Rangers banter 44355

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.



19 Jul 2016 09:47:19
Right I'm going to start a topical debate. Wilson or Keirnan and why? Everyone knows my answer. I think both can come good this season although I feel Kiernan and tav don't work well defensively especially in comparison to Wilson and Wallace and feel on Saturday we were weak on the right in particular. Who knows maybe a proper CDM is all we need.

Agree3 Disagree0

19 Jul 2016 10:28:27
Danny Wilson played beside davie weir and they were a good solid defensive partnership. I don't think kiernan has been given that chance. Kiernan or wilson beside Clint hill could work, old head experience etc. But one things certain kiernan and Wilson does not work and we will get caught out defensively.

19 Jul 2016 10:34:17
My opinion is we should play Hill and Ball, but as it stands I'd have Wilson nxt to Hill. In a nutshell I just think Wilson is a better CH, he's still only 24? and still developing yeah think he's the youngest but same could be said for Kiernan regarding his development! I think both will come good, hate to keep saying it but for CH's they are well young.

19 Jul 2016 10:39:29
Kiernan has pace which at times last season saved us. The issue is Wilson has Wallace next to him making him look good. Kiernan has Tav. Which my opinion on Tav is that he is a winger not a defender. We will see tonight where crooks plays tonight and see how Tav does.

19 Jul 2016 10:52:15
Kiernan has pace? (Chuckle chuckle) .

I prefer Wilson but don't like the sound of Wilson/ Hill partnership, both left footed with no pace between them. i'd try to sign a pacey CB to play alongside Wilson as RCB, and have Kiernan and Hill as back up.

19 Jul 2016 10:55:57
I'd have both minus Tav. With Tav, I'd take Wilson. Although I'm struggling to think what CH could successfully work with Tav. Maybe another RB to shadow Tav? hahahaha 5 at the back. RB, RB CB, CB, LB.

19 Jul 2016 11:10:37
It's strange because both seem to be polarising figures which to me tells us they both have good and bad qualities that some will appreciate more than others.

19 Jul 2016 12:18:06
The only time Kiernan impressed me was the Celtic game. Every other time I've seen him play he's been underwhelming. Wilson's not exactly been great since he came back but he could be a great defender for us.
I'm still holding out for Marriapa, I think him and Wilson could be a great combo.

19 Jul 2016 12:39:39
Personally I think kiernan is getting a hard time at the moment maybe rightly. I think they both need an old head next to them for a couple of seasons to mature into better players. Center half's don't really mature till thier late 20s so I think they could both come good. At the ment though I'd have Wilson only because when he had DW next to him he looked like a real player.

19 Jul 2016 12:52:11
recbob, I tend to agree that this was one of Kiernans better performances for us, but ask yourself why was that?

Was Ball playing as a screen in front of the back 4? Yes.

Were we a little more defensive minded compared with league games, ie- Tav and Wallace not bombing forward as much? Yes.

Don't get me wrong, I don't regard Kiernan as a great defender, but it just goes to show that if we protect the defence a bit better then both Kiernan and Wilson are capable of doing a bit better during the game. To be honest I thought they were much better during the Dundee game, as they made a couple slip ups that were not punished against Celtic.







 

 

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass  
 
Change Consent