogged his secured assets to a yank for 11.2 million. This will be about 10p in the pound and CW will be personally liable for 25 million to Ticketus.


I feel this has a lot more twists and turns.

Agree0 Disagree0

@the long post

Why wouldn't supporters continue turning up to Ibrox to watch the team called Rangers playing in blue, just because of a change in ownership to a newco? With a cut in SPL money, Rangers main source of income is gate money. They'll be fine, financially.

BM doesn't care about cosequences of EBTs as that stays with oldco. It's a liquidation of oldco in all but name anyway.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2012 16:02:05
Another plea for calm and some patience. D&P once again manage to release some confusing...even contradictory...claims in today's release, which lets be honest is not the first time. But now that Miller is officially the Preferred Bidder we can now hear HIS voice rather than second hand sound bites.

He's the owner in waiting. Therefore he will sart to tell us his plans...his vision. I'll pay more attention to those statements rather than D&P's ramblings.

Miller's first press release - to me - reads well. Measured...no outrageous claims...quite rightly he needs to carefully manage expectation. As do we of him!

We'll all learn a lot more about him in the coming weeks. Although I ave some reservations we MUST allow him the chance to show what he envisages for the Club.

The one thing I do like about him so far, is that throughout the circus that was the bidding war for the keys to Ibrox, Miller kept his own counsel throughout. He worked away in the background - not courting the press...and it will come out very soon that he has invested a lot of time in dialogue with the SFA and SPL and also it sounds like a lot of contact with McCoist.

There was a veiled - and possibly valid - dig in D&P's release today that TBK had not invested that same effort as part of their process. Whether that's right or wrong, right now it appears Bill Miller is the only one that is demonstrated his willingness to rescue the club from the abyss....and didn't e give TBK/BK more than one opportunity to trump him!

None of us should be PRE judging Miller ...his motives...his plan...until we hear from the man himself - and unlike Whyte....Miller HAS to play his cards immediately so we'll all know his game plan very, very soon....

And one final word....I bet if you ask 5 different people to define liquidation you'll get 5 different answers....again we'll know soon what Millers plan is.

SPM

Believable31 Unbelievable20

Bottom line - so what's in it for Miller? I want to know why he's doing it as well as how he's going to do it. Not going to make a fortune from Scottish football - he has no ties to the history of the game or the club and only heard of Rangers via You Tube.

Agree0 Disagree0

As always a well thought out post and pretty much on the money for me...........green jhedi

Agree0 Disagree0

Very well said!

Agree0 Disagree0

Does anyone else think this whole thing has been engineered so the due diligence and 'take over' happens just as the seasons ends. Was this always planned ?

Agree0 Disagree0

D&P clearly stated that a CVA is not now possible for Rangers.
There's not enough time or money to offer.
This is a substantial statement of huge gravity for the club.

Agree0 Disagree0

As a Celtic fan I well remember the negative press and coverage of Fergus McCann back in 1993 and 94. A small band of fans believed in him and worked hard under the umbrella of Celts for Change. Dont write Miller off until you get more details about his vision and strategies for securing your club. I must admit I would miss you if you go who else could we slag. Championeeeees

Agree0 Disagree0

At last,a sensible post on this site.rangers are in the most precarious situation and BM is the only guy to have come up with a possible solution.a cva was never going to be possible for the bks as whyte was never going to give up his shares to them.the fans hysteria must stop and for now should be backing BM.its now upto BM to prove to us all that he is serious in his bid to save the club. "we don't do walking away"!

Agree0 Disagree0

D & P actually stated that ther is not enough time for a standalone cva..which this isn't

Agree0 Disagree0

11m in pot, less 5m Admin fees = 6m for CVA. HMRC won't accept that level of dividend and at same time the assets are transferred to Newco. Anyone believes to the contrary is dillusional. We Are The Optimists.

Agree0 Disagree0

Actually under liquidation the assets, ibrox, Murray park, the players, are sold (liquidated) and the creditors paid off with the proceeds. It is not allowed to transfer these assets at under market value to avoid liquidating them. Miller's newco could buy these assets at a fair value but I suspect he won't do that. I'm afraid rangers will be no more by the start of next season.

Agree0 Disagree0

You say none of us should be pre-judging but look what happened with our last 'buyer'

Agree0 Disagree0

Some amount of mhank accountants on this page...just wait and see bhoys,all will become clear soon enough..

Agree0 Disagree0

To the OP - Liquidation has a very precise definition in law, but I agree with you that 4 out of 5 posters on here don't know that.

Agree0 Disagree0

Absolutely fantastic post mate absolutely bang on ...
craig+babybear

Agree0 Disagree0

" we MUST allow him the chance to show what he envisages for the club " Now where have I heard that before . this is a man who knows nothing about " soccer " Why the hell does he want to buy a loss making club like rangers ? The answer is he is an asset stripper in the fine tradition of American capitalism.

Agree0 Disagree0

What is a "standalone CVA" ?

Agree0 Disagree0

"What is a "standalone CVA" ? "

Its what TBK were proposing...Millers idea is a Hybrid cva.

Agree0 Disagree0

" D&P clearly stated that a CVA is not now possible for Rangers.
There's not enough time or money to offer.
This is a substantial statement of huge gravity for the club. "

"If the successful bidder goes down the stand-alone CVA route they can be in control of the club before the start of next season," said Whitehouse. "If it's a newco with a CVA on the side, then they can take control by May 11."

Agree0 Disagree0

Ok, im a Celtic fan, I don't pretend to know anything about cva, liquidation, administration etc. the only thing I'm confused about is,, this guy being preferred bidder,,, of what exactly ? Nobody can force whyte to sell his shares can they ? And if as a lot of comments have said, he owns ibrox and Murray park, can he be forced to sell them ? I hope he does sell the lot to miller and we can all get on with talking football again ;-) good luck.

Agree0 Disagree0

The BM bid and success stands or falls on SPL-SFA-UEFA penalties, at the very least Rangers will be treated as if they are still in administration ( because the original member will be).

Forget penalties for EBTs, Rangers could be deducted points and face further bans from Europe until they merge back to one company.

Do not be shocked if BM withrdaws his bid, after failing to get firm assurances from the SPL and SFA that there will be no further penalties.

Is everyone supposed to forget about the EBT case ?

Anorak...this deal is a no deal.

Agree0 Disagree0

I believe he will start a newco to transfer the assets eventually the original company will be liquidated he will then build up the newco and sell for a massive profit newco is a way of stealing an old company's assets.He is a businessman hes only in it to make money

Agree0 Disagree0

McCoist backed the BK and the SFA and SPL say that they would apply the rules without fear and favour and so on! If a newco is set up then its liquidation some may attempt to call it something else but its liquidation140 years of history is lost! I cant see how you can leave all your debts on a shelf and simply change the name on your front door (when its not even your front door - remember CW) I smell another rat!

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2012 15:19:23
cant bill miller and brian kennedy join forces to buy rangers?

Believable4 Unbelievable36

Brian keneddy is a joke, he only wants to look good but dosent have a sound plan or any idea how to sort out the finincial mess at rangers, he can stay away all day as far as im concerned. he will put us back into administration

Agree0 Disagree0

Brian has announced that he is STILL going to keep an eye on the outcome of the next two weeks....just incase his name is forgotten....he will come back in with his final bestest final verbal bid to keep his name in the papers....i mean to save the club.

Agree0 Disagree0

If both parties had Rangers best interests at heart this would have happened ages ago. It looks obvious that Miller sees the takeover of Rangers as a business opportunity. While TBK and BK have closer emotional ties to Rangers, they do not have the financial clout to achieve their aims. The biggest disappointment for Rangers fans must be that TBK were unable to galvanise Rangers fans throughout the world to contribute enough funds to make a credible bid for Rangers. The future of Rangers under Miller looks very uncertain despite his promises.

Agree0 Disagree0

Yes but their agendas are likely to clash.

Agree0 Disagree0

Only Miller was willing to put money in. As he said, put up or shut up - TBK now silent.

Agree0 Disagree0

Why would they? Miller is in this for financial gain. Where he sees it is the big question. Neither really want rangers out of love.

Agree0 Disagree0

Well at least him and Murray kept Whyte out of his two free seats at the game last night.

Agree0 Disagree0

BM has paid(?) for exclusivity, unless deal falls apart for some reason, TBK cannot re enter the process.

Agree0 Disagree0

It's not over yet. If HMRC refuses to accept the sale of assets to newco then who knows but BK might be back in his "reluctant bidder" position.

Agree0 Disagree0

Bk he was never intrested m8,wer have u been lol PUBLICITY fae kennedy,im a celtic fan,yous have to give miller a chance"SIMPLES" theres no one else

Agree0 Disagree0

Kennedy is only in this for the publicity, then again, in the coming months he's going to get plenty of free pages from the bowler hat brigade, he was never going to get Rangers, now with everything else going on behind the scenes.. remember where you heard this first..

Agree0 Disagree0

I worked for HMRC and believe me they don't do walking away EVER ! They have finished lesser businesses than Rangers and for a lot less of a tax liability.

Agree0 Disagree0

Brian Kennedy had every opportunity to sort things out ages ago. He has played games, along with the "pathetic" IMO Blue Knights, possibly hoping at the end of the day, to be welcomed onto the new Rangers board. Paul Murray just on Sportsound sounding like a wounded animal, down crying what D n P have gone forward with. If they had been serious, why hadn't they come up with a better, more serious offer. Pathetic IMO.

Agree0 Disagree0

Only Miller was willing to put money in. As he said, put up or shut up - TBK now silent.

What money has Miller put up?

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2012 15:10:41
I can't believe all the negativity on this page, we have waited for long enough for this announcement and yet we're still not happy.

Bill Miller was never my preferred option but has come forward and acted so i say now we have to give the guy a chance and see what happens, we need to stand as one and get behnd this guy

Believable32 Unbelievable18

I read his plans, seems BRILLIANT to me is he does what he says. he also has the money and as he's american, can hopefully do what whyte failed doing in making us popular in america and selling merchandise/tv over there.

Agree0 Disagree0

Look there's a new Maister O' the Big Hoose. The previous two Maisters were terrible and brought the estate tae rack an ruin. This new guy from ?? Looks worse! He's starting off this venture with a crazy idea never done before and he doesn't know British corporate law.
He's never before done any business in the UK. This is all about control of the corpse of Rangers.

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree with your comment about negativity. Some people are never happy. Let's give Miller a chance. I checked out his company (Miller Industries) on Bloomberg and it has a market value of $178m. His idea of protecting the assets whilst appeasing the creditors sounds OK to me. At some future point the two can again become one. The sticking point as ever will be HRMC, Ticketus and our own SPL and FA!

Agree0 Disagree0

My main concern and I know its slight in the grand scheme of things but...why had Miller never took the time or effort to even come to Ibrox, never mind take in a match nor meet Ali and Co...I find that very strange...and worrying. Whats your thoughts bears?

Agree0 Disagree0

Everyone is acting like he's bought the club. All he has done is obtained exclusitivity for two weeks to look at the books and talk to creditors - nothing more. He could still walk away at any time.

Agree0 Disagree0

He stated that hes brining in people from america, england and SCOTLAND to help him with this mess, seems to me he knows rangers is to big for one person to deal with and is getting a task force together to tackle this mess, btw he said about getting these people in A friday (not that friday), at the time it was him speaking on friday to press, weekend spl/sfa and monday make a bid, but he left TBK to sort it out, thats where i know this

Agree0 Disagree0

This news means a NewCo, that is why people are not happen. Rangers is gone. 144 years down the pan. Up the Thistle.

Agree0 Disagree0

This is just another guy blowing wind in our sail until we are too far out too rescue. Do you honestly think that the SPL will bow to his demands? If they don't no deal if they do Watch FIFA come charging towards us.He is the preferred bidder because he is the only bidder, TBK had nothing to offer other than loyalty to the club Loyalty wont pay the kind of bills we owe. Preferred bidder does not equal buyer. His conditions can not be met and he won't even come to Scotland until he has that agreement. Looking Grim Guys.

Agree0 Disagree0

So being an American means he can deliver the American market. George Bush is American and I would let him deliver my papers.

Agree0 Disagree0

We were all pretty happy when Craig Whyte came along. And look what happened. Bill Miller could turn out to be another asset stripper. We know nothing at all about this man. As was the case with Whyte.

Agree0 Disagree0

I am amazed at how gullible rangers fans are here " we need to give the guy a chance " You are joking ! This guy is an asset stripper- full stop ! We'll meet again, don't know where, don't know when ....

Agree0 Disagree0

Brilliant piece about blowing wind in sails. !'ll use that some day and pretend its my own phrase.

Agree0 Disagree0

On BM website he is actually described, and I kid you not, as a WRECKER

Agree0 Disagree0

Checked out his company (Miller Industries) on Bloomberg and it has a market value of $178m.

so not quite enough to pay of the big tax bill

Agree0 Disagree0

"I can't believe all the negativity on this page, we have waited for long enough for this announcement and yet we're still not happy.

Bill Miller was never my preferred option but has come forward and acted so i say now we have to give the guy a chance and see what happens, we need to stand as one and get behnd this guy"

Isn't that what was being said when Mr. Whyte was begining his takeover?

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2012 14:07:40
Nobody posting on this site knows the ins and outs of the Miller deal.
The Administrators work for the Courts and are to look after the interest of the creditors.
They have found Miller's bid the best one.
There is no mention of liquidation. He's not even in the door and people are saying this and that and we are finished.
There will be more to come and is a long process.
There is a potential debt of around £120m, the spl decision, sfa appeal and the tax tribunal decision to come. And of course CW shares and the court action against Collyer Bristow to deal with and Ticketus issue. We also have the creditors and employees at RFC.
Yet this man has made a successfull bid for all of this. Think he is due a chance to see what he can do, nobody else came forward other than the TBK and BK.
Tims have said we were finished in Feb and every week thereafter. They extended that to the end of the season and July. Buckie fuelled posts of 'Liquidation is a cert' even with potential bidders.
Looks like we are stepping forward. But they will say it is the end blah blah blah and of course squeeze in the 'newco is liquidation' when the business world sees it different.
Lot more to come bears.

Believable11 Unbelievable20

Im a bear and i think it is over, i think you are delluded. you know nothing, as i know nothing! stop guessing! it doesnt help the situation saying positive when you dont know the truth either way
lord nelson

Agree0 Disagree0

The only thing still to come is misery, it's Like river city this is, boring but u can't stop watching, laughing and wondering what's next, in Lennon we trust

Agree0 Disagree0

You REEK of desperation mate!

Agree0 Disagree0

I think you will find that the Administrators have come out in their press conference and on the rangers website and said categorically that there is NO liquidation

Agree0 Disagree0

Well I'm a CEO in the business world, chartered accountant and MBA and no matter how pretty the paper you wrap this up with, you save the old rangers and history with a CVA. You liquidate and start again with a NewCo.

Agree0 Disagree0

What we do know is that bill miller has no emotional ties with rangers. He is a businessman. His attraction is to make a profit & by whichever mena possible. If that is thro asset stripping & sales to raise more than he has paid then it will be that way. If it is by running a football team to make profits & sell on, then that will be the method. which is more likely? I dont know.

Agree0 Disagree0

That's why it's called "Rangers Rumours" it gives people a chance to vent ideas and thoughts as well as the bull..it. That said, I have seen more integrity and honesty on this site than I have seen coming from the people who created this mess in the first place and that includes the ones who are supposedly trying to save the club

Agree0 Disagree0

What is being proposed is not a recognised route for exiting Administration under corporate and insolvency law. It has never been done before and D&P have already gone to the media with the options to exit Admin and this wasn't one of them.
It doesn't exist. Wake up they're leading us gradually to liquidation.

Agree0 Disagree0

My last boss tried this hybrid liquidation thing with his company with his brother buying the machines/factory/assets. our only creditor wee hector blocked it and it went t*ts up. too many deluded fans out there thinking all is now hunky dory. lets wait and see if the cva is accepted 11.2 million for 55 million i can see being accepted. 11.2 million for 134 million (depending who the source is) will never happen in a million years.

Agree0 Disagree0

If the original poster is happy to see dodgy celtic supporters, tucked up cosy with Bill miller and Andrew ellis, sitting in our directors box every second week then I'm afraid he must be delluded. The fan groups need to have a meeting with Miller to put him straight with this matter. Catweazle-talkingbone.

Agree0 Disagree0

It's a new co then. They can dress it up however they like but RFC is no more. I wont be supporting the new one. Partick Thistle for me next year.

Agree0 Disagree0

The Q is whether you can transfer history & assets & not debt. HMRC is watching.

Agree0 Disagree0

An accountant mate of mine has said that the "incubator" idea is incredibly risky and not normally recommended.

Agree0 Disagree0

Either way it's the same old song - run up the bills don't pay the debt.

I wish rangers well and this is not a partisan comment, I am always disgusted when any business tries to get out of paying its debts. I know the logic is that it protects jobs etc, but no-one seems to care about the jobs it can cost in the businesses that the company owes money to. And in the case of football clubs too many people seem to think that the debts should be cancelled because it is a community asset, frankly it makes me sick to the pit of my stomach!

Agree0 Disagree0

D&P have categorically stated that a CVA is not now possible, not enough time and not enough money to offer.
What paRt of that statement do folks not understand?

Agree0 Disagree0

Miller has obviously thought long and hard about this, he has visited ibrox on many occasions and spoke to manager and players,and enjoyed the atmososphere of a few games. em no he hasnt. stop deluding youreselves. its another DUD deal !!!!!!!! dd

Agree0 Disagree0

Difficult to see what is in this for Miller. Why risk any cash in such a chancy business and how can he asset strip? Even the biggest tow truck is not going to move Ibrox or MP and who could he find to buy them? How much money has he laid out for how much publicity?

Agree0 Disagree0

Difficult to see what is in this for Miller

Ibrox value as a stadium rented to a new co £20million with a return of about £1.5 to £ 4 million per year or £35million plus as a development site. Murrey park potential value if rezoned £30million + , Player sales £10 million + . Other assets £10 million (see we buy any gold).

All for £11.5million

What is the appeal?

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2012 13:58:29
Statement from D&P today:

Duff and Phelps, joint administrators of Rangers Football Club, issued the following statement today.

Paul Clark, joint administrator, said: "We would like to thank all parties for their efforts in seeking to submit bids which preserve the long history and success of the Club.

"We are delighted to announce that today we have received an unconditional bid for the business and assets of Rangers Football Club plc from Mr Bill Miller which has been accepted and he is now the preferred bidder. Mr Miller now proposes to complete his transaction by the end of the season.

"After many weeks of negotiation and deliberation we believe that the structure of the bid from Mr Miller provides not only the most deliverable outcome but preserves the history of the Club. Rangers Football Club will continue as the football club it has been for 140 years.

"Furthermore, Mr Miller and his team have sought clarity in relation to potential footballing sanctions and the place of Rangers Football Club plc within the Scottish Premier League. Significant progress has been made and discussions will continue throughout the period which Mr Miller now enjoys as preferred bidder.

"Very importantly, the bid also avoids the need for liquidation. All too often the term liquidation has been bandied about during the process without a clear understanding of what it actually means.

"Liquidation means selling off the assets of a business individually to raise cash and therefore bringing about the closure or winding up of that business. This has never been on the table from any party in any form. There is no liquidation involved in this strategy and we cannot stress that strongly enough.

"As we stated at the outset, one of the prime objectives of the administration was to achieve a CVA which would deliver a return to creditors. Mr Miller's bid meets this criteria.

"In recent weeks there has been much debate about Rangers exiting from administration through a stand-alone CVA. However, the barriers to a proposed stand-alone CVA are now too high.

"These barriers include, in particular, the absence of any bidder proposing unconditionally sufficient funds to enable a stand-alone CVA to take place.

"Crucially a stand-alone CVA would take so long now to effect, the Club could not survive in administration.

As a consequence, no party has been able to submit an unconditional bid in a stand-alone CVA scenario.

"We confirm that discussions with the two final bidding parties for the Club included the possibility, as part of the proposals, the formation of a new company in addition to the preservation of the Rangers Football Club plc.

"Mr Miller's proposal involves the use of a specially created newco in addition to the retention of the Rangers Football Club plc. The business and assets he proposes to purchase will be sheltered in a newco and returned to the plc once the plc has been 'cleaned up'.

"He sees this route as a necessity rather than a choice and in our view this is an entirely workable strategy. Indeed to ensure the continuing operation of the Club beyond the end of May it is in our view a very compelling strategy.

"For the avoidance of any doubt as administrators we can only accept ultimately an unconditional bid - and Mr Miller's proposal is the only unconditional bid we have received.

"The bid submitted by Mr Miller is substantially greater than any other proposal and provides the best return to creditors, a fundamental part of our duties as administrators. Importantly, the structure provides a stable platform through which new investment can be deployed to ensure that the Club thrives again in the future.

"The bid from Mr Miller creates the most suitable framework to deal with the issue of the majority shareholding in Rangers Football Club plc.

"Mr Miller will be making his own statement in due course and we can confirm that it is envisaged that the sale of the Club will be completed by the end of the current season.

"We hope fans will now support and appreciate the commitment made by Mr Miller. His approach has been consistent throughout the process and on two occasions he has stepped back from the fray to enable other parties to submit an unconditional bid.

"Mr Miller's proposal can provide the opportunity for the Club to return to success on and off the field. We have no doubt that the fans will continue to provide the tremendous support to the club necessary to continue the Club's long history of success and tradition.

"Despite the competitive nature of the bidding scenario, we are hopeful that now a bidder has been chosen for the Club, all parties involved in the process will act in the best interests of the Club by lending their full support to the prospective new owner. We expect to enter into a binding agreement very soon."

Believable11 Unbelievable21

We're screwed, he'll not walk away he'll run away when he see's the books and if the SFA don't hammer us UEFA will.

Agree0 Disagree0

How can the newco take the history and records etc from the old co? I am not following this at all. Newco but not liquidation? That doesn't make sense. Why start a newco then? {Ed022's Note - There is much confusion between fans because D+P has created it.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Has Miller said anything about transfer targets for the transfer windy. We need at least 3 new signings if we are gona compete next yr.
I'll by the new kit now i no were sorted out! Happy days!

Agree0 Disagree0

Doh, transfer embargo you muppet?

Agree0 Disagree0

New players? What about the transfer embargo?

Agree0 Disagree0

Hector fan....you can not sign any players over the age of 18....have you not been watching the news.

Agree0 Disagree0

It looks as though Miller has bought Rangers off E-Bay.Why does a business man for Tennessee, USA, with no connection to Rangers want to invest £11million in a Scottish football club with unimaginable debts? He has not even visited Glasgow to see what he is buying.Again the Scottish media seem to be nodding in agreement to everything that he says. Deja-vu! How can he make an unconditional bid when he does not know the sanctions the SFA/SFL and perhaps UEFA will impose? He does not know the result of the BTC. It all seems very dodgy.

Agree0 Disagree0

Gapping hole alert.....NO MENTION of what the plan is if there is NO CVA agreed?

Agree0 Disagree0

Cant believe the last poster....we need 3 new signings? your gonna loose a lot of players. Where`s the money to buy players? Sfa embargo still stands!

Agree0 Disagree0

You know that feeling you get on the roller coaster when you get to the top as it slowly reaches the highest part of the ride........thats where rangers are right now........hands in the air as the big drop comes weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Agree0 Disagree0

What happens with the players ? A CVA can't be done before the players wages go back up and they can walk away for nothing.

Agree0 Disagree0

This is pure magic, guys this is exactly what the dhims done under fergus - only difference is we are in admin they werent at the time ( so im sure thay wont have any complaints not one of them :) lol - im not so sure the players signed up to a deal which allowed them to walk or for that matter the admin guys allowing the clubs main source of revenue to walk free gratis more like a reduced fee if they do move, what will be interesting is if they stay contracted with the plc or move to the new incubator company. I know its not a done deal but a CVA will be agreed, its a no brainer either you accept CVA and get something or nadda under liquidation as i said no brainer take the cash, and im sure hmrc will enjoy another 139 years of rangers tax money;)
*** i really cant understand why so many dhims at my work are upset by this news ;), and also ED can you clarify that mondays meeting that was postponed by the spl is about sanctions to be put in place for future occurences of admin/liquidation and not new sanctions to be applied to rangers exclusivley? {Ed001's Note - that is correct, it is about setting rules in place for the future, not for one instance.}

Agree0 Disagree0

The only problem is HMRC have never agreed to a CVA before, I don't think they are going to start now!

Agree0 Disagree0

If the majority of creditors believe that they will get more by selling the assets than what is offered to them in a CVA they can have them all put up for sale. Then you / we can write a cheque and buy Ibrox

Agree0 Disagree0

No mention of Mr Whyte who owns 85.3% of the shares . Who owns Ibrox , Murray Park & the Albion car park? Has Whyte transferred ownership ?

Agree0 Disagree0

Can anyone explain what the term 'cleaned up' means.

Agree0 Disagree0

To 'This is pure magic' ' HMRC will enjoy another 139 years of Rangers tax money' I thought that the non-payment of tax was the fundamental problem - try a coffee.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2012 13:53:43
I think that we should be grateful that this guy is interested in buying our club, we should all get behind him, it has been said over and over again that our history remains , the time line is unbroken, the name is the same, the blue knights( real rangers men?) were NOT WILLING OR ABLE to come up with the cash and /or the ideas that were required, the only thing that worries me is the floating charge held by CW , if anyone out there can give me some info on this I would be very grateful

Believable11 Unbelievable6

Timeline has been broken as soon as the current RFC go into liquidation when a CVA cannot be agreed, which it wont and everyone knows it wont...end off

Agree0 Disagree0

There is NO liquidation for the current RFC holding out for a CVA however long it takes

Agree0 Disagree0

Never mind Craig white shares hmrc are owed at least 15 million and they won't accept a cva new legislation out this year if you do not pay you're tax you owe hmrc can liquidate you and sell you're assets for their money to be recouped

Agree0 Disagree0

Aye, no liquidation so CW gets to sell his shares to newco. Watch the money go round.

Agree0 Disagree0

Very disappointing for the Doomsayers I'm sure, but the adminstrators have achieved the best valuation they could get in the time - Deal is not signed yet, but D+P will have checked with the major creditors that the valuation is ballpark acceptable. Don't expect HMRC or ticketus to kick up a fuss over the CVA.

;)

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree

Agree0 Disagree0

HMRC confirmed tonight that no one has put any offer or inication of a dividend to them, so assumptions on that front are untrue.

Source BBC

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2012 13:10:45
Surely the events of today will serve as a lesson to all the people who post outright lies on here.

I've lost count of the number of times people have said "TBK to be anounced as preferred bidder today" and the like.

Please can people start posting actual rumours or opinions without stating that it is FACT?

BigBear1873

Believable26 Unbelievable11

Miller has only been given preferred bidder status to look over the books....nothing more at this time.
There is no word of what the plan is IF the business cannot get a CVA organized...
The club is not out of the woods....

Agree0 Disagree0

Just like to echo this statement, as with the england manager everyone had said its redknaps then the FA appoint Hodgson. So its a lesson to us all, never believe what is in the papers, as I always say wait until its been confirmed before speculating

Agree0 Disagree0

Okay how's this....you're liquidating.....real enough for you?

Agree0 Disagree0

Big billy will save us,daily record says multi billionair,watch us go.

Agree0 Disagree0

Daft question, but what is an "actual rumour". A rumour is a rumour you muppet - believe it or don't believe it, but never rely on it.

Agree0 Disagree0

I never mentioned anything about being out of the woods. My point is that people have been stating on here that TBK were to be named the preferred bidder "within 48 hours", "24 hours" early next week for the last few weeks among other untrue statements.

As the second poster said, wait until it's confirmed.

BigBear1873

Agree0 Disagree0

Big Bear its a RUMOUR site.....FACT

Agree0 Disagree0

An "actual rumour" is a rumour which has a foundation and not just picked out of thin air by some Buckfast filled numskull who clearly doesn't know anything about the situation to post a reasonable comment.

And to the third poster, how are we liquidating? Did you even hear the statement?

BigBear1873

Agree0 Disagree0

My worry about Miller is his accounts.

The last published accounts of his company said they had a turneover last year of £14M and that he was paid £1.4M . That doesn't sound to me like a man with the readies to save our club.

Hopefully the SFA will be once bitten twice shy and make sure they carry out a complete check on his fitness to run a football club!

Agree0 Disagree0

If we wait until it's confirmed, then it's not a rumour, it IS a fact... This is a site for people to express the news, gossip and odd bit of potentially factual information they heard on other forums, at the games or through their neighbours grannies dog walkers pet canary... If you want facts, check other sites, if you want rumours, come here.

Agree0 Disagree0

That canary you mention tweeted me this morning

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2012 13:00:01
This bill miller guy only worth 25 million according to one article. How's that meant to help Rangers! I now fear for liquidation.

Believable23 Unbelievable21

What...he's only worth a tenth of his company's turnover?! OMG!

Agree0 Disagree0

I've read 40m, but now thinking that's dollars and 25m is pounds. £1.00=$1.60 works out perfectly.

Agree0 Disagree0

Don't talk p***, TBKs couldn't even come anywhere near his bid, so what does that say about them?

Agree0 Disagree0

Potentially this is an investment opportunity for him.   If he manages to get the club back on track and  into europe etc he could sell it at a later date. However he is going to need deep pockets and good people around him. Other than that, if as you say he is only worth 25 million. 1) D&P should have done better due diligence 2) He is absolutely mad.   

 

Agree0 Disagree0

He owns one of the leading towing companies in USA how can he only be worth that

Agree0 Disagree0

His personal worth is irrelevant he will be risking very little and borrowing plenty. The debt will end up with Rangers 2012.

Agree0 Disagree0

You fear liquidation? Stand up and take a bow, you are officially the dimmest person on the planet.
Bill Miller stated his plan was to liquidate the club and you fear liquidation.

Duh!

Agree0 Disagree0

Whether it's £25M or £250M it's not going to be enough.

As somebody who lived in Canada for years, unless you have an owner who has very deep pockets, there is no will or motivation for them to invest in players.

Don't forget in North America you don't pay transfer fees, you 'trade', or signed on a contract basis.


I think that this move will not move very far at all I'm sorry to say. Look at Portsmouth, multiple owners over a season, I can see that happening, just to keep the team afloat.

Agree0 Disagree0

You can't expect people to keep plowing endless amounts of money into our club.

Rangers should be run like a business as it's this kind of attitude which got us into this mess.

Murray sank millions into the club and when he took his money away look what happened.

BigBear1873

Agree0 Disagree0

"Bill Miller stated his plan was to liquidate the club and you fear liquidation."
--

Inaccurate, and you have the cheek to question others intelligence. Obsessed.

Agree0 Disagree0

"Inaccurate, and you have the cheek to question others intelligence. Obsessed."

Wait and see smart ar#e. But please come back on here in a month when your beloved club are going through liquidation.

Agree0 Disagree0

Look Big Bear ...... just cos you dont have a time machine like some of the other bears and err non-bears on this site doesnt mean you need to take the huff! These guys are time travelling, alternative universing and quite possibly at times tripping to put these rumours up! Still, here's hoping this is the start of better things for all Bears. WATP. LB

Agree0 Disagree0

Doesnt matter what hes worth it is his backers who have the £££ He gets club on cheap takes all the toxicity out of it takes all the flak from fans then backers move in and he gets paid handsomely for it. Backers get toxic free debt free club on the cheap

Agree0 Disagree0

Bill Miller's company had sales last year of $412.7 million dollars. I don't know what that translates into in terms of personal wealth, but I would imagine it is significantly more than £25 million {Ed022's Note - Sales mean little with regards to providing an insight of wealth. Profit I'd say is a little more helpful.}

Agree0 Disagree0

"But please come back on here in a month when your beloved club are going through liquidation."
--

No problem, no doubt you'll still be here!

Agree0 Disagree0

"Inaccurate, and you have the cheek to question others intelligence. Obsessed."

Wait and see smart ar#e. But please come back on here in a month when your beloved club are going through liquidation


Your are a idiot, this is not the same person BTW, But he stated he does not want liqudation, ow wait I forgot, over there in the east end you get diffrent news from the rest of the world, go back to your own rumours page.

Agree0 Disagree0

Yeah i think hes buying with the intention to sell for a profit,fergus mccann like

Agree0 Disagree0

LB can you please explain which part of my statement suggests that I have taken the huff?

I merely replied to the post as you have. Are you taking the huff also?

BigBear1873

Agree0 Disagree0

"But please come back on here in a month when your beloved club are going through liquidation."
--

Will do, no doubt you will still be here. Obsessed.

Agree0 Disagree0

"Will do, no doubt you will still be here. Obsessed."

It'll be NEWCO RUMOURS in a month, will YOU still be here?

Agree0 Disagree0

He only has own 2.77% of 'his' company. he sold it years ago & simply runs it, nothing more so dont go looking at profits, turnover etc.

Agree0 Disagree0

Miller is another shyster. This pie in the sky is never going to happen.

Agree0 Disagree0

"It'll be NEWCO RUMOURS in a month, will YOU still be here?"
--

Always. Of that you can be absolutely positive.

Agree0 Disagree0

So the tic can run their club within their means but cos the guy who may buy rangers ain't a billionaire it won't work? Why can't rangers live within their means within a couple of years? No SPL club should rely on c league money or a sugar daddy. So he don't need to be super rich . Give him a chance.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2012 12:49:07
Rangers Football Club will not be liquidated, thus saving the 140 year history of the club.

Finally some good news!

CC

Believable16 Unbelievable29

You dont honestly believe Duffer and Duffer do you?. Oh dear! ha

Agree0 Disagree0

The "club", whatever that means legally, will be sold to newco. The company currently administered by D&P will be liquidated.

Agree0 Disagree0

Youv got to read between the lines of the news...this guy has no wealth to save rangers...he is hoping that hmrc and ticketus accept cva...if this was all that good regarding miller they would have accepted ages ago...i fear its the end this only to please fans...the sfa,spl,uefa etc will still want to punish rangers because no matter how much you juggle things its a newco and like the tax and vat and other debts miller is bending the rules with other peoples money and assets

Agree0 Disagree0

They said liquidation would not happen, they didnt say a newco would not happen which it will.

They are completely different and the history of the club will be transferred and maintained in the newco club just like what happened with Leeds, Plymouth, Crystal Palace and Fiorentina. Sorry to disappoint timmys, but that really is FACT!

Agree0 Disagree0

If you believe that you're a bigger idiot than Craig Whyte.
Craig Whyte has to agree to the CVA under the old company.HMRC and Ticketus have to agree to the meagre amount presented to them. If it's better than nothing they might agree but still a big ? hanging over it. Anyway Craig Whyte as always is the worry here. No one has clarified what his position is.From previous experience he'll dig his heels in if he doesn't get what he wants. Liquidation still most likely outcome!No going back to old company in my opinion. This is all just to ease you into the situation without you cracking up further than you all already have done.

Agree0 Disagree0

Long way to go yet - don't build your hopes up!

Agree0 Disagree0

To the above post....absolute garbage....away back to kerryfail fail street ya daftie.

Agree0 Disagree0

HMRC have had their top three executives sacked for doing CVAs. It's no longer possible, no more pennies in pound sweetheart deals. Ticketus will not do CVA and demand £24.5m.
UEFA have 3 years no euro football for CVA and liquidation. Also huge penalties for 2 contracts and EBTs.
No history can be moved between companies. It's impossible. It's just to placate fans until they get used to Newco without history.

Agree0 Disagree0

Miller smells a profit somewhere, he's not doing this out of love of Rangers.
I think he's going along with this for a month, without putting in £500k.

Agree0 Disagree0

This is a ruse to placate mental fans.
Just ask if he paid £500k unconditionally.
It's liquidation and no history for sure.

Agree0 Disagree0

I think you will find that in the eyes of UEFA you CAN transfer history, titles etc to a newco club. And I am sure their decision is worth a lot more than your opinion

Agree0 Disagree0

Administrators say has paid the 500K as of today and it is an unconditional bid as he has held "very constructive" talks with the SPL and SFA yesterday and tuesday.

Is that conspiracy theories I can hear?

Agree0 Disagree0

Sly sports and others are saying bill miller will not liquidate, but i have heard from many people that that is exactly what he intends to do. i mean if this guy was really keen on buying gers then surely to goodness he would at least have had the decency to get the first flight over and conduct his business. l for one are still worried, bill miller, who knows anything about this guy and i doubt he has the muscle to invest in the team!

Agree0 Disagree0

There at least 2 huge barriers to prevent the history being lost;

1. Obtaining the shares in the OriginalCo from CW.
2. OriginalCo exiting administration via a CVA

Agree0 Disagree0

Some corrective points:
UEFA do not recognise history moving to Newco corporate entities.
D&P have nowhere in statements that he has paid £500k non returnable.
His bid IS unconditional, so no pulling out on UEFA, SFA and SPL sanctions.

Agree0 Disagree0

People bandy about a newco....there aint such a thing as a newco its been invented to give these people a chance to vote rangers back into the Spl to line there own pockets The current SPL Board is made up of Ralph Topping (SPL Chairman), Neil Doncaster (SPL Chief Executive), Eric Riley (Celtic FC), Stephen Thompson (Dundee United FC), Derek Weir (Motherwell FC) and Steven Brown (St Johnstone FC). {Ed014's Note - Ralph Topping has stood down.

Agree0 Disagree0

Re 2 huge barriers

1 - easy, it's part of the plan. Money left in oldco will be used to pay off CW. Sure, there should be none after the CVA but I bet there will be.

2 - yes, this is the snag. HMRC may insist on liquidation as it means they get a share of ALL the money not just what D&P offer on the CVA.

Agree0 Disagree0

Cant see HMRC taking a CVA. Big money is owed by clubs in EPL who also misused EBTs. If the do a deal with RFC they need to do deals with EPL clubs. Sets a very dangerous precedent

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2012 11:56:07
i was one of the fans backing tbk - but i say lets give miller a chance-craig whyte was given a chance...multiple chances in fact.

Does anyone know what miller is worth?

Good luck to Stuart Mccall and motherwell in the champions league qualifiers theyve done a great job down there - atleast it wont be dundee utd lol

ryanrfc

Believable19 Unbelievable16

Don't think we have a choice but to give him a chance Ryan mate :(
PaulRFC

Agree0 Disagree0

Bill millers worth is irrelevenat - he is running this as a company , not with his own cash

Agree0 Disagree0

Welcome Rangers 2012...no history...no european football for three years....no where to go but up.

Celtic now the club with the best performance record still in business in the world.

Wonder what the Hectors will be signing on Saturday.

Agree0 Disagree0

"Septic" is Cockney slang from "Septic Tank" for "Yank" and is an insulting way of alluding to our ex colonists. Maybe the Bears will coin a new term for Celtic. "Worthy" for "Worthy Champs" -worth a try.

Agree0 Disagree0

Agreed. I've cheered up already ;

Stuart Mccall and Motherwell. Congratulations on the Champions League place next year from me too. No Rangers next year, so I'll be routing for you.

;)

Oh no, green jedi will be round in a minute trying to pour cold water on everything with his dour predictions of disaster.

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree, give Miller a chance. Personally, I wanted the Blue Knights/Brian Kennedy bid.

Miller now has access to the books for two weeks, due diligance to be performed by both parties during this time.

I wonder what the TBK/BK consortium will be feeling now.

I just hope this is a positive move.

Agree0 Disagree0

As a Celtic Fan I wish you well but take a look at this guys history and dont have selective reading i honestly believe he is in the mould as CW hope im wrong but thats my opinion

Agree0 Disagree0

I wish tbk got the preferred bidder,i dont trust mr miller one bit and he has not a clue about scottish football imstill afraid for gers with this guy

Agree0 Disagree0

His company is worth around $200 million

Agree0 Disagree0

Around 40M

Agree0 Disagree0

Personal Wealth of around $40 million. Company profits steadily falling and needs cash from some where...Another CW by all accounts.

Agree0 Disagree0

Please I said dont have selective reading this guy has been dumping shares in his OWN company also his son who is president is doing exactly the same take a lok at the NYSE

Agree0 Disagree0

We have an illustrious history thank you. Long may it continue.

Agree0 Disagree0

To the third poster - Did you see the press conference? We aren't being liquidated and we still have our history.

BigBear1873

Agree0 Disagree0

BigBear: did you see Whyte's arrival? Warchests ring a bell?

Agree0 Disagree0

What about "worthy champs in their own mind", or "Worthy could have won it being managed by my pet dug given total disarray of our only real competitor ,champs"...4 years, millions of pounds spent, more players than at any Superbowl final,demoralised and burned out sole competitor, and you finally won it....well done...hopefully circumstances will be as kind when you embark on your, er, epic European journey.

Agree0 Disagree0

Why is everyone frightened of the word "liquidation"? Newco means liquidation of oldco, be sure of that. The question is - what will be sold to newco? For £11m not much. I don't see BM's bid as sustainable I'm afraid. Might be the best offer on the table for creditors but I also think BM has spotted some corporate magic like CW had and will make money out of this and not from winning competitions. Why would someone worth £40m buy a club for £11m in a country a long way away? Answer - to make a quick buck.

Agree0 Disagree0

He only has a 3% shareholding in his company.

Agree0 Disagree0

The Q is whether you can simply transfer history & assets & not the debts - HMRC watching closely.

Agree0 Disagree0

Torre Andre Flo cost 12 Million

Agree0 Disagree0

He's only ever heard of or seen Rangers play on You Tube. He was sent the link by his agent when the opportunity to buy first arose.

Agree0 Disagree0

Hectors what part of newco do you not understand means new Rangers....new application to the sfa...new application to eufa....Do you peasants think your creditors are going to just stand by and be screwed....grow up this is the end....you are getting a short term coat of paint on a wall that is full of cracks and about ready to fall down.....If you think this guy is the saviour of Rangers then you are bigger fools than I thought you were.

Agree0 Disagree0

To BigBear1873

Liquidation means the selling of assets inc players, stadium, training facilities etc etc.

Mr Millers plan is to transfer these assets to a Newco (we shall call them Rangers 2012 for now) while he tries to resolve the debt issue with Rangers in their current guise. Should the debt issues be resolved he would then transfer all these assets back. However, Rangers current playing staff would be under no obligation to join this newco (as confirmed by the SPFA and SPL) which means either the players would be sold off on mass to recoup some of the monies owed, some players could have their contracts 'ripped up' meaning they are free to seek pastures new. I imagine some player would sign a contract for this newco but i wouldn't hold out much hope on the better players ie. Davis, McGregor taking this route.

Agree0 Disagree0

Why all the negativity about BM? Miller has put his money up while TBK have talked a good game but nothing else - if they really wanted (or had the money) to 'save' Rangers they would have done so weeks ago. Give Miller a chance, he might be another con man like CW but we're not in a position to pick and choose. As for all this crap about losing our history - history is in the past and will never be lost or altered - and the future will only create more history. WATP. {Ed022's Note - History will never be lost, as I found out when my girlfriend went through my deleted 'fetish folder'.}

Agree0 Disagree0

"Do you peasants think your creditors are going to just stand by and be screwed"

Do all fans of other clubs in the SPL have depressing personalities? If it's not your club why do you care? You all seemed quite joyous when you thought Rangers was dying - going to have a party if I remember correctly.

Now you're all upset because it doesn't look as though it's going to happen and you're faux worried about OUR future!

Please, take it somewhere else!

Agree0 Disagree0

To be bought by one asset stripper is a mistake, to be bought by a second one is just careless.........

Agree0 Disagree0

According to Bloomberg.com Miller Industries has a market capitlisation value of £178m US$. Turnover in 2011 was over $300m with net income (profit) of $22m. They seem to have good cashflow and assets. I'm no accountant but it looks good. Question is how much of his cash will Miller want to put into Rangers for the future?
Check out the link:

http://www.bloomberg.com/quote/MLR:US/

Agree0 Disagree0

What about 'Deluded Fools' ?

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2012 11:42:19
Rangers to retire the number 12 shirt in honour of the fans. Sky Sports.

Believable18 Unbelievable18

Is the best they can do ? surely a (very) lame PR stunt to placate the fans who are not keen on the Newco. Are Bill Millers's / Duff & Phelps PR men so out of touch as to believe Fans will buy this?

Agree0 Disagree0

Liquidation to retire the 1 - 11 shirts

Agree0 Disagree0

Maybe they wont have enough players to need a number 12

Agree0 Disagree0

What a random gesture! Do they not have other things to be worrying about just now besides retiring shirt numbers? I think it would be a nice touch...in time, when things have hopefully turned around or even settled down but it just seems weird timing.

Agree0 Disagree0

Whats wallace changing to then?

Agree0 Disagree0

Rangers wont exist in 4 weeks time. I for one wont be supporting any new co . No matter how the tart it up rangers is dead anything new is just an ego trip for the new owner and a way of getting us top part with our cash. The debts should be paid and if not, forget it.

Agree0 Disagree0

Rangers to retire the number 12 shirt in honour of the referees

Agree0 Disagree0

Aberdeen did this a few years ago.

1903

Agree0 Disagree0

The third division don't play with squad numbers.........what a nonsense

Agree0 Disagree0

Very fitting. Lee Wallace and Bob Malcom are Scottish Football Legends

Agree0 Disagree0

It's a gesture. Good on em. Let's wait for the obsessed to arrive and rubbish the idea. You know what they're like.

Agree0 Disagree0

How much money has that just cost use? they are raking in the cash sitting on their arses and laffing

Agree0 Disagree0

If he goes with a newco that will be me finished it will never be the same

Agree0 Disagree0

Is this so fans can have RFC 12 on the back of their shirts? How appropriate if there has to be a new name.

Agree0 Disagree0

In honour of fans, today of all days. Placate us and shut us up or what?
Did he pay £500k just tell us please!

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2012 11:26:38
The administrators for Rangers
Football Club chose American businessman Bill Miller as the
preferred bidder for the Glasgow soccer team.
Rangers, which has won a record 54 Scottish titles, went
into administration, a form of bankruptcy, in February as U.K.
tax authorities chased the team over unpaid bills.
“Mr. Miller now proposes to complete his transaction by
the end of the season,” administrators Duff & Phelps said in a
statement on Rangers website.
Miller is founder of Miller Industries, a towing equipment
company based in Tennessee.

For Related News and Information:

Believable10 Unbelievable9

Bill Miller named as Preferred Bidder.
We have plenty of chapters to suffer yet before this epic is complete.

Agree0 Disagree0

He is the reaper beware bears

Agree0 Disagree0

Its "miller time".....

Agree0 Disagree0

Good luck your going to need it google this character

Agree0 Disagree0

Right okay could be a good day after all. just read the bbc website all assets transfer across to this "newco". how do we get rid of mr whyte's floating charge or whatever it is over these assets?? every duff and duffer statment just has too many unanswered questions after it

Agree0 Disagree0

No reason to get excited. He is the preferred bidder. That IS IT at the moment

It doesn't mean the transaction will happen. The creditors have to agree to it.

And, its a big stretch of the imagination that they will.

Agree0 Disagree0

Oh well. What will be will be. We'll give him a chance. Not many other options. Positive news always welcome.

Agree0 Disagree0

Creditors probably don't have much choice. The club could be liquidated and the assets (mostly the two main properties) sold and would raise...what? As much as £11.2m? The club could in theory be sold separately but it would need a ground etc, which could be leased from a new Ibrox owner. But all of that would need a new club structure with uncertain returns (after costs of renting Ibrox, players' wages and any fines the SFA might demand for being allowed back into the fold again). A fan-run club would be the best solution under a liquidation scenario. Can't see a Paul Murray or Bill Miller type wanting to take over a club with no assets.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2012 11:15:29
Rangers confirm that American businessman Bill Miller has been granted preferred bidder status by the club administrators Duff and Phelps. The club are due to hold a press conference at 1200 BST.
BBC

Believable10 Unbelievable4

We there we have it fellow bluenoses. The yank has the whip hand noo. I've not got a good feeling about this at all.

Why does he want Rangers?
Why wont he explain what hes goin to do?
Why wont he even visit Scotland?

There are mere questions than answers.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2012 11:10:43
Bill Miller named preferred bidder. Sky Sports!

Believable11 Unbelievable5

Thanks for the memories Bears. Its been a great battle. Sorry to see you go.

Timmy.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2012 10:51:54
Daily Record reporting on twitter that rangers staff have been called to Ibrox for an 11am meeting where it is expected that Bill Miller will be named as the preferred bidder. Don't trust this guy one bit the fact he cant even get on a plane a come over says it all!

Gers1986

Believable17 Unbelievable13

Bill Miller named as Preferred Bidder by D & P - Sky Sports News

Agree0 Disagree0

Just been announced. Its Bill Miller. Lets give him a chance, we have no other option anyway.

Agree0 Disagree0

Miller may be the preferred bidder but he will not get the deal through, its a mess.

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm not sure about him either but you can't really criticise him for not flying over with all the delays that have gone on. If he pulls out we are in even bigger trouble. Tbk don't appear to have the cash so what happens if neither follow up interest? I dread to think.

Agree0 Disagree0

Sad day for rangers. Says it all he cant even come over to Glasgow. Were fecked now!

Agree0 Disagree0

Bill Miller has now officially been named as Preferred Bidder by Duff and Phelps.

Agree0 Disagree0

Confirmed on Sky Sports TV & Website - Bill M confimed as preferred bidder, like it or not.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ok, so TBK & BK bid hasn't been accepted. I'm sure the reasoning will be relayed by D&P soon enough. They were my preference from Day 1, but we have to give BM his opportunity to pull our club through (if possible) from this mess. I'm still confused by all this "Hybrid" mumbo jumbo. But as Ally said...if we wear blue and play at Ibrox, we are still Rangers! Let's get behind the man and give him our support. Welcome him into the "family". WATP!

Agree0 Disagree0

And how do you know that he hasn`t been over?

Agree0 Disagree0

It's been confirmed now. Preferred bidder and bid is unconditional

Agree0 Disagree0

"Sad day for rangers. Says it all he cant even come over to Glasgow. Were fecked now!"
--

Stay strong, could it have been any worse? Things need to move forward one way or another. Yes I trust Kennedy and Murray more, but Miller is prepared to put up the money where many other haven't. Interesting point is that he can move Gers forward without owning CW shares.

Agree0 Disagree0

Still has to deal with Craig whyte. He also doesn't have the financial muscle to invest the amounts of money needed here.

Agree0 Disagree0

Farewell Bears, its been emotional.

Timmy

Agree0 Disagree0

Best news in a while glad the Gladys Nights did`nt get us... hopeless the lot of em.

Agree0 Disagree0

What a lot of negative rubbish! give the man a chance or show me the alternative! SG

Agree0 Disagree0

Give the man a chance he can produce the best chance of getting us out this mess and we can flourish for years to come

Agree0 Disagree0

"Don't trust this guy one bit the fact he cant even get on a plane a come over says it all!"

Well if you don't trust him then hell we all better accept your judgement of a guy you know nothing about eh lol.
You know for sure he's never been over at Ibrox?
At least he's willing put more money in that anybody else, so give the guy a chance as i will appreciate anything he can do to save our great club. So lets all get behind him and sort our club out together.
WATP

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2012 08:57:05
Miller failed to transfer £500k deposit yesterday as he has now wants it to be refundable in event he receives negative reaction to the sale from the fans.

Believable11 Unbelievable14

I think Duff and Phelps will negotiate this fee. It is not a mandatory requirement by law. It is simply a payment to Duff and Phelps to keep the club going till the start of the new season as there will be no ticket income over the summer.

Agree0 Disagree0

You know TBK will now follow suit and this will roll on & on & on etc etc etc

Agree0 Disagree0

What a time waster we need people who can save us pronto

Agree0 Disagree0

There is someting not right about this mans intentions or his bid.

Anorak.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2012 02:33:52
Bill miller 80% cert to be announced as preferred bidder today as they delayed yesterday for some odd reason

Believable9 Unbelievable9

Probably because we were playing @ home last night and they didn't want any protests from fans if he is made preffered bidder

Agree0 Disagree0

Thats an odd % . Where did that come from. You usually hear 0f either 50% or 99% but 80% ? just sounds odd to me.

Agree0 Disagree0

Was delayed yesterday because he wouldn't transfer the £500k non refundable deposit. Has asked D&P to make it refundable should be meet resistance from the fans on the sale.

Agree0 Disagree0

Was wondering who would be the first with this one today.
"Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow." - Shakespear.
Al

Agree0 Disagree0

80% CERT.
What you on about ?
A cert is 100%, not 80%..
Nothing is a cert in this circus merry-go-round.
The ony thing a cert is LIQUIDATION!!

Agree0 Disagree0

"Was wondering who would be the first with this one today."
----

Mmmmmh. Let's have the next comment then.... Yes but you'll lose your history... Blah, Blah, Blah.

Obsessed indeed.

Agree0 Disagree0

WELL WELL WELL as jeremy kyle says....he was telling the truth....it IS Bill Miller

Agree0 Disagree0

Not obsessed, but I do have a healthy interest as it has implications for all of Scottish football.
Al

Agree0 Disagree0

02 May 2012 23:42:04
thought big bartley had a cracking game toinhgt playing in a back 3, not been his biggest fan this season but thought the back 3 were awesome big carlos organising everything goian solid in the air and bartley was solid in the tackle. wonder if he will keep the same formation against motherwell.
B

Believable36 Unbelievable21

I said at the beginning of the season I would like to see Rangers play a 3-5-2 and both times I've seen them play it they've been quite impressive.

I really hope this becomes a preferred formation from now on.

BigBear1873

Agree0 Disagree0

Sure he did! would you not play you heart out if on sale! I know they say they are playing for the fans, but let's be honest Ibrox is a shop window at the moment!

Agree0 Disagree0

They wont be there next year....we need to get used to this and the mentality were will be back even better with 3 years. 10 at best

Agree0 Disagree0

Rangers r a far better team when little doesn't start, let's, b honest he's no we're good enuf for rangers

Agree0 Disagree0

Funny they chaged to a 3-5-2 four days after Celtic pasted them using the same system. Celtic dont own that formation, im just pointing out the irony.

Agree0 Disagree0

They played the same formation in the 3-2 game did they not ed?

BigBear1873 {Ed001's Note - I think so, my memory isn't the best though.}

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent