Rangers Rumours Archive May 19 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


19 May 2012 17:48:21
if cva doesn't go through mr green's shares will revert back to mr whyte. FACT

Believable63 Unbelievable34

green has spoken about this

Agree0 Disagree0

Have you not been paying attention, if CVA is not agreed then Charles Green is obligated to go down the newco route. Why dont you back up your "FACT" with a source or a link to a website outlining to compexities of the deal which you are obvioulsy in on with all the info you have?

Agree0 Disagree0

No name
no proof

FACT!

bil72

Agree0 Disagree0

Has Whytes shares been officially re-assigned to Green at Companies House, Edinburgh? Is Green registered as the Owner of Rangers at Companies House? I don't think he is!

Agree0 Disagree0

Radio clyde mentioned it on more than 1 ocassion today even replaying mr green's interview. it is true whether u like it or not. craig whyte ain't goin anywhere.

Agree0 Disagree0

Whyte/Ticketus want liquidation . They want ibrox and Murray park. Sell / rent to rangers 2012.

Agree0 Disagree0

STV online has stated Green isn't the Owner of Rangers until 6th June (after a successful CVA).

Agree0 Disagree0

Listen guys u just don't give a guy £2 and he hands you a bit of paper and that's the shares sold. Lawyers from each party need to be involved and accountants and companies house and the stock exchange. Green doesn't have the shares in his name apparently.

Agree0 Disagree0

How can CVA be agreed on June 6th when BTC result date is unknown and HMRC needs to agree the CVA.
Putting the cart before the horse.
Wouldn't be logical for Mr Spock.

Agree0 Disagree0

Lol mr FACT i think ul find tht in the cva fail the shares are irrelevant as the old co will b liquidated after the savable asssets have been moved to the newco and the big guy at the end the BTC has nout to do with the CVA the hand HMRC are holding is whts commonly known as the WTC(thts wee taxcase not world trade centre)oh and u with the whyte/ticketus want liquidation thy can want all thy want both are irrelevant whyte has signed over ownership to green in wht was unconditional 6th of june is the date for official announcement

Agree0 Disagree0

Floating charge and shares are separate. Crucial distiinction.

Agree0 Disagree0

Shares in a company that will no longer exist.

Whyte won't have any say in what happens to the assets, the liquidators will sell to the highest bidder.

Agree0 Disagree0

If a CVA isnt agreed,then Green doesnt need Whytes shares as they will be going down the NewCo route and the company he has his shares in wont exist
DaveG

Agree0 Disagree0

FACT?. graeme

Agree0 Disagree0

But in Green is not the Highest Bidder who can form a NewCo that is anymore the true Rangers than anyone else?

Agree0 Disagree0

Stop moaning the bottom line is this was the game plan all along.Rangers debts became to much for them to afford.So this was the simple way to get rid and start afresh.Are we happy with it no the last few months have been murder even if it turns out creig whyte was a genius and and left us in a better state than he found us we will never forgive him or david murray.Why because even at CVAs being total legal its the way it has been handled that stinks it has just become one embarrassment after another.But i think the majority of people now realize that rangers will still be here next season one way or another.

Agree0 Disagree0

Neither Green nor the people associated with him have anything to do with Rangers. They want to make money for themselves. They don't feel sorry for Rangers, empathise and feel the need to be generous.
I'm very very wary........... This Nanny McPhee patter is very disconcerting. Yes he'll disappear but with what? And how much dosh? I heArd Murray Park is targeted for developing into a spa hotel resort for expensive clients.

Agree0 Disagree0

Wise up guys, if the share reverts to CW so does the SPL share for league participation. I fear this attempted CVA may be a charade to play out time for blue knights etc. to implement their plan. Expect Green to walk 7th June

Agree0 Disagree0

Nanny McPhee?

Rangers will survive in some form, but beggars can't be choosers. Green and his ilk is as good as it gets. There is no chance of an Abramovich or a Mansour pulling up outside Ibrox. Even a rollover Euromillions winner wouldn't have enough money to make it work on their own.

So you are left with opportunists, streetwise operators and wide boys who see an opportunity to club together to make money out of exploiting a "brand".

I suspect that, after the initial purchase, the supporters will end up providing the bulk of the working capital, one way or another. That would probably be the case even if (perhaps especially if) Paul Murray and Brian Kennedy bought the club.

Agree0 Disagree0

The supporters provide most if not all the cash for most clubs. there arent many abramovichs around

Agree0 Disagree0

Something funny going on -
a) CVA agreed - Then CW will be expecting Green to honour the Ticketus deal, probably in black & white somewhere.
b) Liquidation - newco set up CW holds Ibrox and Murray Park via the flaoting charge. He will use them to pay off Ticketus in some way.
No way CW is stupid enough to give Green control of the shares (successful CVA) and then Green gets to tear up the Ticketus contract leaving CW the debt and nothing to use to pay it with.
c) Ticketus - At the moment only D&P can attempt to breach the contract, but I think it would fail. They have to act in the interests of ALL creditors and adding Ticketus to the CVA pot doesn't do that.

Lots of court cases on the horizon.

Agree0 Disagree0

Forget about the CVA, worry about....

As RFC stands they are ineligable for an SFA club license (no audited accounts).
As a newco the SFA license is non-transferable anyway.
This is outwith the SPL share, and the SPL has no rights in regard to the SFA club license.
could be hosed either way!

Agree0 Disagree0

The BTC is in effect irrelevant because we can't pay it anyway. and if liquidation happens don't need to.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 May 2012 16:11:01
Everybody seems to think that a CVA is not going to be agreed.
The bottom line as I see it is that the creditors that will decide are ticketus and HMRC. There is no doubt that Duffers have been discussing the whole thing with HMRC and it has gone to put a formal offer to the creditors. They know this is the best chance of getting any money, because they will get nothing if liquidation is the outcome.
I don't think ticketus will be an issue as they will go after CW for any shortfall. Not that you can believe a word that comes out of that liars mouth, but he did say he had guaranteed the deal personally.
HMRC must prefer getting something rather than nothing, and you have to remember that Rangers will be a big tax contributor in the future.
I don't think that Duffers would put forward this deal if they thought HMRC would refuse the deal.
Before one say that if liquidation was to go ahead and the assets to be sold, what would they get. The assets are valued in accounts at over £100m but there is no chance of getting a fraction of that on the open market. They would be lucky to get £10m, as neither Ibrox or the training ground ( I refuse to use its current title), have any other uses, and no doubt some will say they can knock it down for a supermarket or last etc, let's remind ourselves that this is Govan not Knightsbridge. Tesco or the likes can buy any piece of ground without having demolition costs etc. luxury flats in Govan , don't think so.
I am confident that a CVA will be accepted, and that this miserable time in our history will be nearing an end. However I have to say that the constant reports of a war chest and £20m being pledged is not the way to go as this cannot it well with those owed money. I wish the likes of RST would just leave Green to deal with this and stop demanding answers that may not do us any good at this time, but in fact the RST have done nothing but harm during this time, as long as a couple of them get five minutes on the telly seems to be their only interest. At a time when we need all the help we can get financially they insist on no season ticket increases, talks of boycotting the Scottish Cup where half of any gate fees is earned, they call for players to boycott Scotland, this is not the way to influence anybody. Why don't they just shut up and go away and I would like to see them removed of any influence, they certainly don't speak for me or any other fans I know.

Believable47 Unbelievable37

You wont get the time back in your life that you have penned to convince yourself everything will be ok!!

Liquidation is happening....

Ticketus will only go after CW when liquidation kicks in......they will drag Rangers through the courts and pursue them until liquidation occurs!Not CW.....

HMRC are not discussing anything with Charles Green believe that!! He may have offered a deal....they wont even look at it and do not assume something is better than nothing....."We will avoid paying tax continue to spend and at the end we will agree a CVA and pay 10p in the pound" No deal....why?..every company in the land would take that route...it is pay us everything you owe or go bust...end of!

oh and if you thought things were bad....minimum 5 titles to be deducted in next 10 days!

Agree0 Disagree0

HMRC do not accept CVAs when there has been deliberate withholding of tax.That's it.Accept it.there will be no CVA.HMRC will get next to nothing either way so a CVA means nothing to them.However,sending out a signal to everyone that's thought about not paying,that suits them just fine.

Agree0 Disagree0

Rusty the tim here!!yor head is really up your butt hole!!a cva is only giving them 8.5mil,so if they get anything over that thru selling the assets then they've scored!would it not be better for ticketus to say no right now so they've still got 2 people to chase??creditors bleeding you's dry?they just want what there due which rangers got of them through business!!put yourself in the creditors shoes,would you not want your money back??war chest?there business men and won't put in without nothing in return that's why your in this mess!drogba,la pard etc your living in cloud cookoo land!!I thought I was mental,you make me look sensible!!wouldn't it be logical to get answers from them just now before it's to late,look what happened last year!!all roads lead to liquidation!!!!hail hail rusty the tim

Agree0 Disagree0

"remember that Rangers will be a big tax contributor in the future. "

you couldnt make this stuff up..lol..if they had contributed what they were due in the past surely they wouldn't be in this situation (£24M for EBT...nearly £13M for PAYE,NIC and VAT this year alone)

Why would HMRC even consider that as a possibility with your past record...and CVA not likely to be done with any business found guilty of not paying tax ( I do not say EBT guilty but afforementioned £13M for this season is not debateable HMRC likely to wind you up if unable to redeem monies from you as an example to others. I do not see CVA as an option to HMRC only wishful thinking on your part.....JohnnyG

Agree0 Disagree0

HMRC must prefer getting something rather than nothing?

Actually they'll get something far bigger than a few pennies in the pound if they liquidate RFC, they'll get THE FEAR FACTOR so other clubs and businesses know not to mess with them.

This is going to be the worst week or so for Rangers in over forty years. Expect bad news shortly on the BTC & revelations that could really hurt our history!

BB

Agree0 Disagree0

Big tax contributor in the future? If you'd done that in the past you wouldn't be in this mess.

as for boycotting the Scottish cup didn't you do that this year? certainly the important parts of it (and last year come to think of it)

Agree0 Disagree0

It's a social strategy of Governments to have upmarket accommodation built in previously bad areas. Hoban certainly fits the profile for building new housing and flats. Nobody thought Gorbals or Leith in Edinburgh would get new upmarket flats but they are built.

Agree0 Disagree0

Everybody seems to think that a CVA is not going to be agreed......

Hmmm Ticketus give over £26.7m - and you think they will now accept nothing for this and just walk away ?? UNREAL!

You think HRMC will accept a few million - WHEN THEY TURNED DOWN OFFER OF £10 million (oddly close to the £9million PAYE amount) - so they spotted this was not serious offer - or new money

You think rangers will pay lots of tax in future....

NOT if they not allowed to play football, or dont own ibrox, or a training ground, or tickets, or play in div3 (if allowed in - there is a queue you know!!)

ha ha ha

Agree0 Disagree0

To the 1st re poster ticketus will only go after cw once we go under have u got a clue ?? they ave already started suing cw do ur research be4 posting bull on here plz

Agree0 Disagree0

All Celtic fans have obtained a degree in law - FACT.

HMRC invited companies to come forward about tax issues, Whyte chose not to come forward, this is why HMRC wont do a deal with Whyte, they have already stated they are awaiting talks with Rangers. Rangers will exist as the current company that we know, Rangers will be in the SPL next season with roughly the same team. Timmy will ALWAYS be obsessed with all things Rangers.

Agree0 Disagree0

Have to agree hrmc would collect tax and vat etc from a continuing RFC, as someone has mentioned b4 until recently RFC have paid the tax ,ok we have the grey area about the ongoing tax case, but if RFC were to disappear Hrmc would see a major drop in taxes as everything has some sort of tax attached to it wether through paye or vat , the knock on effect also means possibly less income streams coming into other football teams so less tax too collect there aswell

Agree0 Disagree0

A lot visitors on tonight from the other side. Op here, it is great how you are all tax experts and have full understanding of HMRC. Surprising when half of you can't even spell. My post said nothing of our failures to pay tax in the past but of course you numpties have to make the point that we wouldn't be in this mess if we had paid, really, I never knew that. The post was common sense, something you are clearly lacking in. Looking forward to when the CVA is agreed and you can all go back to your own page. {Ed014's Note -

Agree0 Disagree0

PAYE and NIC that were used to run the club (12-13million or so) will be expected to be paid in FULL. As was posted by someone earlier failure to demand that leaves HMRC open to every company in the UK doing the same (Moral Hazard).
CW already offered HMRC 11 million (or so) to settle the BTC and was turned down.
As a side issue - Green has committed to paying the football creditors in full, see what HMRC thinks of preferential creditor treatment and agreeing to CVA's.
Ticketus - Are not a creditor at the moment, and they won't be until the contract is actaully breached, next payment is due next season I think.
A big IF to what Green has said is that D&P as the administrators can ONLY breach the Ticketus IF it is to the advantage of the creditors as a WHOLE. Clearly this is not the case, adding Ticketus to the CVA pot dilutes the amount available to all the other creditors.
I can forsee a court case in the near future over this.
Yes he has committed to buying the assets should a newco become the only exit route, yet we still don't know if D&P can sell him the assets directly or if other groups will enter the feeding frenzy, mainly due to D&P failure to publish the result of the creditors vote. (over 3 weeks now)
Much more to come!!

Agree0 Disagree0

Maybe a lot of celtic cans can read... plenty on internet with regard to tax law, hrmc, rangers shenanigans....

If rangers run for next 3 years a loss - they can avoid corporation tax (21%) - as this only on profits - so dont make a profit... thats a legitimate way to avoid tax... no ?

and this would bring hrmc no bumper crop..... so hrmc left with PAYE and NICs - which we saw rangers did not pay this year ??

history (and lots of english clubs went into admin and there were cva examples galore) and hrmc voted against - or abstained.

gers fans can save thier club is they work out where the issue is , and fix it.

blaming sfa, spl, other clubs etc etc etc seems unlikely to succeed, and may just get rangers closed down forever.

BBc program next week about gers being on the verge of extinction....... that seems a lot worse than most of the rumours on here... have suggested

have BBC found even more issues.... other than what we know.....

Agree0 Disagree0

A CVA is very likely to succeed if its at least 25p in the pound. Payments can be staggered.

Agree0 Disagree0

LOL theres BB the confused tim trying to convince us all he is a rangers man.BB its ok u dont have to pretend here.OP welldone mate u really wound them up with that one.Like i said must be hard for them to beleive that we will still be here next season.Now lets have a wee think if rangers had no chance off survival either cva or newco the spl would have kicked us out they did not.Secondly the fighting fund would be fraudulent taking money of fans making them beleive there was hope when there was none.Thirdly even if like u lot say everyone involved in rangers is controlled by whyte then the man is obviously a genius and it wont be long until he takes over the world lol so nothing to worry about then either that or hes the first of his kind a intelligent celtic fan who single handidly took down the mighty gers i will let u decide.

Agree0 Disagree0

Any Economist would tell you that the demise of Rangers will make little or no difference to tax revenues. The money the fans spend on season tickets traveling etc would be spent elsewhere and be liable to VAT.

In terms of the Exchequer the impact would be minimal. - Doctor R

Agree0 Disagree0

Simple economics for 25 in the £

Ticketus owed £26 million, get £5.1 and therefore loose £21 million....

and hence we now see why ticketus have started legal action in first instance against whyte (for any shortfall in amount they get for ranger)

Key question is will ticketus get more if ibrox sold off lock, stock and barrel..

Economics say they should get more than £5 million - so expect them to vote against CVA and for liquidation!

another way out is for all gers fans to offer to pay 3x cost for season tickets, and tickets next year - that will restore gers dreams.... yet noone offers that solution...

is that cos its economically unsound ?

Agree0 Disagree0

SFA will purchase murray park as a training facility for whole of scottish football, it will be renamed and rangers (old/new co) will get £5 million for it.

Ibrox will be sold to whoever wished to buy it for about £25-30 million.

This would help to give a more substantial fund to try to meet CVA - as expect first attempt will fail - and newco will be created to avoid liquidation (of all assest).

Any addtional penalties incurred (btc, double-contracts review, appeals, legal action etc etc) will attach to newco if it wants to be in SPL - or ignored if new application to div3.

Who plays at ibrox next year - no idea - could be team of kids, or made up from the 40 already on the books. Or could be new team purchased lock, stock and barrel and moved to ibrox and rebranded rfc.

Agree0 Disagree0

Hmrc do not do cva's for non payment of nic & paye as this money is taken from the employee.
the nic is for benifits & pensions.
just think of anyone who goes to job centre only to be told sorry your stamps have not been paid in the last year

Agree0 Disagree0

Remember D+P get their money from the £8.5 million dont they? So how much does that recude it by

Agree0 Disagree0

19 May 2012 16:08:14
Bears, from a good source, Mr Green backed by substantial money from far east, idea is to play hard ball with the creditors, make sure they dont bleed us dry, once the cva sorted the real funding will come in, the newco will have no debt, backed with a huge war chest and the ability to get more money from the banks. Word is they are looking for some kind of asian league with the big clubs from europe like barca, inter, liverpool, the gers and bayern. Heard that drogba yakubu and lampard have already been spoken to before the european cup final. Good times ahead at last WATP.

Believable20 Unbelievable49

Drogba etc etc... Cheers for that, was a bit down with not being in the final and then I say this lol... Scott

Agree0 Disagree0

Bleed us dry? Im a rangers fan and i feel we should be paying every penny we can. Whether it take a year or 10years! Cva's are shocking business practice

Agree0 Disagree0

I live on planet earth,what planet u from... Have u woken up from ur dream...

Agree0 Disagree0

Aha no

Agree0 Disagree0

So you mean rangers will bleed the creditors dry, im sick of all you supporters who basically just care about warchests, money, big signings, this just shows that supporters like you have learned nothing from all this.
You have to ask yourself why would anyone throw the billions your talking about into a football club from scotland with all the baggage that goes with it, im sure this is probably wasted on you I give up with it all.

Agree0 Disagree0

Nasty creditors bleeding you dry! You are off your head. I am all for free speech but this post is ridiculous.
Liah Smit

Agree0 Disagree0

Bears, its idiots like this that let the side down.

Agree0 Disagree0

I want some of whatever your smoking sounds like some good stuff

Agree0 Disagree0

Yeh thats right make sure the creditors dont bleed you dry Thats your job to bleed everyone else dry. Get a grip take all your punishments change your ways and get back to being a team to be proud of

Agree0 Disagree0

This surely is a wind up......DH

Agree0 Disagree0

Even my boy who believes just about anything doesn't believe a word of this. Sounds like a Celtic fan on the wind-up.

Either that or a bear that's started on the sherry a bit too early. BB

Agree0 Disagree0

I say this as a Rangers' fan, and it gives me no pleasure to say it...

CVA or liquidation, it makes no difference, Rangers' name will be forever tainted until they pay their dues. And I don't mean pennies in the pound.

You don't just wash your hands of wrongdoing as if nothing has happened, you do your penance.

There has been no humility or genuine remorse whatsoever from Rangers Football Club. Nor will there be, whoever takes over. And the more I hear from McCoist and Jardine on the matter the more disgusted I become.

RFFF paying for a QC to act on their behalf to appeal against the transfer embargo? They should be using the fund to pay off as many of the small creditors as they can.

It's the supporters who are going to have to lead the way, and show their football club how to behave. They should start a charity, completely separate from Rangers Football Club, to repair some of the damage caused by Whyte and Murray.

This God Almighty mess is not the supporters' fault, so they shouldn't have to make amends, but, hopefully, they have more class than the football club they support.

Agree0 Disagree0

The sad part is that the OP is right as far as the stance that Green (or any other opportunist) will take regarding the creditors.

Would-be purchasers are not the original defaulters on the debt, so they don't see it as their responsibility to pay it off in full. They just pay as little as they can get away with to get their hands on the club.

Agree0 Disagree0

No more booze for this eeejit! yakubu, drogba n lampard. are you mental? unless yakuba, lampard n drogba are the name of some u17 league players in china or summat that aint happenin! what a rocket you are
the tiger.

Agree0 Disagree0

Easily by a trillion miles the best post ever on here, i cant stop laughing !!!!

Agree0 Disagree0

Is your source Santa Claus or the tooth fairy ?

Agree0 Disagree0

Asian league eh? What happened to Rangers need to stay in the SPL?????????????????? What happened to the rest of the teams in the SPL need Rangers???????????? Sounds like you want to up sticks and leave, well if you want to leave then go to the 3rd division if you are relegated instead of a kiddy on made up league which does not exist. Why dont Rangers pay the debt first please.

Agree0 Disagree0

How did you manage to type this post?
I take it the ward staff let you out of the straight jacket once a day. Please remember to take your medication!

Agree0 Disagree0

How can you get arrange a CVA and then talk about the newco having a warchest. Does a CVA being agreed not mean there is no newco? For the rest - what a clown.........martyc1888

Agree0 Disagree0

Best pile a p1sh yet!!

& Get aff the swally

The Pilot!

Agree0 Disagree0

OOOOOOOOOOOOOh
MYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
GoDDDDDDDDDDDD

wehave just entered the twilight zone ;-)

bil72

Agree0 Disagree0

Haha brilliant post huge warchest! Green has already said Rangers will live within their means and UEFA fair play rule kick in some oh one last thing Transfer embargo

Agree0 Disagree0

OP you've got to be a time on the windup

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm away to lie down in a dark room. I must have dementia. I thought that someone said that Drogba is coming to Ibrox! It's ok I will phone NHS24.

Agree0 Disagree0

For g ds sake let pay off our debts firstly and get a bit of credit back at the club

Agree0 Disagree0

Wot you smokin????

Agree0 Disagree0

I'll have whatever you are on.... have you heard they are also going to be building a bridge to the moon, the hope is that we can have an intergalactic league with those aliens from Mars Attacks, Good times!

Agree0 Disagree0

Well done mate - this certainly ranks as the most ridiculous post ever written on this forum.

A wee bit of advice: next time you write drivel like this, pause for a moment, read it and ask yourself "how likely is this to be true?".

If Carlsberg did CVA's...

Agree0 Disagree0

I'd just like to add my 2 pennies in here. Although i don't agree with the OP, the UK law is such that it allows companies to rake in the debt and not pay back its creditors. With all due respect (and yes i think we should pay back the debt), the company cannot be blamed for following a CVA route or liquidation/newco. Millions of companies have done it and will continue to do it. If people have such a big issue with it, they should march on Westminster and get the law changed. There is no difference to Rangers FC or Vodafone or whomever following this route as the law allows it.

Let me ask you, if you were a businessman and your money was on the line (ignore morals and ethics), would you follow the route that cost you more or less when it was legally allowed by our law system?

I know what i'd choose...

Agree0 Disagree0

19 May 2012 12:10:27
could someone clarify for me. if rangers can't get a cva does this mean that craig whyte will remain as majority shareholder. if so, where does this leave charles green and his consortium.

Believable38 Unbelievable10

Yep the deal with whyte is only binding if Green gets a cva if no t then I think only God knows whats next Troubled times

Agree0 Disagree0

If we don't get the CVA, Charles Green will put us into liquidation and form a Newco. all shares on our club will be worthless as Glasgow Rangers FC will fail to exist.

Agree0 Disagree0

Did the sfa not fine him and ban him from ever getting involved in owning a scottish club, sorry if im wrong but that seems no he wont be major shareholder because the sfa arnt allowing it!!

Agree0 Disagree0

100% True. And I think Green knows he has no chance of a CVA.

Agree0 Disagree0

Lets be honest a CVA is not going to happen. there was a lawyer on radio last night stating that having spoken to many work collegues there is no chance of a CVA being the outcome.

Agree0 Disagree0

Green bought Whyte's shares for £2, the consortium is the owner whether a CVA is agreed or not. If it isn't, they make a newco. Whyte has nothing to do with us anymore

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm not as optimistic. do you seriously think mr whyte is just gonna walk away from this- NO CHANCE!

Agree0 Disagree0

Acquiring Whyte's shares is a done deal. For what it's worth, he doubled his £1 investment. The contract is signed and legally binding and the only thing that can deem that agreement worthless, is the failure to agree the CVA. If the CVA is not accepted, work begins immediately on the newco option, which in itself deems Whyte's shares null and void
This is from Rangers media

Agree0 Disagree0

Whyte has nothing to do with us anymore?

Dream on.

BB

Agree0 Disagree0

As if mr whyte would put himself through all this just for £1 profit, get real. rest assured he will get something out of this.

Agree0 Disagree0

The 'binding contract' has the cva clause in it. No cva, no green. Shares go back to whyte.

Agree0 Disagree0

If no CVA the shares are worthless so this is a moot point?

Agree0 Disagree0

19 May 2012 10:25:41
naismith is said to be keen on a move to everton to link up with former strike partner jelavic who has recommended the move to the toffees

Believable67 Unbelievable42

Yep as I posted before Jelavic is talking up
Naismith to Everton. Talk about kicking us when we are down.

Agree0 Disagree0

Im still of the belief that mcgregor davis lafferty naismith whittaker should move on to benefit the club in the long term. Massive reduction in the wage bill, in the region of 6million a year, as well as the transfer fees received

Agree0 Disagree0

Naismith isnt leaving! give him some credit

Agree0 Disagree0

Naismith is a quality player. He deserves a chance in premier league. Just a shame we won't get full value for him.

Agree0 Disagree0

Although Naisy is determined to stay at the Gers, if Everton make a move and offer him decent wages, I can't see him knocking it back.

However, I don't believe for a second Jelavic is talking up, from what I am hearing, this is all just utter garbage.

TTG

Agree0 Disagree0

Jelavic is part of the reason we lost the title. if not for him hidding in matches for over a month it might have been a different story. pains me to say this but who would want to play for us under such circumstances.

Agree0 Disagree0

Jelavic hiding, the whole team were marked absent manys a match, the guy was class here when he got service and was allowed to play, move on he certainly has

Agree0 Disagree0

Dont blame Jelavic for anything he was great for us. If anyone is to blame for lossing such a huge lead then it is Ally McCoist. A move to Everton would be a great move for wee Naisy - good luck to him and thanks for the memories.

Agree0 Disagree0

If you where in a insecure job and being offered more money and security with another job what would you do?

I know what I would do family and your own well being come first no matter what team you support.

Agree0 Disagree0

Why is ally to blame for losing a lead? It is what you said a lead. In that basis Lennon should have been sacked when he fell 9 real points behind. 11 players take the field. It isn't PlayStation stuff ally can't help it if whit makes a mistake or goian gets a red. They win as a team and lose as a team.

Agree0 Disagree0

Was ally to blame for naismith injury? Was ally to blame for jelavic going missing for last month of his rangers career. I think the blame ally thing is a bit weak really. He did well to get us to end of November unbeaten. He signed two half decent centre halfs but needed a striker which we all knew he wasn't able to do.

Agree0 Disagree0

DONT BLAME ALLY! IT WAS WHYTE! where was the £20mil first season? or even a mil, he was only allowed to buy guys with a 6 figure price tag! not what gers player usually cost! look at celik, goin, get a grip.

Agree0 Disagree0

Wallace was a 7 figure sum

Agree0 Disagree0

Wallace, name another two? or even another 1? we spent less on all ignings than we got for the single sale of jelavic, as i said, nowhere near what rangers pay for players. im waiting for that other 7 figure sum ally was allowed to buy?

Agree0 Disagree0

Rangers have spent more than Celtic for the last three seasons summer window, u have spent more than Celtic. Whilst on your knees you told us, maybe you were actually spending what u could afford for a change.

Still shouting about million pound players?Seriously?!

Jamie Mac

Agree0 Disagree0

I wish any Rangers player who leaves in the summer all the very best, they have been royally SHAFTED by the men in charge.

Agree0 Disagree0

It's funny you don't blame ally for the results it's a collective thing ! But when the wee French man with a better record than ally was there you could not wait to get rid ! Lol

Agree0 Disagree0

Naismith wants to go let him only going to be good for him future,does not want to play in the spl unlike scott brown wants to stay at celtic and not test his self at the top level he is s**te.

Agree0 Disagree0

One of the best Scottish talents in a long time, he will do brilliantly no matter where he goes, if its Everton, i'll be watching him every week. Thank goodness we will still benefit from him with Scotland.

Good Luck!

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent