Rangers Rumours Archive May 01 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


01 May 2014 16:51:14
Please tell me this isn't true. cribari to get offered a new deal

Believable27 Unbelievable21

Naw he's off after Saturday.

Agree0 Disagree0

No no no! Ally wake up, let him go and use his wages to sign someone else!

Agree0 Disagree1

Would not be surprised one bit IDE rather he gave the kids a chance but that's not going to happen either

Agree0 Disagree0

01 May 2014 15:28:01
been told a Dave King statement on ST fund and strategy imminent.

Believable20 Unbelievable30

Am waiting to see if this is true because I want to give king my season book money but still no heard anything!

Agree0 Disagree0

Ou would rather give king your money than your club are you mad?

Agree0 Disagree0

The club will still get the money it's just to keep it out the hands of our useless board!

Agree0 Disagree0

Why should king get the money this will only make our club worse!! This 'plan' to stop money going into the club will make a 2nd administration definite as the club needs ticket money to survive and function
So fans have to open their eyes and look at the long term effect of this personic plan and not just jump into something we know nothing about

Agree0 Disagree0

What is making our club worse is the board! Wallace on 300k per year plus 100% bonus for winning the league and a 10% increase each league we move up 330 then 363 plus 100% bonus your no telling me that's no a drain on money we don't have! Aye mr Wallace here's ma hard earned while u sit on your ass, achieve nothing n make a fortune! Total joke!

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - can I just check something here, as I want to make sure I understand this correctly. Is Wallace on less than McCoist? A lot less as well, if I am remembering correctly.}

That is correct but in ally defence his contract was made before we went I to admin under Craig whyte when we supposedly had money! One thing for sure is ally might not be a great manager but he's not just there to drain money out the club like some!

Agree0 Disagree1

Govan front what planet are u on ally has taken as much money as anyone he even got shares from the penny arcade and anyone that gives king money without him commiting some of his own are entirely of there head until he puts his money where his mouth is anything he does or says is piffle let him commit some of his own money and come out clearly and tell all bears what his plans are and how he proposes to bargain with the club because his stance of wanting security over ibrox and murray park is as much good two rows of sheeps shi? and if that fails what happens willthe money be given back straight away who pays for the expense of administration of the fund and exactly who will be appointed to hold money and administer the fund at this minute in time he is as bad as the board for giving info on what his plans are at least if u pay the club your money u will be able to go to ibrox with king the only way u will get in is pay again not a satisfactory way to run a war

Agree0 Disagree2

Give king your money without any pledges from him u will lose your money but as things stand at the minute he will lose what the we boy got at the scramble hee haw

Agree0 Disagree2

Ur right ed I suppose what wallace is being paid is par for the job compared to other clubs with same size of turnover and more problems than most let's face it its not a job where encumbent will win any popularity competition especially when other people turned the job down he is in the middle between bears and the board with dave king attacking from the rear

Agree0 Disagree2

{Ed001's Note - exactly mate, the problem isn't how much he is being paid, it is more about the size of bonuses, for an almost certain result. That kind of bonus should be reserved for doing something extraordinary, such as a cup win, or making a profit a number of times the bonus payment etc. For winning a part time league with a full time team, well it is a joke to get a bonus for that! His job is to run the club with the money brought in anyway, which he is obviously failing to do right now. So I would say he should be refused a bonus by the shareholders, as he would be in most companies. Which brings me to another point, have any of the shareholders been given the opportunity to veto the bonus? I thought shareholder meetings were supposed to give information like directors' salaries etc? So how come his salary has only just been revealed? The club is being run very oddly.}

Like a said at the start am waiting to see what king has to offer!

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent