Rangers banter 49262

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.



24 Jun 2017 12:36:47
Why are people not excited by the signing of a tried and tested player but will fall over themselves for a foreigner that we have no idea about?

Mclean is a better signing than Dorrans for me and makes more financial sense. In saying that, i don't think either are world beaters but would provide some good options for us. Both are a serious improvement on what we have at the minute.

Looking forward to the season ahead. A lot of unknown players signed and it will be exciting to see how they turn out.

Agree7 Disagree7

24 Jun 2017 12:43:11
Was reading a BBC Article by a Mexican journalist and he said they are all surprised the Mexican boys got a move here. I am very excited to see them play but he warned that they've been off the boil for a couple of tears and might be a big disappointment. However, I am even more excited at the prospect of Dorrans or McLean as they are both tried and tested, some of the best talents Scotland has to offer.

So, I agree with you! Foreign talents are exciting as they're unknown butfans should be excited by the guaranteed improvement that people like Dorrans or McLean would bring. Bonus that they know what Rangers are all about

24 Jun 2017 13:00:58
Tried and Tested?

O'Halloran?
Barton?

Tried and tested in Scotland you mean rather than proven players with skill, temperament and experience?

I get your point but every one of the signings is a big step up from the player they are replacing - granted that life in Glasgow has its stresses for these guys but Pedro knows and trusts them

24 Jun 2017 14:40:13
mclean is a better signing than dorrans for you.

really gm?

mclean who's played at st mirren arbroath and for aberdeen who finnished 30pts behind celtic you would rather over scotland internationalist dorrans who's played in
EPL for 8yrs

respect your opinion mate but baffled by it all the same. I get at 30 the financial side of signing dorrans in terms of lack of re-sale value but in terms of quality I just don't see it

24 Jun 2017 15:30:00
McLean is not a better signing than Dorrans in terms of ability but I get the resale point of view. I hope we go all out for Dorrans tbh he is a class act, got premiership and international experience. Dorrans and Walker would be great additions but if it comes down to cash then I'd still be happy with McLean and Walker. For me It's Walker we should be prioritising!

24 Jun 2017 16:18:04
Dorrans has played in the English Premier league but he's not the player he was 2-3 years ago. If you looked at him the last couple of seasons he seems in decline as a player. McLean still seems to improving as a player in my opinion. Still has something to prove. Why shouldn't we try to sign one of the better players playing in Scotland? I know he's not a defensive midfielder but McLean is a better footballer than jack. Who every one seemed delighted we signed

24 Jun 2017 18:19:51
McLean wouldn't be the worst signing but dorrans is a more established player. I wouldn't be surprised if we bought one of them or walker and a full back. Think the new dof could lure a couple young talents either 🤞







 

 

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass  
 
Change Consent