14 Aug 2016 07:17:37
Everyone jumping on the garner band wagon that I broke first and then bear necessities and gazzmclau ridiculed me for saying it. Few others only warbs gave me credit for what every paper has now broke the story. So many on here slag you for posting info on here it's a rumour site.
14 Aug 2016 07:51:50
Fair play to you Alex for breaking the story. Well done.
14 Aug 2016 07:56:13
Totally back you up here alexcee, I had the same when I broke the moh news on here almost 4 months before we signed him, that's what a small minority is like on here because they've not got a scoop and they continually think posters on here are making everything up because they're not in the know or have no info on a specific player, that's why we have this facility to share what we hear about everything regarding glasgow rangers.
14 Aug 2016 08:13:48
Fair play to you alexcee. Looks like it's a goer. Personally I know nothing about him but any half decent striker will score plenty with the chances we create. There's a lot of folk on this site that just want to be negative or pick holes in rumours posted, yes some rumours like RVP were total none sense but there is a few genuine ones and yours seems to be gathering pace.
14 Aug 2016 10:44:55
Surely joe garner isn't the big name that was being lined up. I'll give anyone a chance when they sign for rangers. But I have to say i'm a little underwhelmed about the signing. I'll happily be proved wrong. But his career record is 1 in 3 games and a lot of his appearances were in the lower leagues. 28 so no real sell on value. But like I said I'll be over the moon to be proved wrong.
14 Aug 2016 10:57:49
I remember that warbs I don't usually post and its for that reason but when I heard about this one I had to share. He seems a decent player from what I know but at least we are spending money.
14 Aug 2016 11:23:12
people tend to forget. That this is a Roumers Page and again this transfer window most players we have been linked with are nonsence. The ones that do come true the posters tend to harp on and on about I told you, if this one does materialise I hope he's better than MoH who just doesn't look interested he's been with us since January in my opinion you Harry Forrester is miles better!
14 Aug 2016 11:54:33
Disagree Bongo, O'Halloran is suffering from teams sitting deep leaving little space to run into. Think he was unlucky not to start yesterday as he played very well on Tuesday. He has real pace and is the only player we have with this asset which in my opinion we will need. I don't see this bit that he doesn't look interested!
14 Aug 2016 12:57:25
Disagree that MOH isn't interested, he is clearly trying (possibly too hard)
Problem is that he isn't good enough. He has pace but runs head down and has zero end product. Said before we signed him that it was a mistake, done nothing to prove me wrong.
14 Aug 2016 15:26:09
Jury still out on moh. think he is better suited to bn an impact player. he seems to b struggling to fit into our style. at st jon he was always playing on the counter wheras at us he's constantly bn asked to attack.
14 Aug 2016 16:35:36
I would play ohalloran on the left let him come inside and drive at teams or through the middle.
14 Aug 2016 08:36:12
I still don't think we can afford him especially when the asking price is supposedly at least £1million as we don't have that money at this moment in time not with court cases happening all the time and legal fees to pay, I hope I'm wrong because I think this guy could do really well for us, i hope warburton and weir get the backing of the board on this and of course a strong centre back which is a position that also needs badly addressed.
14 Aug 2016 09:43:29
No apologies from me - you post and take your chance.
Well done for a super guess.
Looks like the deal will rest on Tav deal being done.
TBBaB.
14 Aug 2016 14:55:34
garner won't be at ibrox preston will not budge on fee they want and we will not pay £1.25 m.