Rangers Rumours Member Posts

Big Blue's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Big Blue's Posts

To Big Blue's last 5 banter posts

Big Blue has no Rumours Posts

Big Blue's banter posts with other poster's replies to Big Blue's banter posts

25 Jul 2018 11:17:51
Does anyone think we were intelligent enough to put a sell on % when we sold Waghorn like the other half always seem to benefit from? I think not.

1.) 25 Jul 2018 12:04:08
This lack of foresight by our board really concerns me Big Blue. Everybody knows the inflated prices in England so why Rangers never negotiate a sell on fee baffles me. If Windass does move on hopefully the board take heed of the Waghorn situation.

2.) 25 Jul 2018 13:42:19
Intelligent? Ok blame the board again. a sell on clause I would imagine make the player harder to move on. and at the time people on here were just wanting rid of waghorn and Garner . waghorns last half a doz games for the club he was shocking and everyone . practically everyone ( even although they would never admit now) was wanting by hook or by crook. So you can blame the board all you want but it simply is not true as the board were just trying to please the fans FACT ok now he’s come good . hindsight eh don’t see many complaining or asking about joey. did waggy score against the unwashed? I remember joey runnin riot against them . they couldn’t handle him and had to boot him off the park. HYNDSIGHT. But hey let’s blame the board.

3.) 25 Jul 2018 13:44:09
Tell you this in my humble opinion if waghorn is worth 8 then Alfredo’s worth 12 goals or no goals . in my humble opinion.

4.) 25 Jul 2018 13:48:45
The old board done it. We got more from sell on for Adam than we did for the original fee. It should just be a standard in every sale.

03 Aug 2017 19:36:46
I still wish we would make an offer for Naismith. Could replace Miller when required as up to now no1 can score the vital goes he can. Better quality of player to help reduce the gap.

1.) 03 Aug 2017 19:52:51
Norwich would demand a hefty fee plus his wages are currently reputed to be £50K per week. certainly out of our pay structure

But, apart from the above, I agree. Naismith would be a fantastic acquisition.

2.) 03 Aug 2017 20:07:08
Hearing a deal is all but agreed just requires a few more fringe players to be moved on to free up money for his wages

3.) 03 Aug 2017 20:49:31
Radio said hearts game in November to be played at murrayfield

4.) 03 Aug 2017 23:47:37
I really do not think that Naismith is worth the type of money I hear being mentioned.

5.) 04 Aug 2017 09:31:13
The Naismith deal will not fall because of his wage demand, anyone suggesting that is talking nonsense.
Naismith wants to return home, like Dorrans he has made enough to last a lifetime down in the richest league in. The world.
If it does not happen it is because Pedro does not want him.
Norwich wa t him off their wage bill they too will be easy to deal with, just as they were with Dorrans.

Big Blue has no Rumour Replies

Big Blue has no Banter Replies