Rangers banter 58870

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


(single word yields best result)

17 Feb 2019 14:50:43
McKay was our number 10 and we made a c**t of it by selling him for buttons.

Agree5 Disagree0

17 Feb 2019 15:04:49
He wasn’t consistent enough couldn’t tackle need a better no 10 than him.

17 Feb 2019 15:55:22
A no.10 doesn't need to be a good tackler! The wonderful ian durrant,
paul gascoigne, ronald de boer etc,
weren't terrific tacklers! A no.10's strongest attributes, has to be able to pass the killer ball, through the tightest and stubborn of defences, be able to score goals by being able to run beyond the striker or strikers and score goals themselves! IMO, that is the 3 attributes of a very good no.10!

17 Feb 2019 16:12:49
Not one of those players was a number 10. Gazza played as a traditional centre midfielder, as did Durrant. De Boer started as a centre forward then became a right midfielder.

17 Feb 2019 16:21:57
Would have rather we got a number 10 than the woeful and past it player Davis. Guy contributed nothing and is finished.

17 Feb 2019 16:41:53
Totally disagree with you Theswagman 100%! Each of the players i mentioned could play the no.10 role with ease and did various times! Yes i grant you they could play and did play in other positions also, but my point being they all could play the no.10 role and did at times!

17 Feb 2019 16:43:03
Ok Theswagman name players that are no.10's in your opinion?

17 Feb 2019 17:54:40
Well said wagman, some people don't understand. Mckay was a nobody.

17 Feb 2019 17:57:36
Ye those players could play no 10 and going back to McKay difference with him he use to pull out of challenges and s. t it good player but in end he didn’t want to be here.

17 Feb 2019 18:03:33
Oops rangers have never played with a true ten,
We've had guys who could make a pass i. e. Gazza, luadrup, cannigia.
Only real ten in Scottish footy was moravcic.

17 Feb 2019 18:44:28
I do agree with you Jboy21,that lubo moravcic, was a proper no.10!But my point with the players i mentioned was, that all these players i mentioned, undoubtedly could play the no.10 role, as well as being able to play in other positions!

17 Feb 2019 18:48:14
apart from that didn't mckay want away. he wasnt consistent enough, put one hard tackle against him and his game was done, went into hiding.

17 Feb 2019 19:18:27
McKays attitude is poor and as people have mentioned he is a sh*tebag. Capable of a few decent moments but not somebody i'd turn to regularly. I used to play 5s with him and he wasn't that impressive. He should have been ripping us to shreds but the gap wasn't that great. I know 5s isn't exactly competitive but someone who would eventually end up at rangers should still have been miles better than us.

17 Feb 2019 19:23:18
Mckay is not of required standard, surely this was evident when he tried his hand in the spl👍.

17 Feb 2019 19:33:01
Supercoop, you are very quite on Davis, recall you lobbied for him on here and even expressed disappointment we only have him for an initial 6 month period. Looks 2 yard off the pace.

17 Feb 2019 20:08:38
I totally agree bankie that so far i've been disappointed in stevie davis! He does look a couple of yards off the pace, but i won't cast him aside as a bad signing or finished,
'till he's played a good few more games. Although underwhelmed by his performances so far, we have got to be mindful, that davis has hardly played any football at Southampton for months. I'll reserve judgement on him for now.

17 Feb 2019 20:10:18
For the record bankie, there was a helluva lot of us on here who canvassed for steven davis to be brought back to ibrox, FACT!

17 Feb 2019 21:09:09
Supercoop I really hope you are correct but I fear he is well past his best. He was a naive nostalgic signing, at least we can let him go at end of the season.







 

 

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass