Rangers banter 57724


Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.

(single word yields best result)

20 Nov 2018 17:06:24
We were getting 18.75 million per season which was the lowest of the top 18 leagues in europe. Now we are getting 20 million per season. How is this seen as a triumph. This is shocking. Scottish football is class. Rangers with Stevie G. Celtic. Aberdeen, hibs, kilmarnock, hearts all with good managers and players. Its competitive and good tv. Only the sfa could have messed this up. I would be expecting 100 mill per season.

Agree7 Disagree8

20 Nov 2018 18:32:48
rfc, crumbs from skys table, shocking, neil doncaster should be sacked for this.

20 Nov 2018 19:29:45
The problem is that Scottish football fans subscribe to these packages and continue to fund the EPL. We should all refuse to subscribe until we are offered a package that is exclusively showing Scottish football and nothing else, then we’ll see the value of our contracts increase.

20 Nov 2018 20:58:40
100 m a season when some weeks it will be games like Hamilton v dundee?

20 Nov 2018 21:37:23
Nail on the head COYBIG. All other countries will have sky France, sky Spain and so on. We have sky UK and therefore they will give is a 3rd class product inferior to the English premier league and championship.

20 Nov 2018 23:32:43
Totally agree lads, cancelling this week, RTV only from now on!

20 Nov 2018 23:49:33
Not saying the deal is fantastic but it is an improvement. Take into consideration we only have 12 teams in the top flight. Most other countries have 16 if not much more. So you could look at it pro rata. The English Championship got 595 million for 24 teams. So if prorata ours would be 200 million. That ain't to bad taking all things into consideration.

20 Nov 2018 23:49:48
It’s not about the football. It’s about the potential audience who will buy subscriptions and the advertising revenue.

When teams outside of the old firm can barely get 5,000 to a home game it says a lot about interest in football.

21 Nov 2018 00:29:47
Exactly Eastcoatblue and the £595M is subsidised by us. It’s nonsense that a team like Huddersfield can pay more for players than Celtic or Rangers. I don’t subscribe at the moment but I’d happily pay more for a Scottish only package than the current UK package knowing that the money was going back into Scottish football.

21 Nov 2018 13:02:18
there now saying 160 million on 5 year deal from sky, any thoughts on this.

21 Nov 2018 15:57:55
We have only got the old firm end of, no one wants to watch any other teams in Scotland including Edinburgh derby. That goes for rangers or celtic playing any other teams in spfl, the money we receive commercially is because of old firm.

21 Nov 2018 16:15:13
not sure where you are plucking 20m per season from?
£160m on a 5 year deal = 32m.
For league games alone. Then we will receive more for our cup matches.
This stands for only 12 top flight clubs?
A lot of other countries receive nothing like this per club.

21 Nov 2018 17:04:42
Agree Dunfermline and hollow.

21 Nov 2018 20:39:13
Beggars cant be choosers. us and celtic are the money.

22 Nov 2018 22:30:18
To be fair I read that it was 100 mill over 5 seasons as well, where are you reading 160? I don't have sky anyway, I have virgin and get BT sports free so I have been enjoying the football this season, when games are on sky I can stream with no problems. I do like that BT have given the less interesting games a shot though it's fair to the league as a whole and the league has become more competitive with the likes of Kilmarnock under Clarke very resilient hard to beat. Your also going to get plenty if goals in most of hibs games, obviously the fan base of the old firm and then aberdeen and hearts in the mix, it's good for a change having a good few teams battling it out so far but the tv deal is poor, your talking less than 2 mill per team per season if it is 100 mill.



Log In or Register to post

Remember me

Forgot Pass