Rangers Rumours Archive July 03 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


03 Jul 2012 20:06:12
Scottish FA will block any move to accept newco Rangers into SPL

03 July 2012 17:32 BST

Scottish FA chief executive Stewart Regan. Pic: ©SNS Group
The Scottish Football Association will block any attempt to include Charles Green’s Rangers newco in the Scottish Premier League for the 2012/13 campaign, according to Stewart Regan.

The chief executive of Scottish football’s governing body made the statement as he addressed the member clubs of the Scottish Football League at a meeting on Tuesday.

Sides in the SPL will vote on Wednesday over whether to approve the transfer of Rangers’ member share of the league to Green’s new company.

An 8-4 majority is required to ratify such a move, but seven clubs have already stated they will vote no.

The businessman though remains confident that some club chairmen will change their minds at the last minute and allow his team to participate in the top flight.

Should he fail, SFL clubs will vote on proposals to include a newco Rangers in the First Division, instead of having an application process for them to potentially join Division Three, next Thursday.

When asked if Regan had stated during his address to SFL representatives that the Scottish FA would stand in the way of newco Rangers playing in the SPL, Livingston chairman Gordon McDougall remarked: “In his opinion, yes”.

Despite McDougall's confirmation, Regan responded saying he did not say the Scottish FA would intervene.

"The Scottish FA was invited to participate in today’s meeting of the Scottish Football League’s members at Hampden Park.

"During a positive and productive meeting, a number of detailed scenarios were discussed regarding the future status of Rangers FC as a newco club.

"Unfortunately, a comment relating to one potential scenario - Rangers FC’s readmission to the SPL - was distorted, taken out of context and leaked to the media by a member.

"For the avoidance of doubt, any decision regarding the future status of Rangers FC requires not only the transfer of the SPL share but the transfer of the Scottish FA’s membership.

"The Scottish FA Board will approve this only when all relevant information has been provided and the directors are satisfied that the solution presented is in the best interests of Scottish football."

Believable11 Unbelievable11

100% division 3 for me, nothing else will be acceptable, we will be back stronger and better as we watch the rest of the SPL die.

Agree28 Disagree18

This is Regan trying a trick to get Rangers into SPL on Wednesday.
Hoping Chairman will think they can vote YES but Rangers won't get in because SFA won't let them. What a con.

SPL chairmen have to vote NO.

Regan will let them in otherwise.

Agree6 Disagree4

Well the vote was going against Newco anyway so its safe for the SFA to take a position now.

Agree6 Disagree0

If you watch the SPL die , where are you coming back strong to

Agree14 Disagree3

If i cant play your not getting my ball stop your crying and deal with it . you broke the rules and you must have penalties {Ed039's Note - Nobody is debating that)

Agree12 Disagree1

SPL maight not even vote today, acording to Doncaster. What a mess.

Agree0 Disagree1

I don't believe this it's an SFA/ Regan ploy to get them to vote yes thinking he'll not allow rangers into SPL then he will allow it.
Regan also saying this morning that vote might be delayed until after SFL vote. Nonsense from this guy. SPL cannot change its vote now no matter howsfl vote.

Agree1 Disagree0

Nobody is debating anything... where have all the posters gone? {Ed039's Note - There are plenty of posts and posters, just look, are you blind?)

Agree2 Disagree0

The headline and the story dont match, some guy from livingston says that was his opinion of what what he thought regan said and regan says thats not what he said, all bulls#it

JG

Agree1 Disagree1

God help us if we are waiting on Doncaster making a decision. I've never heard anyone talk so much without saying anything. It'll be another meeting and another meeting and.....

Agree2 Disagree0

03 Jul 2012 17:36:26
Besiktas make move for Steven Davis as talks continue with Allan McGregor

03 July 2012 17:08 BST

Steven Davis is on the lookout for a new club after refusing to join newco Rangers in June. Pic: ©SNS Group
Steven Davis has received an offer from Besiktas to join them on a free transfer and he could be joined by his former Rangers team-mate Allan McGregor.

STV understands the Turkish side are in talks with the goalkeeper, having already made their move to try and land former Ibrox captain Davis.

Both players declined to have their contracts transferred to Charles Green’s new company after moves were made to put their previous employers, The Rangers Football Club Ltd, into liquidation following the rejection of a CVA.

Believable18 Unbelievable5

03 Jul 2012 13:42:22
sure i heard somewhere that Kevin Kyle had expressed an interest in coming.if we can keep him fit think he,s a good big striker who would do a job.I f we can get black as well then think it would be a good peice of business.We are able to sign players now as its to replace outgoing players,obviously no movement as we dont know where we are playing yet.would love to see Boccanegra committing. {Ed039's Note - Keeping Kevin Kyle fit? I dont think Charles Green knows a miracle worker, otherwise the oldco wouldnt have been liquidated)

Believable14 Unbelievable32

It's a good strategy. Gretna did well by signing players at the end of their careers or otherwise unable to secure long term contracts elsewhere. (Until their money ran out, that is).

Agree3 Disagree1

If the ban stands u can only replace players with free transfers and players must be under 18 {Ed039's Note - Free transfers would not even be permitted. It would be under 18s only as per the original decision)

Agree3 Disagree2

For goodness sake the man cant even get a proper bank account or a decent bank the ruddy Metro back in London dosnt count good lord.

Agree5 Disagree2

Boca will leave, he has a world cup in Brazil to think about and playing 3rd division won't see him get there, we don't need him for 3rd division anyway, Perry and broadfoot would coast that league.

Agree4 Disagree3

A decent bank ? You mean like Barclays or Rbs !!!

Agree6 Disagree1

Sunderland fan here,kkyle an absolute brute in the air,but hes got 2 left feet,if you need a bruiser though hes yer man.tk73

Agree6 Disagree2

03 Jul 2012 13:21:03
SFA will not allow RFC Newco into spl says Stewart Regan.

Source: Jim Spence twitter while at todays meeting

Believable41 Unbelievable19

So why bother to have a vote then? more shi*e from spence?

Agree2 Disagree7

That's to stop the vote which is already decided anyway and thus stop fans boycotting teams.

Agree1 Disagree2

Which would then beg the question if the SFA have no intention of letting gers in, why have the other clubs vote , since it wouldn't matter what way they vote they wouldn't be admitted.

Agree1 Disagree1

Heard SPL are voting to never allow Newco into the SPL. {Ed039's Note - So why are they having a meeting to allow their members to vote tomorrow then? What a load of tosh. If this was the case then they would have made a decision during their discussions a while back instead of saying we will let our members vote)

Agree0 Disagree0

The only sensible thing he has said in weeks when is he prepared to go the full road and impose all penalties/sanctions that they so deserve if he doesn't the SFA, SPL,SFL will have lost all credibility so I defy any fans of all clubs not just RFC Newco don't buy season books until this Ogilvie,Doncaster, Regan are booted out, if it was any other club the decision would have been done a long time ago.

Agree3 Disagree3

All this moral nonsense doesn't wash, our game without rangers will be a lesser league than the irish division. for the sake of scottish football keep them in spl and take punishments accordingly.

Agree1 Disagree5

I presume the "never" post was a troll. For weeks I've been wanting SFL3 but now I'm thinking SPL with penalties along the lines of CG's alleged proposition is fairer.

I think a club should be allowed to play at its natural level otherwise it's unfair on the other teams in its division. The penalties need to limit the chance of the punished club actually winning its division and maybe even fighting for survival (as per Dundee).

Agree3 Disagree5

There are no such things as trolls on here as this website is for all I assume given its easy accessibility? {Ed039's Note - Website is available for all, except those banned and posts are reviewed before posting)

Agree0 Disagree0

That depends whether you are talking about oldco's natural level or the new? Given we are only left with the newco with no players, money, embargos etc etc, etc maybe the third is a more realistic level. Have you also considered the potential damage to the SPL or SFL if fans continue to refuse to back CG and you are back in administration within a matter of weeks? You no longer have a natural level my friend as we don't even know who you are yet! This talk of what you bring to the game in terms of finance is historical, can’t you see that? You, me, Ed, no one knows what type of money this newco can generate. Talk of 40k season ticket holders is also historical! Rangers are no longer that rangers can't you get that?

Agree2 Disagree6

I get the feeling (not to mention time running out) that this is all heading to a 12 month suspension for newco. Gives the SFA/SPL/SFL time to re-structure the whole game up here properly and then to ask for new applications to whatever setup they come up with.

Agree2 Disagree1

Regan @ Doncaster have handled a difficult situation very badly (amateurs). The SFA @ SPL must join together and decide the way forward with all clubs. Scottish football will cease to exist if Regan @ Doncaster proceed.
Sporadic meetings which decide nothing, individual sanctions from the SFA, then the SPL, then the SFA again etc, etc. Please get a grip for the sake of football in Scotland.
Other FA's support there member teams for the overall good of the association, not self destruction to save face or be seen to do the right thing for every individual. Please do the right thing for the overall football in this country. Forget individual clubs, individual fans and think of the big picture

Agree0 Disagree0

OK I use the word "troll" to describe someone who deliberately posts nonsense in order to wind up people enough so that they reply. Unless anyone else has an explanation for that post?

Agree0 Disagree0

The article is on STV site now. A bit convoluted, really. The message has come via the Livi chairman who said it was "his opinion" that's what Regan meant.

SFA has not commented.

Agree1 Disagree1

The Irish league is fair, open and competitive. I could settle for that

Agree2 Disagree4

Correct me if Im wrong but without a massive budget to attract key players, with a depleted side how competitive would the Newco be even if admitted to the SPL

Agree4 Disagree0

No matter where Rangers end up it would be nice if there was some merit in us being there and the only way that that can happen is to apply to the lower league division three. To be simply forced into somewhere else for the sake of SKY would be even more humiliation for Gers fans the Club would be the only Club there without merit and no matter how long we are there nor how successful it will all be unmerited.

Agree4 Disagree1

Yes, SFA 'll not allow Rangers to play in their lower leagues. So they'll play in SPL saving the other clubs in financial troubles

Agree0 Disagree3

They should be allowed to play at their natural level as it's unfair for other teams in the league?? Jeezo what type of players do you think you will get? Believe me if rangers go to division 3 it won't be a stroll as they will have sanctions etc and not to mention running costs. It won't be straightforward case of winning the league every year till they get back into the spl

Agree3 Disagree2

Is that just hear say as im sure he would prefer his beloved dundee to get in instead of us?

Agree0 Disagree0

I can't see how SFA can stop Rangers going into SPL.

Agree1 Disagree1

They're voting cause that's the rules and the decision has to be documented for audit purposes and any future legal action from any party involved or effected. SFA can veto as they still issue, monitor and administrate a club's licence to play in the SPL. Covering their ass incase UEFA, who ultimately call the shots, step in and fry them..

Agree0 Disagree0

Dounds like thet are not voting. SPL and SFA - what a shambles.

Agree0 Disagree0

What a circus. the sfa and spl are a joke. No europe for 3 years so lets juat drop to div 3 and play the youth.

Agree3 Disagree0

03 Jul 2012 12:56:35
Stranraer and Stirling Albion come out against allowing the Newco Rangers club into the SFL.
Source DR

Believable25 Unbelievable12

Is there anywhere Rangers can go, no one seems to want them, I can't understand it why are we so hated, Rangers will always bring money to ground which in turn means the said teams finances are in better shape, it's a no brainer, I just can't see their logic

Agree13 Disagree5

Not suprised by Stranraer as Rangers tried to put them out of business in the 60s, What goes around comes around boys. Junior Leagues West?

Agree3 Disagree5

Re above post. Logic: there isn't a logic because other fans are sick of just that kind of arrogance you have shown. They don't want a team which hasn't paid any of its debts and which has apparently broken all the SFA rules of fair contract play, including making extra payments, all untaxed. its called integrity - nothing to do with logic. I agree with other postings, there is no likelihood of there ever being 40 thousand season ticket holders and similar travelling support again, for some time, if ever. So even if there was any 'logic' it would be that the natural level for this newly formed club is the Third div. Or qualifiying process to get into the League as a new-start company. Basically just a new team. Someone should maybe just set up a blue shirted team and see who turns up to watch it. It shouldn't be any less true than a Sevco. jmac

Agree3 Disagree3

@ poster of first reply. Your reasoning is exactly why these particular clubs are saying no to the First Division. It is nothing to do with sporting integrity or following the rules (which don't actually exist within the SPL anyway): THEY will miss out on the revenue if Rangers do end up in either the SPL or Div1. They all want us, or more precisely our cash, (the clubs - NOT their fans) but aren't overly keen on the baggage or the stigma attached with unfairly letting us back in.

I can't think of one good reason why any 2nd or 3rd Division club would vote for it as they will not receive the financial benefits first hand and I am seriously beginning to think that the 'vote' tomorrow will be delayed once again and won't take place until after the SFL one. They may throw the dice tomorrow and hope that by saying 'no' it will concurrently appease their fans and force the SFL into accepting the proposals but if, and it is still a big if, the SFL refuse to be bullied into accepting us and subsequently vote 'no' then, by their own admission and the drafting of this document, the majority of SPL clubs would be up the proverbial creek without a paddle.

That is why I think there will be yet another delay and the SPL clubs will then have to, purely for economic security, go against the wishes of their own fans and vote us back in (via a secret ballot no doubt for plausible deniability) if the SFL say no to Division 1 (which would be entirely wrong in my opinion).

The only potential saving grace for them (if that is even possible given the depth of feeling) would be that we would almost instantly get kicked straight back out of the league anyway as punishment before the new season starts (re-instated then relegated - Dunfermline would replace us in this scenario) once the outstanding investigations are hastily concluded.

Either way I am more or less convinced, despite personally wanting it to be Division 3, that we will now be in Division 1 come the start of the new season as the SPL clubs are admitting they need our finances (not necessarily us as a club) in order to survive themselves (they feel they could cope for a year and if we don't get promotion, which definitely wouldn't be guaranteed, then we can all look forward to debating the sporting integrity of league reconstruction to have us included within the SPL this time next year). They just don't want to be left to do the dirty deed themselves hence this document and its attached 'rewards' for compliance. As you say, it is a Ł16m no-brainer when the emotional aspect is removed from it.

We shall know soon enough anyway as all parties are quickly running out of time to sort it out decisively. We should know by next week which (if any - which is still a possibility although a lot more remote after these admissions) league we are going to be playing in.

Brian

Agree2 Disagree2

Change sports, join the rugby league bring back John grieg as coach, he played the game for 20 years.

Agree2 Disagree0

@ jmac: "Re above post. Logic..."

I have absolutely no objection to non-Sevco/Rangers supporters posting their opinions on here when they are being constructive or giving a logical and thoughtful reply to counter an argument (GJ, Evingu, Anorak to name but a few) but did you even read your post through before you pressed send? It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever so you clearly didn't and posters like you are the reason that whatever division our 'newco' ends up in next year Ibrox will still be better attended than any other Scottish ground bar Celtic Park.

What arrogance did the poster you refer to show? "Rangers will always bring money to ground..." - TRUE. "...means the said teams finances are in better shape..." - Equally true or the SPL board (INCLUDING a representative from whatever team you support acting on behalf of your board) wouldn't have drafted this document or been so eager to get us in the First Division in the first place. His comments weren't arrogant, he was stating the obvious the same as these chairmen have been doing for the last two weeks.

From there you really appeared to lose it and contradicted yourself left, right and centre, just as a lot of others appear to be doing on here recently. You, along with them, need to make your mind up if you think Rangers still exist (as far as I was aware the club I have supported for over twenty years ceases to exist in a few weeks time and I will be supporting whatever Charles Green decides to call the new club) or if they have been REPLACED by a new company and new owners with no history and no connection to the old one (good or bad).

Whilst you are at it give the 'integrity' line a break, it doesn't, and never has existed in football or Celtic would have paid back the decades of unpaid taxes (evasion not avoidance) from their 'malfunctioning' turnstyles over the years, Jim McLean would have apologised for blackmailing kids into signing ten year contracts with no escape clauses, and Davy Cooper would have deliberately put his penalty over the bar against the Welsh that night because he, along with everyone else bar the referee (and of course those that naively believe integrity exists within competitive sport), knew it should never have been given.

If Rangers still exist in its old form then you are right - no-one would want them (they would still need them financially though) for the reasons you give and they should be hammered forever more so they would take decades to become competitive again if at all. However, if it is a brand new club who just so happen to play at Ibrox and wear blue strips as you imply with your final contradiction then leave it the hell alone and find some other team to take your crap out on as by your 'logic' it has he-haw to do with Rangers. They no longer exist.

His reply was entirely logical. You just opened your laptop and let your fingers rumble.

Brian

p.s. Sorry Ed but I am starting to get really annoyed by naive have their cake and eat it posters coming on here spouting poorly thought out crap and signing off with the usual 'sporting integrity' drivel when every single club in Scotland has their own immoral skeletons hanging in their closet.

Agree6 Disagree1

03 Jul 2012 12:04:38
(Scotsman, I think)
It is believed he has offered a six-point plan of punishments in a bid to win their approval.

Green’s plan would see his Rangers newco:

• Back SPL voting reform and slash the Old Firm’s influence;

• Agree a fairer split of revenue and cut payments to the Old Firm;

• Accept the transfer embargo given by the SFA appeals body;

• Pay all Rangers’ football debts at home and abroad;

• Take a points deduction for at least one, possibly more seasons;

• Issue a public apology for Gers’ past wrongdoing.

In my opinion (not a Rangers fan but nothing against Rangers and am taking an interest) this kind of package would be a good solution for all.

But will it be enough for the other 11 clubs?

McWulf

Believable11 Unbelievable35

Sounds like a james traynor story if ever i read one........

lamb muncher....

Agree3 Disagree0

Only a public apology now? If 7 SPL chairmen said they were voting yes, there wouldn't be the disingenuous, cynical, blame the guys who have left apology.
The other issues the SPL teams will get anyway with Rangers gone.
Tried to bribe the SFL. Now trying to bribe the SPL. {Ed039's Note - Where was the bribe?)

Agree2 Disagree0

Can I ask a question if after this season with all the sanctions mr green has proposed newco gets relegated will he ask for league reconstruction just so to keep the sky deal ??

Agree1 Disagree0

I think thins would be a good plan apart from the transfer embargo, considering only 13 players are currently training.

Agree2 Disagree0

Lets go to the third div and start again stuff the rest

Agree4 Disagree0

I do not think we would have enough players to compete at spl level with transfer embargo we struggled last year with injuries some loan concessions would have to be granted otherwise we might as well start in lower divisions as we would end up there anyway with added points deductions

Agree2 Disagree0

Sounds ok, but since the other SPL so called fans want us to burn in hell for eternity even if it means their clubs will lose much needed revenue it's a nonstarter.

Agree4 Disagree0

Regarding your reference to old firm influence ,on any given weekend during the season whichever of the two are at home their attendance comfortably outstrips the entire attendance total for every other game in the spl and scottish league combined,how much influence in your opinion does that entitle them to?

Agree2 Disagree1

The article says we think this is the right punishment. Sorry to be cynical, but why would we call it a punishment for saying sorry for breaking the rules and a punishment to pay off the money we owe to other clubs. And why did it take us until 24 hours before a vote we loke like loosing before we come up with this .

Agree2 Disagree0

As a Newco its 3rd div or nothing, sporting integrity and the rules of the game must be upheld, no more corruption in scottish football, Newco must start at the bottom

Agree2 Disagree2

I see the Green fingers are out in force on our page as per norm, Sighs!

Agree2 Disagree0

There is no such thing as a Rangers fan anymore that club are dead, capoot, finito. Charles Greens newco are the most recent Scottish football team maybe you are getting confused its the same team. {Ed039's Note - So they wont be playing at Ibrox, wearing blue and have a name with Rangers in it?)

Agree2 Disagree1

Point 1: his company has no influence.
Point 2: his company has no right to any payments.
Point 3: already ruled by court not allowable.
Point 4: does his company have the 'possibly' Ł100M owed to HMRC.
Point 5: Point deductions, already seen from last season this won't matter, what was it 10 points ahead. of 3rd place.
Point 6: well that's already done today.

Agree2 Disagree0

I think it's bull! You can't just take an embargo if the body in power doesn't have the power to impose such a restriction!

Agree2 Disagree0

Actually I think a more fundamental question should be, will the fans of the other clubs accept it? Looking at the discussions that have gone on before, most of the teams who are rejecting New 'Rangers' into the SPL have done so on the basis that their fans do not agree with New 'Rangers' simply walking back in.

From everything I've read to date, regardless of the contrition being shown by Rangers as a club, I can't help but feel that there is little stomach to allow New 'Rangers' to start anywhere but the 3rd division. Given that the smaller towns in scotland will need to foot the bill for Policing rangers coming to 'town' surely a nice act of contrition on Rangers part would be to pay the costs for the policing. Let's be honest, Peterhead, etc. didn't ASK for rangers to come to Peterhead twice a season, so WHY should they be financially impacted?

Agree0 Disagree2

Why are you calling them PUNISHMENTS?
Its sanctions for misdemeanors.

Agree2 Disagree1

Has anybody actually seen anything definite from SKY saying that they are going to pull the plug if no NEWCO in the SPL or indeed anything that says that current SKY tv deal is dependent on 4 'old firm' ganes a season....because I must have missed it (Ed039's Note - They are hardly going to broadcast problems/negotiations that would impact on their ratings and subscribers are they)

Agree2 Disagree1

I think fans will get over it. Especially if they see Rangers struggling at the foot of the SPL.

I also think the current Newco squad, plus a few natty under 18s, will be good enough to stay up. 3 seasons of bottom 6 is better than 3 in the SFL, no?

Agree0 Disagree3

McWulf again (mine was the last post too). Has anyone wondered where under this porposal, CG will get money from to pay footy debts? If he's trying to bribe Romanov here, he will need to show he has a few hundred grand in cash, not in "funny money". {Ed039's Note - I think there will be a timescale in place to pay football debts, they wouldnt be due immediately I wouldnt imagine)

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed039's Note - So they wont be playing at Ibrox, wearing blue and have a name with Rangers in it?)

Well that ain't certain yet. (Ed039's Note - Of course its not, but if a team is admitted to the league then they will be)

Agree0 Disagree0

It will be Rangers/Blue/Ibrox without a doubt. Even if the SFA insists on a different name for odd bureaucratic resons, fans will still be cheering "Rangers".

Yes, Ed, there will need to be a timescale. But that dilutes the proposition. Rangers (oldco) still owed fees dating back 10 years or so, and I would think there is a real chance of administration again within the next year or two. I can't see newco being able to borrow money to pay these debts either.

McWulf

Agree0 Disagree2

Are the wheels already grinding to a halt on the sporting integrity train as they tried to railroad rangers out of the SPL. I can’t believe Green is even thinking about accepting terms to clubs who are thinking about a u-turn on kicking Rangers out of the SPL, only because now they realise it’s their clubs that may face extinction. This has been scenario Rangers supporters have had to endure for the last few weeks. We would have to agree to a six point plan that includes a point’s deduction, the transfer embargo stays, and they two are enough to kill any chance of Rangers being competitive. We have already lost most of our team and wouldn’t be allowed to replace them, only 13 players turned up for training first day. We are out of Europe for three years but our gate money is to help other teams that are in the various competitions in Europe, some of the very teams that have been battering the Ranger’s naughty boy for weeks. Why don’t they give us clarity we all know the answer but they won’t come out and say it. We hate you, we don’t want you ever having a chance of winning anything, we would like to continually kick you in the teeth, but can we still have the money you will generate. The bullied become the bullies. Charles Green should tell them to go forth a multiply. If he does that I for one will be backing him. It may be a totally different SPL we find ourselves in if we move up from third, and I for one will laugh.

Agree3 Disagree1

It just keeps getting WORSE!! CG, Sky & ALL the other clubs that can't exist without 'Rangers' want their cake and to eat it by keeping us in the SPL but crippling us. If they get their way, it'll mean history recording Celtic putting a barrow-load past us every game! F%K THAT! Division 3 for us or I'm done with the game in Scotland. Johnny

Agree5 Disagree0

Point I was making re sky etc was that a lot of posters on this and other forums have talked about this as fact with nothing really to back it up

Agree0 Disagree1

16 million is lost to rangers in a season (e.g. just look at season tickets).

But without spl football at ibrox - will that be lost to footbal is the question.

Many of those season tickets holders and fans will have sky tv, and maybe now without spl football even more... so sky may get more income from this now less

Other clubs never saw this Ł16 million - but may now have more home fans, wins and trophies - so could easily get more money without gers in spl - not less

its not clear - who looses Ł16 million a year - other than rangers - new or old.

fans can now all call thier clubs and say if you vote gers into div 1 - we cancel season tickets - and this will stop that vote dead.

Agree2 Disagree2

Has Green lost his mind?! It's all fine and well getting into the SPL,but if they reimpose the transfer embargo,would we actually have enough players to play?

Agree2 Disagree1

Claims on bbc radio - that rangers may only take 1/3 of the season ticket payments... so about Ł5 million for the season.

is this enough for any division?

Agree0 Disagree1

"is this enough for any division?"

How much do you think Peterhead, Montrose or East Stirling take in season ticket sales? {Ed039's Note - less than 100 people)

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2012 09:39:08
ness signs for stoke lets see how many games he plays ?

Believable26 Unbelievable3

I'll bet you any money he'll play more games for Stoke than he would have done for Rangers next season.

TerribleBeauty

Agree2 Disagree1

Yeah sitting on the bench earning Ł10000+ a week must be hard. He will play some games. Good luck to him

Agree2 Disagree0

You can't blame the boy for getting a bit of security and a decent wage {Ed039's Note - Of course not)

Agree1 Disagree1

Hopefully he won't get a game for them and for the rest of his career. {Ed039's Note - Away you go, thats attrocious)

Agree1 Disagree1

His style of football doesn't really blend in the stoke way and i think he will be exposed down south that's if he's even fit to play.

Agree1 Disagree0

Well good luck to the wee man for lookin after his future and securing a move to the epl. no need for bitterness against a youngster fo doing whats best for himself
frankiebhoy

Agree1 Disagree0

TerribleBeauty..........

How could you possibly know how many games he would have played for Rangers next season.....thats a silly statement!!

Agree0 Disagree0

Give it 5 and then he's onto the championship/lower leagues

Agree0 Disagree0

We know he is injury prone but just wish the boy good luck and let us move on

JG

Agree0 Disagree0

I`ve got a felling that he will be just like andy webster when at rangers always injured but when he leaves he will never be injured

SM

Agree0 Disagree0

I don't blame the players for leaving.

I blame the people who put us in the position where so many of them thought it was best to leave. BB

Agree1 Disagree0

Should we not be entitled to compensation as he came through our youth ranks?

Agree0 Disagree0

Stop slating the players. The players and fans are the ones who have suffered during this. Who blames them for moving considering we don't have a clue if we will be SPL, Div 1, Div 3 or even if we can exist this.

I wish Jamie Ness a long successful career, he looked a good passer and calm when he played.

Agree1 Disagree1

To the un-named poster who replied to my comment....

.....seriously?

Agree0 Disagree0

Just realised i never left a name either...

TerribleBeauty

Agree0 Disagree0

Green is ONLY backer however he has as much Football business accumen his name. He wasted valuable money supporting a none starting CVA he has wasted money on pushing for entry to SPL and by reports blames SPL for mis-leading him to believe it was still possible upto the vote day( my 6 YO read in paper 7 had stated NO beforemeeting) He wastes money on fighting player contracts and calls them rebels GRow UP these players had families and debts they have waited by RFC side till 4 weeks before NEW season. Green now at last seems to have applied to SFA for registration. May I remind the RFC faithful of the USA business man you hounded out that he foretold the present scenario from day one and was willing to back financially with expertise. Scottish football will survive, question is will RFC

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent