Rangers Rumours Member Posts

 

Stuart64's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded



Stuart64's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Stuart64's Posts

 

 

To Stuart64's last 5 banter posts

 

To Stuart64's last 5 rumour replies

 

To Stuart64's last 5 banter replies

 

Stuart64 has no Rumours Posts

 

 

Stuart64's banter posts with other poster's replies to Stuart64's banter posts

 

24 Apr 2017 07:38:19
Why was the minutes silence for big Ugo abandoned?

Players looked like they had gathered around centre circle to observe it, and then referee indicated that the game should start.

No excuses about the result yesterday . we were second best in every department.

Pedro got his tactics shockingly wrong . doesn't bode well for next season! Murty's team at Parkhead were better prepared and set out to compete with them.

I hope King is ready to spend the kids inheritance . one evidence of yesterday we need 6 - 8 top quality players . not freebies from lower leagues in England.

Stuart64

1.) 24 Apr 2017 10:03:38
Was king there yesterday?


2.) 24 Apr 2017 14:47:04
Surely King will do the sensible thing by his kids.


3.) 24 Apr 2017 15:16:29
Stuart64, as far as i'm concerned, the minutes applause/ silence was abandoned because i'm sure certain fans would've sang, booed etc through it


 

 

19 Jan 2015 08:57:49
As widely predicted on this forum. the Board are trying to have King's request for an EGM thrown out due to the "unsuitability" of those King proposes to have elected to the board.

Rich coming from Somers and the Sleasedales! couldn't have a board made up of more unsuitable characters!

Stuart64

1.) 19 Jan 2015 09:19:00
Does one of the easdales not have a criminal conviction for the same thing as Dave King?, and surely if this is the road the board are taking to stop an E. G. M then its only a matter of withdrawing himself and Mr Murray from the proposed board members and replacing them with two others for the time being. I also noticed the board are trying to get fans on side by saying some of the loan would go to improving the squad. I right!.
r. f


2.) Rf ide imagine mr king would have expected this move, and will have an answer to it, as far as loan money helping the squad lol, he is talking about the squad in the boardroom lo.


3.) Neither Easedale has been a director of any business that has faced an insolvency event in the last five years. Dave King and Paul Murray have so neither can legally sit on the board of Rangers at this moment in time.

This is not just an SFA rule as far as I can see it is the rule for any UK company but feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

As I wrote yesterday I cannot see DK's plan here. Is it an ego thing?

Why not let the 3 Bears take the lead?


4.) 19 Jan 2015 12:37:10
I hope he has George 123, but it would be beneficial to have a back up plan for two other candidates for the board just incase of any doubt. like your comment about the "squad" on the board lol.
r. f


5.) 19 Jan 2015 14:16:22
Naz you are right mate,I hope Kings ego has nothing to do with nominating himself.It could scupper the lot,why jeopordize the EGM?I'd rather Parks camp handled it.


6.) 19 Jan 2015 13:50:28
Naz is it not also the case you are not allowed if you have a criminal conviction as one of the easdales have?
r. f


7.) King is not stupid he will be fully aware of this BEFORE he requested the EGM this will go ahead in 40 days the board are just trying stalling tactics.

BOARD OUT AND POLICE IN TO CHECK ACCOUNTING PROCEEDURES

bluesnakeskincowboyboots


8.) One of the greasedales was jailed for a VAT charge.


9.) The EGM will go ahead at worst 3 Bears will do a back up request the fact they are trying to oppose it tells you everything their days are numbered count them down

BOARD OUT BEARS IN

Roya;e bloo


10.) R. f. I am no expert but I really don’t think so. In fact I would guess there are many convicted criminals on boards across the UK.


11.) Rf I was meaning mr king would have two other names to put for ward, should the case arise,


12.) Naz I think the convictions think only come into play if someone, anyone is looking for full ownership, and as no single person is trying full control, I don't think it will be a problem, I hope it's not a problem, but like I said to rf I would imagine mr king has this under control, as I think he is wide enough or he would not be trying to get involve, but as I say this is only my opinion on it.


 

 

30 Dec 2014 12:28:10
With attendances now less than 20,000. which straw will be the final straw for these fans?
MacLeod being sold to Brentford for £1m?
Board refusing to take the £6.5m from the 3 Bears and resort to sending begging letters on Boxing Day to Ashley, Kennedy, etc?
The woeful performances by the overpaid and over-rated players?
McDowall continuing to pick same team and same style of play that we've watched for 3 long seasons?

Stuart64

1.) 30 Dec 2014 12:50:54
Lets face facts until you get rid of the board we will not have a team on the park if we had brought on promising youngsters the board would have sold them to line their pockets . Somers treated the fans with contempt and second class citizens at agm not one cares as long as he gets paid which I doubt if the players have had their dues,i would down tools if my boss was sipping champagne and I had not been paid I think more is happening behind the scenes . we have got to hope we get rid of them even if it means staying in championship for another season


2.) 30 Dec 2014 13:22:04
I think everyone can now see that replacing Ally was not the answer, any team he put out would not have lost so heavily to any team let alone Hibs.
He was the heart and soul of Rangers and loved this club, I believe he resigned as a matter of principal over all the redundancies. Any monies he received as well as any monies from shares he was given he deserves and earned.
He has now earned the club £1m as it was him who nurtured macleod and all the other Murray Park kids.


3.) 30 Dec 2014 14:52:18
Is that a joke? He nurtured him what planet are you on he wouldn't even play him in his preferred position, what kids from murray park did he nurture. He filled the squad with old men who have no hunger what so ever, he bought nicky Clarke a young man that scored 30 plus goals in division 1 and would prefer to play boyd miller and daily before him. He didn't improve 1 player over the 4years he was in charge, and for all the hassle he received with administration and liquidation and sticking with us he was payed rather handsomely for the aggro


4.) Clarkston Bud: I agree with you up to a point, getting rid of McCoist only serves a purpose if you have someone capable in line to step in and take over, we don't have that and are probably worse off, ever since we knew he was going we have been even worse.


5.) Clarkston bud u have had to much clarkston budweiser if u think ally was resposible for lewis macleod


6.) @2) ". he resigned as a matter of principal over all the redundancies. "

Do you really belive that? If that was the case, would he not have walked away rather than handed in his 12 months notice and have his pay revert back to its original level? Doing that might have saved those jobs, or others which could be on the line in the future.


7.) Hooly 78 for me the problem he had was he didn't buy Clark he was a free just like all the rest were would have been better if we had bought young players with potential and brought them through but the board didn't want transfer fees no scouting system anyway just older players pay a bit more on wages but no transfer fees as for bringing our own youth through we don't have any the good ones left when we went into liquidation and we haven't brought in any to replace them we offered Telford a contract but he turned it down to sit on united, s bench you need to pull your head out of the sand and look upstairs that's where our problems are until we rid ourselves of these leeches we will not move on begging letters being sent out at four am on boxing day selling probably our only decent young player disgraceful


8.) Ally handed in his notice he did not resign big difference. In fact £750,000 of a difference. Ally couldn't do the job and neither can McDowall it was ludicrous to give him the job. As for McLeod can't blame him for leaving. maybe he will get some proper coaching and become the player that his potential suggests. Next out the door will be Wallace but after that I can't see many clubs wanting any of our over paid players. Possibly Templeton on loan somewhere but that will be it


9.) 30 Dec 2014 17:28:22
Cooperboy we've never brought are own players through the ranks even when we had money and a different board, telfer didn't sign a contract because he wasn't going to get a game not because of money I'd hazard a guess rangers probably offered more money, and you talk about not paying out on transfer fees Derek mcinnes hasn't spend much on transfer fees and look at the job he has done, mccoist was a very poor manager end off! How many jobs is he ever linked with none! There's a reason for that


10.) Clarkston bud either your a celtic man or you have been sniffing glue. mccoist was the answer gees peace


11.) 30 Dec 2014 17:43:11
Rangers "owe" Ashley £3M.
He has ordered the sale of our best player.
End of.
We will not finish third.
We will be hoovered in the cup by that mob.
Sad facts.
Lucky to be in Europe within 5 years
That's if we survive.


12.) Hooly you've missed the point again i'm not standing up for Ally i'm trying to point out the failings of this board I can't even think about a manager because as long as this board is here we won't move on £70 mill we've went through and look at the team we have no money no scouting system selling our one decent young player sending out begging letters and while all this is going on there is two offers of investment not loans which is just our own money being lent back to us secured against assests £9. 25 in every £10 in our kit deal goes to Ashley and people think he is our saviour he's robbing us blind so I have no problem with Ally going I just wish a few of our board members had followed him


13.) 30 Dec 2014 18:56:22
Mccoist backed every money grabber that came in to are club, it wasn't that long go he was welcoming Ashley to the club! He wanted king and Ashley to work together. In my opinion he's as bad as the current board, if he was such a rangers man why didn't he resign without receiving a penny and blow the lid on what's been going on.


14.) 30 Dec 2014 23:55:22
StYAB: Nobody knows the reasons for him resigning, the redundancies may very well have played a part.


15.) 31 Dec 2014 08:45:56
He didn't resign! He is still getting paid there's a difference between resigning and handing in your notice! I've heard all this shit about mccoist leaving because of the redundancies well why did he and his cronies not chip in and pay there wages especially his own secretary! he's no hero!


16.) Holy 78: Ok he left then, but you tell me any manager who would have done that with the money, to me that's a lot of s***. It seems that Ally had to lay down his career to help out the club, am not a big Ally fan but everything he did was treated with suspicion, even when he had his wages deferred, oh yeah it was because it had come out in the press, give me peace.


17.) Holy 78: I've heard all this s*** about him paying to save redundancies, you tell me what manager would have done this? Answer None. You guys are priceless, he gets slagged mercilessly, yes, don't interrupt and you look to him to save the club, he probably would have got no credit if he had done that, the guy couldn't do right for doing wrong and I ain't an Ally fan but the guy's moves were always treated with suspicion, bet you he's glad to be away from the lot of you.

{Ed001's Note - actually it has happened a number of times that well off players drop into the non-league or lower league as managers and put their own personal money into those clubs to keep them afloat and stave off things such as redundancies. Dietmar Hamann being a recent example, he went into Stockport County as manager and actually ended up paying gas and electricity bills etc out of his own pockets as the alternative was to make low paid staff redundant. McCoist is an extremely wealthy man, why couldn't he have had his wages deferred under the condition that it went fully to pay the wages of a number of the staff that would otherwise be laid off? Other than personal greed of course.}


18.) 31 Dec 2014 11:20:27
Well said ed! What connection did dietmar hamann have with Stockport none what so ever it was just the right thing to do! Rangers made mccoist a very wealthy man, and another thing he only took a pay cut because green shamed him into it by releasing his Salary,FACT


19.) He still would have got no credit, it's not well said Ed


20.) 31 Dec 2014 11:48:46
End of the day, why should he? There his wages and yes he took a lot of shit to earn them

{Ed001's Note - he took nothing. What is wrong with people? What on earth did he take? He had 800k paid into his bank account for doing a job he loves! The man is lucky and still deluded people try and claim he is some kind of hero. For heaven's sake, all he does is things he wants to do and gets paid ludicrous amounts for not being particularly good at them. I am sick of this idiocy about how difficult it was! The man had it easy. He should be in the non-leagues learning his craft where it is difficult, instead of being molly coddled by deluded fans.}


21.) Fact nothing and even if that was true he didn't need to do it and that's rich to say Green shamed anyone into anything.

{Ed001's Note - wow, you really must be related to him or you need help! Morals must be non-existent in your world!}


22.) Hooly78 we all backed the previous boards to some degree or other we all hoped white was the answer then we hoped green was the answer it wasn't just Ally. Ally was on a higher salary before he joined Rangers and if your telling me that this whole mess has not taken a toll on him then I suggest that you must be blind. Remember this, Ally has left, so change the record.


23.) 31 Dec 2014 12:11:52
Ed if your attitude is what he had to put up with then I say again he's happy to be away, are your morals so greT then, maybe you should put yourself on his shoes as manager before you talk such deluded rubbish.

{Ed001's Note - grow up. You think this is any more to put up with than any job has to cope with? Such an idiotic comment. You need to get a life lad. My morals are fine. I don't let other people go out of work so I can keep my huge wages intact. I have been in a similar situation, though I was on a lot less money, and chose to take a pay cut to protect the jobs of those I worked with. He can afford to work for free, but he still chose to carry on taking huge money out of pure greed, that is lacking morals and defending him shows you lack them too. No wonder the world is in such a state with people like you in it. All you have done is post childish insulting comments, so you are now blocked until you grow up, and your other comments are deleted that you aimed at other posters. You have no defence so resorted to slagging people off, give it a rest or don't come back.}


24.) 31 Dec 2014 12:30:50
He hasn't left he is still getting paid


 

 

22 Dec 2014 13:41:26
Rangers chairman, David Somers, has the audacity to stand up at the AGM today and blame the fans who have not bought season tickets this year for the current financial problems of the club. This man is clearly a fool and unfit to fill this position.
He obviously does not have a clue why thousands of fans, like myself, have taken the difficult decision not to attend games this season.
Today he has managed to blame the SFA, the media, the previous board, Dave King and the fans for the predicament. Everyone to blame except the ones who have squandered millions of £s!
For now, I will reserve judgement on Lambias and Ashley. But until this clown, Somers clears his desk. I won't be back!

Stuart64

1.) 22 Dec 2014 13:54:08
Don't see were you can say he blames fans & king plus previous boards for me he is just stating the obvious, season ticket sales are down fact. king encouraged the boycott of ticket sales fact. and previous boards squandered millions fact.
r. f


2.) 22 Dec 2014 14:16:43
r.f he quite clearly points out its the fans fault take king out the accusation
a lot of fans threw there own choice have finally woke up and seen the state our club is been run and the money these men are taking out our club that is why they have chose not to go to games they are sick of it at that buffoon summers has just enraged even more rangers fans treating us with total disregard


3.) 22 Dec 2014 15:12:13
Not once did he state it was fans fault he says it down to reduced season tickets and investors not willing to put money in.
r. f
P. s just a thought how long can we go. on saying I won't be back until this or that one has gone, green, ahmed, stockbridge, Irvine, even ally now its sommers when does it end or will the boycotters only be happy if and its a big if king gets his way!
r. f


4.) 22 Dec 2014 18:10:21
r.f I could not care bout king these current crop of people running the club do not have cash to run our club so should sell the club but they ain't there ripping us off big time
i ask the question what is the alternative from your point of view keep giving money to them


5.) Rf reduced season tickets is a way of blaming the fans, think about it, no ticket sales due to fans not buying them, thus fans fault.


6.) 22 Dec 2014 20:54:38
I get that George but the other poster says he "clearly" blames the fans.
r. f


7.) 23 Dec 2014 09:16:05
@4 I still don't get were their "ripping us off" as far as I'm aware there is no money to rip off they may be paying excessive wages but "ripping us off" can't see it as the money that does come in needs topped up by loans to pay players wages, utility bills etc also for the last few years we have been crying out for a board to make cuts as we have still been living beyond our means now it appears we have one willing to do this so why not give them the chance to see what they can do? Because for now they are going nowhere unless someone comes in and buys the club.
r. f


 

 

12 Dec 2014 07:36:50
If the Spivs cash in on Lewis MacLeod in January, then it could be the final straw for many fans.

Crowds are already under 20,000. if we accept a low bid in January, then there will be less than 10,000 at most of the remaining home games.

With MacLeod away. average age of team will be about 30!

No pace, no creativity. long ball is Plan A, B & C!

Stuart64

1.) 12 Dec 2014 08:15:36
This young boys career will be ruined by all this.


2.) Believe me, if we drop points tonight, the home gate will drop before any deal for lewis mcleod is ever done!!


3.) Stuart64, MacLeod, at best, will only tread water under the current regime. [ both financial and, more importantly, the football side of the business. ]
It would be in the lad's best interest to move on.
McCoist's latest comments on the youth set-up is a joke. He justifies everything by ''we would not have won the leagues with a team full of youths. ''
No fan expected that, all that we wanted were the boys to be given a chance to see if they 'had it'. Their opportunities were few and far between, and as such, they must look to their own future in the game, elsewhere. If McCoist stays much longer, any youth with any ability will move on, for their own good.
Just one question for him---- When the league was won, last season, why did he not blood some players then? My thoughts, there was money in it for him to go through the league unbeaten and something for his cv.
All the money and organisation in the world will not make us a team until he is gone.


4.) Ttally agree billyb!, we won those divisions by the proverbial country mile. The deluded one could quite easily have played youngsters with a couple of seasoned pros and still won both divs. The real problem is purely & simply his lack of coaching ability, his ego & greed!


5.) 12 Dec 2014 13:30:06
I think u are clutching at straws regards McLeod. He's nowhere near the valuation being spoke about. U trying to tell me we would get 2 million for mcgregor whose played at higher level. I don't think so. Plus other clubs know u's are desperate. Do u honestly think he won't go for next to nothing. Big mike will get the cash. Filling his pockets.


6.) Billy bat post 3 we'll said mate here here


 

 

 

Stuart64's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

23 Nov 2016 15:24:38
Asbestos is not an issue. We've just had it removed from our Church. Two options . if you can afford to, remove it completely. If not, use tradesmen who are trained and qualified to work in an area where there is asbestos. (i. e. with breathing masks, etc) .

Just another rumour from the dark side who are gutted that we haven't gone away!

Stuart64

 

 

Click To View This Thread

27 Jan 2015 08:01:46
Well what a surprise!
Ashley gets security over the Scottish Championship club's Murray Park training ground, registered trademarks and other properties!
Enough is Enough. bring on the EGM and get the rats out!

Stuart64

 

 

 

Stuart64's banter replies

 

Click To View This Thread

17 Aug 2017 10:10:36
Wont get either of them. At best we'll get a loan deal courtesy of new DoF.

Stuart64

 

 

Click To View This Thread

05 Jul 2017 16:45:40
Sellick issue a statement and "are expecting SPFL" to review Rangers titles won while EBTs were paid.

As Liewell is pulling the strings . we don't need to be rocket scientists to work out the outcome!

When will it get better for us? Just keep getting kicked at every turn!

Stuart64

 

 

Click To View This Thread

14 Feb 2017 07:24:58
Next appointment will demonstrate whether DK and the board are serious about catching Celtic and stopping 10IAR.

Appoint Davies, Wright or McLeish (permanently) and we know we've given up and will be happy to accept second best.

Appointing Frank De Boer is high profile and a statement that we're up for the fight.

FDB won't come unless he knows he has some funds behind him to go into the transfer market. And we're not talking about £250k on a 4th tier goalkeeper!

Stuart64

 

 

Click To View This Thread

30 Nov 2016 20:49:16
Oh that we could actually pass the ball straight! I'd actually settle for that at the moment!

No leaders in the team . missing big Clint at the back.

Cant see anyway of getting into this one . unless there is an inspired substitution (on 60 minutes of course! ) .

Stuart64

 

 

Click To View This Thread

Sorry. fans may have sung well. but let Club down by trotting out just about every banned song!

SFA will be wetting themselves with excitement as they will take great pleasure in hammering us with another fine.

Club is a shambles and an embarrassment. in the boardroom, on the field and on the terraces.

I don't expect many to agree with this. but it's a fact!

Stuart64

 

 





Change Consent