Rangers banter 54411


Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.

(single word yields best result)

02 Jun 2018 09:26:10
SG saying he's not wanting to encourage bids for Tav and Windas, anybody think this is true or just a smoke screen to encourage higher bids?
Personally i would not mind if either or both went.

Agree19 Disagree2

02 Jun 2018 10:55:52
I think Tav played really well against hibs but bottom line is he leaks goals at the back which costs games so wouldn’t bother me if he went but I think SG will keep him. Windass should go and stay with his dad down south. He’s too inconsistent and doesn’t play in big games

02 Jun 2018 11:11:08
Why don’t we play him further up the pitch and buy a right back that just defends? . Tav

02 Jun 2018 12:34:10
We can't get rid of the whole team, tavernier was probably one of the better players over the season and i think he will get better with better players around him, windass is extremely frustrating as there is a player in there but consistency has been his problem, hopefully stevie g can get there confidence sky high and we can get the best out of them.

02 Jun 2018 12:49:27
Ryan Jack started his career at right back. I would play him there

02 Jun 2018 12:56:52
I think you will find Tav is the highest performing full back in the league, left side or right. (Queue the obsessed mouth foam) . The stats do not lie.

He has improved defensively this season also, the CB's and our midfield which is soft as sh*te is the reason why we have lost so many goals. Tav is one of our best players, a complete clear out is not the way forward, keep the good players and add better quality to replace the ones that are good enough.

02 Jun 2018 15:00:19
Tav is much better when mcorrie played in midfield as ross, s natural instinct is to defend so he would natuarally cover . tav cannot be counted in a defensive line or role but has still great value to offer in the team . windass too . asked to do to much . I would keep windass as an impact player and try him for 30 mins second half for a spell

02 Jun 2018 15:58:46
Maybe not rangers class but there would be 7 or 8 out the door before them

02 Jun 2018 16:57:57
Id definitely give tav ago futher forward or in midfield the way we changed ricksen as he's definitely a threat running with ball and good engine but defensive positioning let's him down

02 Jun 2018 16:59:30
Have read and enjoyed posts here for a long time but this is my first post so go easy guys if you disagree. I’m with MOLS suggestion. I’m old enough to remember Sandy Jardine come into the first team. He was almost a general use player but mainly midfield then some time as centre forward, always hard working but not fast. When by necessity he was moved to right back he was totally transformed and was widely thought of as one of the best full backs In the world. I’m not say Ryan Jack would reach that level but why not? Nobody thought it of Jardine. MM played him there for Scotland and I thought apart from one mistake he had a really good solid game. Tav has just not got the concentration to be counted on when needed in defence but in front of a competent full back I think he’d excel, he’s good going forward. With Candias as back up we’d be well covered RM. just my thought guys.

02 Jun 2018 19:58:25
Jon bear
Jardine is the best right back the club has ever had

02 Jun 2018 22:46:11
Shows he don't know are league going on the hype of windass from down south probably

02 Jun 2018 23:19:57
100% agree Arthur he was recognised far beyond our shores as world class. Was privileged to watch him.

03 Jun 2018 01:30:47
I'd keep both unless an offer of crazy money came in. Not going to have a lot of time to find quality replacements before the 12th July and despite what many (including myself) have thought of both at time's the amount of goals they were both involved with can't be taken for granted.



Log In or Register to post

Remember me

Forgot Pass