Rangers Rumours Member Posts


onlyshowaround's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
Correct Score Competition:
143.)   Kopite8310
144.)   TQ10
145.)   Ron Keague10
146.)   onlyshowaround10
147.)   Greengrass10
148.)   Gunn10
149.)   Church on a hill10
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



onlyshowaround's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To onlyshowaround's Posts



To onlyshowaround's last 5 rumours posts


To onlyshowaround's last 5 banter posts


To onlyshowaround's last 5 rumour replies


To onlyshowaround's last 5 banter replies


onlyshowaround's rumours posts with other poster's replies to onlyshowaround's rumours posts


09 Mar 2017 15:32:59
Al Gharafa have confirmed Pedro is on his way to Rangers.




09 Feb 2017 09:13:39
If it is true regarding the rumour of major investment coming in February/ March, would it bother people if it was Redbull?


1.) 09 Feb 2017 09:39:41
It's not coming! while the fat man has his finger in the pie no one will touch us unless they buy the club outright

2.) 09 Feb 2017 09:40:15
Only of it would mean our disqualification from european competition. Otherwise i would be fine with it.

3.) 09 Feb 2017 10:47:52
If there was to be any significant investment, from any source, I would want to know all the ins and outs of it. If SDM had done his due diligence, perhaps we would not be where we are currently. It all comes down to what conditions are involved.

4.) 09 Feb 2017 11:11:54
WOULDNT, i meant to say

5.) 09 Feb 2017 17:28:48
Cullin 72, I think Murray knew what he was doing. He has walked away scot free from a situation that paul Daniels would not have fixed. Yes Whyte green Ashley have all messed up and put rangers where they are today but Murray is still never blamed by the majority of rangers fans. So I ask why not?

6.) 09 Feb 2017 21:29:34
For me, David Murray and his shorts at Bank of Scotland are 100% to blame. They knew exactly what they were up to. As for Due Diligence, it is my understanding that Whyte also banked with Lloyds Banking Group so they wouldn't have needed to look to far to see that he was a man of straw!

7.) 09 Feb 2017 23:22:55
Maybe Ashley has asked for X amount OR there IS a buy out clause in contract that King etc cannot put up IF merchandise is worth between 4-6m annually then god knows what it would be BUT I wonder how much SD are generating from merchandise currently can't imagine its anywhere near even a 1/ 4 of potential amount? Thoughts Bears do u think fat man would go if an offer was put on table for him to walk?

8.) 09 Feb 2017 23:57:38
onlyshow where was it u heard this rumour as if it was here thenu know its probably a load of nonsense created by the many manky mob that visit our site

9.) 10 Feb 2017 07:28:45
its always somebody else fault James eh! its a rumours/ banter site. enjoy it and stop taking it too serious.

10.) 10 Feb 2017 16:13:11
If we were to get investment would need to be the right people an I'd imagine they would want the fat mans contracts torn up would be great but no 1 will invest in Rangers with him hanging over us can't see it happening but would love serious money to bring us back abit quicker as I'm impatient

11.) 10 Feb 2017 12:28:38

Members of the then Rangers board had warned Murray not to sell to Whyte as they knew he was a charlatan however Murray chose not to listen and sold the club regardless. To me Murray is equally as culpable as the rest who followed and if there was any justice he would be sharing a cell with Whyte in Barlinnie



31 Jan 2017 11:20:06
Anyone know what fee we got for Matt Gilks?


1.) 31 Jan 2017 12:22:32
Was curios of this myself, I heard they were willing to let him go for free, hopefully got a small fee, it won't be more than we signed Jak Alnwick for.

2.) 31 Jan 2017 13:01:12
Gilks went for free onlyshow.

3.) 31 Jan 2017 13:21:30
Went for an undisclosed fee

4.) 31 Jan 2017 13:26:40
Thought is was undisclosed. not sure if that means "Free" but would have thought he would have been on bigger wage than the new guy

5.) 31 Jan 2017 13:35:25
No he didn't go for free jaws

6.) 31 Jan 2017 13:21:30
Went for an undisclosed fee

7.) 31 Jan 2017 13:26:40
Thought is was undisclosed. not sure if that means "Free" but would have thought he would have been on bigger wage than the new guy

8.) 31 Jan 2017 13:35:25
No he didn't go for free jaws

9.) 31 Jan 2017 13:58:39
300k for gilks

10.) 31 Jan 2017 16:31:19
Indisclosed fee as they say, expect would be around £100k

11.) 31 Jan 2017 16:44:37
'A fee believed to be in the region of £75k' I was told.

12.) 31 Jan 2017 16:22:29
Moved for undisclosed fee



16 Jan 2017 11:48:07
we are being linked with Juan carlos paredes. Watford rb/ rwb.


1.) 16 Jan 2017 12:47:18
Why? We already have Tav and Hudson

2.) 16 Jan 2017 13:18:45
bit of a stupid question mate. Better quality.

3.) 16 Jan 2017 13:45:54
tavs proved in the scottish cup final and last old firm game that if someone is prepared to run at him whole game his bottle crashes hodson i can't fault for effort but isn't the answer if were moving forward RB is definetely an area we nd to strengthen as is our whole defence tbh

4.) 16 Jan 2017 14:12:40
We need a holding midfield player / defensive midfield more than we need a right back unless young Rossiter is ready to return!

5.) 16 Jan 2017 15:21:30
We need a striker.

6.) 16 Jan 2017 15:49:23
I can't see this one being realistic. Price of £2m being quoted. I can't see us struggling for cash and then making a 29 year old Right Back (a non-essential) being our most expensive purchase when we are crying out for quality in other areas?

7.) 16 Jan 2017 16:08:32
Well Blue, it depends what formation we are going forward with. if it is a 3-5-2 then we need a decent rwb, Tav will cost us a lot of goals if he continues his current form.

8.) 16 Jan 2017 17:01:48
I can't wait to see the back of tavs so she hope this true

9.) 16 Jan 2017 17:15:48
I'm not supporting Tav OSA but surely when we are crying out for a centre back, a defensive mid and a striker of quality and we had £2m for one position (which we don't) we would fill these berths first!?

10.) 16 Jan 2017 18:20:17
@bluegenius - got to agree. If and it's a big if, there is no way we would be spending £2 million on one player.

11.) 16 Jan 2017 18:23:50
Tav is the weakest link. Always posted missing.

12.) 16 Jan 2017 18:38:08
first of all we need a striker as priority and i wouldn't even class tav as a right back no harm to the boy but he is definently the week link

13.) 17 Jan 2017 08:04:06
Tavernier might be a weak link but he is not alone. There are holes all over the park and at least we have Hodson, (who, defensively is a better player), to play in that position.

There are problems in attack despite the fact that we have at least four players that we deem to be strikers but if you take away Miller and acknowledge that Dodoo is a young player with a lot to learn the other two right now couldn't score in a Brothel!
We have some decent young players, like McKay with real potential in attacking midfield.

Where we are sadly lacking, indeed totally lacking, is in holding midfield / defensive midfield and if we are honest, that is a position that Warburton has failed miserably to fill.

Yes, you can say he was unlucky with Barton, but was he? He knew the guy carried baggage but, when you are lacking alternatives you don't just get rid of someone after a spat with an inferior player! Then you could say he was unlucky with young Rossiter and yes he was, but one look at the boy's injury history with Liverpool highlights that he was always going to be a risk.

Yes, if there is one player I want to see fit it is Rossiter because I believe that he would make the difference but right now we have no idea what the state of the boy's injury is because we are being told nothing by people at Rangers.

If there is one position I would be looking to fill right now it is that defensive / holding midfield role. If there is one position where I would be happy to find a seasoned professional that could walk into a role and simultaneously help steady the defence, improve the midfield and set up more chances for the forwards then that is it. Strangely, for reasons that are beyond me, Warburton appears to be happy with what he has!

14.) 17 Jan 2017 12:49:41
Personally I think Tav deserves more respect from a lot of so called fans! He's contributed a lot for us and had some blinders in a Rangers shirt. We are struggling as a team and they need our support. I don't get the absolute rush to improve, we will get second but there is nowhere to go beyond them, we will never compete in Europe. If you don't like it go an support Barcelona!

15.) 17 Jan 2017 12:49:41
Personally I think Tav deserves more respect from a lot of so called fans! He's contributed a lot for us and had some blinders in a Rangers shirt. We are struggling as a team and they need our support. I don't get the absolute rush to improve, we will get second but there is nowhere to go beyond them, we will never compete in Europe. If you don't like it go an support Barcelona!



10 Jan 2017 14:48:31
Bates has been signed on a 18month deal.


1.) 10 Jan 2017 15:43:21
Ah, the old master

2.) 10 Jan 2017 15:56:25
Nice one gram. Took me a wee second!

3.) 10 Jan 2017 15:56:35
David bates why?

4.) 10 Jan 2017 17:02:28
Because he's still very Young and warburton sees him everyday at Murray park, so he must see something in the boy

5.) 10 Jan 2017 17:08:53
Yes, but like the others, will he ever be given a chance to show what he can do in the first team?

6.) 10 Jan 2017 17:20:10
Looks to be a big unit and has a bit of presence about him. David Weir must also rate the boy, would like to see him get some game time in the second half of the season.

7.) 10 Jan 2017 18:17:48
He sees the rest of the defence everyday in training. I'd love to know what he sees in them

8.) 10 Jan 2017 18:26:17
Ive saw him twice albeit at a lesser level but he looked solid! Under the right coaching he could go on to be a decent big player, we can't go wrong with him be on minimal wage so we've nothing to lose




onlyshowaround's banter posts with other poster's replies to onlyshowaround's banter posts


06 Apr 2017 09:46:03
Caixinha really has his work cut out. Defense needs sorted, lack of strength and creativity in midfield, and no goalscorer to be seen. This won't be a quick fix.


1.) 06 Apr 2017 11:13:40
It won't be a fix at all unless we see some serious investment. At the present time we run more risk of being caught for 3rd place by St Johnstone than we have hope of catching Aberdeen for second.

The players generally are a joke! The ones that might make a difference, our goalkeeper excluded are either injured or out on loan! We might be fortunate with one or two of the youth players but in general, Warburton's signings are no where near good enough. They are Scottish Championship level at best and we need to be signing players that are better than those of the competition in the SPL.

I just hope that Pedro has a few Liga MX players lined up for next season because we are about six first team players short of what we need and that is before we start looking at the Squad!

2.) 06 Apr 2017 12:05:12
Brexit might make it harder to unearth some rough diamonds from outside the UK.

3.) 06 Apr 2017 13:47:14
If you think brexit will have any effect on the potential for the UK to tax a player making 1-500k a week you're uneducated. We will be able to set whatever laws the UK government decides is appropriate through the people we actually elect.

4.) 06 Apr 2017 14:19:32
It would make a nice change for you naysayers to give Pedro some credit for having a bit of intelligence.

Do you really think he had no idea how much he would have to spend before he accepted the job?

Do your really think he did not have an understanding of our current level of player?

One side of the debate is surely thick. Pedro or the doubters

5.) 06 Apr 2017 14:42:04
No one should be criticising the new manager; he has the biggest bunch of jokers that we have ever had in the SPL and trying to find eleven that are good enough will be far from easy. We can criticise Warburton all we want as well but at the end of the day the only semi decent money he spent was on Garner and while he appears to have wasted that I am not sure what quality of striker we could have unearthed for that sort of money looking in the UK.

My only criticisms of Warburton are that he didn't shop overseas and he didn't instil any fight in the players.

As for Brexit not helping, what rubbish! The only two things that will help are (1) Serious Investment (2) Good scouting

6.) 06 Apr 2017 15:40:48
Obviously Pedro was told how much money he would have for transfers.

Whether the figure mentioned is remotely accurate remains to be seen.

After all last year Dave King promised that he would 'overinvest'.

7.) 06 Apr 2017 16:59:35
According to Kings club statement where he was giving Warburton it tight after his alleged sacking, he said the manager was giving more funds for players, than the board had budgeted for at the start of the season

need to over/ overinvest just to catch Aberdeen next season.

8.) 06 Apr 2017 16:46:26
The biggest problem is we cannot create a thing.

9.) 06 Apr 2017 16:48:55
this could be a quick fix he could bring in 5 players and job done we don't know and i'd rather be positive about it as I've been too negative of late

10.) 06 Apr 2017 19:41:55
Nothing to do with tax. Non UK players will need work permits after brexit. Only players who have played enough percentage of games for their national team will be given a work permit.

11.) 06 Apr 2017 19:34:07
Brexit is going to make it more difficult to get Europeans as they will need Work Permits. Unless a player has a certain amount of caps they don't get automatic WPs. So it will, on theory, make it more difficult to get rough diamonds.

12.) 06 Apr 2017 20:44:40
If we bring in European players next season then Brexit won't be an issue and when we look outside Europe the answer is simple, sign international stars, not second rate third division England players.

13.) 06 Apr 2017 20:35:11
Brexit will have no effect whatsoever on player movement for at least three years, and maybe even then the restrictions will be minor. Plus Brexit means we are withdrawing from the EU, not the world.

14.) 07 Apr 2017 13:59:16
Yeah we are withdrawing from the eu so after the 3 years players will need permits. Obviously.



03 Apr 2017 14:23:51
Wallace and Hill likely to miss the game against Kilmarnock. Hodson Looks like he will return, Tav should be back, however Wilson should be out again. Looks like a back four of Tav, Senderos, Kiernan and Hodson on wednesday. The 3-5-2 against Motherwell seemed to work, Maybe we should go for it again? back 3 of Senderos, Kiernan and Bates?


1.) 03 Apr 2017 16:26:08
senderos shoouldnt be near our team

2.) 03 Apr 2017 16:33:39
Tav kiernan Bates halliday.

3.) 04 Apr 2017 07:58:57

Did u watch the second half on Saturday? Halliday was murder at left back and nearly all their attacks came down the left. He were going by Halliday as if he wasn't there and once again his passing was terrible. I'd rather play one of the young defenders than play Halliday at left back

4.) 04 Apr 2017 11:55:33
i feel for halliday as he constantly gets played out of position

5.) 04 Apr 2017 19:03:47
You talking about halliday who was playing centre back on Saturday with kiernan and toral? We were totally open with no cover at all for them. Can't blame them.



30 Mar 2017 08:12:45
I see the Daily Record have made an article about Scotland's "pathetic" tv deal. From what I can see there is nothing pathetic about it, the deal very much represents how poor Scottish football is.


1.) 30 Mar 2017 09:11:06
With that mentality, will it ever improve? Why would anyone invest in something where its core audience constantly undermines it?

{Ed001's Note - in any business, it is not up to the audience to improve it. In fact audience dissatisfaction is usually the catalyst to changes.}

2.) 30 Mar 2017 10:41:59
The fact of the matter is, outwith the oldfirm the demand is just not there for it. It is as pure and simple as that and onlyshow is correct. The demand is not there because of the standard of the games on show. That's not a poor mentality. It's the truth.


3.) 30 Mar 2017 11:00:27
If we continually talk ourself down then we will never get investment. We have some seriously rich people involved with our clubs i think if all those people put some cash in a pot to sponsor ourselves we would be more likely to get outside investment as we are showing that we are willing to invest in ourselves. It's like going to the bank for 100% mortgage or going in with some savings the bank will lend if you can show you have something to put in too.

4.) 30 Mar 2017 12:28:11
I think the teams with large fan bases should be rewarded because TV coverage of their games comes with atmosphere. A near full house at Easter Road or Tynecastle can be great entertainment irrespective of which league and both teams are entertaining. We can't just say everything about Scottish football is 'rank rotten', it's not and you could sell a package of our best supported clubs. I admit that seeing a St Johnstone vs Ross County with a near empty stadium is awful viewing but let's admit to that and hand pick a package worthy to appeal to a large TV audience and sell it for big bucks. All teams playing will benefit.

5.) 30 Mar 2017 12:49:16
I don't watch football for the atmosphere. I watch it to be entertained and Scottish football doesn't do that.

6.) 30 Mar 2017 13:19:21
Ed001 True, but it's hard to sell a product to a broader market when your current customers only leave bad reviews!

{Ed001's Note - then you improve the product and get better reviews.}

7.) 30 Mar 2017 13:30:32
BlueIsTheColour, don't bad reviews lead to improvements? if we only talk about the good we will never fix the bad.

8.) 30 Mar 2017 14:44:14
Fair play lads. I agree Scottish football's in a bad place currently, but I can't agree that us slating it is the solution. I actually thought the DR made some decent points and are trying to fight our corner, when it seems noone else will!

9.) 30 Mar 2017 14:44:19
The product is GASH unless one of the old firm is playing and even then it's only just tolerable.

10.) 30 Mar 2017 15:01:25
Blue, which points did you think were decent? just out of interest.

11.) 30 Mar 2017 14:42:30
why have we had no big changes then edd we have been dissatisfied for year now and its not air to say we aren't worth more than the deals we get its all about undermining scotland as we have players up here who have went for pennies compared to much much worse players going for millions more down south so yes my friends it is a poor reflection of the value of scottish football and when u look at the likes of porto who have their own individual deal with broadcasters make so much more money and have less fans than us worldwide

12.) 30 Mar 2017 14:58:13
In many ways the atmosphere is what makes football so disagree with previous comments.

13.) 30 Mar 2017 15:17:45
James, don't see your point about fans. Rangers fans outwith the UK are a pointless fact. they don't affect TV income from BT and SKY at all. Besides Porto are a very attractive team to watch, Rangers (or any Scottish team) aren't.

14.) 30 Mar 2017 15:21:23
This all stems back to that Setanta deal when all the wee diddy clubs wanted an equal share without providing any of the audience.

15.) 30 Mar 2017 20:04:21
Scottish football is far more entertaining than most. And I agree with Dawson it's because every team bar us and celtic would rather take 10 million of setanta than 40 off sky, guess the sfas calculator was broke.

16.) 30 Mar 2017 20:38:54
All the clubs in Scotland are diddy clubs.

17.) 31 Mar 2017 08:40:44
That we receive £18.75M from the TV deal, while the EPL receive £1.71 BILLION. That's 1% of what they get. Watford got more cash just from selling Ighalo than our entire league receives from what should probably be the biggest income source! If that doesn't seem an imbalance to you, then we can enjoy talking about the poor standard for as long as Scottish football survives for.

18.) 31 Mar 2017 10:16:09
EPL is a very competitive league with a lot of very good players. It's a very attractive league to watch, I will say the cost per season is ridiculous however it is in demand. There is no imbalance at all that Watford got more for Ighalo than we do for TV rights. TV Rights are based on 1) Demand 2) Quality Scotland has neither, so we get less. The EPL has both so gets a LOT for it, thus meaning teams can command more for their players.

19.) 31 Mar 2017 12:07:40
Ok onlyshow, I've had enough mate! You can have your opinion, I'll keep mine.

20.) 31 Mar 2017 13:58:44
Fair enough Blue, to be honest you sound like a guy in my work. "Scottish football gets a dreadful TV deal, we deserve more. " Fair enough that's your opinion but what the hell is it based on? The article the dailyrecord put up does nothing but show how pathetic our standard of football is. Compare us to the other 17 countries in the table and we have the WORST quality out of the lot, meaning our "pathetic" TV deal is very very fair. "All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others"

21.) 31 mar 2017 16:16:51
onlyshow the english league is only that good because of the money they make from tv deals.

they have more money they can buy a better class of players and whilst i agree its a better tougher league that should be on more than us we are still being dealt a bad hand by the broadcasters mate.

no way should we get less money than that of the league one sides down there, no way should we be getting less money than that of the danish league or the league in greece.

scottish football is a lot better entertainment than those leagues in my opinion and rangers and celtic are bigger names and our men in charge should be getting closer to the 80 million mark rather than 18 it is offensive to be getting the worst deal in europe when we have teams like rangers and celtic and those games minimum 4 a year are the second most watched sporting events in the world after a once a year superbowl! we are getting bumped end of!

22.) 31 Mar 2017 13:28:54
English championship is the fifth most watched in Europe behind all the major European leagues and I have watched a few of the games. You get like 3-3 draws that if you take out the goals the game would be the most boring game of football ive watched and that's the best of them.

I don't get how people continue to watch that dross and to be honest I love watching Scottish football it's fast and some teams play great stuff like hearts and obviously old firm but Ito the same as every one of the major leagues it's fast great entertainment but u do get the odd dross 0-0 but you name a league that doesn't and I think people that stag the Scottish game then watch English league pish needs a reality check.

I'm afraid another thing i'll touch on is the business model of Scottish clubs they need to get their hottest talents signed up on good 4-5 year contracts and then if they get good offers they have to accept them and also I'd like to see the clubs buy off of each other.

I don't mean rangers and that lot buying all the best players I mean all clubs buying off of each other and that would keep the money in Scottish football and not getting free bees from lower league in England that's my view on this :)

23.) 31 Mar 2017 17:52:50
James Stirling. The danish league and Greece super League are better than ours. If either Aberdeen or Rangers were put into either of those leagues next year they'd be lucky to finish in the top 3. League 1 down south again is better quality than the SPFL. most if not all League 1 sides would be capable of finishing top 6 each year in scotland.

Scotlands produces no where near the quality to get £80mil per year. I agree due to having the old firm we should get atleast 30-40 per season but that's about it. I still reckon quality wise we deserve £19mil per season, but the bonus of now having 4 old firms per season does make it now worth 30-40.



02 Mar 2017 13:47:18
Was Kiernans sending off the correct decision? I reckon it was a harsh tackle but when you see it in slow motion I reckon it is only a yellow, then again I'm old school. What is everyone else's opinion?


1.) 02 Mar 2017 14:49:22
In my mind 100% not a red full blooded tackle studs weren't up poor decision however there was no need to go flying in like that in the 1st place

2.) 02 Mar 2017 15:24:06
Stupid tackle, 2-1 up with time left and Boulder nut flys in with a tackle from behind, either way he gives the ref a decision to make. Sooner he's away the better imo

3.) 02 Mar 2017 14:56:48
I agree. His foot was on the ground and not dangerously high. Stupid thing to do though, especially when out on the touchline. Gave the ref a decision to make when he didn't have to. I thought he and Hill both had a decent game to be fair.

4.) 02 Mar 2017 15:43:31
Whether people think it was a red or not, i'm so glad, i just hope we don't win our appeal, he could play against celtic :- (

5.) 02 Mar 2017 16:01:44
Never a red.

6.) 02 Mar 2017 22:45:23
I didn't think that it was a red card but he didn't need to make the tackle in the first place!



09 Feb 2017 16:18:06
Warburton is Second favourite for the Nottingham Forest job. I know how the bookies work, but if there is interest from Nottingham Forest then that to me says a lot about our manager.





onlyshowaround's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

15 Apr 2017 10:26:50
Poor wee Billy. He'd rather chase money than play 1st team football. Also the high possibility of European football next year. I'll give him stick when he goes on loan to halifax town!




Click To View This Thread

14 Apr 2017 23:39:00
Anyone with a brain would move out of Aberdeen. Things will only get worse up there.




Click To View This Thread

14 Apr 2017 14:20:39
I wouldn't touch patterson with his current injury, far too much of a gamble to go for him after he has recovered.




Click To View This Thread

14 Apr 2017 08:36:44
Far better than what we currently have for his position. will also unsettle Aberdeen as they don't have anyone to fill his spot.




Click To View This Thread

13 Apr 2017 09:52:17
Toral is wasting his time at Arsenal, he will never make it into that first team. He may aswell try and push to leave them.





onlyshowaround's banter replies


Click To View This Thread

15 Apr 2017 10:28:00
Realitivily young Rangers side. A bit older Celtic team, with a 38 year old in goals. Not much to gloat about.




Click To View This Thread

14 Apr 2017 14:23:41
A new CB is a must, Ryan jack would be a great signing for midfield. It looks like we will be going forward with a 4-2-3-1 formation, Garner will be useful upfront in that formation. Caixinha has his work cut out, decent players are needed to close the gap and do well in europe, and we don't have a very long time to bring in those players and let them settle.




Click To View This Thread

13 Apr 2017 09:54:20
Could be worth a shot, wouldn't exactly set us back much either.




Click To View This Thread

10 Apr 2017 11:11:26
Correct Bengy we Shouldn't be 35 points behind them. We should be a lot closer to them with the budget we have, again blame the breadman. However there isn't much point comparing ourselves with Celtic right now, we should be comparing ourselves with Aberdeen as they are the team we should be beating comfortably to 2nd.




Click To View This Thread

10 Apr 2017 08:41:56
there is honestly no point at all comparing ourselves with Celtic based upon points difference. Celtic are outstanding this year, Rodgers has them playing the way they should be. Their financial power dwarves our own, We should be Second, but we can blame Warburton for that.